Home Metabolic adaptation in lactation: Insulin-dependent and -independent glycemic control
Article Open Access

Metabolic adaptation in lactation: Insulin-dependent and -independent glycemic control

  • Ling Fu , Maria A. Ramos-Roman and Yingfeng Deng EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 30, 2022

Background

The metabolic syndrome including type 2 diabetes is associated with aberrant metabolism of glucose and lipid, that is, impaired metabolic flexibility. Proper metabolic adaptation is critical for mammals to survive conditions with restricted caloric intake, such as starvation. However, one process that exemplifies the amazing capacity of metabolic flexibility in mammals is lactation, an exquisite metabolic adaptation process that normally is not associated with restricted caloric intake. Instead of an exchange of energy source between carbohydrate and lipid, lactation is associated with mobilization of both glucose and fat from storage for milk production. A rewiring of inter-organ metabolic flux is induced during lactation, which has significant health impacts on both mothers and babies. In humans, little is known about the metabolic adaptations during active lactation and post-lactation, let alone the relevance of lactation to the longterm risk of type 2 diabetes in mothers. Recent studies of the metabolic control during lactation provide new insights into the physiology of metabolic adaptation regarding the role of insulin in glycemic control and energy homeostasis, which may lead to novel treatment strategies for type 2 diabetes and other metabolic diseases associated with insulin resistance.

Insulin is the central hormone of metabolism and physiology that orchestrates the transition between the fed and fasted states. Insulin is also viewed as the major regulator of blood glucose and is the mainstay of treatment for type 1 diabetes mellitus. However, when insulin is used as treatment for type 2 diabetes, a condition characterized by relative insulin deficiency and insulin resistance, one conundrum observed is that insulin promotes energy storage, which further exacerbates insulin resistance due to increased adiposity. Part of the underlying physiology is the anabolic effect of insulin. Insulin promotes fatty acid and amino acid uptake, energy storage, and cellular growth. Insulin resistance in diet-induced obesity is only selective for glycemic control, that is, the anabolic role of insulin in energy storage remains intact under the condition of insulin resistance.[1] Whereas extensive efforts have been directed to understand the bifurcation of insulin signaling in glycemic control and pro-anabolic regulation, a growing body of epidemiological and basic/ translational evidence now suggests that non-insulin-mediated glucose uptake/utilization (NIMGU) may be a component that, when disrupted, can induce an elevation of blood glucose and promote the development of selective insulin resistance. Conversely, stimulation of NIMGU, such as what lactation does to maternal metabolism, may be a novel solution to the pathogenic paradox associated with insulin therapy under the nonpregnant and non-postpartum state.

Increased glucose production during lactation

Lactation per se promotes glucose usage, so it is expected that glycemic control is improved in lactation. Indeed, the intensity of lactation is found to be positively associated with the improvement of fasting glucose level.[2] Moreover, breastfeeding an infant during the 2-h 75 g oral glucose tolerance test lowers the 2-h plasma glucose trajectory further among all the postpartum women who choose to breastfeed.[3] Consistent with the acute effect of lactation, blood glucose concentrations, under both fasting condition and through 2-h glucose overload test, were lower in lactating mothers than nonlactating mothers at 3.6 years postpartum.[4]

Compared to formula feeding women, lactating women have higher basal endogenous glucose production as well as whole-body glucose disposal.[5] Higher basal glucose production appears to be from increased glycogenolysis in response to increased metabolic demand during lactation at similar or lower insulin concentrations compared to the nonpregnant, non-postpartum control group.[6] Animal studies showed that glucose clearance rate was significantly higher in rats from 3 days of lactation, which was further increased during the euglycemic insulin clamp, a process when exogenous glucose is administered to animals continuously.[7] However, glucose utilization in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, the canonical insulin-responsive organs, is decreased in lactating animals.[8] The increase in glucose uptake and utilization during lactation mainly results from the mammary gland, which accounts for 45% of the overall glucose utilization in rats.[7]

Decreased plasma insulin during lactation

Postpartum maternal fasting insulin levels are decreased regardless of breastfeeding.[9] Moreover, fasting insulin concentrations are lower in lactating women than nonlactating women at 3–5 months postpartum.[10] Adiposity is a key regulator of maternal insulin levels during lactation. Breastfeeding women with body mass index (BMI) < 30 have lower fasting insulin than those with BMI > 30.[10] Intriguingly, insulin concentrations under fasting or in response to glucose overload are also lowered in lactating women who are diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), suggesting the reduction of insulin is induced by lactation, which is unlikely to be a consequence of improved insulin sensitivity.[2]

What is the mechanism for lower insulin in lactating women if it is not from improved insulin sensitivity? One possibility is β-cell rest.[4] Lactating women have significantly lower first- and second-phase glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, as shown by Stumvoll index, when compared to nonlactating women.[10] Another reason for lower plasma insulin is increased rate of insulin clearance. The uptake of 125I-insulin by the mammary glands of lactating rats is 12-fold of nonlactating rats, whereas the insulin uptake in the liver, kidney, and heart is not changed, suggesting that lactation may increase insulin clearance through its uptake by the mammary gland.[11]

Responsiveness of peripheral tissues to insulin in lactation

With simultaneous reduction of blood glucose and insulin, the nursing women seem to have improved insulin sensitivity compared to nonlactating ones. Indeed, HOMA IR, an index for insulin resistance,[2, 10] is lower in lactating mothers, whereas the Matsuda index, an index for insulin sensitivity, is higher in lactating mothers compared to nonlactating mothers in several clinical studies.[12] Importantly, the improvement in Matsuda index persists 3 years postpartum, suggesting that lactation leaves a long-lasting impact on glycemic control.[12] Consistent with the aforementioned index changes in clinical studies, an euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp study in rats confirmed that whole-body glucose uptake is increased in lactating rats. The amount of insulin needed to induce half-maximal inhibition of glucose production and half-maximal stimulation of glucose utilization clearance was decreased by 60% and 50%, respectively, in lactating rats.[13]

Although systemic insulin sensitivity is improved in lactating mothers when examined by blood glucose and insulin levels, insulin responsiveness of nonmammary tissues is not enhanced during lactation. Mother rats weaned for 24 h at peak lactation secreted as much as three times more insulin than nonlactating rats when given equivalent amounts of intravenous glucose, suggesting insulin resistance in tissues other than mammary glands in rats weaned for 24 h compared with nonlactating rats. When examined in vitro, the adipocytes isolated from nonlactating rats showed insulin-stimulated glucose incorporation into fatty acids, whereas the adipocytes from lactating rats showed no response.[14] In contrast, mammary lipogenesis in rats at peak lactation is increased significantly by administration of low-dose insulin compared to nonlactating rats. In the same rats, however, insulin administration did not initiate any change in anabolic activities in the liver or lipolysis in white or brown adipose tissue,[11] indicating that insulin response is maintained in the lactating mammary gland, but not in the other peripheral tissues. Similar results were obtained from lactating women when using the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp method. Therefore, the enhancement of maternal insulin responsiveness during lactation may not result from improved insulin response in the canonical insulin-responsive tissues. Instead, it relies on the functionality of mammary glands, which assimilate glucose efficiently in the presence of low insulin.

Potential mechanism for insulin-independent glycemic control during lactation

Both animal and clinical studies indicate that a condition of systemic insulin resistance is induced following the onset of lactation. It has been suggested that the condition of insulin resistance in peripheral tissues helps glucose partition to mammary glands, which is critical for milk production.[15] Unlike the canonical insulin resistance associated with obesity and prediabetes, the blood glucose and insulin levels do not increase in lactation despite an increase in glucose production. Although the mammary glands remain responsive to insulin in the presence of systemic insulin resistance for purposes other than glucose uptake, the contradiction between lower plasma insulin level and higher glucose uptake in mammary glands suggests that insulin may not be the sole key regulator. Additional factors, which are referred here collectively as the non-insulin-mediated mechanism, may play important roles in the glycemic control during lactation.

Differential expression of non-insulin-regulated glucose transporter

At the cellular level, glucose uptake is regulated by insulin through the insulin-regulated glucose transporter, GLUT4. Tissues with high expression of GLUT4 are insulin sensitive regarding glucose uptake. In contrast, glucose uptake mediated through non-insulin-regulated glucose transporter, such as GLUT1, manifests the feature of non-insulin-mediated glucose uptake. Glucose uptake by mammary epithelial cells is mediated by several GLUTs, and the differential expression of GLUT1 has been suggested as a mechanism for insulin-independent glucose uptake in the lactating mammary gland. Studies found that the mammary gland of lactating cows expressed large amount of GLUT1, while the mammary gland of nonlactating cows did not.[16] The expression of GLUT1 in mammary glands was significantly reduced 6 h after weaning in lactating rats.[17] Increased GLUT1 expression in mammary glands during lactation is also demonstrated in rats, mice, and humans. Prolactin level is increased during pregnancy and lactation, and it is suggested that prolactin increases the expression of GLUT1 in mammary glands.[18] In addition to GLUT1 which is the primary transporter for glucose uptake in mammary glands, other insulin-independent transporters, including GLUT3, 5, and 12, are also expressed in lactating bovine mammary glands, suggesting a potential contribution to NIMGU.[19]

Reduction of leptin surrounding parturition

Leptin, like insulin, is another central hormone with a key role in metabolic regulation in response to fasting and feeding. Primarily secreted from adipocytes, leptin is the representative adipokine that acts as a hormone to coordinate energy homeostasis systemically. It is well established that falling leptin levels are a key signal of the starved state.[20] Interestingly, plasma leptin drops by 30%– 50% during the days surrounding parturition in mammals.[21] Noticeably, the significant reduction of leptin is not due to a substantial decrease of adiposity or the loss of placenta upon parturition.[22] This rapid reduction in plasma leptin is, therefore, suggested to serve as a signal promoting glucose conservation during the transition from late pregnancy to early lactation. However, due to the concomitant changes in other hormones during lactation, the significance of leptin reduction in the maternal metabolic remodeling remains elusive. A recent study reveals that partial leptin reduction restores hypothalamic leptin sensitivity and protects mice from diet-induced obesity.[23] The report shows that down-titration of leptin in mice through anti-leptin antibody alone is sufficient to improve glucose disposal, even when the adiposity remains unchanged in those mice.[23] These findings support that the reduction of leptin surrounding parturition may contribute directly to the glycemic control in lactating mothers through an insulin-independent mechanism.

Increase of monosaccharide diversity at the expense of glucose

Lactation is associated with massive production of lactose, a disaccharide composed of glucose and galactose subunits. In addition to lactation, the maintenance of cellular monosaccharide diversity is critical for cell function and survival. Without a complete set of monosaccharides, cells may accumulate misfolded protein in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and fail to secrete or send molecules to targeted subcellular locations due to a defect in glycosylation. Since glucose is the major source for the supply of monosaccharides in cells, the rate of glucose flux to other monosaccharides is expected to be coupled to glucose uptake and may influence glycemic control systemically. Indeed, ER stress, a chronic condition that is well known for its contribution to the development of insulin resistance,[24] has been shown to regulate several key enzymes for the production of monosaccharides including UDP-glucose-4-epimerase (GalE),[25-27] the sole epimerase for mammals to produce galactose from glucose. Notably, hepatic overexpression of spliced Xbp1 (Xbp1s), a transducer of the unfolded protein response (UPR) induced by ER stress, not only augments cellular pool of monosaccharide at the expense of hepatic glycogen storage, but also substantially lowers the blood glucose,[25] supporting that stimulation of glucose flux to other monosaccharides may improve glycemic control in the absence of lactation.

