Startseite Constructions and the problem of discovery: A case for the paradigmatic
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Constructions and the problem of discovery: A case for the paradigmatic

  • David Wible EMAIL logo und Nai-Lung Tsao
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. Juli 2017

Abstract

Much of the patterned use of language occupies a poorly charted middle ground of usages that are neither frozen, one-off items listable in dictionaries nor products of maximally general rules found in grammars. Similarly, these usages fly below the radar of modular theories of language that make a strict distinction between items in a lexicon and the rules of syntax for combining them. Early constructionist approaches showed this neglected territory to be teeming with conventional form-meaning pairings, i.e., lexico-grammatical constructions. While corpora have been seen as a source for investigating these constructions, they entail a fundamental but seldom-noted limitation: constructions are constituted by both syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations, but corpora lack the paradigmatic dimension. Thus corpora can reveal multiword items but not the relations among them that constitute constructions. We elaborate on an alternative, illustrating how the design of an existing machine-readable language model affords discovery of lexico-grammatical constructions by capturing bottom up the relations they contract with other patterns. The network is noise-ridden, but we exploit the noise as the necessary background against which constructions can be set into relief and thus made discoverable.

Funding statement: Taiwan’s Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant/Award Number: ‘MOST105-2511-S-008-008’).

References

Biber, Douglas. 2009. A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3). 275–311.10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bibSuche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad & Viviana Cortes. 2004. If you look at … : Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3). 371–405.10.1093/applin/25.3.371Suche in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight L. 1961. Syntactic blends and other matters. Language 37(3). 366–381.10.2307/411078Suche in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight L. 1965. The atomization of meaning. Language 41(4). 555–573.10.2307/411524Suche in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight L. 1977. Idioms have relations. Forum Linguisticum 2. 157–169.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 1998. The emergent lexicon. Chicago Linguistic Society 34. 421–435.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.003.0013Suche in Google Scholar

Church, Kenneth & Patrick Hanks. 1989. Word association norms, mutual information and lexicography. In Proceedings of the 27 Annual Meeting of ACL, 76–83. Vancouver, Canada.10.3115/981623.981633Suche in Google Scholar

Csomay, Eniko & Viviana Cortes. 2010. Lexical bundle distribution in university classroom talk. In Stefan Thomas Gries, Stefanie Wulff & Mark Davies (eds.), Corpus linguistic applications: Current studies, new directions, 153–168. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789042028012_011Suche in Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C., Rita Simpson‐Vlach & Carson Maynard. 2008. Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 42(3). 375–396.10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00137.xSuche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1985. Syntactic intrusions and the notion of grammatical construction. In Mary Niepokuj, Mary VanClay, Vassiliki Nikiforidou & Deborah Feders (eds.), Proceedings of the eleventh annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society, 73–86. University of California, Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v11i0.1913Suche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of Let alone. Language 64(3). 501–538.10.2307/414531Suche in Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. 1957. Modes of meaning. In John R. Firth (ed.), Papers in linguistics 1934–1951, 190–215. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Francis, Gill. 1993. A corpus-driven approach to grammar: Principles, methods, and examples. In Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.64Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004. Covarying collexemes in the into-causative. In Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Language, culture, and mind. Stanford: CSLI.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1961. Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17(3). 241–292.10.1515/9783110820041-012Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 2003. On the “architecture” of language. In Jonathan Webster (ed.), Collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, vol. 3. London: Equinox.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 2009. Methods – techniques – problems. In M. A. K. Halliday & Jonathan Webster (eds.), Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics, 59–86. New York: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Harris, Zellig. 1946. From morpheme to utterance. Language 23(3). 161–183.10.2307/410205Suche in Google Scholar

Harris, Zellig. 1951. Structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Harris, Zellig. 1954. Distributional structure. Word 10. 146–162.10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520Suche in Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan& & Gill Francis. 1999. Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.4Suche in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1995. The boundaries of the lexicon. In Martin Everaert, Erik-Jan Van der Linden, André Schenk & Rob Schreuder (eds.), Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives, 133–165. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2008. Construction after construction and its theoretical challenges. Language 84(1). 8–28.10.1353/lan.2008.0058Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1990. Aspects of language and two types of aphasia. In Linda R. Waugh & Monique Monville-Burston (eds.), On language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kilgarriff, Adam. 1997. I don’t believe in word senses. Computers and the Humanities 31(2). 91–113.10.1515/9783110895698.361Suche in Google Scholar

Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Rychl’y, Pavel Smrz & David Tugwell. 2004. The sketch engine. In Geoffrey Williams & Sandra Vessier (eds.), Proceedings of EURALEX, 105–116. Lorient, France.Suche in Google Scholar

Martinez, Ron & Norbert Schmitt. 2012. A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics 33(3). 299–320.10.1093/applin/ams010Suche in Google Scholar

Murphy, Raymond. 2012. English grammar in use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Nattinger, James R. & Jeanette S. DeCarrico. 1992. Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew & Frances Hodgetts Syder. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Jack C. Richards & Richard W. Schmidt (eds.), Language and communication, 191–225. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Pedersen, Ted. 1996. Fishing for exactness. In Proceedings of the South-Central SAS Users Group Conference (SCSUG-96), 188–200. Austin, TX.Suche in Google Scholar

Renouf, Antoinette & John Sinclair. 1991. Collocational frames in English. In Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik, 128–144. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1959. Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). New York: The Philosophical Library.Suche in Google Scholar

Simpson-Vlach, Rita & Nick C. Ellis. 2010. An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics 31(4). 487–512.10.1093/applin/amp058Suche in Google Scholar

Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna & Ron Martinez. 2015. The idiom principle revisited. Applied Linguistics 36(5). 549–569.10.1093/applin/amt054Suche in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243.10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03steSuche in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2005. Covarying Collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1). 1–43.10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.1Suche in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2009. Corpora and Grammar. In Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, vol. 2, 933–951. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Tsao, Nai-Lung & David Wible. 2009. A method for unsupervised lexical error detection and correction. In Proceedings of the NAACL workshop on innovative use of NLP for building educational applications, 51–54. Boulder, Colorado.10.3115/1609843.1609851Suche in Google Scholar

Tsao, Nai-Lung & David Wible. 2013. Word similarity using constructions as contextual features. In Proceedings of the Joint Symposium on Semantic Processing, 51–59. Trento, Italy.Suche in Google Scholar

Wible, David & Nai-Lung Tsao. 2010. StringNet as a computational resource for discovering and investigating linguistic constructions. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT workshop on extracting and using constructions in computational linguistics, 25–31. Los Angeles, CA.Suche in Google Scholar

Wible, David & Nai-Lung Tsao. 2011. Towards a new generation of corpus-derived lexical resources for language learning. In Fanny Meunier, Sylvie De Cock, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Magali Paquot (eds.), A taste for corpora, 237–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.45.14wibSuche in Google Scholar

Yorio, Carlos A. 1980. Conventionalized language forms and the development of communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly 14(4).433–442.10.2307/3586232Suche in Google Scholar


Article Note

Nai-Lung Tsao’s contribution to the research reported here was completed while he was employed full-time at National Central University.


Published Online: 2017-07-08
Published in Print: 2020-05-27

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 11.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cllt-2017-0008/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen