Home Medicine Interpretation of the key issues of expert consensus on immunomodulatory therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Article Open Access

Interpretation of the key issues of expert consensus on immunomodulatory therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

  • Lina Sun and Yahong Chen EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 13, 2023

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease. Its pathogenesis mainly involves airway remodeling and alveolar destruction caused by inflammatory response, protease anti-protease imbalance, oxidative stress, apoptosis and imbalance of compensation repair in lung structural cell.[1] More recently, researchers have devoted considerable attention to the mechanisms related to immunology. Lung tissue structural cells and innate/ adaptive immune cells jointly participate in and maintain the homeostasis of local tissue microenvironment. When the respiratory system is stimulated by different substances, the regional immune system shows different response characteristics, causing different physiological and pathological changes. Immunomodulatory treatment of COPD is one of the hot issues in clinical practices after the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (revised edition in 2021) was published.[2]

On the basis of negotiation, the writing group for the expert consensus of immunomodulatory therapies for COPD proposed the following four recommendations for treating COPD with immunomodulatory therapies.

Certain biological and chemical agents have immunomodulatory effects on COPD by enhancing immune function and immune cell activity: Bacterial lysates, Phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors and macrolides

Bacterial lysates (Levels of evidence: Grade A)

Bacterial lysates have a protective effect, which induce a significant reduction of the symptoms related to respiratory infections,[3] envisage a reduction in the number of acute exacerbations[3,4] and a shorter duration of hospitalization, help to improve the patient's lung function and immune function[5] Therefore, for patients with COPD who need antibiotics due to acute exacerbation of COPD or repeated bacterial infections in the past 1-year, bacterial lysate treatment can be considered.

PDE inhibitors (Levels of evidence: Grade B)

The principal action of PDE inhibitors is to reduce inflammation by inhibiting the breakdown of intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate.[6] PDEs are enzymes that impact a range of cellular functions by modulating levels of cyclic nucleotides. PDE3 regulates cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) concentrations in airway smooth muscle, such that inhibition results in airway smooth muscle relaxation. PDE4 regulates cAMP concentrations and is involved in inflammatory cell activation. PDE inhibitors may reduce moderate and severe exacerbations, improve symptoms[7] and lung function[7] and the life quality of patients with COPD.[8] However, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-and active-controlled, parallel-group study showed CHF6001, a novel inhaled PDE4 inhibitor had no effect in the primary lung function analysis, reduced moderate-to-severe exacerbations for specific patient subgroup with chronic bronchitis and eosinophil count ≥ 150 cells/μL.[9] The adverse reaction of PDE 4 inhibitor in digestive tract and so on limits its clinical application.[2] For patients with chronic bronchitis, severe and extremely severe ventilation dysfunction under standard treatment with medicine of COPD (including inhalation of long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids treatment) but still have a history of repeated acute exacerbations, especially those with a history of hospitalization due to acute exacerbation, PDE inhibitor treatment may be considered. However, during the treatment period, the patient's body mass decline, digestive tract adverse reactions, etc. should be closely monitored. Patients with depressive symptoms should use this drug with caution. PDE inhibitor should not be used together with theophylline drugs.

Macrolides (Levels of evidence: Grade A)

It can effectively reduce the inflammation of patients with COPD by reducing the generation of inflammatory cells, inhibiting the inflammatory reaction mediated by inflammatory cells, promoting the early apoptosis of inflammatory cells, and reducing the secretion of mucus in the lower airway, so as to reduce the airway injury and the risks of exacerbations,[10,11] improve the lung function and improve the quality of life of patients.[12] At present, more evidence-based medical evidence is still needed for the best patients with COPD who benefit from macrolides and their adverse reactions.

Vaccination against influenza and pneumococcal infection

Influenza vaccination (Levels of evidence: Grade A)

Influenza vaccination can reduce the total number of exacerbations,[13] serious illness and death in COPD patients, especially in elderly patients with COPD.[14] Therefore, influenza vaccination is recommended for patients with COPD.

Pneumococcal vaccinations (Levels of evidence: Grade A)

13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and 23-valent Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine (PPSV23), are recommended for all patients ≥ 65 years of age. The PPSV23 is also recommended for younger COPD patients with significant comorbid conditions including chronic heart or lung disease. The PCV13 has been shown to exhibit at least the same or greater immunogenicity than the PPSV23 up to two years.[15] Overall, pneumococcal vaccination can reduce the possibility of acute exacerbation in patients with COPD and is beneficial.

Statins and Vitamin D

Statins (Levels of evidence: Grade C)

In recent years, it has been found that statins may improve lung function and delay the deterioration of the disease in COPD.[16] However, a population-based study showed that statin use may thus only associate with reduced risk of exacerbations in patients with COPD with coexisting cardiovascular disease, but not in patients with the most severe COPD without cardiovascular comorbidity.[17] The therapeutic effect of statins on COPD needs to be further explored.

Vitamin D (Levels of evidence: Grade B)

Vitamin D has emerged to possess inhibiting effects on pulmonary inflammation while exaggerating innate immune defenses.[18] Vitamin D supplementation to patients with severe vitamin D deficiency can effectively prevent the acute exacerbation of COPD, but more evidence-based medical evidence is still needed to verify.

Immunotherapy with traditional Chinese medicine

Certain Chinese medicine compound and Cordyceps preparations may improve the quality of life and reduce the probability of acute exacerbations in patients with stable COPD by regulating immune function and improving immune cell activity, for example, traditional Chinese medicine compound and Cordyceps preparation,[19] acupoint application and combined needle.[20]

Based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine level system (2001), there are several recommendations of immunomodulatory drugs for COPD (Table 1).

Table 1

Grades of recommendations for immunomodulatory drugs of COPD

Immunomodulatory drugs for COPD Strength of recommendation
Biological agents of microbial origin
Bacterial lysates A
BCG-polysaccharide nucleic acid C
Immunomodulator of Klebsiella extract C
Products of the human or animal immune system
Thymosin C
Chemosynthetic drugs
Macrolides A
Phosphodiesterase inhibitors B
Pidotimod C
Vitamin D* B
Statins* C
Other functional regulation preparations
Influenza vaccines A
Pneumococcal vaccines A
New targeted anti-inflammatory drugs
Anti-non-T2 inflammation biologics C
Anti-type T2 inflammation biologics C
Protease inhibitor C

*indicates that there is less evidence of application in COPD and more evidence-based evidence is needed. COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

There are many kinds of immunomodulators with different effects. The clinical research evidence for the treatment of COPD needs to be further verified in the real world. For clinicians, the key to selecting appropriate immunomodulators lies in the correct understanding of their immunomodulatory mechanisms. The authors also hope to take the opportunity of the preparation of this expert consensus to further improve the understanding of the immune pathogenesis of COPD and find new targets for immunomodulation therapy. With the continuous increase of research evidence and the continuous accumulation of clinical experience, this expert consensus will be updated in due time.


Dr. Yahong Chen, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital; Research Center for Chronic Airway Diseases, Peking University Health Science Center, 49 North Garden Rd.,Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.

  1. Source of Funding

    This work was supported by the Capital health development scientific research special project (first issue 2020-2z-40917) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants No. 820900013, 820900014 and 82100031); International Practice Guide Registration Platform (Registration No. ipgrp-2022cn267).

  2. Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

References

1 Hogg JC, Timens W. The pathology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Annu Rev Pathol 2009;4:435–59.10.1146/annurev.pathol.4.110807.092145Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Group of Chinese Thoracic Society, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Committee of Chinese Association of Chest Physician. [Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (revised version 2021)]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 2021;44:170–205.Search in Google Scholar

3 Huang Y, Pei Y, Qian Y, Yao Z, Chen C, Du J, et al. A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022;9:877124.10.3389/fmed.2022.877124Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4 Troiano G, Messina G, Nante N. Bacterial lysates (OM-85 BV): a cost-effective proposal in order to contrast antibiotic resistance. J Prev Med Hyg 2021;62:E564–73.Search in Google Scholar

5 Steurer-Stey C, Bachmann LM, Steurer J, Tramèr MR. Oral purified bacterial extracts in chronic bronchitis and COPD: systematic review. Chest 2004;126:1645–55.10.1378/chest.126.5.1645Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6 Singh D, Watz H, Beeh KM, Kornmann O, Leaker B, Colgan B, et al. COPD sputum eosinophils: relationship to blood eosinophils and the effect of inhaled PDE4 inhibition. Eur Respir J 2020;56:2000237.10.1183/13993003.00237-2020Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7 Singh D, Martinez FJ, Watz H, Bengtsson T, Maurer BT. A dose-ranging study of the inhaled dual phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibitor ensifentrine in COPD. Respir Res 2020;21:47.10.1186/s12931-020-1307-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8 Rabe KF, Bateman ED, O'Donnell D, Witte S, Bredenbröker D, Bethke TD. Roflumilast—an oral anti-inflammatory treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;366:563–71.10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67100-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9 Singh D, Emirova A, Francisco C, Santoro D, Govoni M, Nandeuil MA. Efficacy and safety of CHF6001, a novel inhaled PDE4 inhibitor in COPD: the PIONEER study. Respir Res 2020;21:246.10.1186/s12931-020-01512-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10 Pomares X, Montón C, Huertas D, Marín A, Cuevas E, Casabella A, et al. Efficacy of Low-Dose versus High-Dose Continuous Cyclic Azithromycin Therapy for Preventing Acute Exacerbations of COPD. Respiration 2021;100:1070–7.10.1159/000517781Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11 Vermeersch K, Gabrovska M, Aumann J, Demedts IK, Corhay JL, Marchand E, et al. Azithromycin during Acute Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations Requiring Hospitalization (BACE). A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;200:857–68.10.1164/rccm.201901-0094OCSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

12 Huang Z, Yang G, Wang H, Wu S, Wang Y. [Effect of low dose azithromycin treatment on pulmonary function and inflammatory factors in elderly patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]. Chin J Gerontol 2016;36:135–6.Search in Google Scholar

13 Kopsaftis Z, Wood-Baker R, Poole P. Influenza vaccine for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;6:CD002733.10.1002/14651858.CD002733.pub3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14 Hak E, van Essen GA, Buskens E, Stalman W, de Melker RA. Is immunising all patients with chronic lung disease in the community against influenza cost effective? Evidence from a general practice based clinical prospective cohort study in Utrecht, The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:120–5.10.1136/jech.52.2.120Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15 Dransfield MT, Harnden S, Burton RL, Albert RK, Bailey WC, Casaburi R, et al. Long-term comparative immunogenicity of protein conjugate and free polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55:e35–44.10.1093/cid/cis513Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16 Young RP, Hopkins RJ. Update on the potential role of statins in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its co-morbidities. Expert Rev Respir Med 2013;7:533–44.10.1586/17476348.2013.838018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17 Ingebrigtsen TS, Marott JL, Nordestgaard BG, Lange P, Hallas J, Vestbo J. Statin use and exacerbations in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 2015;70:33–40.10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205795Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18 Ahmad S, Arora S, Khan S, Mohsin M, Mohan A, Manda K, et al. Vitamin D and its therapeutic relevance in pulmonary diseases. J Nutr Biochem 2021;90:108571.10.1016/j.jnutbio.2020.108571Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19 Wang CY, Ding HZ, Tang X, Li ZG. Effect of Liuweibuqi capsules on CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells, helper T cells and lung function in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated with lung Qi deficiency. J Thorac Dis 2018;10:2700–11.10.21037/jtd.2018.04.110Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20 Wu JJ, Zhang YX, Xu HR, Li YX, Jiang LD, Wang CX, et al. Effect of acupoint application on T lymphocyte subsets in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e19537.10.1097/MD.0000000000019537Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Published Online: 2023-01-13

© 2022 Lina Sun, Yahong Chen, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial
  2. Interpretation of the key issues of expert consensus on immunomodulatory therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  3. Perspective
  4. Emerging noninvasive neuromodulation methods for functional gastrointestinal diseases
  5. Gastric electrical stimulation: Overview and summary
  6. Antibiotic stewardship: Dead bugs do not mutate
  7. The long and the short of current nanomedicines for treating Alzheimer's disease
  8. Monkeypox: Clinical issues of concern
  9. Cortical synaptic mechanism for chronic pain and anxiety in Parkinson’s disease
  10. Commentary
  11. Chemical therapy for chronic pancreatitis: An assumption or an alternative?
  12. Review Article
  13. Focal liver lesions other than hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: Diagnostic challenges
  14. The emergence of travel-related infections in critical care units
  15. Research progress on N6-adenosylate methylation RNA modification in heart failure remodeling
  16. Original Article
  17. Characteristics of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 omicron BA.2 subvariant in Jilin, China from March to May 2022
  18. A comprehensive weighted gene co-expression network analysis uncovers potential targets in diabetic kidney disease
  19. Letter to Editor
  20. Acute kidney injury associated with severe hypouricemia caused by a novel SLC2A9 mutation: Enlightenment from rare disease to common disease
  21. Noted tension headache, anxiety, and depression in a Chinese patient with spinocerebellar ataxia, autosomal recessive 10 caused by a novel anoctamin 10 mutation
Downloaded on 29.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2478/jtim-2022-0069/html
Scroll to top button