ER stress and UPR in maternal metabolic remodeling during lactation

Chronic activation of ER stress and UPR has been well known for its adverse impact on insulin response in multiple tissues including muscle, liver, and adipose tissues.[28] Interestingly, recent findings indicate that ER stress is increased in the postpartum mammary gland in mice, and the proper activation of the Inositol-requiring enzyme-1a (IRE1a) branch of UPR is necessary for milk production.[29] Consistently, Xbp1s, the downstream target of IRE1a, is increased by prolactin treatment in adipocytes during lactation, and lactating moms with Xbp1 deficiency have decreased milk production and increased adiposity,[30] concurrent with the stimulatory role of Xbp1s in the flux of glucose to galactose through activation of GalE as mentioned above.[25] Conversely, when Xbp1s is overexpressed in adipocytes, uridine supply from adipocytes is augmented,[31] which is consistent with the role of adipocytes in uridine homeostasis.[32] Importantly, increased uridine supply not only favors the production of monosaccharides including galactose from glucose, but also diminishes the insulin response partially by interfering with insulin signaling pathway through protein O-GlcNAcylation.[33, 34] Lastly, Xbp1s is induced in adipocytes by fasting,[31] whereas fasting per se is a process associated with a fall in circulating leptin. It warrants future investigation whether ER stress in adipocytes is involved in the fall of leptin by fasting and lactation. In summary, ER stress and UPR may serve as a connection of insulin-independent mechanisms, which plays a key role in the maternal metabolic remolding during lactation (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Insulin-independent glycemic control during lactation augments glucose uptake and utilization in mammary glands. Simultaneously, glucose uptake in insulin-responsive tissues such as the liver, adipose tissues, and skeletal muscle, that is, insulin-dependent glucose uptake and utilization, shows a reduction compared to the nonlactating state. ER stress and the UPR in mammary glands and adipose tissues during lactation may play a key role in coordination of the maternal metabolic remodeling. ER: endoplasmic reticulum; UPR: unfolded protein response.
Figure 1

Insulin-independent glycemic control during lactation augments glucose uptake and utilization in mammary glands. Simultaneously, glucose uptake in insulin-responsive tissues such as the liver, adipose tissues, and skeletal muscle, that is, insulin-dependent glucose uptake and utilization, shows a reduction compared to the nonlactating state. ER stress and the UPR in mammary glands and adipose tissues during lactation may play a key role in coordination of the maternal metabolic remodeling. ER: endoplasmic reticulum; UPR: unfolded protein response.

Perspectives

Low plasma insulin combined with insulin resistance in nonmammary tissues is a feature of glucose metabolism during lactation in animal models, including rodents and farming animals. This feature safeguards the calorie supply for lactose synthesis. Although the glucose uptake in mammary glands is significant and insulin independent, it remains a subject of debate whether insulin resistance is developed in lactating women depending on whether insulin sensitivity is examined by systemic glycemic control or tissue responsiveness to insulin. However, it is unambiguous that the concomitant augmentation of NIMGU in lactation makes it possible to restore a low level of insulin without impairing glycemic control in the presence of increased glucose production. One beneficial effect associated with such maternal metabolic remodeling is the suppression of insulin-dependent energy storage and subsequent obesity progression. Indeed, clinical observations from different ethnic groups have found that lactation reduces the risk of maternal hyperglycemia and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes.[35] Given the significance of insulin resistance to the progression of metabolic disease, the physiology behind glucose metabolism and energy homeostasis during lactation is of great interest.

Investigations on NIMGU during established human lactation can use indirect or direct approaches like those previously tested outside the pregnancy and postpartum window.[5] The indirect approach includes a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp with a stable isotope of glucose and analysis of the data with a model similar to the one published by Jumpertz et al.[36] Specifically, for each subject, the steady-state Rd glucose is plotted against the respective steady-state insulin concentrations during three study conditions: 2 h of basal state, 2 h of a lower insulin infusion rate such as 10 mU/m2/min, and 2 h of a higher insulin infusion rate such as 40 mU/m2/min. Data obtained during these three study conditions may be used to calculate individual linear regression equations from which Rd glucose at theoretical zero insulin concentrations can be extrapolated. The direct approach would infuse somatostatin during the clamp procedure to inhibit endogenous insulin secretion.

Understanding the non-insulin-dependent glucose uptake/ utilization and its link to energy homeostasis could lead to new therapeutic strategies for blood glucose management under conditions of insulin resistance and diabetes.


Dr. Yingfeng Deng, Department of Diabetes and Cancer Metabolism, Arthur Riggs Diabetes & Metabolism Research Institute, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte 91010, CA, USA

Funding statement: This work was supported by the American Diabetes Association (1-19-JDF-082), and the NIH (R01-126975) provided fund to Deng Y.

Acknowledgment

The figure was prepared with biorender.com.

  1. Conflict of Interest

    None declared.

