Startseite From “Being and Time” to “Dao and Time”
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

From “Being and Time” to “Dao and Time”

  • Qingjie James Wang und Sai Hang Kwok
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. Mai 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Heidegger’s “Being and Time” is the title of a remarkable masterpiece belonging to the philosophy classics of the past century. It paves the way for a new and more fundamental way of exploring the question of being—by questioning being in terms of time. Heidegger’s approach has not only influenced our understanding of Western philosophy, but it has also inspired scholars from other cultural and philosophical traditions, such as those from East Asia and Chinese traditions, to delve into the question of dao in light of a philosophical understanding of time and temporality. This is particularly important for inter-cultural studies of philosophy. This essay aims to provide a brief introduction to the study of “dao and time” in the Laozi from an intercultural perspective. It highlights its importance in our understanding of philosophy, particularly Chinese metaphysics as “Xin-er-shang-xue 形而上學.” Our discussion will begin with a word that is missing in the Laozi.

Literature

Aquinas, Thomas. 1996. Commentary on the Book of Causes, translated by Vincent A. Guagliardo, O. P. Charles R. Hess, and O. P. Richard C. Taylor. Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Guying (eds.). 1993. Daojia wenhua yanjiu 道家文化研究 (Studies on Daoist Culture), Vol. 3. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji chubanshe.Suche in Google Scholar

— 2007. Huangdi sijing jinzhu jinyi 黃帝四經今注今譯 (Annotation of the Four Classical Pieces of Yellow Emperor). Beijing: Commercial Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Songchang. 1973. Changsha mawangdui yihao hanmu 長沙馬王堆一號漢墓 (Changsha Mawangdui Han Tomb No. 1). Changsha: Wenwu Chubanshe.Suche in Google Scholar

Ding, Yuanzhi. 1998. Guodian zhujian Laozi shixi yanjiu 郭店竹簡老子釋析研究 (Analysis and Investigation of the Guodian Bamboo Laozi). Taipei: Wanjuanloutushu.Suche in Google Scholar

Gao, Heng. 1937. Zhouyi gujing jinzhu 周易古經今注 (A Contemporary Annotation of the Old Cannon of the Book of Change). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.31Suche in Google Scholar

Gao, Ming. 1996. Boshu Laozi jiaozhu 帛書老子校注 (Annotation of the Silk Manuscripts of the Laozi). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Suche in Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1959. Unterwegs zur Sprache. Pfullingen: Verlag Günther Neske.Suche in Google Scholar

— 1962. Being and Time, translated by Jacque Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

— 1967. Sein und Zeit [SZ]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag Tübingen.Suche in Google Scholar

— 1988. Basic Problems of Phenomenology, translated by Albert Hofstadter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

— 1991. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik [KPM]. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Suche in Google Scholar

— 1997. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, translated by Richard Taft. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

— 2003, The Heidegger-Jasper Correspondenc, 1920–1963. ed. by K. Jaspers, W. Biemel & H. Saner, Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Henricks, Robert G. 1989. Lao-Tzu Te-Tao Ching: A New Translation Based on the Recently Discovered Ma-Wang-Dui Texts. New York: Ballantine Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Hsiao, Shih-yi. 2004. “Heidegger and Our Translation of the Daodejing,” in: World Philosophy 2: 98–102.Suche in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1783. Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik: die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können [Prolegomena]. Riga.Suche in Google Scholar

— 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

— 2004. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, translated by Gary Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Hongkyung. 2012. The Old Master: A Syncretic Reading of the Laozi from the Mawangdui Text A Onward. Albany: SUNY.10.1353/book14821Suche in Google Scholar

Kwok, Sai Hang. 2020. “The Problem of Genesis in Derrida and Daoism.” Sophia. Available Online, viewed 8 Nov. 2020, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11841-020-00762-z>.32Suche in Google Scholar

Lau, D.C. 1963. T ao Te Ching By Lao Tzu. London: Penguin Books.Suche in Google Scholar

— 1982. “Introduction to the Silk Manuscripts of Lao Tzu,” in: Chinese Classics: Tao Te Ching. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Xiaogan. 2006. Laozi Gujin: Wuzhong duikan yu pingxi yinlun 老子古今:五種對勘與評析引論 (The Antiquity and Present of Laozi: Comparison and Analysis of the Five Versions). Beijing: Social Sciences in China Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ma, Lin. 2007. Heidegger on East-West Dialogue. New York, Routledge.10.4324/9780203927786Suche in Google Scholar

May, Reinhard. 1989. Ex oriente lux: Heideggers Werk unter ostasiatischem Einfluss. Stuttgart: Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden. English version: Heidegger’s Hidden Source: East-Asian Influences on his Work. Routledge: 1996.Suche in Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2001. The Gay Science, translated by Josefine Nauckhoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511812088Suche in Google Scholar

Parkes, Graham. 1987. Heidegger and Asian Thought. Honolulu: University of Hawa’ii Press.10.1515/9780824845384Suche in Google Scholar

Steger, Manfred. 2007. The Rise of the Global Imaginary: Political Ideologies from the French Revolution to the Global War on Terror. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wagner, Rudolf. 2003. A Chinese Reading of the Daodejing: Wang Bi’s Commentary on the Laozi with Critical Text and Translation. Albany: SUNY.10.1353/book4480Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Qingjie, 1993. “Heng Dao: A New Version of Dao,” Conference paper accepted by the 8th Conference of The International Association of Chinese Philosophy, Peking University, Beijing.Suche in Google Scholar

— 2000. “Heng Dao and Appropriation of Nature—A Hermeneutical Interpretation of Laozi,” in: Asian Philosophy 10(2): 149–163.3310.1080/713650896Suche in Google Scholar

— 2001. “Heng and Temporality of Dao: Laozi and Heidegger,” in: Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 1(1): 55–71.10.1007/BF02857463Suche in Google Scholar

— 2012. “Transzendental Gainian de sanchong dingyi yu chaoyuelun xianxiangxue de kangde pipan” Transzendental概念的三重定義與超越論現象學的康德批判 („The Three-fold Interpretations of ‘Transzendental’ and the Critique of Kant from Transcendental Phenomenology”). In: World Philosophy 4: 5–23.Suche in Google Scholar

— 2014. “The Problem of Transzendenz and Transzendental in Heidegger’s ‘Being and Time,’” in: Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Section) 1: 24–39.Suche in Google Scholar

— 2016. “Thing-ing and No-thing in Heidegger, Kant and Laozi,” in: Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 2: 159–174.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2025-05-17
Published in Print: 2025-05-09

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Frontmatter
  3. Editorial Preface
  4. Preface
  5. I. Teaching Daoist Philosophy
  6. Experiences of Learning, Teaching, and Investigating Chinese Philosophy in Europe
  7. Zhuangzi as Educator: Spectatorial Engagement and Transcultural Understanding for Global Citizenship
  8. Teaching Chinese Philosophy Outside the Philosophy Classroom: Reflections on Contents, Methods, and Prospects
  9. From “Being and Time” to “Dao and Time”
  10. II. Teaching Confucian Philosophy
  11. How to Interpret Chinese Philosophy to the West—My Experience of Teaching Chinese Philosophy at Freie Universität Berlin
  12. Teaching through Sublation: Political and Philosophical Confucianism
  13. Engaging with Li 禮 in the European Philosophy Classroom
  14. A Few Reflections from Central Europe on Teaching Chinese Philosophy
  15. Teaching Chinese Philosophy: From a “Skill-Based” to a “Thinking Through Early Chinese Philosophy” Approach
  16. The Teaching of “Chinese Philosophy” in Sinology Studies
  17. Look Back in Anger? Chinese Philosophy at Ruhr University Bochum
  18. III. Teaching Chinese Buddhist Philosophy
  19. Buddhism as Philosophy: Exercise in Observing Observation: The Nonduality of Paradoxical and Representational Thinking in Chinese Buddhism
  20. Ideas, Labels, and Boxes – The Three Teachings in Cheng Xuanying’s Early Tang Commentary to the Laozi and Some Reflections on our Scholarly Explorations of the Three Teachings
  21. IV. Miscellaneous
  22. Die Bildung abstrakter Begriffe in archaischen chinesischen Schriften: Humboldt’sche Perspektiven
  23. Chinesische Sprache und Schrift in philosophischer und kulturübergreifender Sicht—ein Vorlesungsplan
  24. Bio-Bibliography
  25. Name Index
Heruntergeladen am 6.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/yewph-2025-0006/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen