Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik 8 Complex and simple postpositions: The split in Permic
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

8 Complex and simple postpositions: The split in Permic

  • Maria Usacheva und Timofey Arkhangelskiy
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper is devoted to complex postpositions in Permic languages (namely, in Udmurt and in Komi varieties). We argue that only morphological complexity is attested in most Permic idioms, i.e. most postpositions attach case and possessive markers and/or their stems consist of two roots. However, postpositions in certain Udmurt dialects have the option of having nominal and pronominal dependents in the genitive, in addition to the nominative or unmarked form. Postpositions in Komi varieties, both morphologically complex and morphologically simple, strongly prefer nominative marking of dependents. Komi and Udmurt are quite closely related, but have existed in different contact situations for quite some time. Therefore, it could be possible that the difference has been partly induced by language contact, in particular, by Turkic influence, but this hypothesis appeared not to be supported by the data.

Abstract

This paper is devoted to complex postpositions in Permic languages (namely, in Udmurt and in Komi varieties). We argue that only morphological complexity is attested in most Permic idioms, i.e. most postpositions attach case and possessive markers and/or their stems consist of two roots. However, postpositions in certain Udmurt dialects have the option of having nominal and pronominal dependents in the genitive, in addition to the nominative or unmarked form. Postpositions in Komi varieties, both morphologically complex and morphologically simple, strongly prefer nominative marking of dependents. Komi and Udmurt are quite closely related, but have existed in different contact situations for quite some time. Therefore, it could be possible that the difference has been partly induced by language contact, in particular, by Turkic influence, but this hypothesis appeared not to be supported by the data.

Heruntergeladen am 1.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110686647-009/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen