Startseite Allgemein Modern Durgas Fighting against the Demons of Globalization
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Modern Durgas Fighting against the Demons of Globalization

  • Stefania Cavaliere EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. März 2020
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The analysis presented here focuses on the way the antithesis between the global and the local is approached from a literary point of view in the contemporary Indian context. Assuming an ecocritical perspective, it reinterprets literature on ecological themes as a tool to negotiate some spaces of autonomy from hegemonic models imposed by globalization on an economic, technological and cultural level. Global plans often collide with local ecosystems, upsetting their pre-existent equilibrium and always more frequently producing antagonism, resistance and overt conflicts. The claim for the management of local resources and the safeguard of traditional lore become a response to the “allegedly value-neutral global market” (Eaton / Lorentzen (eds.) (2003): Ecofeminism and Globalization: Exploring Culture, Context, and Religion. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., 4). Filtering the discussion through an ecofeminist critique, it is possible to find a connection between the abuse of power that underlies human oppression and the exploitation of the environment. Women and nature are, in fact, connected in the dominant masculine discourse by the rhetoric of submission, which is harmful to both of them (Zimmerman, et al. (ed.) (1993): Environmental Philosophy: from Animal Rights to Radical Ecology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.; Warren / Cheney. (1991): “Ecological Feminism and Ecosystem Ecology”. Hypatia 6/1 Ecological Feminism: 179–197.). As an example of resistance strategy to these dynamics and a means to give voice to women through literature, this article proposes a critical reading of the novel Betvā bahtī rahī by Maitreyī Puṣpā (“The Betvā River was flowing”).

Bibliography

Agarwal, Bina (1992): “The Gender and Environment Debate: Lessons from India”. Feminist Studies 18.1: 119–158.10.4324/9780429302602-6Suche in Google Scholar

Appadurai, Arjun (1996): Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhalovich (1981): “Forms of Time and of the Chronotope in the Novels: Notes toward a Historical Poetics”. In: The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. Edited by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press, 84–258.Suche in Google Scholar

Biehl, Janet (1991): Rethinking Ecofeminist Politics. Boston: South End Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dimri, Jaiwanti (2012): Images and Representation of the Rural Woman. A Study of the Selected Novels of Indian Women Writers. Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.Suche in Google Scholar

Eaton, Heather, Lorentzen, Lois Ann (eds.) (2003): Ecofeminism and Globalization: Exploring Culture, Context, and Religion. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.Suche in Google Scholar

Gaard, Greta (1993a): “Ecofeminism. Toward Global Justice and Planetary Health”. Society and Nature 2: 1–35.Suche in Google Scholar

Gaard, Greta (ed.) (1993b): Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Gaard, Greta (2011): “Ecofeminism Revisited: Rejecting Essentialism and Re-Placing Species in a Material Feminist Environmentalism”. Feminist Formations 23/2: 26–53.10.1353/ff.2011.0017Suche in Google Scholar

Glotfelty, Cheryll, Fromm, Harold (eds.) (1996): The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Guattari, Félix (2000): The Three Ecologies Translated by Ian Pindar and Paul Sutton. London and New York: The Athlone Press.Suche in Google Scholar

King, Ynestra (1989): “Healing the Wounds: Feminism, Ecology, and the Nature/Culture Dualism”. In: Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing. Edited by Alison M. Jaggar, Susan Bordo. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kola, Adam F. (2013): “Beyond ‘global Babble’. Comparative Literature as a Critical Metatheory for Glocalizing Humanities”. World Literature Studies 2/5.22: 39–51.Suche in Google Scholar

Lerner, Gerda (1986): The Creation of Patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Madhav, Gadgil, Guha, Ramachandra (1995): Ecology and Equity: the Use and Abuse of Nature in Contemporary India. London and New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

McAndrew, Donald A. (1996): “Ecofeminism and the Teaching of Literacy”. College Composition and Communication 47/3: 367–382.10.2307/358294Suche in Google Scholar

Mies, Maria (1986): Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale. London: Zed Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Minakshi (2007): “Maitrayi Pushpa Katha Sahitya Ka Sanskrutik Anushilan”. Shodhganga. A reservoir of Indian theses. http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/10603/15236 (10/15/2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Plumwood, Val (1993): Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. New York and London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Popkar, Sushri Kiran (2008): “Maitreyee Pushpa Ka Katha Sahitya: Stree Vimarsh”. Shodhganga. A reservoir of Indian theses http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/10603/13981 (10/15/2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Puṣpā, Maitreyī (1996): Betvā Bahtī Rahī. Dillī: Kitābghar Prakāśan.Suche in Google Scholar

Rao, Manisha (2012): “Ecofeminism at the Crossroads in India: A Review”. DEP 20: 124–142.Suche in Google Scholar

Rath, Arnapurna, Malshe, Milind (2010): “Chronotopes of “Places” and “Non-places”: Ecopoetics of Amitav Ghosh’s the Hungry Tide”. Asiatic 4/2: 14–33.Suche in Google Scholar

Shiva, Vandana (1988): Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Survival in India. New Delhi: Kali for Women.Suche in Google Scholar

Showalter, Elaine (1986): “Toward a Feminist Poetics”. In: The New Feminist Criticism: Essays on Women, Literature and Theory. Edited by Elaine Showalter. London: Virago, 125–143.Suche in Google Scholar

Warren, Karen J. (1987): “Feminism and Ecology: Making Connections”. Environmental Ethics 9/1: 3–20.10.5840/enviroethics19879113Suche in Google Scholar

Warren, Karen J. (1995): “The Power and the Promise of Ecological Feminism”. In: Readings in Ecology & Feminist Theology. Edited by Mary Heather MacKinnon, Moni McIntyre. Kansas City: Sheed & Ward, 172–195.Suche in Google Scholar

Warren, Karen J. (2000): Ecofeminist Philosophy. A Western Perspective on What It Is and Why It Matters. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Suche in Google Scholar

Warren, Karen J., Cheney, Jim (1991): “Ecological Feminism and Ecosystem Ecology”. Hypatia 6/1 Ecological Feminism: 179–197.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00216.xSuche in Google Scholar

Yadav, Priti (2005): “Maitreyee Pushpa Ke Upanyas Shatya Me Naree Sanvedna”. Shodhganga. A reservoir of Indian theses http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/10603/14928 (10/15/2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Michael E., et al. (eds.) (1993): Environmental Philosophy: from Animal Rights to Radical Ecology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-03-14
Published in Print: 2020-03-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 16.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/asia-2019-0046/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen