Startseite Engaging with Li 禮 in the European Philosophy Classroom
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Engaging with Li 禮 in the European Philosophy Classroom

  • Geir Sigurðsson
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. Mai 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

For students of Western philosophy, the Confucian li 禮, conventionally translated as “ritual”, arguably comes across as the weakest link in the Confucian philosophy qua philosophy. Students exposed to it for the first time may find it unattractive, antiquarian, and therefore entirely unphilosophical. This essay suggests four helpful approaches to the introduction of li in the European classroom: 1. The “expiative,” emphasizing the much wider scope of li than implied in the conventional gloss “ritual”; 2. the “reassessed ritual,” providing a philosophical re-evaluation of the complex nature of “ritual” in light of relatively recent philosophical schools of thought; 3. the “internal critical,” analyzing the critical discussion of li by other philosophical schools of ancient China; and, lastly, 4. the “Confucian theory,” unfolding the sophisticated Confucian exposition of li as an integral aspect of personal cultivation and social integration, which may include and combine all other three approaches.

Literature

Roger T. Ames, Confucian Role Ethics: A Vocabulary, Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press 2011.10.2307/j.ctt1p9wqgmSuche in Google Scholar

Analects 論語, in: Chinese Text Project, Pre-Qin and Han, Confucianism, https://ctext.org/analects. Accessed: February 20, 2024.Suche in Google Scholar

Zygmunt Bauman, Liquid Modernity, Cambridge and Malden: Blackwell 2000.Suche in Google Scholar

Catherine Bell, Ritual. Perspectives and Dimensions, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1997. Suche in Google Scholar

Pierre Bourdieu, The Logic of Practice, tr. by Richard Nice, Stanford: Stanford University Press 1990.Suche in Google Scholar

Peter Burke, “The Repudiation of Ritual in Early Modern Europe,” in: The Historical Anthropology of Early Modern Italy: Essays on Perception and Communication, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1987.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen Lai, The Core Values of Chinese Civilization, tr. by Paul J. D’Ambrosio, Robert Carleo III, Chad Meyers and Joanna Guzowska, Singapore: Springer 2017.10.1007/978-981-10-3367-4_2Suche in Google Scholar

Daodejing 道德經, in: Chinese Text Project, Pre-Qin and Han, Ancient Classics, Daoism, https://ctext.org/dao-de-jing. Accessed: February 20, 2024.Suche in Google Scholar

Linda Ekstrom, and Richard D. Hecht, “Ritual Performance and Ritual Practice: Teaching the Multiple Forms and Dimensions of Ritual”, in: Teaching Ritual, ed. by Catherine Bell, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press 2007, pp. 229–250.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195176452.003.0019Suche in Google Scholar

Duoyi Fei, “From “the mind isolated with the body” to “the mind being embodied”: Contemporary approaches to the philosophy of the body,” Cultures of Science, vol. 3 (3), 2020, pp. 206–219.10.1177/2096608320960242Suche in Google Scholar

Herbert Fingarette, Confucius – The Secular as Sacred, New York et al.: Harper & Row 1972.Suche in Google Scholar

Rongjin Ge 葛荣晋, Zhongguo zhexue fanchou tonglun 中国哲学范畴通论, Beijing: Shoudu shifan daxue chubanshe 2001.Suche in Google Scholar

Kurtis Hagen, The Philosophy of Xunzi. A Reconstruction, Chicago and La Salle: Open Court 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

David L. Hall, and Roger T. Ames, Thinking Through Confucius, Albany: State University of New York Press 1987.10.1515/9781438405537Suche in Google Scholar

Byung-Chul Han, Vom Verschwinden der Rituale. Eine Topologie der Gegenwart, Berlin: Ullstein 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

Han Feizi, in: Chinese Text Project, Pre-Qin and Han, Ancient Classics, Legalism, https://ctext.org/hanfeizi. Accessed: February 29, 2024.Suche in Google Scholar

Theodore W. Jennings, “On Ritual Knowledge,” The Journal of Religion, vol 26, 1982, pp. 111–127.10.1086/486929Suche in Google Scholar

Tao Jiang, Origins of Moral-Political Philosophy in Early China: Contestation of Humaneness, Justice, and Personal Freedom, New York: Oxford University Press 2021.10.1093/oso/9780197603475.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Jin Jingfang 金景芳, “Tan li 谈礼,” in: Ershi shiji zhongguo lixue yanjiu lunji 二十世纪中国礼研究论集, ed. by Chen Qitai 陈其泰, Guo Weichuan 郭伟川, and Zhou Shaochuan 周少川, Beijing: Xueyuan chubanshe 1998, pp. 1–12.Suche in Google Scholar

James Legge, “Translator’s Introduction,” in: Li Chi: Book of Rites, tr. by James Legge, vol. 1, New York: University Books Inc. 1967, pp. 1–60.Suche in Google Scholar

Simon Leys, “An Introduction to Confucius,” in: The Hall of Uselessness: Collected Essays, New York: New York Review Books 2013, pp. 314–328.Suche in Google Scholar

Liji 禮記, in: Chinese Text Project, Pre-Qin and Han, Confucianism, https://ctext.org/liji. Accessed: February 27, 2024. Suche in Google Scholar

Maurice Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible, tr. by Alphonso Lingis, Evanston: Northwestern University Press 1968.Suche in Google Scholar

Mozi 墨子, in: Chinese Text Project, Pre-Qin and Han, Mohism, https://ctext.org/mozi. Accessed: February 22, 2024.Suche in Google Scholar

Heiner Roetz, Konfuzius, Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck 1998.Suche in Google Scholar

Hartmut Rosa, Resonanz: Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung, Berlin: Suhrkamp 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

Chris Shilling, “The Rise of Body Studies and the Embodiment of Society: A Review of the Field,” Horizons in Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 2 (1), 2016, pp. 1–14.10.19089/hhss.v2i1.39Suche in Google Scholar

Geir Sigurðsson, Confucian Propriety and Ritual Learning: A Philosophical Interpretation, Albany: State University of New York Press 2015.10.1515/9781438454429Suche in Google Scholar

Geir Sigurðsson, “Can Ritual be Modern? Liquid Modernity, Social Acceleration and Li-Inspired Ritual,” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, vol. 13 (2), 2021, pp. 65–89.10.24204/ejpr.2021.3325Suche in Google Scholar

Geir Sigurðsson, “Li (Ritual),, in: Key Concepts in World Philosophies: A Toolkit for Philosophers, ed. by Sarah Flavel and Chiara Robbiano, London et al.: Bloomsbury Academic, 2023, pp. 393–399.10.5040/9781350168152.ch-042Suche in Google Scholar

Geir Sigurðsson, and Paul J. D’Ambrosio, “Ritualized world relations: a Confucian critique of Rosa’s limitations on resonance,” The Journal of Chinese Sociology, vol. 10 (4), 2023, pp. 1–19.10.1186/s40711-023-00184-7Suche in Google Scholar

Sor-hoon Tan, “The Dao of Politics: Li (Rituals/Rites) and Laws as Pragmatic Tools of Government,” Philosophy East and West, vol. 61 (3), 2011, pp. 468–491.10.1353/pew.2011.0043Suche in Google Scholar

Weiming Tu, Milan Hejtmanek, and Alan Watchman, The Confucian World Observed: A Contemporary Discussion of Confucian Humanism in East Asia, Honolulu: The East-West Center 1992.Suche in Google Scholar

Weiming Tu and Daisaku Ikeda, New Horizons in Eastern Humanism: Buddhism, Confucianism and the Quest for Global Peace, London: I. B. Tauris 2011.10.5040/9780755625635Suche in Google Scholar

Mercedes Valmisa, Adapting. A Chinese Philosophy of Action. New York: Oxford University Press 2021.10.1093/oso/9780197572962.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Max Weber, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) 1972.Suche in Google Scholar

Ron G. Williams, and James W. Boyd, Ritual Art and Knowledge: Aesthetic Theory and Zoroastrian Ritual, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press 1993.Suche in Google Scholar

Xunzi 荀子, in: Chinese Text Project, Pre-Qin and Han, Confucianism, https://ctext.org/xunzi. Accessed: February 26, 2024.Suche in Google Scholar

Dainian Zhang, Key Concepts in Chinese Philosophy, tr. by Edmund Ryden. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press/New Haven: Yale University Press 2002.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhuangzi 莊子, in: Chinese Text Project, Pre-Qin and Han, Ancient Classics, Daoism, https://ctext.org/zhuangzi. Accessed: February 23, 2024.Suche in Google Scholar

Changlin Zou 邹昌林, Zhongguo li wenhua 中国礼文化, Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe 2000.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2025-05-17
Published in Print: 2025-05-09

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Frontmatter
  3. Editorial Preface
  4. Preface
  5. I. Teaching Daoist Philosophy
  6. Experiences of Learning, Teaching, and Investigating Chinese Philosophy in Europe
  7. Zhuangzi as Educator: Spectatorial Engagement and Transcultural Understanding for Global Citizenship
  8. Teaching Chinese Philosophy Outside the Philosophy Classroom: Reflections on Contents, Methods, and Prospects
  9. From “Being and Time” to “Dao and Time”
  10. II. Teaching Confucian Philosophy
  11. How to Interpret Chinese Philosophy to the West—My Experience of Teaching Chinese Philosophy at Freie Universität Berlin
  12. Teaching through Sublation: Political and Philosophical Confucianism
  13. Engaging with Li 禮 in the European Philosophy Classroom
  14. A Few Reflections from Central Europe on Teaching Chinese Philosophy
  15. Teaching Chinese Philosophy: From a “Skill-Based” to a “Thinking Through Early Chinese Philosophy” Approach
  16. The Teaching of “Chinese Philosophy” in Sinology Studies
  17. Look Back in Anger? Chinese Philosophy at Ruhr University Bochum
  18. III. Teaching Chinese Buddhist Philosophy
  19. Buddhism as Philosophy: Exercise in Observing Observation: The Nonduality of Paradoxical and Representational Thinking in Chinese Buddhism
  20. Ideas, Labels, and Boxes – The Three Teachings in Cheng Xuanying’s Early Tang Commentary to the Laozi and Some Reflections on our Scholarly Explorations of the Three Teachings
  21. IV. Miscellaneous
  22. Die Bildung abstrakter Begriffe in archaischen chinesischen Schriften: Humboldt’sche Perspektiven
  23. Chinesische Sprache und Schrift in philosophischer und kulturübergreifender Sicht—ein Vorlesungsplan
  24. Bio-Bibliography
  25. Name Index
Heruntergeladen am 6.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/yewph-2025-0009/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen