Abstract
Essential oils (EOs) of three Iranian cultivated Nepeta species were investigated. The oils were obtained by hydrodistillation of air-dried plant materials at full flowering stage and analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectroscopy (GC/MS). In total, 89 compounds were detected. In over 2 years, a number of constituents were identified in the EO of Nepeta binaloudensis first and second years (26 and 37, respectively), Nepeta cataria (25 and 32, respectively), and Nepeta assurgens (45 and 50, respectively). In the oils of N. binaloudensis, 4a-α,7-α,7a-α-nepetalactone (NL) 59.7% and 1,8-cineole (19.6%) during the first and second years, respectively, were the main constituents. The main components of N. cataria were 4a-α,7-α,7a-β-NL (72.8%) and 4a-α,7-β,7a-α-NL (73.9%) during the first and second years, respectively, and 4a–α,7-α,7a-α-NL (55.5%) and 1,8-cineole (24.1%) during the first and second years, respectively, were the main constituents of N. assurgens. The results showed that NLs isomers and 1,8-cineole were the main components of the oils of three cultivated Nepeta species.
1 Introduction
Nepeta is one of the largest genera of the subfamily Nepetoideae and family Lamiaceae. It comprises approximately 300 species, which are often perennial herbs. Nepeta species are distributed in the central and southern parts of Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. Iran is one of the main centers of diversity for the genus with about 79 species naturally growing in different regions of the country [1], [2], [3]. The genus Nepeta was attributed with a number of pharmacological effects. The application of essential oils (EOs) against microorganisms increased, and it is known that Nepeta oils also have such effects. The EOs of this genus were found to be rich in iridoid monoterpenoids, which exhibited many in vitro/in vivo biological activities including antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, cytostatic, phytotoxic, and repellent properties [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. In general, bioactivities of Nepeta EOs are attributed to the presence of nepetalactones (NLs) that have been used as the phytochemical markers.
In this study, we investigated the EO composition of three cultivated species of Nepeta in 2 years (Nepeta assurgens, Nepeta binaloudensis Jamzad, Nepeta cataria L.), two of which are endemic (Table 1). Briefly, N. assurgens is an herbaceous aromatic plant growing in dry areas of Kerman, Iran. Kerman province is a unique center of medicinal plants in the country. Nepeta binaloudensis is an endemic and rare perennial aromatic herb, which is distributed in a limited area in Binalud Mountains, Khorasan Razavi Province in North-East of Iran [11], which is used as a culinary herb, and N. cataria, the most intensively studied species, is commonly known as catnip or catmint because of its irresistible action on cats.
Nepeta species investigated in this study and their harvesting data.
| Taxon | Collection locality | Collection date and elevation (m) | Herbarium voucher no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nepeta assurgens Hausskn. & Bornm. ex Bornma | Kerman province, Darb-e Behesht, mountain slopes of Bahrasman | 20.09.2017 (3323) | ANRRCIH 8636 |
| Nepeta binaloudensis Jamzada | Razavi Khorassan Province, Zoshk, Binaloud mountains | 29.09.2015 (2400) | FUMH 46489 |
| Nepeta cataria L. | Razavi Khorassan481.89 Province, Mashhad | 20.08.2017 (1010) | FUMH 44565 |
ANRRCKH, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Kerman, Herbarium; FUMH, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Herbarium. aEndemic of Iran.
The biological and chemical diversity, species richness, as well as biological properties greatly promoted the research focusing on this genus [4]. Until now, 143 compounds were identified in the various species of this genus [12], mainly including nepetalactones, β-caryophyllene, caryophyllene oxide, 1,8-cineol, α-humulene, citronellol, linalool, geraniol, geranial, geranyl acetate, spathulenol, citronellyl acetate, germacrene-D, α-pinene, and camphor. However, in a number of Nepeta species, NLs are either present as minor components or are not produced at all. In general, according to EO composition, the various species of Nepeta may be divided into two main groups: in the first group, NLs are the dominant constituents; in the second group, compounds such as 1,8-cineole, caryophyllene, citral derivatives, and α-humulene are dominant [2], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18].
Furthermore, many of these species are considered of horticultural and medicinal interests in arid and semi-arid areas, due to their long flowering period, adaptation to drought conditions, as well as their high EO and phenolic compound contents [6], [19], [20], [21]. However, there are many species and constituents of EO that have not been studied yet.
In plants, the EO composition and secondary metabolite diversity are extremely dependent on environmental factors, such as light, temperature, water, soil salinity, and climatic conditions. Plant collecting from the wild could lead to further loss of genetic diversity and habitat destruction. Some previous studies highlighted the possibility of domestic cultivation of these valuable medicinal plants. Introduction into cultivation under controlled environments represents a great challenge that could modify the content of bioactive phytochemicals and lower the pressure on wild populations [22], [23], [24], [25]. Thus, investigations of new, as well as known plant species from different geographic regions may considerably expand the existing knowledge on the EO-bearing plants [12].
Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the EO composition of three Nepeta species and evaluate the NL isomer content in order to select the most suitable species for domestication and cultivation under the same conditions, and to meet the market and consumer needs.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Plant material
The research was conducted in the Experimental Garden of Agricultural Faculty of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran, in 2016–2018. The seeds of three Nepeta species were collected from Kerman and Mashhad provinces of Iran. The origin of plant material, year of collection, and herbarium voucher are presented in Table 1.
2.2 Cultivation conditions
The seeds were placed at 4 °C for 2 weeks, then sown under greenhouse-controlled conditions with a temperature range of 20°–25 °C and relative humidity of 60 °C (latitude: 36°16′N, longitude: 59°36′E) during the last week of March. The culture bed contained peat moss, cocopeat, and perlite (40:40:20, w:w:w). After about 30 days, seedlings were transplanted into pots of 30-cm height, with the same composition of the first bed; after about 45 days, seedlings were transplanted to the field, on the base of completely randomized design including three replications (1.5×2 m2 plot) in the Experimental Garden of Ferdowsi, University of Mashhad. Based on the climatic conditions, the plants were irrigated to maintain near-field capacity. The characteristics of the field location are reported in Table 2.
Soil characteristics and meteorological conditions of the experimental field where Nepeta species were cultivated.
| Physical and chemical properties | (2016–2017) | (2017–2018) |
|---|---|---|
| Clay % | 26 | 26.5 |
| Silt % | 48 | 49.1 |
| Sand % | 26 | 24 |
| Soil texture | Sandy loam | Sandy loam |
| FCa | 15 | – |
| CCEb | 12.5 | – |
| pH | 7.28 | 7.8 |
| ECc (dSm−1) | 3.70 | 2.21 |
| Organic matter % | 0.78 | – |
| Ca % | 0.08 | – |
| Available N (mg/kg) | 16.5 | 11.8 |
| Available P (mg/kg) | 19.4 | 14.7 |
| Available K (mg/kg) | 334 | 278 |
| Available Mg (ppm) | 11 | – |
| Available Cu (ppm) | 1.27 | – |
| Available Mn (ppm) | 7.92 | – |
| Available Zn (ppm) | 1.93 | – |
| Available Fe (ppm) | 1.51 | – |
| Meteorological data | (2016–2017) | (2017–2018) |
| Altitude (m) | 985 | 985 |
| Annual minimum temperature (°C) | 9.1 | 9.9 |
| Annual maximum temperature(°C) | 22.4 | 23 |
| Annual mean temperature (°C) | 15.7 | 17.2 |
| Absolute humidity mean (%) | 46 | 44 |
| Annual precipitations (mm) | 308.1 | 185.9 |
| Number of ice days | 17 | 61 |
| Number of rainy days | 97 | 67 |
aField capacity. bCalcium carbonate equivalent. cElectrical conductivity.
2.3 Extraction of the EOs
During the summer, aerial parts of the plants were harvested at full flowering stage in the first and second year (about 120 and 360 days after cultivation) of their establishment on the farm. Plants were harvested at 5 cm above the soil level and then air-dried in the shade.
The EOs from the dry plants (30 g) of two cuts, during the first and second years, were extracted by hydro-distillation for 4 h using a Clevenger apparatus (Ashk shishe Co., Tehran, Iran), and the EO yield percentage was recorded as %v/w of plant dry weight. Sodium sulfate anhydrous purchased from Sigma (St Gallen, Switzerland) was added for removing water from the isolated EOs that was stored in a refrigerator in dark bottles until analyses.
2.4 Gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectroscopy (GC/MS) (GC/MS) analysis
The composition analysis of the essential oil samples of the first and second years was carried out using a GC–MS instrument with the following specifications: GC analysis was carried out using an Agilent-Technologies-7890A gas chromatograph equipped with an HP-5 column (30 m×0.32 mm ID) and film thickness of 0.25 μm. The oven temperature was from 60 °C and then programmed to 210 °C at a flow rate of 3 °C/min, then from 210 °C to 240 °C at 20 °C/min and held for 8.5 min; injector and detector (FID) temperature were 280 °C and 290 °C, respectively; N2 was used as carrier gas with a linear velocity of 1 mL/min, split ratio was 1:50.
GC/MS analyses were carried out on GC/MS (Agilent Technologies-5975C-MS, 7890A-GC) equipped with HP-5MS capillary column (30 m×0.25 mm ID) and film thickness of 0.25 μm. The oven temperature was programmed as follows: from 60 °C to 210 °C with a rate of 3 °C/min, then increased to 240 °C with a rate of 20 °C/min, and the final temperature was kept for 8.5 min; run “time” was 60 min. The electron ionization energy was 70 eV in the electronic ionization (EI) mode, ion source 230 °C, detector MS, interface line temperature 280 °C, injector 280 °C, split ratio 1:50, carrier gas He 1 mL/min, mass range 50–480 amu.
The percentages of compounds were calculated by the area normalization method. The components of the oil were identified by comparison of retention indices (RI, HP-5) in their mass spectra with those of an Adams library and sorted in NIST and Wiley libraries or with authentic compounds reported in the literature. Retention indices were determined using retention times of n-alkane that were injected after the EO under the same chromatographic conditions [26].
2.5 Statistical analysis of EO yields
Mean values and variance analysis of EO yields were calculated according to a completely randomized design including three replications for each year. Statistical analysis of the obtained results was performed by (JMP software ve. 9.0.3). Significant differences among the samples were evaluated by Duncan test at the probability level (p≤0.05).
3 Results
3.1 EO yields
Results of the EO yields from the three Nepeta species for 2 years are reported in Table 3. The EOs extracted from the N. assurgens and N. binaloudensis species were yellow, whereas the N. cataria was whitish-yellow in color. There were significant differences in the EO yield among the species. The highest EO yields were obtained from N. assurgens in 2 years (0.51% and 0.75% in the first and second years, respectively). The yields of N. cataria were 0.32% (first year) and 0.29% (second year), whereas N. binaloudensis yielded the lowest amounts (0.23% and 0.18% in the first and second years, respectively) (Table 3).
Analysis of variances and means of essential oil yields among cultivated N. binaloudensis, N. cataria, and N. assurgens species during 2016/2018.
| Sources | Df | Means of squares |
|---|---|---|
| Essential oil yield (%) | ||
| 1st year | ||
| Species | 2 | 0.0613a |
| Replications | 2 | 0.0085 |
| Error | 4 | 0.0010 |
| 2nd year | ||
| Species | 2 | 0.2585a |
| Replications | 2 | 0.0009 |
| Error | 4 | 0.0080 |
| Cultivation year | Species | Yield (%) |
| 1st year | N. binaloudensis | 0.23b |
| N. cataria | 0.32c | |
| N. assurgens | 0.51a | |
| 2nd year | N. binaloudensis | 0. 18b |
| N. cataria | 0.29c | |
| N. assurgens | 0.74a | |
Means having the same letter within the same column are not significantly different. aSignificant at p≤0.05.
3.2 The composition of EOs
The constituents of the Nepeta EOs analyzed by GC and GC-MS are reported in Table 4. In total, 89 constituents were identified. During 2 years of cultivation, a number of constituents were identified in the EOs of N. binaloudensis in the first and second years (26 and 37, respectively), N. cataria (25 and 32, respectively) and N. assurgens (45 and 50, respectively) The results indicated that there were differences between the species in the first and second years in EO composition and number of compounds. The EOs were rich in monoterpenoids, as other Nepeta species previously reported. In the oils of N. binaloudensis, 4a-α,7-α,7a-α-NL (1.2–59.7%) and 1,8-cineole (14.8–19.6%) were the main components in the 2 years. Other abundant constituents included β-pinene (10.4%), p-cymene (9.7%), α-terpineol (7%), γ-terpinene (4.5%), α-pinene (4.33%), terpinen-4-ol (4.2%), δ-terpineol (3.61%), and thymol (1.7%) in the first year. Thymol, carvacrol (0.6%), α-copaene (0.2%), β-copaene (0.1%), β-bourbonene (1.0%), 4a-α,7-α,7a-β-NL (NL2) (0.9%), germacrene-D (0.2%), γ-muurolene (0.3%), and γ-terpinene were identified only in the first year, whereas 4a-α,7-β,7a-α-NL (0.9%) was detected only during the second year. The EOs of N. cataria were rich in NL isomers, while in the second year, the main compound was 4a-α,7-α,7a-β-NL (72.8%). In general, 4a-α,7-β,7a-α-NL (2.5–73.9%) and 4a-α,7-α,7a-α-NL (17.9–19.8%) in the first and second years, respectively, were quantified as the main components in this species. In the EOs of N. assurgens, 4a-α,7-α,7a-α-NL (34.7–55.5%) and 1,8-cineole (24.1–16.8%) were the main constituents in the first and second years, respectively. Other compounds included β-pinene (3.9–4.6%), trans-carveol (6.7–2.2%), NL2 (5.7% only in the first year), and 4a-α,7-β,7a-α–NL (2.7%) only in the second year.
Number and percentage of the essential oil constituents from the three cultivated Nepeta species in 2 years.
| No. | Compounds | Retention index | % | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. binaloudensis | N. cataria | N. assurgens | |||||||
| RIa | RIb | 1st year | 2nd year | 1st year | 2nd year | 1st year | 2nd year | ||
| 1 | (E)-2-Hexenal | 948 | 848 | – | – | – | 0.1 | – | – |
| 2 | Tricyclene | 919 | 919 | tr | – | – | – | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| 3 | α-Thujene | 925 | 926 | 1.2 | 0.5 | tr | tr | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 4 | α-Pinene | 932 | 933 | 4.3 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 3.6 |
| 5 | Camphene | 947 | 948 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | tr | tr | 0.1 |
| 6 | Thuja-2,4(10)-diene | 953 | 953 | – | – | – | – | – | tr |
| 7 | Sabinene | 973 | 972 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.7 |
| 8 | β-Pinene | 978 | 977 | 10.4 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 3.9 | 4.6 |
| 9 | 3-Octanone | 985 | 985 | – | – | tr | tr | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| 10 | Myrcene | 992 | 990 | 1.6 | 1.4 | tr | tr | 0.6 | 2.8 |
| 11 | n-Decane | 1000 | 1000 | 6.2 | 0.1 | tr | 0.1 | 3.2 | – |
| 12 | α-Phellandrene | 1006 | 1004 | 0.3 | 0.2 | – | – | – | – |
| 13 | α-Terpinene | 1016 | 1017 | 2.7 | 0.3 | – | tr | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| 14 | p-Cymene | 1024 | 1024 | 9.7 | 4.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.1 |
| 15 | Limonene | 1029 | 1028 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| 16 | 1,8-Cineole | 1030 | 1033 | 14.8 | 19.6 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 24.1 | 16.8 |
| 17 | (Z)-β-Ocimene | 1037 | 10.36 | 0.9 | 0.2 | – | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.9 |
| 18 | (E)-β-Ocimene | 1046 | 1046 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – | 0.1 | – | 0.2 |
| 19 | γ-Terpinene | 1057 | 1057 | 4.5 | – | – | tr | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| 20 | cis-Sabinene hydrate | 1067 | 1066 | 0.3 | 0.5 | – | – | – | 0.2 |
| 21 | trans-Linalool oxide | 1071 | 1071 | – | – | – | – | 0.1 | tr |
| 22 | Terpinolene | 1088 | 1089 | 1.3 | 0.3 | tr | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| 23 | Linalool | 1098 | 1099 | 1.8 | 1.2 | – | tr | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| 24 | 3-Methyl butyl 2-methyl butanoate | 1104 | 1101 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – | – | – | 0.2 |
| 25 | n-Nonanal | 1105 | 1105 | – | – | tr | tr | – | – |
| 26 | Isopentyl isovalerate | 1106 | 1106 | tr | – | – | – | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 27 | cis-Rose oxide | 1111 | 1111 | – | – | – | – | 0.1 | – |
| 28 | endo-Fenchol | 1113 | 1113 | – | – | – | – | 0.1 | – |
| 29 | cis-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 1121 | 1121 | 0.6 | 0.1 | – | – | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| 30 | α-Campholenal | 1126 | 1126 | 0.2 | – | – | – | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 31 | allo-Ocimene | 1128 | 1128 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.1 |
| 32 | trans-Pinocarveol | 1138 | 1136 | – | 0.1 | – | tr | 0.9 | 0.2 |
| 33 | Nopinone | 1137 | 1137 | – | 0.2 | – | – | 0.1 | – |
| 34 | trans-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 1138 | 1138 | – | 0.6 | – | – | – | – |
| 35 | Geijerene | 1141 | 1141 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.1 |
| 36 | Camphor | 1145 | 1144 | – | tr | tr | 0.1 | – | – |
| 37 | trans-Verbenol | 1145 | 1146 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.1 |
| 38 | Citronellal | 1154 | 1152 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.1 |
| 39 | Pinocarvone | 1162 | 1162 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – | tr | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 40 | δ-Terpineol | 1166 | 1166 | 3.6 | 1.1 | – | tr | 0.2 | 0.9 |
| 41 | Terpinen-4-ol | 1178 | 1177 | 4.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | – | 0.7 | 0.4 |
| 42 | p-Cymen-8-ol | 1185 | 1185 | 0.3 | 0.1 | – | – | 0.2 | – |
| 43 | Cryptone | 1186 | 1186 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 44 | α-Terpineol | 1190 | 1190 | 7.0 | 2.5 | tr | – | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| 45 | Methyl salicylate | 1194 | 1194 | – | – | – | 0.1 | – | – |
| 46 | Myrtenal | 1196 | 1196 | 0.7 | 0.1 | tr | – | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| 47 | n-Dodecane | 1205 | 1201 | 3.5 | tr | – | – | 2.6 | – |
| 48 | trans-Piperitol | 1207 | 1207 | 0.2 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 49 | trans-Carveol | 1219 | 1218 | – | – | – | 0.8 | 6.7 | 2.2 |
| 50 | n-Hexyl 2-methyl butanoate | 1236 | 1236 | 0.2 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 51 | Neral | 1238 | 1240 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.1 |
| 52 | Carvone | 1244 | 1244 | – | – | – | – | 0.1 | tr |
| 53 | Geraniol | 1254 | 1255 | – | – | – | tr | – | 0.1 |
| 54 | Geranial | 1268 | 1269 | – | 0.1 | – | – | – | – |
| 55 | Bornyl acetate | 1287 | 1287 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 56 | p-Cymen-7-ol | 1290 | 1290 | – | – | – | – | tr | – |
| 57 | Thymol | 1290 | 1290 | 1.7 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 58 | Carvacrol | 1297 | 1297 | 0.6 | – | – | 0.1 | – | |
| 59 | δ-Elemene | 1336 | 1336 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.1 |
| 60 | 4a-α,7-α,7a-α-Nepetalactone | 1358 | 1360 | 1.2 | 59.7 | 17.9 | 19.8 | 34.7 | 55.5 |
| 61 | Neryl acetate | 1366 | 1366 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 62 | Methyl p-anisate | 1374 | 1374 | – | – | 0.1 | |||
| 63 | α-Copaene | 1376 | 1376 | 0.2 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 64 | β-Bourbonene | 1384 | 1384 | 1.0 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 65 | Geranyl acetone | 1386 | 1387 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 66 | 4a-α,7-α,7a-β-Nepetalactone | 1388 | 1388 | 0.9 | – | 72.8 | – | 5.7 | – |
| 67 | 4a-α,7-β,7a-α-Nepetalactone | 1391 | 1392 | – | 0.9 | 2.5 | 73.9 | – | 2.7 |
| 68 | n-Tetradecane | 1401 | 1402 | 1.4 | – | – | – | 1.4 | – |
| 69 | Methyl eugenol | 1407 | 1407 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.1 |
| 70 | β-Funebrene | 1413 | 1413 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 71 | (E)-Caryophyllene | 1419 | 1421 | – | – | 0.7 | – | 0.2 | 0.5 |
| 72 | β-Copaene | 1427 | 1427 | 0.1 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 73 | trans-α-Bergamotene | 1738 | 1438 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 74 | (E)-β-Farnesene | 1447 | 1447 | – | – | 0.4 | – | – | – |
| 75 | α-Humulene | 1545 | 1454 | – | – | 0.1 | tr | – | 0.1 |
| 76 | allo-Aromadendrene | 1460 | 1460 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 77 | (E)-β-Farnesene | 1458 | 1458 | – | – | – | 1 | – | tr |
| 78 | γ-Muurolene | 1475 | 1475 | 0.3 | – | – | – | – | |
| 79 | Germacrene D | 1483 | 1483 | 0.2 | – | – | – | – | 0.1 |
| 80 | Neryl isobutanoate | 1486 | 1486 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 81 | (E)-β-Ionone | 1485 | 1485 | 0.2 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 82 | Valencene | 1493 | 1493 | 0.1 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 83 | Bicyclogermacrene | 1496 | 1496 | – | – | – | – | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| 84 | (Z)-α-Bisabolene | 1510 | 1510 | 0.3 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 85 | δ-Cadinene | 1524 | 1524 | 0.4 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 86 | Spathulenol | 1578 | 1578 | – | 0.1 | – | tr | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 87 | Caryophyllene oxide | 1583 | 1583 | – | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| 88 | Humulene epoxide II | 1610 | 1610 | – | – | tr | – | – | – |
| 89 | 6,10,14-trimethyl-2-Pentadecanone | 1846 | 1846 | – | – | – | – | 0.4 | – |
| Total identified (%) | 92.4% | 95% | 99% | 98.3% | 96.6% | 99.8% | |||
| Number of compounds | 26 | 37 | 25 | 32 | 45 | 50 | |||
tr, traces (<0.05%). aRetention index in the first year. bRetention index in the second year determined on HP-5MS capillary column.
4 Discussion
4.1 EO yields
The yields of EOs from the studied Nepeta species were from 0.18% (N. binaludensi) to 0.79% (N. assurgens). In previous studies, EO yields of N. cataria were in the range of 0.1–2.5%, in plants from different regions (Table 5), whereas the yield of N. binaludensis collected in Iran was 0.74% [11]. Therefore, the previously reported EO yields from N. cataria were remarkably higher: 2.5% [19] and 1.02% [8] from plants cultivated in Iran and Morocco, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, the yields of EO from N. assurgens were not reported previously. Noteworthy, the variability of EO yields during the 2 years may be attributed to environmental factors possibly modifying photosynthate allocation to secondary metabolic pathways [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25].
Essential oil yields of Nepeta species reported in previous studies.
| Species | Condition | Region | Oil | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. cataria | collected | Moroccan | 1.02% | [8] |
| N. cataria | collected | Iran | 0.3–0.9% | [9] |
| N. binaludensis | collected | Iran | 0.5% | [11] |
| N. cataria | cultivated | Lithuania | 5.94 mg/g | [12] |
| N. cataria | cultivated | Iran | 2.5% | [19] |
| N. cataria | cultivated | Egypt | 0.117–0.253% | [20] |
| N. cataria | cultivated | Egypt | 0.19–2.5% | [21] |
| N. cataria | collected | Turkey | 0.74% | [27] |
| N. cataria | collected | Poland | 0.45–0.80% | [28] |
4.2 The composition of EOs
Biological activities of NLs were thoroughly investigated, and some Nepeta species were previously introduced into cultivation due to their horticultural and medicinal values [16], [19], [20], [21]. Most EOs of the Nepeta species contain NLs as the main components, though different oil compositions were identified among the different species. In the present study, three types of NL isomers, 4a-α,7-α,7a-α-NL, 4a-α,7-α,7a-β-NL, and 4a-α,7-β,7a-α-NL, were identified. All these NL isomers were the dominant components of the oils of N. cataria, whereas in N. assurgens and N. binaloudensis, other constituents were significantly present besides 4a-α,7-α,7a-α-NL, in particular, 1,8-cineole.
