Home Technology Strategy, main stages and progress of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant decommissioning
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Strategy, main stages and progress of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant decommissioning

  • P. Poskas , V. Simonis , A. Smaizys , A. Sirvydas , V. Ragaisis , R. Kilda and R. Zujus
Published/Copyright: April 19, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Unit 1 and Unit 2 reactors of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant were shutdown in December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Preliminary and Final Decommissioning Plans for the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 were prepared, the latter of which was approved by Ministry of Economy in 2005. The main points of Final Decommissioning Plan and the main Decommissioning Projects for the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant are summarized in this paper. Particular attention is drawn to the spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste management projects. Preliminary analysis showed that the main mass of equipment to be dismantled is concentrated in reactor buildings (∼39%) and turbine halls (∼37%) and consists from metals of different types (∼83%). From radiological point of view, a major part (∼61%) of contaminated equipment can be classified as very low level radioactive waste.

Kurzfassung

Die Reaktoreinheiten 1 und 2 des Ignalina Kernkraftwerks waren am 31. Dezember 2004 bzw. am 31. Dezember 2009 stillgelegt worden. Einleitende und endgültige Stilllegungspläne waren vorbereitet und vom Wirtschaftsministerium 2005 genehmigt worden. Die Stilllegungspläne und die wichtigsten Stilllegungsprojekte für das Ignalina Kernkraftwerk werden in diesem Artikel zusammengefasst. Besondere Aufmerksamkeit richtet sich auf das Management von verbrauchtem Kernbrennstoff und radioaktivem Abfall. Die Analyse zeigte, dass die Hauptmasse der zu demontierenden Ausrüstung in den Reaktorgebäuden (∼39%) und Turbinenhallen (∼37%) konzentriert sind und aus Metallen verschiedener Art (∼83%) bestehen. Vom radiologischen Gesichtspunkt aus kann der Hauptteil (∼61%) der kontaminierten Ausrüstung als radioaktive Abfälle niedrigster Stufe klassifiziert werden.


Corresponding author E-mail:

References

1 National Energy Strategy. Parliament of Lithuania, No. IX-1130. October 10, 2002Search in Google Scholar

2 Almenas, K.; Kaliatka, A.; Uspuras, E.: Ignalina RBMK-1500. A Source Book (Extended and updated version). Lithuanian Energy Institute, Kaunas, 1998Search in Google Scholar

3 The Republic of Lithuania Law on Decommissioning of Unit 1 of the State Enterprise Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant. Parliament of Lithuania, No. VIII-1661. May 2, 2000Search in Google Scholar

4 Decommissioning Program for the Unit 1 of the State Enterprise Ignalina NPP. Government of Lithuania, Resolution No. 172. February 19, 2001Search in Google Scholar

5 Final Decommissioning Plan for Ignalina NPP Units 1 and 2. A1.1/ED/B4/0004, Issue 06. INPP, Lithuania, 2004Search in Google Scholar

6 Decommissioning Program for the Units 1 and 2 of the State Enterprise Ignalina NPP. Government of Lithuania, Resolution No. 117. February 2, 2005Search in Google Scholar

7 Decommissioning Program for the State Enterprise Ignalina NPP for years 2010–2014. Government of Lithuania, Resolution No. 1425. September 29, 2010Search in Google Scholar

8 Poskas, P.; Poskas, R.; Simonis, V.; Zujus, R.; Teskeviciene, B.: Progress in preparation for decommissioning at Ignalina NPP. ICEM05-1242. Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management, Glasgow, Scotland, September 4–8, 2005Search in Google Scholar

9 Urbonavichius, S.: Strategy, progress and lessons learnt in the decommissioning of Ignalina NPP. Proc. Int. Conf. on Decommissioning and Waste Cooperation in Nuclear, Vilnius, Lithuania, May 21–22, 2007Search in Google Scholar

10 Poskas, P.: Current status of ongoing decommissioning at Ignalina NPP and radwaste strategies in Lithuania. Proc. Int. Conf. on CEE Decommissioning and Waste Cooperation, Berlin, Germany, June 18–19, 2008Search in Google Scholar

11 Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material, 2009 Edition. IAEA Safety Standards Series, No. TS-R-1, IAEA, Vienna, 2009Search in Google Scholar

12 Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM). NUREG-1575, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 1997Search in Google Scholar

13 Poskas, P.; Zujus, R.; Drumstas, G.; Poskas, R.; Simonis, V.: Principles on radiological characterization of the Unit 1 at Ignalina NPP for decommissioning purposes – 8096. Proc. WM2008 Conference, Phoenix, AZ, February 24–28, 2008Search in Google Scholar

14 Poskas, P.; Zujus, R.; Drumstas, G.; Kolesnikovas, J.; Poskas, R.; Simonis, V.: Radiological characterization of the Unit 1 at Ignalina NPP: historical assessment of the radiological situation. IAEA-CN-143/20. Contributed Papers Int. Conf. on Lessons Learned from the Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities and the Safe Termination of Nuclear Activities, Athens, Greece, December 11–15, 2006Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2011-02-25
Published Online: 2013-04-19
Published in Print: 2011-11-01

© 2011, Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Downloaded on 11.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/124.110169/pdf
Scroll to top button