Home Analysis of common biomarkers in capillary blood in routine clinical laboratory. Preanalytical and analytical comparison with venous blood
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Analysis of common biomarkers in capillary blood in routine clinical laboratory. Preanalytical and analytical comparison with venous blood

  • Julia Maroto-García ORCID logo , Sara Deza , Patricia Fuentes-Bullejos ORCID logo , Patricia Fernández-Tomás , Débora Martínez-Espartosa , María Marcos-Jubilar , Nerea Varo and Álvaro González EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 7, 2023

Abstract

Objectives

Remote self-collected capillary blood samples have been proposed as alternative to venous blood samples as an aid in telemedicine. The aim of this work is to compare the preanalytical and analytical performance of these two types of samples and to study the stability of common measurands in capillary blood.

Methods

Capillary and venous blood samples were collected in parallel from 296 patients in serum tubes to analyze 22 common biochemistry magnitudes after centrifugation and in EDTA tubes to analyze 15 hematologic magnitudes. Quality of the preanalytical process was assessed applying the model of quality indicator. 24 h stability at room temperature was studied by obtaining paired capillary samples. A questionnaire of assessment was conducted.

Results

Mean hemolysis index was higher in capillary samples compared to venous blood samples (p<0.001). Regression analysis and difference analysis showed no bias for all studied biochemistry parameters and hematologic parameters, except mean corpuscular volume (MCV), between capillary and venous blood samples. Regarding sample stability, percentage deviation was higher than the corresponding minimum analytical performance specification for ferritin, vitamin D, hematocrit, MCV, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelets distribution wide, mean platelet volume and basophils. Finger pricking was perceived as less painful (p<0.05) than venipuncture in participants who undergo more than one blood test per year.

Conclusions

Capillary blood can be used as an alternative to venous blood for the studied parameters in automated common clinical analyzers. Cautious should be taken if samples are not analyzed within 24 h from the collection.


Corresponding author: Álvaro González, PhD, Service of Biochemistry, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pío XII 36, 31008 Pamplona, Spain; and Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain, Phone: +34 948 255400, Fax: +34 948 296 500, E-mail:
Nerea Varo and Álvaro González contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dra. María Romero for her technical assistance.

  1. Research funding: This study was partially supported by Roche Diagnostics, Barcelona, Spain.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee.

References

1. Cross, J, Sharma, S, John, WG, Rayman, G. Validation and feasibility of a postal system for remote monitoring of HbA1c. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2021;9:e002527. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002527.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Gill, EL, Patel, K, Dickerson, JA, Dulik, MC, Grant, RP, Heaney, DL, et al.. Alternative sample matrices supporting remote sample collection during the pandemic and beyond. Clin Chem 2022;68:269–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvab257.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Koulman, A, Rennie, KL, Parkington, D, Tyrrell, CS, Catt, M, Gkrania-Klotsas, E, et al.. The development, validation and application of remote blood sample collection in telehealth programmes. J Telemed Telecare 2022;10:1357633X221093434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x221093434.Search in Google Scholar

4. Gómez-Rioja, R, Amaro, MS, Diaz-Garzón, J, Bauçà, JM, Espartosa, DM, Fernández-Calle, P, et al.. A protocol for testing the stability of biochemical analytes. Technical document. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:1829–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0586.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Brown, L, Byrne, RL, Fraser, A, Owen, SI, Cubas-Atienzar, AI, Williams, CT, et al.. Self-sampling of capillary blood for SARS-CoV-2 serology. Sci Rep 2021;11:7754. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86008-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Hendelman, T, Chaudhary, A, LeClair, AC, van Leuven, K, Chee, J, Fink, SL, et al.. Self-collection of capillary blood using Tasso-SST devices for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody testing. PLoS One 2021;16:e0255841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255841.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Matthews, MM, Kim, TG, Shibata, S, Shibata, N, Butcher, C, Hyun, J, et al.. COVID-19 serological survey using micro blood sampling. Sci Rep 2021;11:9475. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88850-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. García-Claver, A, Ramos-Corral, R, Laviña-Fañanás, C, Solans-Blecua, I, Puzo-Foncillas, J. Capillary glucose concentration during oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020;150:234–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13178.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Kurup, PM, Rameshkumar, R, Soundravally, R, Satheesh, P. Capillary versus serum b-hydroxybutyrate in pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis. Indian Pediatr 2019;56:126–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-019-1485-7.Search in Google Scholar

10. Léguillier, T, Jouffroy, R, Boisson, M, Boussaroque, A, Chenevier-Gobeaux, C, Chaabouni, T, et al.. Lactate POCT in mobile intensive care units for septic patients? A comparison of capillary blood method versus venous blood and plasma-based reference methods. Clin Biochem 2018;55:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Tanyanyiwa, D, Dandara, C, Bhana, SA, Pauly, B, Marule, F, Ramokoka, M, et al.. Implementation of POCT in the diabetic clinic in a large hospital. Afr Health Sci 2015;15:902–7. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v15i3.26.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Landon, MB, Cembrowski, GS, Gabbe, SG. Capillary blood glucose screening for gestational diabetes: a preliminary investigation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;155:717–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(86)80005-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Yum, SI, Roe, J. Capillary blood sampling for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Technol Therapeut 1999;1:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1089/152091599317549.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Oudatzis, G, Tsagarakis, NJ, Paterakis, G, Vasileiou, P, Xenou, E, Maraki, P, et al.. Evaluation of automated capillary complete blood counts for routine clinical decision making in a large cohort of hematological patients, using mindray BC-3000 plus auto and sysmex XE-5000 hematology analyzers. Int J Lab Hematol 2020;42:565–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.13237.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Bergman, M, Felig, P. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels in diabetes. Principles and practice. Arch Intern Med 1984;144:2029–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.144.10.2029.Search in Google Scholar

16. Groenendijk, WN, Griffin, TP, Islam, MN, Blake, L, Wall, D, Bell, M, et al.. Remote capillary blood collection for HbA1c measurement during the COVID‐19 pandemic: a laboratory and patient perspective. Diabet Med 2022;39:e14897. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14897.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Kitchen, DP, Kitchen, S, Jennings, I, Woods, TAL, Fitzmaurice, DA, Murray, ET, et al.. Point of Care INR testing devices: performance of the Roche CoaguChek XS and XS plus in the UK NEQAS BC external quality assessment programme for healthcare professionals: four years’ experience. J Clin Pathol 2012;65:1119–23. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201049.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Woods, K, Douketis, JD, Schnurr, T, Kinnon, K, Powers, P, Crowther, MA. Patient preferences for capillary vs. venous INR determination in an anticoagulation clinic: a randomized controlled trial. Thromb Res 2004;114:161–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2004.05.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Kupke, IR, Kather, B, Zeugner, S. On the composition of capillary and venous blood serum. Clin Chim Acta 1981;112:177–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(81)90376-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Patel, AJ, Wesley, R, Leitman, SF, Bryant, BJ. Capillary versus venous hemoglobin determination in the assessment of healthy blood donors. Vox Sang 2013;104:317–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.12006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Tong, E, Murphy, WG, Kinsella, A, Darragh, E, Woods, J, Murphy, C, et al.. Capillary and venous haemoglobin levels in blood donors: a 42-month study of 36,258 paired samples. Vox Sang 2010;98:547–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01285.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Jensen, ME, Ducharme, FM, Théorêt, Y, Bélanger, AS, Delvin, E. Assessing vitamin D nutritional status: is capillary blood adequate? Clin Chim Acta 2016;457:59–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2016.03.020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Monneret, D, Godmer, A, Le Guen, R, Bravetti, C, Emeraud, C, Marteau, A, et al.. Stability of routine biochemical analytes in whole blood and plasma from lithium heparin gel tubes during 6‐hr storage. J Clin Lab Anal 2016;30:602–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.21909.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Oddoze, C, Lombard, E, Portugal, H. Stability study of 81 analytes in human whole blood, in serum and in plasma. Clin Biochem 2012;45:464–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.01.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Hedayati, M, Razavi, SA, Boroomand, S, Kia, SK. The impact of pre-analytical variations on biochemical analytes stability: a systematic review. J Clin Lab Anal 2020;34:e23551. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23551.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Sciacovelli, L, Lippi, G, Sumarac, Z, del Pino Castro, IG, Ivanov, A, De Guire, V, et al.. Pre-analytical quality indicators in laboratory medicine: performance of laboratories participating in the IFCC working group “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” project. Clin Chim Acta 2019;497:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2019.07.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Measurement procedure comparison and bias estimation using patient samples, 3rd ed: CLSI EP09C ED3; 2018 [Internet]. Available from: https://clsi.edaptivedocs.biz/GetDoc.aspx?doc=CLSI%20EP09C%20ED3:2018 [Accessed 30 Sep 2022].Search in Google Scholar

28. EFLM Working Group on Biological variation (WG-BV) and the task group for the biological variation database (TG-BVD). EFLM biological variation [Internet]. Available from: https://biologicalvariation.eu/ [Accessed 20 Sep 2022].Search in Google Scholar

29. Guder, WG, Fiedler, M, da Fonseca Wollheim, F, Schmitt, Y, Töpfer, G, Wisser, H, et al.. Quality of diagnostic samples - recommendations of the working group on preanalytical quality of the German society for clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 3rd ed: Becton Dickinson; 2010 [Internet]. Available from: https://labosudb.manuelprelevement.fr/DocumentNew.aspx?idDoc=7344.Search in Google Scholar