The EO of the composition of various Nepeta species grown in Iran was extensively investigated [29], [30], [31], [32], [33]. The essential oil of N. binaludensis, an endemic species to Iran, was studied by Mohammadpour et al. [30] who identified 65 components including 1,8-cineol (68.31%), α-terpineol (5.24%), β-pinene (4.7%), δ-terpineol (2.57%), and α-pinene (1.54%) [30]. The most abundant constituents in N. binaludensis investigated by Rustaiyan and Nadji [32] were 1,8-cineole (42%), nepetalactone (25%), linalol (4%), α-terpineol (4%), and β-pinene (3%). According to the literature, the EO composition of N. assurgens, an Iranian endemic species was previously reported only by Moradalizadeh et al. [31] who identified 4aα,7α,7aα-NL, 4aα,7α,7aβ-NL, 1, 8-cineole, α-pinene, β-pinene, and α-terpineol as the main components.
The differences between wild and cultivated medicinal plants growing in various regions were reported in terms of EO composition. The chemical profiles shown in the present study are quite similar to the ones previously reported in other studies, except for the amounts of some compounds. For instance, the main EO constituents of N. cataria were 4a-α,7-α,7a-α-NL, and 4a-α,7-β,7a-α-NL, in the range of 78–91%, in plants cultivated in Iran [19], and 20.81–35.15%, in plants cultivated in Egypt [20], [21]. In the EO from N. cataria cultivated in Lithuania, 4aα,7α,7aβ-NL (50.16%) was the dominant constituent, in addition to 4aα,7α,7aα-NL (35.64%) and 4aα,7β,7aα-NL (1.80%), which represented 87.60% of the total EO volatiles [12]. Again, NLs were the major compounds in the EO of N. cataria from Turkey, Poland, and Morocco, but their percentages were different [19].
It is well known that variability in quality and quantity of secondary metabolites in plants is mainly influenced by the environmental factors possibly modifying the expression levels of the key genes/enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of the EO constituents. Therefore, introduction of Nepeta species into the cultivation under different growing conditions represents a promising perspective in the field of medicinal plants. Mashhad province is a region with semi-arid weather and an annual rainfall less than 200 mm; in these conditions, water deficit and high temperatures represent the limiting factors for Nepeta grown in the summer. Therefore, timing of sowing as well as management of nutrients and water could improve the economic Nepeta production.
In addition, the phytochemical differences could also be due to the existence of different Nepeta chemotypes [18], [19], [20]. Accordingly, on the basis of our results, N. binaloudensis and N. assurgens are characterized by high percentages of and NLs and 1,8-cineole, whereas N. cataria EO was composed mainly of NLs.
5 Conclusions
One of the main aims of local and global medicinal and aromatic plant market is to take a decisive step toward the modern, cost effective, and sustainable plant cultivation and production, particularly in Iran. In this context, the environmental conditions of Mashhad (Iran) are suitable to cultivate Nepeta species and produce EOs with peculiar aromatic traits.
Although the yields of EOs were not rather high, in general, 89 compounds were identified, which is a remarkably higher number compared with the previous reports [12]. Nepeta assurgens with high contents of 4a-α,7-α,7a-α-NL and 1,8-cineole was not reported previously. Evaluation of EOs of Nepeta species in the present study confirmed information on the existence of two main chemotypes in the Nepeta genus according to the previous studies. In Iran, cultivated N. cataria can be assigned to the NL chemotype, whereas N. binaloudensis and N. assurgens can be assigned to 1,8-cineole chemotype.
References
1. Hedge C, Wendelbo P, Aellen P. Studies in the Flora of Afghanistan. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian University Press, 1964.Suche in Google Scholar
2. Jamzad Z. Flora of Iran, Lamiaceae. Iran: Research Institute of Forest and Rangelands, Tehran Press, 2012.Suche in Google Scholar
3. Amirmohammadi FZ, Azizi M, Neamati SH, Memariani F, Murphy R. Nutlet micromorphology of Iranian Nepeta (Lamiaceae) species. Nord J Bot 2019;37:8–02441.10.1111/njb.02441Suche in Google Scholar
4. Formisano C, Rigano D, Senatore F. Chemical constituents and biological activities of Nepeta species. Chem Biodivers 2011;8:1783–818.10.1002/cbdv.201000191Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Mihaylova D, Georgieva L, Pavlov A. In vitro antioxidant activity and phenolic composition of Nepeta cataria L. extracts. Int J Appl Sci Technol 2013;1:74–9.Suche in Google Scholar
6. Stappen A, Ali N, Tabanca IA, Khan J, Wanner VK, Gochev V, et al. Antimicrobial and repellent activity of the essential oils of two lamiaceae cultivated in western himalaya. Curr Bioact Compd 2015;11:23–30.10.2174/157340721101150804143954Suche in Google Scholar
7. Skoric M, Gligorijevic N, Cavic M, Ristic M, Misic D, Radulovic S. Cytotoxic activity of Nepeta rtanjensis Diklic and Milojevic essential oil and its mode of action. Ind Crops Prod 2017;100:163–70.10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.02.027Suche in Google Scholar
8. Zenasni L, Bouidida H, Hancali A, Boudhane A, Amzal H, Idrissi A, et al. The essentials oils and antimicrobial activity of four Nepeta species from Morocco. J Med Plants Res 2008;2:111–4.Suche in Google Scholar
9. Zomorodian K, Saharkhiz MJ, Shariati S, Pakshir K, Rahimi MJ, Khashei R. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activities of essential oils from Nepeta cataria L. against common causes of food-borne infections. ISRN Pharm 2012;2012:591953.10.5402/2012/591953Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
10. Joshi N, Sah GC. GC–MS analysis and antimicrobial activity of essential oil of Nepeta coerulescens. Int J Res 2014;3:68–71.10.9790/5736-0634951Suche in Google Scholar
11. Nadjafi F, Koocheki A, Honermeier B, Asili J. Autecology, ethnomedicinal and phytochemical studies of Nepeta binaloudensis Jamzad a highly endangered medicinal plant of Iran. J Essent Oil-Bear Plants 2009;12:97–110.10.1080/0972060X.2009.10643699Suche in Google Scholar
12. Baranauskienė R, Bendžiuvienė V, Ragažinskienė O, Venskutonis PR. Essential oil composition of five Nepeta species cultivated in Lithuania and evaluation of their bioactivities, toxicity and antioxidant potential of hydrodistillation residues. Food Chem Toxicol 2019;129:269–80.10.1016/j.fct.2019.04.039Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Asgarpanah J, Sarabian S, Ziarati P. Essential oil of Nepeta genus (Lamiaceae) from Iran: a review. J Essent Oil Res 2014;26:1–12.10.1080/10412905.2013.851040Suche in Google Scholar
14. Sharma A, Cannoo DS. Phytochemical composition of essential oils isolated from different species of genus Nepeta of Labiatae family: a review. Pharmacophore 2013;4:181–211.Suche in Google Scholar
15. Ashraf B, Ramak P, Ezatpour B, Talei GR. Biological activity and chemical composition of the essential oil of Nepeta cataria L. J Res Pharm 2019;23:336–43.10.12991/jrp.2019.141Suche in Google Scholar
16. Gkinis G, Iliopoulou D, Roussis V, Tzakou O. Chemical composition and biological activity of Nepeta parnassica oils and isolated Nepetalactones. Z Naturforsch C J Biosci 2003;58:681–6.10.1515/znc-2003-9-1015Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Nestorovic J, Misic D, Siler B, Sokovic M, Glamoclija J, Ciric A, et al. Nepetalactone content in shoot cultures of three endemic Nepeta species and the evaluation of their antimicrobial activity. Fitoterapia 2010;81:621–6.10.1016/j.fitote.2010.03.007Suche in Google Scholar
18. Kumar V, Mathela CS. Chemical constituents of essential oils of Himalayan Nepeta ciliaris Benth and Senecio nudicaulis Buch-Ham. Ex D. Don. J Essent Oil Res 2018;30:207–13.10.1080/10412905.2018.1425642Suche in Google Scholar
19. Hadi N, Shojaeiyan A, Sefidkon F, Jafari AA. Quantitative and qualitative study of essential oil in some accessions of Nepeta spp and determination of essential oil components ability in intra and inter-specific relationships analysis. Iran J Hortic Sci 2016;49:601–12.Suche in Google Scholar
20. Said-Al Ahl H, Naguib NY, Hussein MS. Evaluation growth and essential oil content of catmint and lemon catnip plants as new cultivated medicinal plants in Egypt. Ann Agric Sci 2018;63:201–5.10.1016/j.aoas.2018.11.005Suche in Google Scholar
21. Ibrahim ME, El-Sawi SA, Ibrahim FM. Nepeta cataria L, one of the promising aromatic plants in Egypt: seed germination, growth and essential oil production. J Mater Environ Sci 2017;8:1990–5.Suche in Google Scholar
22. Yang L, Wen KS, Ruan X, Zhao YX, Wei F, Wang Q. Response of plant secondary metabolites to environmental factors. Molecules 2018;23:762–80.10.3390/molecules23040762Suche in Google Scholar
23. Ncube B, Finnie JF, Van Staden J. Quality from the field: the impact of environmental factors as quality determinants in medicinal plants. S Afr J Bot 2012;82:11–20.10.1016/j.sajb.2012.05.009Suche in Google Scholar
24. Horvath G, Szabo LG, Héthelyi E, Lemberkovics E. Essential oil composition of three cultivated Thymus chemotypes from Hungary. J Essent Oil Res 2006;18:315–7.10.1080/10412905.2006.9699101Suche in Google Scholar
25. Lubbe R, Verpoorte R. Cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants for specialty industrial materials. Ind Crops Prod 2011;34:785–801.10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.01.019Suche in Google Scholar
26. Adams RA. Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/quadropole mass spectroscopy. Corp Carol Stream, IL: Allured Press, 2011.Suche in Google Scholar
27. Adiguzel A, Ozer H, Sokmen M, Gulluce M, Sokmen A, Kilic H, et al. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of the essential oil and methanol extract of Nepeta cataria. Pol J Microbiol 2009;58:69–76.Suche in Google Scholar
28. Klimek B, Modnicki D. Terpenoids and sterols from Nepeta cataria L. var. citriodora (Lamiaceae). Acta Pol Pharm 2005;62:231–5.Suche in Google Scholar
29. Dabiri M, Sefidkon F. Chemical composition of Nepeta crassifolia Boiss. & Buhse oil from Iran. Flavour Fragr J 2003;18:225–7.10.1002/ffj.1199Suche in Google Scholar
30. Mohammadpour N, Emami SA, Asili J. Identification of volatile oil components of Nepeta binaludensis Jamzad by GC-MS and 13C-NMR. Methods and evaluation of its antimicrobial activity. J Essent Oil-Bear Plants 2013;16:102–7.10.1080/0972060X.2013.764206Suche in Google Scholar
31. Moradalizadeh M, Akhgar MR, Jafari S. Chemical composition of the essential oil of Nepeta assurgens Hausskn. Bornm. Trends Modern Chem 2012;2:31–5.Suche in Google Scholar
32. Rustaiyan A, Nadji K. Composition of the essential oils of Nepeta ispahanica Boiss and Nepeta binaludensis Jamzad from Iran. Flavour Fragr J 1999;14:35–7.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1026(199901/02)14:1<35::AID-FFJ776>3.0.CO;2-NSuche in Google Scholar
33. Sefidkon F, Jamzad Z, Mirza M. Chemical composition of the essential oil of five Iranian Nepeta species (N. crispa, N. mahanensis, N. ispahanica, N. eremophila and N. rivularis). Flavour Fragr J 2006;21:764–7.10.1002/ffj.1668Suche in Google Scholar
©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Essential oils
- Letter
- Bioinsecticides based on plant essential oils: a short overview
- Review Articles
- The application of essential oils as a next-generation of pesticides: recent developments and future perspectives
- Selected essential oils and their mechanisms for therapeutic use against public health disorders. An overview
- Potential use of essential oils to enhance heat tolerance in plants
- Essential oils of spontaneous species of the genus Lavandula from Portugal: a brief review
- Research Articles
- Analysis of the essential oil composition of three cultivated Nepeta species from Iran
- Effect of geographical origin on yield and composition of cone essential oils of Cedrus libani A. Rich. growing in Lebanese protected areas and variability assessment in comparison with literature survey
- Helichrysum araxinum Takht. ex Kirp. grown in Italy: volatiloma composition and in vitro antimicrobial activity
- Composition of the essential oil of Satureja metastasiantha: a new species for the flora of Turkey
- Bergamot essential oil nanoemulsions: antimicrobial and cytotoxic activity
- Toxicology study of fraxinellone as ovicidal agents against Mythimna separata Walker and Bombyx mori Linaeus
- Rapid Communication
- Essential oil composition of three Cryptocarya species from Malaysia
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Essential oils
- Letter
- Bioinsecticides based on plant essential oils: a short overview
- Review Articles
- The application of essential oils as a next-generation of pesticides: recent developments and future perspectives
- Selected essential oils and their mechanisms for therapeutic use against public health disorders. An overview
- Potential use of essential oils to enhance heat tolerance in plants
- Essential oils of spontaneous species of the genus Lavandula from Portugal: a brief review
- Research Articles
- Analysis of the essential oil composition of three cultivated Nepeta species from Iran
- Effect of geographical origin on yield and composition of cone essential oils of Cedrus libani A. Rich. growing in Lebanese protected areas and variability assessment in comparison with literature survey
- Helichrysum araxinum Takht. ex Kirp. grown in Italy: volatiloma composition and in vitro antimicrobial activity
- Composition of the essential oil of Satureja metastasiantha: a new species for the flora of Turkey
- Bergamot essential oil nanoemulsions: antimicrobial and cytotoxic activity
- Toxicology study of fraxinellone as ovicidal agents against Mythimna separata Walker and Bombyx mori Linaeus
- Rapid Communication
- Essential oil composition of three Cryptocarya species from Malaysia