Surplus interword phonological similarity in English multiword units

References

Abelson, Robert. 1985. A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin 97(1). 129–133.10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.129Search in Google Scholar

Ackermann, Kirsten & Yu-Hua Chen. 2013. Developing the academic collocation list (ACL) – A corpus-driven and expert-judged approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(4). 235–247.10.1016/j.jeap.2013.08.002Search in Google Scholar

Adolphs, Svenja & Norbert Schmitt. 2004. Vocabulary coverage according to spoken discourse content. In Paul Bogaards & Batia Laufer (eds.), Vocabulary in a second language, 40–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.10.05adoSearch in Google Scholar

Alario, F.-Xavier, Bruno De Cara & Johannes Ziegler. 2007. Automatic activation of phonology in silent reading is parallel: Evidence from beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 97(3). 205–219.10.1016/j.jecp.2007.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald, Richard Piepenbrock & Leon Gulikers (eds). 1995. CELEX lexical database. (CD-ROM). Linguistic data consortium. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.Search in Google Scholar

Boers, Frank & Seth Lindstromberg. 2005. Finding ways to make phrase-learning feasible: The mnemonic effect of alliteration. System 33(2). 225–238.10.1016/j.system.2004.12.007Search in Google Scholar

Boers, Frank & Seth Lindstromberg. 2009. Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second language acquisition. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230245006Search in Google Scholar

Boers, Frank & Seth Lindstromberg. 2012. Experimental and intervention studies of formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32. 83–110.10.1017/S0267190512000050Search in Google Scholar

Boers, Frank, Seth Lindstromberg & June Eyckmans. 2014a. Is alliteration mnemonic without awareness raising? Language Awareness 23(4). 291–303.10.1080/09658416.2013.774008Search in Google Scholar

Boers, Frank, Seth Lindstromberg & June Eyckmans. 2014b. When does assonance make lexical phrases memorable? European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL 3(1). 93–107.Search in Google Scholar

Boers, Frank & Hélène Stengers. 2008. Adding sound to the picture: An exercise in motivating the lexical composition of metaphorical idioms in English, Spanish and Dutch. In Lynne Cameron, Maria Sophia Zanotto & Marilda Cavalcanti (eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach, 63–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.173.05boeSearch in Google Scholar

Bower, Gordon & Laura Bolton. 1969. Why are rhymes easy to learn? Journal of Experimental Psychology 82(3). 453–461.10.1037/h0028365Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Search in Google Scholar

Collins Cobuild Dictionary of Idioms, 2nd edn. 2002. London. Harper Collins.Search in Google Scholar

Core Team, R (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.3.1). Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2008–2017. The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA). http://www.americancorpus.org (accessed 2016).Search in Google Scholar

De Cara, Bruno & Usha Goswami. 2002. Similarity relations among spoken words: The special status of rimes in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 34(3). 416–423.10.3758/BF03195470Search in Google Scholar

Dell, Gary & Jean Gordon. 2003. Neighbors in the lexicon: Friends or foes? In Niels Schiller & Antje Meyer (eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities, 9–37. Berlin & New York: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark. 2015. Ideophones and reduplication: Description, depiction, and the interpretation of repeated talk in discourse. Studies in Language 39(4). 946–970.10.1075/sl.39.4.05dinSearch in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Will Schuerman, Eva Reinisch, Silvia Tufvesson & Holger Mitterer. 2016. What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages. Language 92(2). 117–133.10.1353/lan.2016.0034Search in Google Scholar

Eyckmans, June, Frank Boers & Seth Lindstromberg. 2016. The impact of imposing processing strategies on L2 learners’ deliberate study of lexical phrases. System 56. 127–139.10.1016/j.system.2015.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Eyckmans, June & Seth Lindstromberg. 2017. The power of sound in L2 vocabulary learning: Phonological similarity effects on the retention of conventionalized phrases. Language Teaching Research 21(3). 341–365.10.1177/1362168816655831Search in Google Scholar

Goldinger, Stephen, Paul Luce & David Pisoni. 1989. Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language 28. 501–518.10.1016/0749-596X(89)90009-0Search in Google Scholar

Greenbaum, Sidney & Gerald Nelson. 1996. The international corpus of English (ICE) project. World Englishes 15(1). 3–15.10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00088.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan. 2011. Phonological similarity in multi-word symbolic units. Cognitive Linguistics 22(3). 491–510.10.1515/cogl.2011.019Search in Google Scholar

Grissom, Robert & John Kim. 2012. Effect sizes for research: Univariate and multivariate applications, 2nd edn. London, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9780203803233Search in Google Scholar

Gupta, Prahlad & MacWhinney. Brian 1997. Vocabulary acquisition and verbal short-term memory: Computational and neural bases. Brain and Language 59(2). 267–233.10.1006/brln.1997.1819Search in Google Scholar

Gupta, Prahlad, John Lipinski & Emrah Aktunc. 2005. Re-examining the phonological similarity effect in serial recall: The roles of type of similarity, category cueing, and item recall. Memory and Cognition 33(6). 1001–1016.10.3758/BF03193208Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 2000. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levelt, Willem. 1999. Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(6). 223–232.10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01319-4Search in Google Scholar

Lindstromberg, Seth & June Eyckmans. 2014. How big is the positive effect of assonance on the near-term recall of L2 collocations? ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics 165(1). 19–45.10.1075/itl.165.1.02linSearch in Google Scholar

Lindstromberg, Seth & June Eyckmans. 2017. The particular need for replication in the quantitative study of SLA: A case study of the mnemonic effect of assonance in collocations. Journal of the European Second Language Association 1(1). 126–136.10.22599/jesla.26Search in Google Scholar

Luce, Paul, Stephen Goldinger, Edward Auer & Michael Vitevitch. 2000. Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Perception and Psychophysics 62(3). 615–625.10.3758/BF03212113Search in Google Scholar

Luce, Paul & David Pisoni. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19 (1). 1–36.10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001Search in Google Scholar

Lupker, Stephen & Bonnie Williams. 1989. Rhyme priming of pictures and words: A lexical activation account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory and Cognition 15(6). 1033–1104.10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1033Search in Google Scholar

Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners, 2nd edn. 2007 London: Macmillan Education.Search in Google Scholar

Macnamara, Brooke, Adam Moore & Andrew Conway. 2011. Phonological similarity effects in simple and complex span tasks. Memory and Cognition 39(7). 1174−1186.10.3758/s13421-011-0100-5Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, Michael. 1998. Spoken language and applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, Antje & van der Meulen. Femke 2000. Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7(2). 314–319.10.3758/BF03212987Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, Douglas & Richard Garland. 1969. Amount and locus of stimulus-response overlap in paired associate acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology 82(2). 297–300.10.1037/h0028132Search in Google Scholar

Oxford collocations dictionary for students of English, 2nd edn. 2009. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Parkinson, Dilys (ed.). 2006. Oxford idioms dictionary for learners of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Radden, Günter & Klaus-Uwe Panther. 2004. Introduction: Reflections on motivation. In Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther, eds., Studies in linguistic motivation (Cognitive Linguistics Research 28), 1–46. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Rapp, David & Arthur Samuel. 2002. A reason to rhyme: Phonological and semantic influences on lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology 28(3). 564–571.10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.564Search in Google Scholar

Rubin, David. 1995. Memory in oral traditions: The cognitive psychology of epic, ballads, and counting-out rhymes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, Norbert. 2000. Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John & Rosamund Moon (eds.). 2000. Collins cobuild dictionary of idioms. Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Speake, Jennifer (ed.). 1999. The Oxford dictionary of idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Storkel, Holly & Michele Morrisette. 2002. The lexicon and phonology: Interactions in language acquisition. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 33. 24–37.10.1044/0161-1461(2002/003)Search in Google Scholar

Treiman, Rebecca. 1988. The internal structure of the syllable. In Greg Carlson & Michael Tanenhaus (eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing, 27–52. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-2729-2_2Search in Google Scholar

Treiman, Rebecca, Brett Kessler, Stephanie Knewasser, Ruth Tincoff & Margot Bowman. 2000. English speakers’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns. In Michael B. Broe & Janet Pierrehumbert (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology (Acquisition and the Lexicon 5), 269–282. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van De Weijer, Joost. 2003. Consonant variation within words. In Dawn Archer, Paul Rayson, Andres Wilson & Tony McEnery (eds.), Proceedings of the corpus linguistics 2003 conference. (University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language Technical Papers 16), 184–190. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.Search in Google Scholar

Van De Weijer, Joost. 2005. Listeners’ sensitivity to consonant variation within words. Lund Working Papers 51. 225–239. Lund: University of Lund.Search in Google Scholar

Vitevitch, Michael. 2002. Influence of onset density on spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28(2). 270–278.10.1037/0096-1523.28.2.270Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, Michael, Olga Watkins & Robert Crowder. 1974. The modality effect in free and serial recall as a function of phonological similarity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13(4). 430–447.10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80021-6Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Rand. 2012. Modern statistics for the social and behavioral sciences: A practical introduction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Search in Google Scholar