References

1 Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Selective versus total insulin resistance: a pathogenic paradox. Cell Metab 2008;7:95-6.10.1016/j.cmet.2007.12.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2 Gunderson EP, Hedderson MM, Chiang V, Crites Y, Walton D, Azevedo RA, et al. Lactation intensity and postpartum maternal glucose tolerance and insulin resistance in women with recent GDM: the SWIFT cohort. Diabetes Care 2012;35:50-6.10.2337/dc11-1409Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3 Gunderson EP, Crites Y, Chiang V, Walton D, Azevedo RA, Fox G, et al. Influence of breastfeeding during the postpartum oral glucose tolerance test on plasma glucose and insulin. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:136-43.10.1097/AOG.0b013e31825b993dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4 Moon JH, Kim H, Kim H, Park J, Choi W, Choi W, et al. Lactation improves pancreatic beta cell mass and function through serotonin production. Sci Transl Med 2020;12:eaay0455.10.1126/scitranslmed.aay0455Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5 Ramos-Roman MA, Syed-Abdul MM, Adams-Huet B, Casey BM, Parks EJ. Lactation versus formula feeding: insulin, glucose, and fatty acid metabolism during the postpartum period. Diabetes 2020;69:1624-35.10.2337/db19-1226Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6 Tigas S, Sunehag A, Haymond MW. Metabolic adaptation to feeding and fasting during lactation in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87:302-7.10.1210/jcem.87.1.8178Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7 Burnol AF, Leturque A, Ferré P, Girard J. Glucose metabolism during lactation in the rat: quantitative and regulatory aspects. Am J Physiol, 1983;245:E351-8.10.1152/ajpendo.1983.245.4.E351Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8 Vernon RG. Endocrine control of metabolic adaptation during lactation. Proc Nutr Soc 1989;48:23-32.10.1079/PNS19890006Search in Google Scholar

9 Ebert T, Stepan H, Schrey S, Kralisch S, Hindricks J, Hopf L, et al. Serum levels of irisin in gestational diabetes mellitus during pregnancy and after delivery. Cytokine 2014;65:153-8.10.1016/j.cyto.2013.11.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10 Harreiter J, Vila G, Leitner K, Wattar L, Leutner M, Worda C, et al. Decreased beta-cell function in breastfeeding obese and non-obese women: A prospective observational study. Clin Nutr 2019;38:2790-8.10.1016/j.clnu.2018.11.035Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11 Jones RG, Ilic V, Williamson DH. Physiological significance of altered insulin metabolism in the conscious rat during lactation. Biochem J 1984;220:455-60.10.1042/bj2200455Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12 Bajaj H, Ye C, Hanley AJ, Connelly PW, Sermer M, Zinman B, et al. Prior lactation reduces future diabetic risk through sustained postweaning effects on insulin sensitivity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2017;312:E215-23.10.1152/ajpendo.00403.2016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13 Burnol AF, Leturque A, Ferré P, Kande J, Girard J. Increased insulin sensitivity and responsiveness during lactation in rats. Am J Physiol 1986;251:E537-41.10.1152/ajpendo.1986.251.5.E537Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14 Burnol AF, Guerre-Millo M, Lavau M, Girard J. Effect of lactation on insulin sensitivity of glucose metabolism in rat. FEBS Lett 1986;194:292-6.10.1016/0014-5793(86)80103-XSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

15 Butte NF, Hopkinson JM, Mehta N, Moon JK, Smith EO. Adjustments in energy expenditure and substrate utilization during late pregnancy and lactation. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:299-307.10.1093/ajcn/69.2.299Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16 Komatsu T, Itoh F, Kushibiki S, Hodate K. Changes in gene expression of glucose transporters in lactating and nonlactating cows. J Anim Sci 2005;83:557-64.10.2527/2005.833557xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

17 Macheda ML, Williams ED, Best JD, Wlodek ME, Rogers S. Expression and localisation of GLUT1 and GLUT12 glucose transporters in the pregnant and lactating rat mammary gland. Cell Tissue Res 2003;311:91-7.10.1007/s00441-002-0661-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18 Hudson ER, Ma LS, Wilde CJ, Flint DJ, Baldwin SA. Regulation of GLUT1 expression in the mammary gland. Biochem Soc Trans 1997;25:464S.10.1042/bst025464sSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

19 Zhao FQ, Keating AF. Expression and regulation of glucose transporters in the bovine mammary gland. J Dairy Sci 2007;26:E76-86.10.3168/jds.2006-470Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20 Flier JS, Maratos-Flier E. Leptin’s physiologic role: does the emperor of energy balance have no clothes? Cell Metab 2017;26:24-6.10.1016/j.cmet.2017.05.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21 Ehrhardt RA, Foskolos A, Giesy SL, Wesolowski SR, Krumm CS, Butler WR, et al. Increased plasma leptin attenuates adaptive metabolism in early lactating dairy cows. J Endocrinol 2016;229:145-57.10.1530/JOE-16-0031Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22 Lage M, Garcia-Mayor RV, Tomé MA, Cordido F, Valle-Inclan F, Considine RV, et al. Serum leptin levels in women throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period and in women suffering spontaneous abortion. Clin Endocrinol, 1999;50:211-6.10.1046/j.1365-2265.1999.00637.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

23 Zhao S, Zhu Y, Schultz RD, Li N, He Z, Zhang Z, et al. Partial leptin reduction as an insulin sensitization and weight loss strategy. Cell Metab 2019;30:706-19.10.1016/j.cmet.2019.08.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24 Özcan U, Cao Q, Yilmaz E, Lee AH, Iwakoshi NN, Özdelen E, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress links obesity, insulin action, and type 2 diabetes. Science 2004;306:457-61.10.1126/science.1103160Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25 Deng Y, Wang ZV, Tao C, Gao N, Holland WL, Ferdous A, et al. The Xbp1s/GalE axis links ER stress to postprandial hepatic metabolism. J Clin Invest 2013;123:455-68.10.1172/JCI62819Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26 Wang ZV, Deng Y, Gao N, Pedrozo Z, Li DL, Morales CR, et al. Spliced X-box binding protein 1 couples the unfolded protein response to hexosamine biosynthetic pathway. Cell 2014;156:1179-92.10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27 Williams KW, Liu T, Kong X, Fukuda M, Deng Y, Berglund ED, et al. Xbp1s in Pomc neurons connects ER stress with energy balance and glucose homeostasis. Cell Metab 2014;20:471-82.10.1016/j.cmet.2014.06.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28 Hotamisligil GS. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the inflammatory basis of metabolic disease. Cell 2010;140:900-17.10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29 Ren S, Lu G, Ota A, Zhou ZH, Vondriska TM, Lane TF, et al. IRE1 phosphatase PP2Ce regulates adaptive ER stress response in the postpartum mammary gland. PLoS One 2014;9:e111606.10.1371/journal.pone.0111606Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30 Gregor MF, Misch ES, Yang L, Hummasti S, Inouye KE, Lee AH, et al. The role of adipocyte Xbp1 in metabolic regulation during lactation. Cell Rep 2013;3:1430-9.10.1016/j.celrep.2013.03.042Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31 Deng Y, Wang ZV, Gordillo R, Zhu Y, Ali A, Zhang C, et al. Adipocyte Xbp1s overexpression drives uridine production and reduces obesity. Mol Metab 2018;11:1-17.10.1016/j.molmet.2018.02.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32 Deng Y, Wang ZV, Gordillo R, An Y, Zhang C, Liang Q, et al. An adipo-biliary-uridine axis that regulates energy homeostasis. Science 2017;355:eaaf5375.10.1126/science.aaf5375Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33 Yang X, Ongusaha PP, Miles PD, Havstad JC, Zhang F, So WV, et al. Phosphoinositide signalling links O-GlcNAc transferase to insulin resistance. Nature 2008;451:964-9.10.1038/nature06668Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34 Urasaki Y, Pizzorno G, Le TT. Uridine affects liver protein glycosylation, insulin signaling, and heme biosynthesis. PLoS One 2014;9:e99728.10.1371/journal.pone.0099728Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35 Jäger S, Jacobs S, Kröger J, Fritsche A, Schienkiewitz A, Rubin D, et al. Breast-feeding and maternal risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective study and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2014;57:1355-65.10.1007/s00125-014-3247-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36 Jumpertz R, Thearle MS, Bunt JC, Krakoff J. Assessment of non-insulin-mediated glucose uptake: association with body fat and glycemic status. Metabolism 2010:1396-401.10.1016/j.metabol.2010.01.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Published Online: 2022-09-30

© 2022 Ling Fu, Maria A. Ramos-Roman, Yingfeng Deng, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2478/jtim-2022-0036/html
Scroll to top button