Startseite Air tab location effect on supersonic jet mixing
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Air tab location effect on supersonic jet mixing

  • Mahendra Perumal Govindan ORCID logo , Aravindh Kumar Suseela Moorthi ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Srinivasan Elangovan ORCID logo , Munisamy Sundararaj ORCID logo und Ethirajan Rathakrishnan ORCID logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 4. April 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Mixing of Mach 2.1 circular, jet issuing from a straight convergent-divergent circular nozzle, in the presence of sonic air tabs at exit and shifted locations along the jet axis was investigated experimentally at nozzle pressure ratios (NPR) 3–6, insteps of 1. Two constant area tubes of 1 mm diameter positioned diametrically opposite, at 0 D, 0.25 D, 0.5 D and 0.75 D (where D is the nozzle exit diameter), were used for fluidic injection. The injection pressure ratio (IPR) of air tabs was maintained at 6. The Mach 2.1 jet operated at nozzle pressure ratio (NPR) in the range of overexpanded states corresponding to NPR 3–6 was controlled with the sonic air tabs operating at the underexpanded state corresponding to IPR 6. The impact of air tabs on jet mixing was studied from the measured Pitot pressure along the jet centerline. The centerline pressure decay of the jet confirms that the air tab promotes jet mixing with the entrained air mass, and the mixing promotion caused by the air tab is dependent on tab location as well as the NPR. In the presence of air tabs, the jet possesses shorter core and experiences faster decay than the uncontrolled jet. Also, the air tabs were effective in reducing the number of shock cells and rendering the waves weaker in the jet core. Among the tab locations, the mixing promoting effectiveness of air tabs at 0 D is better than the tabs at shifted locations. The jet core length reduction caused by the air tab at 0 D increases from 25.4 % to 77.2 %, with increasing NPR from 3 to 6. The same trend was noticed for tab location 0.75 D, but not for 0.25 D and 0.5 D locations. The core length reduction for 0.75 D tab location is about 61.4 %, at NPR 6, and 62.1 % and 55.8 %, for NPR 5 and 4 for tab locations 0.25 D and 0.5 D, respectively. Shadowgraph images of the waves present in the jet core confirms the findings of centerline pressure decay results.


Corresponding author: Aravindh Kumar Suseela Moorthi, Department of Aerospace Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, 603203, India, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: The authors state no funding is involved.

  5. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Arun Kumar, P, Aravindh Kumar, S, Surya Mitra, A, Rathakrishnan, E. Empirical scaling analysis of supersonic jet control using steady fluidic injection. Phys Fluids 2019;31:056107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5096389.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Arun Kumar, P, Aravindh Kumar, S, Surya Mitra, A, Rathakrishnan, E. Fluidic injectors for supersonic jet control. Phys Fluids 2018;30:126101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5056209.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Henderson, B. Fifty years of fluidic injection for jet noise reduction. Int J Aeroacoustics 2010;9:91–122. https://doi.org/10.1260/1475-472x.9.1-2.91.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Davis, M. Variable control of jet decay. AIAA J 1982;20:606–9. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.7934.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Semlitsch, B, Cuppoletti, DR, Gutmark, EJ, Mihăescu, M. Transforming the shock pattern of supersonic jets using fluidic injection. AIAA J 2019;57:1851–61. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j057629.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Khan, A, Nageswara Rao, A, Baghel, T, Perumal, AK, Kumar, R. Parametric study and scaling of Mach 1.5 jet manipulation using steady fluidic injection. Phys Fluids 2022;34:036107. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0078089.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Hafsteinsson, HE, Eriksson, L-E, Andersson, N, Cuppoletti, DR, Gutmark, E. Noise control of supersonic jet with steady and flapping fluidic injection. AIAA J 2015;53:3251–72. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j053846.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Guo, C, Wei, Z, Xie, K, Wang, N. Thrust control by fluidic injection in solid rocket motors. J Propul Power 2017;33:815–29. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b36264.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Wu, K, Kim, HD, Jin, Y. Fluidic thrust vector control based on counter-flow concept. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng 2018;233:1412–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410017752580.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Arun Kumar, P, Rathakrishnan, E. Design of fluidic injector for supersonic jet manipulation. AIAA J 2022;60:4639–48. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j061257.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Hipp, KD, Walker, MM, Benton, SI, Bons, JP. Control of poststall airfoil using leading-edge pulsed jets. AIAA J 2016;55:365–76. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j055223.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Munday, PM, Taira, K. Effects of wall-normal and angular momentum injections in airfoil separation control. AIAA J 2018;56:1830–42. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j056303.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Wan, C, Yu, S. Investigation of air tab’s effect in supersonic jets. J Propul Power 2011;27:1157–60. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.55750.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Sutton, GP, Biblarz, O. Rocket propulsion elements. Chap. 18, 9th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Cuppoletti, D, Perrino, M, Gutmark, E. Fluidic injection effects on acoustics of a supersonic jet at various Mach numbers. 17th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (32nd AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference); 2011.10.2514/6.2011-2900Suche in Google Scholar

