7 Bibliography

Anglade, Joseph, Grammaire de l’ancien provençal ou ancienne langue d’oc: phonétique et morphologie, Paris, Klincksieck, 1921.Search in Google Scholar

Batllori, Montserrat/Hernanz, Maria-Lluïsa, Emphatic polarity from Latin to Romance, Paper presented at the 10th DiGS, Cornell University, 2008, <http://filcat.uab.cat/clt/publicacions/reports/pdf/GGT-09–08.pdf> [last access: 17.02.2019].Search in Google Scholar

Birner, Betty J., Semantic and pragmatic contributions to information status, Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 38 (2006), 14–32.10.1080/03740463.2006.10412201Search in Google Scholar

Bongelli, Ramona/Riccioni, Ilaria/Vincze, Laura/Zuczkowski, Andrzej, Questions and epistemic stance. Some examples from Italian conversations, Ampersand 5 (2018), 29–44.10.1016/j.amper.2018.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Breitbarth, Anne/Lucas, Christopher/Willis, David (edd.), The history of negation in the languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, vol. 1, Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Büring, Daniel/Gunlogson, Christine, Aren’t positive and negative polar questions the same?, manuscripts, University of California Santa Cruz, 2000, <https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/mYwOGNhO/polar_questions.pdf> [last access: 12.03.2019].Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace, Cognitive constraints on information flow, in: Tomlin, Russell S. (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, Amsterdam, Benjamins, 1987, 21–51.10.1075/tsl.11.03chaSearch in Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen, Inflationary effects in language and elsewhere, in: Bybee, Joan/Hopper, Paul (edd.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistics structure, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 2001, 471–480.10.1075/tsl.45.24dahSearch in Google Scholar

Domaneschi, Filippo/Romero, Mirabel/Braun, Bettina, Bias in polar questions. Evidence from English and German production experiments, Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 2 (2017), 1–28, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.27> [last access: 17.02.2019].10.5334/gjgl.27Search in Google Scholar

Ducrot, Oswald, Le dire et le dit, Paris, Minuit, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Eckardt, Regine, Meaning change in grammaticalization. An enquiry into semantic reanalysis, Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 2006.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ellingworth, Paul, When did we see you...? Translating rhetorical questions, The Bible Translator 64 (2013), 64–74.10.1177/0260093513481149Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas/David Wilkins, In the mind’s ear. The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages, Language 76 (2000), 546–592.10.2307/417135Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles, Pragmatic scales and logical structure, Linguistic Inquiry 6 (1975), 353–375.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Olga, Morphosyntactic change. Functional and formal perspectives, Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 2007.10.1093/oso/9780199267040.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gelderen, Elly van, The linguistic cycle. Language change and the language faculty, Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 2011.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy, Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement, in: Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and topic, New York, Academic Press, 1976, 149–188.Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy, Functionalism and grammar, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 1995.10.1075/z.74Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy, On understanding grammar. Revised edition, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 2018.10.1075/z.213Search in Google Scholar

Gutiérrez Rexach, Javier, Rhetorical questions, relevance and scales, Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 11 (1998), 139–155, <https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/16358984.pdf> [last access: 20.03.2019].10.14198/raei.1998.11.11Search in Google Scholar

Han, Chung-Hye, Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions, Lingua 112 (2002), 201–229.10.1016/S0024-3841(01)00044-4Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard, La grammaticalisation de l’interaction, ou Pour une approche polysémique de l’adverbe “bien”, Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 4 (1998), 111–138.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard, The grammaticalization of negative reinforcers in Old and Middle French: a discourse-functional approach, in: Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard/Visconti, Jacqueline (edd.), Current trends in diachronic semantics and pragmatics, Leiden, Brill, 2009, 227–251.10.1163/9789004253216_013Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard/Visconti, Jacqueline, On the diachrony of “reinforced” negation in French and Italian, in: Rossari, Corinne/Ricci, Claudia/Spiridon, Adriana (edd.), Grammaticalization and pragmatics. Facts, approaches, theoretical issues, Leiden, Brill, 2009, 137–171.10.1163/9789004253193_009Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders, The Syntax of Yes and No, Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Israel, Michael, Polarity sensitivity and lexical semantics, Linguistics and Philosophy 19 (1996), 619–666.10.1007/BF00632710Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, Frede, Syntaxe de l’ancien occitan, Tübingen, Niemeyer, 1994.10.1515/9783110936148Search in Google Scholar

Jiajun, Chen, Dialogicity in dialogue: deriving Chinese discourse marker “bieshuo” from the negative imperative, Journal of Pragmatics 110 (2017), 34–49.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.011Search in Google Scholar

Karttunen, Lauri, The syntax and semantics of questions, Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (1977), 3–44.10.1007/BF00351935Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul/Condoravdi, Cleo, Tracking Jespersen’s cycle, in: Janse, Mark/Joseph, Brian D./Ralli, Angela (edd.), Proceedings of the 2^nd International Conference of Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory, Mytilene, University of Patras Press, 2006, 172–197.Search in Google Scholar

Koch, Peter, Frame and contiguity. On the cognitive basis of metonymy and certain types of word-formation, in: Panther, Klaus-Uwe/Radden, Günter (edd.), Metonymy in language and thought, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 1999, 139–167.10.1075/hcp.4.09kocSearch in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred, Bias in commitment space semantics. Declarative questions, negated questions, and question tags, Proceedings of SALT 25, 2015, 328–345 <http://www.journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/SALT/article/view/25.328> [last access: 25.03.2019].10.3765/salt.v25i0.3078Search in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred, Negated polarity questions as denegations of assertions, in: Lee, Chungmin/Kiefer, Ferenc/Krifka, Manfred (edd.), Contrastiveness in information structure, alternatives and scalar implicatures, Cham Switzerland, Springer, 2017, 359–398.10.1007/978-3-319-10106-4_18Search in Google Scholar

Ladd, Robert D., A first look at the semantics and pragmatics of negative questions and tag questions, Chicago Linguistic Society 17 (1981), 164–171, <http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~bob/PAPERS/CLS1981.pdf> [last access: 10/03/2019].Search in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud, Information structure and sentence form: topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents, Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

Larrivée, Pierre, The syntax of pragmatics. The case of presuppositional negatives, Syntaxe et Sémantique 15 (2014), 115–137.10.3917/ss.015.0115Search in Google Scholar

Larrivée, Pierre/Ingham, Richard (edd.), The evolution of negation. Beyond the Jespersen cycle, Berlin/Boston, De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.10.1515/9783110238617Search in Google Scholar

Ledgeway, Adam, Marking presuppositional negation in the dialects of southern Italy, in: Cruschina, Silvio/Hartmann, Katharina/Remberger, Eva-Maria (edd.), Studies on negation: syntax, semantics and variation, Wien, Vienna University Press, 2017, 105–130.10.14220/9783737005609.105Search in Google Scholar

Möhren, Frankwalt, Le renforcement affectif de la négation par l’expression d’une valeur minimale en ancien français, Berlin, De Gruyter, 1980.10.1515/9783111328959Search in Google Scholar

Nølke, Henning, The semantics of polyphony (and the pragmatics of realization), Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 38 (2006), 137–160.10.1080/03740463.2006.10412206Search in Google Scholar

Panther, Klaus-Uwe/Radden, Günter, Motivation in grammar and the lexicon, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 2011.10.1075/hcp.27Search in Google Scholar

Pietrandrea, Paola, Epistemic constructions at work. A corpus study on spoken Italian dialogues, Journal of Pragmatics 128 (2018), 171–191.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.006Search in Google Scholar

Price, Glanville, L’interrogation négative sans “ne”, Studii și cercetări lingvistice 29 (1978), 599–606.Search in Google Scholar

Price, Glanville, “Pas (point)” without “ne” in interrogative clauses, French Language Studies 3 (1993), 191–195.10.1017/S0959269500001745Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Ellen F., The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness, and information-status, in: Thompson, Sandra/Mann, William (edd.), Discourse description. Diverse analyses of a fundraising text, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 1992, 295–325.10.1075/pbns.16.12priSearch in Google Scholar

Radden, Günter/Panther, Klaus-Uwe (edd.), Studies in linguistic motivation, Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Ricketts, Peter T., Concordance de l’occitan médiéval, Turnhout, Brepols, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Roelofsen, Floris/Farkas, Donka F, Polarity particle responses as a window onto the interpretation of questions and assertions, Language 91 (2015), 359–414.10.1353/lan.2015.0017Search in Google Scholar

Rohde, Hannah, Rhetorical questions as redundant questions, San Diego Linguistics Papers 2 (2006), 134–168, <https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4xd7t5ww> [last access: 17.03.2019].Search in Google Scholar

Romero, Maribel/Han, Chung-Hye, Verum focus in negative yes/no questions and Ladd’s “p/p” ambiguity, in: Jackson, Brendan (ed.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic Theory 12, Ithaca, NY, CLC Publications, 2002, 204–224. 10.3765/salt.v12i0.2874Search in Google Scholar

Romero, Maribel/Han, Chung-Hye, On negative “yes”/“no” questions, Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (2004), 609–658.10.1023/B:LING.0000033850.15705.94Search in Google Scholar

Sadock, Jarrold M., Queclaratives, in: Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, Chicago Linguistics Society, 1971, 223–232, <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292524518_Queclaratives> [last access: 18.03.2019].Search in Google Scholar

Sadock, Jarrold M., Toward a linguistic theory of speech acts, New York, Academic Press, 1974.Search in Google Scholar

Schwegler, Armin, Analyticity and syntheticity. A diachronic perspective with special reference to Romance languages, Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter, 1990.10.1515/9783110872927Search in Google Scholar

Schwenter, Scott, Independent “si”-clauses in Spanish. Functions and consequences for insubordination, in: Evans, Nicholas/Watanabe, Honore (edd.), Insubordination, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 2016, 89–112.10.1075/tsl.115.04schSearch in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization, in: Lehmann, Winfred P./Malkiel, Yakov (edd.), Perspectives on historical linguistics, 1982, 245–271.10.1075/cilt.24.09cloSearch in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification, in: Davidse, Kristin/Vandelanotte, Lieven/Cuyckens, Hubert (edd.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, Berlin/New York, De Gruyter Mouton, 2010, 29–71 (= 2010a).Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, Dialogic contexts as motivations for syntactic change, in: Cloutier, Robert A./Hamilton-Brehm, Anne Marie/Kretzschmar, William A. (edd.), Studies in the history of the English language V. Variation and change in English grammar and lexicon: contemporary approaches, Berlin/New York, De Gruyter Mouton, 2010, 11–27 (= 2010b).10.1515/9783110220339.1.11Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, On the function of the epistemic adverbs “surely” and “no doubt” at the left and right peripheries of the clause, in: Beeching, Kate/Detges, Ulrich (edd.), Discourse functions at the left and right periphery. Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change, Leiden, Brill, 2014, 72–91.10.1163/9789004274822_005Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs/Dasher, Richard B., Regularity in semantic change, Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press, 2002.10.1017/CBO9780511486500Search in Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, On the diachrony of negation, in: Horn, Laurence. R. (ed.), The expression of negation, Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter, 2010, 73–101.10.1515/9783110219302.73Search in Google Scholar

Veloudis, Ioannis, Exploiting polar questions for expressive purposes. “Queclaratives” and “whimperatives” in Modern Greek, Lingua 204 (2018), 117–133.10.1016/j.lingua.2017.12.008Search in Google Scholar

Visconti, Jacqueline, From “textual” to “interpersonal”: on the diachrony of the Italian particle “mica”, Journal of Pragmatics 41 (2009), 937–950.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.012Search in Google Scholar

Visconti, Jacqueline, Contesto e co-testo nel mutamento semantico, in: Ferrari, Angela/Lala, Letizia/Stojmenova, Roska (edd.), Testualità. Fondamenti, unità, relazioni, Firenze, Cesati, 2015, 263–271.Search in Google Scholar

Waltereit, Richard/Ulrich Detges, Different functions, different histories. Modal particles and discourse markers from a diachronic point of view, in: Cuenca, Maria Josep (ed.), Contrastive perspectives on discourse markers = Journal of Catalan Linguistics 6 (2007), 61–80.10.5565/rev/catjl.124Search in Google Scholar

White, Peter R.R., Beyond modality and hedging: a dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance, Text & Talk 23 (2003), 259–284, <https://www.grammatics.com/appraisal/textspecial/beyond-modality(white).pdf> [last access: 03.03.2019].10.1515/text.2003.011Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre/Sperber, Dan, Relevance. Communication and cognition, Oxford, Blackwell, ²1995.Search in Google Scholar