30. Falch, DK. Clinical chemical analyses of serum obtained from capillary versus venous blood, using microtainers and vacutainers. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1981;41:59–62. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365518109092015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. O’Grady, CM, Franklin, RC. Thyroid hormone concentrations and free thyroxine status in neonatal venous and capillary serum pairs. Ann Clin Biochem 1984;21:306–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/000456328402100413.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Pootrakul, P, Skikne, BS, Cook, JD. The use of capillary blood for measurements of circulating ferritin. Am J Clin Nutr 1983;37:307–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/37.2.307.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Heenan, H, Lunt, H, Chan, H, Frampton, CM. How much hemolysis is acceptable when undertaking deep lancing for finger stick derived capillary plasma glucose measurement? J Diabetes Sci Technol 2017;11:845–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296816688013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Ernst, DJ. Procedures and devices for the collection of diagnostic capillary blood specimens: approved standard, 6th ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

35. Krleza, JL, Dorotic, A, Grzunov, A, Maradin, M. Capillary blood sampling: national recommendations on behalf of the Croatian society of medical biochemistry and laboratory medicine. Biochem Med 2015;25:335–58. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2015.034.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Ansari, S, Abdel-Malek, M, Kenkre, J, Choudhury, SM, Barnes, S, Misra, S, et al.. The use of whole blood capillary samples to measure 15 analytes for a home-collect biochemistry service during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a proposed model from North West London Pathology. Ann Clin Biochem 2021;58:411–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632211004995.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Barrero, AA, Fort, AC, Arribas, JM, Manero, MR, Ezquerra, EA. [Measurement of triglycerides in capillary blood: validation against whole blood measurement]. Med Clin 2009;133:375–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2008.12.023.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Huijskens, MJAJ, Castel, R, Vermeer, HJ, Verheijen, FM. Evaluation of diabetes care parameters in capillary blood collected with a novel sampling device. Pract Lab Med 2019;17:e00135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2019.e00135.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Schalk, E, Heim, MU, Koenigsmann, M, Jentsch-Ullrich, K. Use of capillary blood count parameters in adults. Vox Sang 2007;93:348–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.00978.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Pierelli, L, Zennaro, F, Patti, D, Miceli, M, Iudicone, P, Mannella, E. Evaluation of the analytical performances of a portable, 18-parameter hemometric system using capillary blood samples for blood donor enrolment. Vox Sang 2010;98:145–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01256.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Mbughuni, MM, Stevens, MA, Langman, LJ, Kudva, YC, Sanchez, W, Dean, PG, et al.. Volumetric microsampling of capillary blood spot vs whole blood sampling for therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus and cyclosporin A: accuracy and patient satisfaction. J Appl Lab Med 2020;5:516–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaa005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Fokkema, MR, Bakker, AJ, de Boer, F, Kooistra, J, de Vries, S, Wolthuis, A. HbA1c measurements from dried blood spots: validation and patient satisfaction. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1259–64. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2009.274.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2022-0126).


Received: 2022-11-22
Accepted: 2023-02-13
Published Online: 2023-03-07

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Cognitive biases in internal medicine: a scoping review
  4. Opinion Papers
  5. “Pivot and Cluster Strategy” in the light of Kahneman’s “Decision Hygiene” template
  6. Developing a European longitudinal and interprofessional curriculum for clinical reasoning
  7. Optimizing measurement of misdiagnosis-related harms using symptom-disease pair analysis of diagnostic error (SPADE): comparison groups to maximize SPADE validity
  8. Reframing context specificity in team diagnosis using the theory of distributed cognition
  9. Original Articles
  10. Promoting clinical reasoning with meta-memory techniques to teach broad differential diagnosis generation in a pediatric core clerkship
  11. Semantic competence and prototypical verbalizations are associated with higher OSCE and global medical degree scores: a multi-theory pilot study on year 6 medical student verbalizations
  12. Influence of comorbid depression and diagnostic workup on diagnosis of physical illness: a randomized experiment
  13. Recognition, diagnostic practices, and cancer outcomes among patients with unintentional weight loss (UWL) in primary care
  14. Quantitation of neurofilament light chain protein in serum and cerebrospinal fluid from patients with multiple sclerosis using the MSD R-PLEX NfL assay
  15. Analysis of common biomarkers in capillary blood in routine clinical laboratory. Preanalytical and analytical comparison with venous blood
  16. Comparison between cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for differential diagnosis of acute meningitis
  17. Short Communications
  18. Exploring relationships between physician stress, burnout, and diagnostic elements in clinician notes
  19. Development of a student-created internal medicine frameworks website for healthcare trainees
  20. Case Report - Lessons in Clinical Reasoning
  21. Lessons in clinical reasoning – pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a case of crushing, substernal chest pain
  22. Letters to the Editor
  23. Ample room for cognitive bias in diagnosing accidental hypothermia
  24. Auscultation order of lung and heart sounds and autonomous noise cancellation
  25. Reliability of a single-nostril nasopharyngeal swab for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection
Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2022-0126/html
Scroll to top button