Startseite The surveys on quality indicators for the total testing process in clinical laboratories of Fujian Province in China from 2018 to 2023
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The surveys on quality indicators for the total testing process in clinical laboratories of Fujian Province in China from 2018 to 2023

  • Yao Li , Falin Chen und Xijun Chen EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 12. Juli 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Objectives

This study investigates the application of 15 Quality Indicators (QIs) in clinical laboratories in Fujian Province, China, from 2018 to 2023. It identifies the main causes of laboratory errors and explores issues in the application of QIs, providing a reference for establishing provincial state-of-the-art and operational quality specifications (QSs).

Methods

All clinical laboratories in Fujian Province were organized to submit general information and original QIs data through the online External Quality Assessment (EQA) system of the National Clinical Laboratory Center (NCCL) for a survey of 15 QIs. Data from 2018 to 2023 were downloaded for statistical analysis, and the current QSs for the 15 QIs in Fujian Province were compared and analyzed with those published by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Working Group on Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety (WG-LEPS).

Results

QIs data from 542 clinical laboratories were collected. The survey on data sources showed that the number of laboratories recording QIs data using Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) increased annually, but the growth was modest and the proportion was less than 50 %. Among the laboratories using LIS to record QIs data, 133 continuously participated in this survey for six years, reporting different QIs. Over the six years, all reported QIs showed significant improvement or at least remained stable. The best median Sigma (σ) metrics were for the percentage of critical values notification and timely critical values notification, reaching 6σ, followed by the percentage of incorrect laboratory reports, with σ metrics ranging from 4.9σ to 5.1σ. In contrast, the percentage of tests covered by internal quality control (IQC) (1.5σ–1.7σ) and inter-laboratory comparison (0.1σ) remained consistently low. Compared to the QSs published by IFCC WG-LEPS, the QSs for the 15 QIs in Fujian Province in 2023 were stricter or roughly equivalent, except for the percentage of incorrect laboratory reports (Fujian Province: 0–0.221, IFCC WG-LEPS: 0–0.03).

Conclusions

1. The application of QIs has significantly improved the quality of testing in clinical laboratories in Fujian Province, but the percentage of tests covered by IQC and inter-laboratory comparison remain low; 2. Effective application of QIs requires the establishment of comprehensive LIS, unified calculation standards, and other supporting measures.


Corresponding author: Xijun Chen, Shengli Clinical College of Fujian Medical University, No.134 East Street, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, P.R. China; and Fujian Provincial Center of Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Provincial Hospital/Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, No.134 East Street, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, P.R. China, E-mail:

Funding source: Joint funds for the innovation of science and technology in Fujian Province

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2023Y9353

Acknowledgments

We appreciate those participant laboratories and institutions that attended the Fujian provincial QIs survey. We also thank the contribution of National Center for Clinical Laboratories (NCCL) made in external quality assessment (EQA) system for data collection.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved submission.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: Joint funds for the innovation of science and technology in Fujian Province were involved in this study. Grant Number: Fujian province 2023Y9353.

  6. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Plebani, M, Laposata, M, Lundberg, GD. The brain-to-brain loop concept for laboratory testing 40 years after its introduction. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:829–33. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcpr28hwhssdnon.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Plebani, M. The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine. Ann Clin Biochem 2010;47:101–10. https://doi.org/10.1258/acb.2009.009222.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Sciacovelli, L, Aita, A, Padoan, A, Pelloso, M, Antonelli, G, Piva, E, et al.. Performance criteria and quality indicators for the post-analytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1169–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0897.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Zarbo, RJ, Jones, BA, Friedberg, RC, Valenstein, PN, Renner, SW, Schifman, RB, et al.. Q-tracks: a College of American Pathologists program of continuous laboratory monitoring and longitudinal tracking. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002;126:1036–44. https://doi.org/10.5858/2002-126-1036-qt.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Plebani, M, Sciacovelli, L, Aita, A, Pelloso, M, Chiozza, ML. Performance criteria and quality indicators for the pre-analytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:943–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-1124.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Sciacovelli, L, Plebani, M. The IFCC Working Group on laboratory errors and patient safety. Clin Chim Acta 2009;404:79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.025.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Sciacovelli, L, O’Kane, M, Skaik, YA, Caciagli, P, Pellegrini, C, Da Rin, G, et al.. Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: from theory to practice. Preliminary data from the IFCC working group project “laboratory errors and patient safety”. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:835–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2011.128.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Quality indicators in laboratory medicine. Available from: http://217.148.121.44/MqiWeb/Page_QualityIndicators.jsf [Accessed 15 Dec 2017].Suche in Google Scholar

9. Panteghini, M, Sandberg, S. Defining analytical performance specifications 15 years after the Stockholm conference. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:829–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0303.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Sciacovelli, L, Panteghini, M, Lippi, G, Sumarac, Z, Cadamuro, J, Galoro, CA, et al.. Defining a roadmap for harmonizing quality indicators in laboratory medicine: a consensus statement on behalf of the IFCC working group “laboratory error and patient safety” and EFLM Task and Finish group “performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases”. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:1478–88. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0412.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Sciacovelli, L, Padoan, A, Aita, A, Basso, D, Plebani, M. Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: state-of-the-art, quality specifications and future strategies. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;61:688–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-1143.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. National Health and Family Planning Commission. Notification about the publishing of quality control indicators. Available from: http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/zhuz/index.shtml [Accessed 10 Apr 2015].Suche in Google Scholar

13. Duan, M, Ma, X, Fan, J, Guo, Y, Wang, W, Zhao, H, et al.. National surveys on 15 quality indicators for the total testing process in clinical laboratories of China from 2015 to 2017. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0416.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Westgard JO. Six sigma quality, design and control. Madison, WI: Westgard QC; 2006.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Westgard JO. The six sigma calculators. Available from: https://www.westgard.com/six-sigma-calculators.htm [Accessed 30 Jan 2018].Suche in Google Scholar

16. The jamovi project. jamovi. (Version 2.3); 2022 [Computer Software]. Available from: https://www.jamovi.org.Suche in Google Scholar

17. CLSI. CLSI document M47-A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2007. Principles and procedures for blood cultures; approved guideline.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Duan, M, Kang, F, Zhao, H, Wang, W, Du, Y, He, F, et al.. Analysis and evaluation of the external quality assessment results of quality indicators in laboratory medicine all over China from 2015 to 2018. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:812–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0983.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Self, WH, Mickanin, J, Grijalva, CG, Grant, FH, Henderson, MC, Corley, G, et al.. Reducing blood culture contamination in community hospital emergency departments: a multicenter evaluation of a quality improvement intervention. Acad Emerg Med 2014;21:274–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12337.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Lippi, G, Sciacovelli, L, Simundic, AM, Plebani, M. Innovative software for recording preanalytical errors in accord with the IFCC quality indicators. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:e51–3. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-1138.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-0495).


Received: 2023-11-15
Accepted: 2024-06-11
Published Online: 2024-07-12
Published in Print: 2025-01-29

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Blood self-sampling: friend or foe?
  4. Reviews
  5. Blood self-sampling devices: innovation, interpretation and implementation in total lab automation
  6. Salivary fatty acids in humans: a comprehensive literature review
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. EFLM Task Force Preparation of Labs for Emergencies (TF-PLE) recommendations for reinforcing cyber-security and managing cyber-attacks in medical laboratories
  9. Point-of-care testing: state-of-the art and perspectives
  10. A standard to report biological variation data studies – based on an expert opinion
  11. Ethical Checklists for Clinical Research Projects and Laboratory Medicine: two tools to evaluate compliance with bioethical principles in different settings
  12. Guidelines and Recommendations
  13. Assessment of cardiovascular risk and physical activity: the role of cardiac-specific biomarkers in the general population and athletes
  14. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  15. Clinical utility of regions of homozygosity (ROH) identified in exome sequencing: when to pursue confirmatory uniparental disomy testing for imprinting disorders?
  16. An ultrasensitive DNA-enhanced amplification method for detecting cfDNA drug-resistant mutations in non-small cell lung cancer with selective FEN-assisted degradation of dominant somatic fragments
  17. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  18. The biological variation of insulin resistance markers: data from the European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS)
  19. The surveys on quality indicators for the total testing process in clinical laboratories of Fujian Province in China from 2018 to 2023
  20. Preservation of urine specimens for metabolic evaluation of recurrent urinary stone formers
  21. Performance evaluation of a smartphone-based home test for fecal calprotection
  22. Implications of monoclonal gammopathy and isoelectric focusing pattern 5 on the free light chain kappa diagnostics in cerebrospinal fluid
  23. Development and validation of a novel 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method and its utility to assess pre-analytical stability
  24. Establishment of ELISA-comparable moderate and high thresholds for anticardiolipin and anti-β2 glycoprotein I chemiluminescent immunoassays according to the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria and evaluation of their diagnostic performance
  25. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  26. Capillary blood parameters are gestational age, birthweight, delivery mode and gender dependent in healthy preterm and term infants
  27. Reference intervals and percentiles for soluble transferrin receptor and sTfR/log ferritin index in healthy children and adolescents
  28. Cancer Diagnostics
  29. Detection of serum CC16 by a rapid and ultrasensitive magnetic chemiluminescence immunoassay for lung disease diagnosis
  30. Cardiovascular Diseases
  31. The role of functional vitamin D deficiency and low vitamin D reservoirs in relation to cardiovascular health and mortality
  32. Annual Reviewer Acknowledgment
  33. Reviewer Acknowledgment
  34. Letters to the Editor
  35. EFLM Task Force Preparation of Labs for Emergencies (TF-PLE) survey on cybersecurity
  36. Comment on Lippi et al.: EFLM Task Force Preparation of Labs for Emergencies (TF-PLE) recommendations for reinforcing cyber-security and managing cyber-attacks in medical laboratories
  37. Six Sigma in laboratory medicine: the unfinished symphony
  38. Navigating complexities in vitamin D and cardiovascular health: a call for comprehensive analysis
  39. Simplified preanalytical laboratory procedures for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients treated with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and glucarpidase
  40. New generation of Abbott enzyme assays: imprecision, methods comparison, and impact on patients’ results
  41. Correction of negative-interference from calcium dobesilate in the Roche sarcosine oxidase creatinine assay using CuO
  42. Two cases of MTHFR C677T polymorphism typing failure by Taqman system due to MTHFR 679 GA heterozygous mutation
  43. A falsely elevated blood alcohol concentration (BAC) related to an intravenous administration of phenytoin sodium
Heruntergeladen am 25.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2024-0495/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen