Home Linguistics & Semiotics 9 Case marking and complex adpositions in Basque
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

9 Case marking and complex adpositions in Basque

  • Gerd Jendraschek
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In addition to a paradigm of eleven cases, the Basque benefactive and motivative are halfway between case suffix and complex postposition. One new postposition expressing ‘after’ is the result of degrammaticalization. The omission or optionality of overt adverbial marking leads to the establishment of a set of lexical items with flexible word class membership. Certain adpositions may trigger differential argument marking: this means that their complement can receive different cases, or no case, depending on semantic factors. Differential case marking can correlate with a difference in meaning of the adposition. We further observe differential marking conditioned by the Nominal Hierarchy; for yet another class of adpositions, the determining factor is referential status. While Basque has phrase-level inflection, nouns in certain adpositional constructions have a privileged relation to their head. This stronger bondedness may be labelled “morphological affinity”. Such an analysis only pertains to the morphological boundary between the adposition and its immediate neighbour, but leaves the syntactic constituency unaffected. Adverbial phrases are routinely turned into adnominal modifiers by adding a suffix used to derive complex modifiers. One major insight from the Basque data is that the distinction between a simple and a complex adposition is not very robust. It is a common development for the additional relator that makes an adposition complex to be omitted as the adposition becomes autonomous from its etymon. Such omissibility of the inner and outer relators suggests a continuum of grammaticalization.

Abstract

In addition to a paradigm of eleven cases, the Basque benefactive and motivative are halfway between case suffix and complex postposition. One new postposition expressing ‘after’ is the result of degrammaticalization. The omission or optionality of overt adverbial marking leads to the establishment of a set of lexical items with flexible word class membership. Certain adpositions may trigger differential argument marking: this means that their complement can receive different cases, or no case, depending on semantic factors. Differential case marking can correlate with a difference in meaning of the adposition. We further observe differential marking conditioned by the Nominal Hierarchy; for yet another class of adpositions, the determining factor is referential status. While Basque has phrase-level inflection, nouns in certain adpositional constructions have a privileged relation to their head. This stronger bondedness may be labelled “morphological affinity”. Such an analysis only pertains to the morphological boundary between the adposition and its immediate neighbour, but leaves the syntactic constituency unaffected. Adverbial phrases are routinely turned into adnominal modifiers by adding a suffix used to derive complex modifiers. One major insight from the Basque data is that the distinction between a simple and a complex adposition is not very robust. It is a common development for the additional relator that makes an adposition complex to be omitted as the adposition becomes autonomous from its etymon. Such omissibility of the inner and outer relators suggests a continuum of grammaticalization.

Downloaded on 1.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110686647-010/html
Scroll to top button