Startseite Promoting clinical reasoning with meta-memory techniques to teach broad differential diagnosis generation in a pediatric core clerkship
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Promoting clinical reasoning with meta-memory techniques to teach broad differential diagnosis generation in a pediatric core clerkship

  • Harisa Spahic ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Dana Goplerud , Carly Blatt , Megan Murphy , William Christopher Golden und Amit Pahwa
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. Juli 2023
Diagnosis
Aus der Zeitschrift Diagnosis Band 10 Heft 3

Abstract

Objectives

Clinical reasoning with generation and prioritization of differential diagnoses (DDx) is a key skill for medical students, but no consensus exists on the best method to teach these skills. Meta-memory techniques (MMTs) may be useful, but the efficacy of individual MMTs is unclear.

Methods

We designed a 3-part curriculum for pediatric clerkship students to teach one of 3 MMTs and provide practice in DDx generation through case-based sessions. Students submitted DDx lists during two sessions and completed pre- and post-curriculum surveys assessing self-reported confidence and perceived helpfulness of the curriculum. Results were analyzed using ANOVA with multiple linear regression.

Results

A total of 130 students participated in the curriculum, with 96 % (125/130) completing at least one DDx session, and 44 % (57/130) completing the post-curriculum survey. On average, 66 % of students rated all three sessions as “quite helpful” (4/5 on 5-point Likert scale) or “extremely helpful” (5/5) without difference between MMT groups. Students generated an average of 8.8, 7.1 and 6.4 diagnoses using the VINDICATES, Mental CT, and Constellations methods, respectively. When controlling for case, case order, and number of prior rotations, students using VINDICATES produced 2.8 more diagnoses than those using Constellations (95 % CI [1.1,4.5], p<0.001). There was no significant difference between VINDICATES and Mental CT (Δ=1.6, 95 % CI [−0.2,3.4], p=0.11) or Mental CT and Constellations (Δ=1.2, 95 % CI [−0.7,3.1], p=0.36).

Conclusions

Medical education should include curricula focused on enhancing DDx development. Although VINDICATES helped students produce the most DDx, further research is needed to identify which MMT generates more accurate DDx.


Corresponding author: Harisa Spahic, MD, (PGY-1), Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, U13123 E 16th Ave, B065, Aurora, CO 80045, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the Osler Apprentice Program for allowing the generation and execution of this curriculum during the full academic year. The authors also acknowledge the use of Microsoft technology in generating the figures developed for this research.

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.

References

1. Connor, DM, Durning, SJ, Rencic, JJ. Clinical reasoning as a core competency. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 2020;95:1166–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003027.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Ritz, C, Sader, J, Cairo Notari, S, Lanier, C, Caire Fon, N, Nendaz, M, et al.. Multimorbidity and clinical reasoning through the eyes of GPs: a qualitative study. Fam Med Community Health 2021;9:e000798. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2020-000798.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Cooper, N, Bartlett, M, Gay, S, Hammond, A, Lillicrap, M, Matthan, J, et al.. Consensus statement on the content of clinical reasoning curricula in undergraduate medical education. Med Teach 2021;43:152–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1842343.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Kassirer, JP. Teaching clinical reasoning: case-based and coached. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 2010;85:1118–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181d5dd0d.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Rencic, J. Twelve tips for teaching expertise in clinical reasoning. Med Teach 2011;33:887–92. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2011.558142.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Amey, L, Donald, KJ, Teodorczuk, A. Teaching clinical reasoning to medical students. Br J Hosp Med Lond Engl 2005. 2017;78:399–401, https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2017.78.7.399.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Amiel, J, Ryan, M, Andriole, D, Whelan, A. Core entrustable professional activities for entering residency: summary of the 10-school pilot, 2014–2021. AAMC; 2022.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Connor, DM, Narayana, S, Dhaliwal, G. A clinical reasoning curriculum for medical students: an interim analysis. Diagn Berl Ger 2021;9:265–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2021-0112.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Bonifacino, E, Follansbee, WP, Farkas, AH, Jeong, K, McNeil, MA, DiNardo, DJ. Implementation of a clinical reasoning curriculum for clerkship-level medical students: a pseudo-randomized and controlled study. Diagn Berl Ger 2019;6:165–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2018-0063.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Rencic, J, Trowbridge, RL, Fagan, M, Szauter, K, Durning, S. Clinical reasoning education at US medical schools: results from a national survey of internal medicine clerkship directors. J Gen Intern Med 2017;32:1242–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4159-y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Duca, NS, Glod, S. Bridging the gap between the classroom and the clerkship: a clinical reasoning curriculum for third-year medical students. MedEdPORTAL J Teach Learn Resour 2019;15:10800. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10800.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Torre, DM, Hernandez, CA, Castiglioni, A, Durning, SJ, Daley, BJ, Hemmer, PA, et al.. The Clinical Reasoning Mapping Exercise (CResME): a new tool for exploring clinical reasoning. Perspect Med Educ 2019;8:47–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0493-y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Gupta, S, Jackson, JM, Appel, JL, Ovitsh, RK, Oza, SK, Pinto-Powell, R, et al.. Perspectives on the current state of pre-clerkship clinical reasoning instruction in United States medical schools: a survey of clinical skills course directors. Diagn Berl Ger 2021;9:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2021-0016.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Kelekar, A, Afonso, N. Evaluation of the effect of a new clinical reasoning curriculum in a pre-clerkship clinical skills course. Perspect Med Educ 2020;9:123–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00566-4.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Leeds, FS, Atwa, KM, Cook, AM, Conway, KA, Crawford, TN. Teaching heuristics and mnemonics to improve generation of differential diagnoses. Med Educ Online 2020;25:1742967. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1742967.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Gruppetta, M, Mallia, M. Clinical reasoning: exploring its characteristics and enhancing its learning. Br J Hosp Med Lond Engl 2005. 2020;81:1–9, https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2020.0227.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. McBee, E, Blum, C, Ratcliffe, T, Schuwirth, L, Polston, E, Artino, AR, et al.. Use of clinical reasoning tasks by medical students. Diagn Berl Ger 2019;6:127–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2018-0077.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Moghadami, M, Amini, M, Moghadami, M, Dalal, B, Charlin, B. Teaching clinical reasoning to undergraduate medical students by illness script method: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 2021;21:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02522-0.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Levin, M, Cennimo, D, Chen, S, Lamba, S. Teaching clinical reasoning to medical students: a case-based illness script worksheet approach. MedEdPORTAL J Teach Learn Resour 2016;12:10445. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10445.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Delany, C, Golding, C. Teaching clinical reasoning by making thinking visible: an action research project with allied health clinical educators. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-20.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Jones, MG, Brader-Ajae, L. The impact of constructivism on education: language, discourse, and meaning. Am Commun J 2002;5:1–10.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Kiesewetter, J, Ebersbach, R, Tsalas, N, Holzer, M, Schmidmaier, R, Fischer, MR. Knowledge is not enough to solve the problems - the role of diagnostic knowledge in clinical reasoning activities. BMC Med Educ 2016;16:303. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0821-z.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Kiesewetter, J, Sailer, M, Jung, VM, Schönberger, R, Bauer, E, Zottmann, JM, et al.. Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact. BMC Med Educ 2020;20:73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1987-y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Olson, APJ, Durning, SJ, Fernandez Branson, C, Sick, B, Lane, KP, Rencic, JJ. Teamwork in clinical reasoning - cooperative or parallel play? Diagn Berl Ger 2020;7:307–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2020-0020.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Ulfa, Y, Igarashi, Y, Takahata, K, Shishido, E, Horiuchi, S. A comparison of team-based learning and lecture-based learning on clinical reasoning and classroom engagement: a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 2021;21:444. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02881-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2023-0038).


Received: 2023-04-03
Accepted: 2023-06-06
Published Online: 2023-07-13

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Cognitive biases in internal medicine: a scoping review
  4. Opinion Papers
  5. “Pivot and Cluster Strategy” in the light of Kahneman’s “Decision Hygiene” template
  6. Developing a European longitudinal and interprofessional curriculum for clinical reasoning
  7. Optimizing measurement of misdiagnosis-related harms using symptom-disease pair analysis of diagnostic error (SPADE): comparison groups to maximize SPADE validity
  8. Reframing context specificity in team diagnosis using the theory of distributed cognition
  9. Original Articles
  10. Promoting clinical reasoning with meta-memory techniques to teach broad differential diagnosis generation in a pediatric core clerkship
  11. Semantic competence and prototypical verbalizations are associated with higher OSCE and global medical degree scores: a multi-theory pilot study on year 6 medical student verbalizations
  12. Influence of comorbid depression and diagnostic workup on diagnosis of physical illness: a randomized experiment
  13. Recognition, diagnostic practices, and cancer outcomes among patients with unintentional weight loss (UWL) in primary care
  14. Quantitation of neurofilament light chain protein in serum and cerebrospinal fluid from patients with multiple sclerosis using the MSD R-PLEX NfL assay
  15. Analysis of common biomarkers in capillary blood in routine clinical laboratory. Preanalytical and analytical comparison with venous blood
  16. Comparison between cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for differential diagnosis of acute meningitis
  17. Short Communications
  18. Exploring relationships between physician stress, burnout, and diagnostic elements in clinician notes
  19. Development of a student-created internal medicine frameworks website for healthcare trainees
  20. Case Report - Lessons in Clinical Reasoning
  21. Lessons in clinical reasoning – pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a case of crushing, substernal chest pain
  22. Letters to the Editor
  23. Ample room for cognitive bias in diagnosing accidental hypothermia
  24. Auscultation order of lung and heart sounds and autonomous noise cancellation
  25. Reliability of a single-nostril nasopharyngeal swab for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection
Heruntergeladen am 19.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2023-0038/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen