Home Linguistics & Semiotics Common ground across globalized English varieties: A multivariate exploration of mental predicates in World Englishes
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Common ground across globalized English varieties: A multivariate exploration of mental predicates in World Englishes

  • Sandra C. Deshors EMAIL logo and Sandra Götz
Published/Copyright: September 8, 2017

Abstract

This study tests for similarities and differences in the uses of near-synonymous mental predicates by speakers of different ENL and ESL speech communities to capture whether, and if so to what degree, speakers of different first and second language English varieties use the four near-synonymous predicates semantically differently. Specifically, we focus on I believe, I think, I suppose and I guess in eight native and second-language varieties of English (i.e. American, British, Canadian, Irish, Hong Kong, Indian, Singapore and New Zealand). We adopt a multivariate modeling approach to analyze mental predicates annotated for six semantic variables (verifiability, epistemic mode, epistemic class, epistemic type, evaluation and negotiability) as well as genre. Our findings show the usefulness of exploring Englishes through the lens of semantic structure. Although, on the surface, two groups of English varieties emerge with different preferential patterns of predicates (British, Indian, Irish and Singapore vs. Canadian, Hong Kong and American), at a more abstract level, those predicates share similar semantic combinatory patterns common to all varieties in focus. It emerges that modeling the development of Englishes based on theoretical frameworks that account for simultaneous development of generic (i.e. common to all Englishes) and specialized (i.e. specific to individual Englishes) linguistic patterns may be beneficial. At a time when English has become a worldwide language shaped by globalization, the present study adds to the discussion on the developmental pathways that characterize the evolution of non-native Englishes in the twenty-first century.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Christoph Wolk, Stefanie Wulff and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive and helpful feedback on earlier versions of this paper and Rosemary Bock for proofreading its final version. All remaining errors are our responsibility alone.

References

Bernaisch, Tobias, Stefan Th. Gries & Joybrato Mukherjee. 2014. The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes. English World-wide 35(1). 7–31.10.1075/eww.35.1.02berSearch in Google Scholar

Bolton, Kingsley (ed.). 2002. Hong Kong English: Autonomy and creativity. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bolton, Kingsley & Helen Kwok. 1990. The dynamics of the Hong Kong accent: Social identity and sociolinguistic description. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 1(1). 147–172.Search in Google Scholar

Bruthiaux, Paul. 2003. Squaring the circles: Issues in modeling English worldwide. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 13(2). 159–178.10.1111/1473-4192.00042Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Jacob. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1). 37–46.10.1177/001316446002000104Search in Google Scholar

Deshors, Sandra C. 2017. Structuring subjectivity in Asian Englishes: Multivariate approaches to mental predicates across genres and functional uses. English Text Construction 10(1). 132–163.10.1075/etc.10.1.07desSearch in Google Scholar

Deshors, Sandra C. & Stefan Th. Gries 2016. Profiling verb complementation constructions across New Englishes: A two-step random forests analysis of ing vs. to complements. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21(2). 192–218.10.1075/ijcl.21.2.03desSearch in Google Scholar

Deterding, David. 2007. Singapore English (Dialects of English 2). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748625444.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, Alison. 2016. English in the Netherlands: Functions, forms and attitudes (Varieties of English Around the World 56). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g56Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, Alison & Samantha Laporte. 2015. Outer and expanding circle Englishes: The competing roles of norm orientation and proficiency levels. English World-Wide 36(2). 135–169.10.1075/eww.36.2.01edwSearch in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C. & Fernando Ferreira-Junior. 2009. Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7. 188–221.10.1075/arcl.7.08ellSearch in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2014. Techniques and tools: Corpus methods and statistics for semantics. In Dylan Glynn & Justyna Robinson (eds.), Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy (Human Cognitive Processing 43), 307–341. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.43.12glySearch in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Greenbaum, Sidney & Gerald Nelson. 1996. The International Corpus of English (ICE) Project. World Englishes 15(1). 3–15.10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00088.xSearch in Google Scholar

Groves, Julie M. 2011. ‘Linguistic schizophrenia’ in Hong Kong: Hong Kong English comes of age. English Today 27(4). 33–42.10.1017/S0266078411000514Search in Google Scholar

Gupta, Anthea F. 1998. Singapore colloquial English? Or deviant standard English? In Jan Tent & France Mugler (eds.), SICOL: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Oceanic Linguistics: Vol. 1. Language Contact, 43–57. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Gupta, Anthea F. 2010. Singapore standard English revisited. In Lisa Lim, Anne Pakir & Lionel Wee (eds.), English in Singapore: Unity and utility, 57–89. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.10.5790/hongkong/9789888028436.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Hilgendorf, Suzanne. 2007. English in Germany: Contact, spread and attitudes. World Englishes 26(2). 131–148.10.1111/j.1467-971X.2007.00498.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Sebastian, Anne-Katrin Blass & Joybrato Mukerjee. 2014. Canonical tag questions in Asian Englishes: Forms, functions and frequencies in Hong Kong English, Indian English and Singapore English. In Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola & Devyani Sharma (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes, 411–435. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199777716.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199777716-e-025 (accessed 29 December 2016).10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199777716.013.025Search in Google Scholar

Horch, Stephanie. 2016. Innovative conversions in South-East Asian Englishes: Reassessing ESL status. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2(2). 278–301.10.1075/bct.98.07horSearch in Google Scholar

Hsieh, Chia-Ling. 2009. Epistemic stance taking in Chinese media discourse. Linguistic Theory Research 3. 1–35. http://web.ntnu.edu.tw/~clhsieh/2_Research/2.1_Publication/A07_2009.12_RTL.pdf (accessed 24 July 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Huss, Leena & Anna-Riitta Lindgren. 2011. Introduction: Defining language emancipation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 209. 1–15.10.1515/ijsl.2011.018Search in Google Scholar

Kachru, Braj B. 1982. Models for non-native Englishes. In Braj B. Kachru (ed.), The other tongue: English across cultures, 48–74. Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kachru, Braj B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle. In Randolph Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures, 11–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Krawczak, Karolina. 2015. Near-synonymous epistemic stance predicates in English: A quantitative corpus-driven study of subjectivity. In Dylan Glynn & Mette Sjölin (eds.), Subjectivity and epistemicity: Stance strategies in discourse and narration, 311–339. Lund: Lund University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Landis, J. Richard & Gary Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1). 159–174.10.2307/2529310Search in Google Scholar

Leimgruber, Jakob R. E. 2011. Singapore English. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(1). 47–62.10.1017/CBO9781139225755Search in Google Scholar

Li, Eden & Ahmar Mahboob. 2012. English today: Forms, functions, and uses. Hong Kong: Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar

Lim, Lisa. 2009. Not just an ‘Outer Circle’, ‘Asian’ English: Singapore English and the significance of ecology. In Thomas Hoffmann & Lucia Siebers (eds.), World Englishes: Problems, properties and prospects (Varieties of English Around the World 40), 179–206. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g40.13limSearch in Google Scholar

Mair, Christian. 2013. The world system of Englishes: Accounting for the transnational Importance of mobile and mediated vernaculars. English World-Wide 34(3). 253–278.10.1075/eww.34.3.01maiSearch in Google Scholar

Meyler, Michael. 2007. A dictionary of Sri Lankan English. Colombo: Mirisgala.Search in Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612862Search in Google Scholar

Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2007. Steady states in the evolution of New Englishes: Present-day Indian English as an equilibrium. Journal of English Linguistics 35(2). 157–187.10.1177/0075424207301888Search in Google Scholar

Okunrinmeta, Uriel. 2013. Izon influences in Nigerian English syntax. English Language and Literature Studies 3(2). 30–43.10.5539/ells.v3n2p30Search in Google Scholar

Phelps, Mandy & Edgar Merkle. 2008. Classification and regression trees as alternatives to regression. In David M. Eichhorn & Susan Kovar (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium: Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects, 77–78. Wichita: Wichita State University. http://soar.wichita.edu:8080/bitstream/handle/10057/1367/grasp-2008-35.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 24 July 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Platt, John Talbot. 1975. The Singapore English speech continuum and its basilect ‘Singlish’ as a ‘Creoloid’. Anthropological Linguistics 17(7). 363–374.Search in Google Scholar

R Development Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://R-project.org (accessed 24 July 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Rahman, Tariq. 1990. Pakistani English. Islamabad: National Institute of Pakistan Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Schilk, Marco. 2011. Structural nativization in Indian English lexicogrammar (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 46). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.46Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618901Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Edgar W. 2011. English around the world: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Siemund, Peter & Julia Davydova. 2014. World Englishes and the study of typology and universals. In Markku Filppula, Jhani Klemola & Devyani Sharma (eds.), The Oxford handbook of World Englishes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199777716.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199777716-e-022 (accessed 29 December 2016).10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199777716.013.022Search in Google Scholar

Stibbard, Richard. 2004. The spoken English of Hong Kong: A study of co- occurring segmental errors. Language, Culture and Curriculum 17(2). 127–142.10.1080/07908310408666688Search in Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Bernd Kortmann. 2009. Vernacular universals and angloversals in a typological perspective. In Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola & Heli Paulasto (eds.), Vernacular universals and language contacts: Evidence from varieties of English and beyond (Routledge Studies in Germanic Linguistics), 33–53. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Timofeev, Roman. 2004. Classification and regression trees (CART): Theory and applications. Unpublished Master Thesis, Humboldt University, Berlin. http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/master/timofeev-roman-2004-12-20/PDF/timofeev.pdf (accessed 24 July 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Wong, Cathy S., P. Jane Setter & Brian H. S. Chan. 2010. Hong Kong English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748635979Search in Google Scholar

Wulff, Stefanie, Anatol Stefanowitsch & Stefan Th. Gries. 2007. Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: Variety-specific meaning construction in the into-causative. In Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg & Peter Siemund (eds.), Aspects of meaning construction, 265–281. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.136.17wulSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-09-08
Published in Print: 2020-05-27

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cllt-2016-0052/html
Scroll to top button