16. Arun Kumar, P, Zhou, Y. Axisymmetric jet manipulation using multiple unsteady minijets. Phys Fluids 2021;33:065124. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0052275.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Bernhard, S, Mihai, M. Fluidic injection scenarios for shock pattern manipulation in exhausts. AIAA J 2018;56:4640–4. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j057537.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Kailash, G, Kumar, SA, editors. Control of sonic jets by fluidic injection. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering: IOP Publishing; 2020.10.1088/1757-899X/912/2/022012Suche in Google Scholar

19. André, B, Castelain, T, Bailly, C. Effect of a tab on the aerodynamical development and noise of an underexpanded supersonic jet. Compt Rendus Mec 2013;341:659–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2013.08.001.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Arun Kumar, P, Aileni, M, Rathakrishnan, E. Impact of tab location relative to the nozzle exit on the shock structure of a supersonic jet. Phys Fluids 2019;31:076104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5111328.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Kaushik, M, Rathakrishnan, E. Tab aspect ratio effect on supersonic jet mixing. Int J Turbo Jet Engines 2015;32:265–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjj-2014-0032.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Arun Kumar, P, Rathakrishnan, E. Triangular tabs for supersonic jet mixing enhancement. Aeronaut J 2014;118:1245–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0001924000009969.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Arun Kumar, P, Rathakrishnan, E. Truncated triangular tabs for supersonic-jet control. J Propul Power 2013;29:50–65. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b34642.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Maruthupandiyan, K, Rathakrishnan, E. Supersonic jet control with shifted tabs. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng 2018;232:433–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410016679197.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Maruthupandiyan, K, Rathakrishnan, E. Shifted triangular tabs for supersonic jet control. J Aero Eng 2018;31:04018067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000893.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Chiranjeevi Phanindra, B, Rathakrishnan, E. Corrugated tabs for supersonic jet control. AIAA J 2010;48:453–65. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.44896.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Ranjan, A, Kaushik, M, Deb, D, Muresan, V, Unguresan, M, editors. Assessment of short rectangular-tab actuation of supersonic jet mixing. Actuators. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; 2020.10.3390/act9030072Suche in Google Scholar

28. Kailash, G, Aravindh Kumar, SM, Rathakrishnan, E. Air-tab orientation effect on underexpanded sonic rectangular jet mixing. AIAA J 2022;60:6054–61. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j061786.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Rathakrishnan, E. Applied gas dynamics. Chap. 12, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley; 2019.10.1002/9781119500377Suche in Google Scholar

30. Rathakrishnan, E. Instrumentation, measurements, and experiments in fluids. Chap. 7, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2016.10.1201/b15874Suche in Google Scholar

31. Tam, CKW. Supersonic jet noise. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1995;27:17–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.27.010195.000313.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-02-24
Accepted: 2024-03-09
Published Online: 2024-04-04
Published in Print: 2024-12-17

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Experimental and numerical investigations on controlled parameter selection methods for kerosene-fueled scramjet
  3. Thrust-matching and optimization design of turbine-based combined cycle engine with trajectory optimization
  4. Parametric analysis of thermal cycle of a short take-off and vertical landing engine
  5. Conjugate heat transfer analysis on double-wall cooling configuration including jets impingement and film holes with conformal pins
  6. Research on the design method of mode transition control law for Ma6 external parallel TBCC engine
  7. A new schedule method for compact propulsion system model
  8. Numerical investigation on mixing of heated confined swirling coaxial jets with blockage
  9. Finite element based dynamic analysis of a porous exponentially graded shaft system subjected to thermal gradients
  10. Numerical study on aerodynamic performance of an intake duct affected by ground effect
  11. Influence of metal magnesium addition on detonation initiation in shock wave focusing Pulse Detonation Engine
  12. Probabilistic analysis of solid oxide fuel-cell integrated with gas turbine
  13. Improving thermal performance of turbine blade with combination of circular and oblong fins in a wedge channel: a numerical investigation
  14. Investigation on effect of injector orifice diameter on injector atomization and combustion characteristics of pulse detonation combustor
  15. Research on cascade control method for turboshaft engine with variable rotor speed
  16. The overall film cooling performance of crescent holes
  17. Air tab location effect on supersonic jet mixing
  18. Design and analysis of air intake of subsonic cruise vehicle with experimental validation
  19. Research on an optimization design method for a TBCC propulsion scheme
  20. Performance analysis of a gas turbine engine via intercooling and regeneration- Part 2
  21. Effects of bleed pressure on shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions in a transonic compressor stator with suction holes
  22. Effect of asymmetric leading edge on transition of suction side
Heruntergeladen am 21.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2024-0017/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen