Startseite Extracellular acidity and oxygen availability conjointly control eukaryotic cell growth via modulation of cytoplasmic translation
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Extracellular acidity and oxygen availability conjointly control eukaryotic cell growth via modulation of cytoplasmic translation

  • Duygu Dikicioglu ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. Juni 2019

Abstract

Background

Oxygen availability and extracellular acidity both have a strong impact on growth and cultivation characteristics of eukaryotes, however they are often considered in isolation, whereby a single parameter is varied at a time to identify its impact, rendering the investigation of synergistic effects created by two or more factors non-achievable. This study identified the synergistic effect between environmental pH and oxygen levels on the physiological and cellular characteristics of the simplest eukaryote, Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Materials and methods

The physiological, transcriptomic, and metabolic responses of yeast were investigated during batch growth in a 2 × 2 factorial design setting; environmental pH and oxygen availability were either controlled at their optimal settings, or allowed to follow their own course during cultivation.

Results

Synergistic effects had a significant impact on yeast physiology, which was provoked further by both the modulation of gene expression by transcription, and the modification of metabolite pools. Genes involved in cytoplasmic translation, the extracellular and intracellular amino acid and their precursor metabolite pools were significantly responsive to concurrent variations in these two factors.

Conclusion

The synergistic effect of extracellular acidity and oxygenation on eukaryotic landscape of growth-associated events was significantly more pronounced than their individual effects.

Öz

Amaç

Büyüme ortamındaki oksijen müsaitliği ve asidite ökaryotik hücrelerin büyüme ve kultivasyon özellikleri üzerinde önemli etkiye sahiptir ancak bu özelliklerin etkileri çoğunlukla diğer parameterelerden ayrı olarak tek başlarına incelenir ve değerlendirilir, ve bu da çoklu etkileşimlerin (sinerjinin) etkilerinin belirlenmesini olanaksız kılar. Bu çalışma, ortam pH ve oksijen seviyeleri arasındaki sinerjiin en basit ökaryotik hücre olan Saccharomyces cerevisiae’nin fizyolojik ve hücresel özellikleri üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Gereç ve Yöntem

Maya hücrelerinin kesikli üretimde fizyolojik, transkriptomik ve metabolik yanıtları 2 × 2 faktöryel tasarım ile incelenmiştir; ortam pH değeri ve oksijen müsaitliği ya optimal değerlerinde kontrol edilmiş, ya da kultivasyon süresince kendi başlarına değişmelerine olanak sağlanmıştır.

Bulgular

Sinerjik etkileşimlerin maya fizyolojisi üzerinde istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı bir değişime yol açtığı gözlemlenmiştir ve bu değişim hem hücresel gen anlatımının yazılım seviyesinde düzenlenmesi hem de amino asit havuzlarının ayarlanması ile gerçekleşmektedir. Sitoplazmik çevirimde rol alan genler ile hücre içi ve hücre dışı amino asit ve amino asit öncül metabolit havuzları, bu iki çevresel faktörun etkileşimine istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı cevaplar vermiştir.

Sonuç

Hücre dışı asidite ve oksijenlenme arasındaki sinerjinin büyüme ile bağıntılı ökaryotik etkinlikler üzerinde, bu parametrelerin tek başlarına yarattıkları etkiden daha belirgin ve istatistiki olarak anlamlı bir şekilde daha yoğun sonuçlar doğurduğu gözlemlenmektedir.

Introduction

The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has long been a loyal workhorse of industrial biotechnology, with evidence for its use dating back several millennia. The emergence of the study of the yeast cellular metabolism in the 19th century accompanied targeted bioprocess development, and this marks the first modern applications of biotechnology [1]. Yeast has substantial commercial relevance as a cell factory in numerous applications ranging from the production of bioethanol [2] to vanillin [3] to resveratrol [4] to chemotherapeutic agents [5]. Yeast has enjoyed this rightful reputation due to the availability of extensive tools and information [6], [7], [8], [9], which ensued from being the first eukaryotic system, whose genome has been completely sequenced [10].

Understanding the control of growth [11] and the optimal growth conditions of Baker’s yeast [12], [13] has been considered in depth as a result of the commercial interest in fermentation technologies associated with its utilisation [14]. The effect of parameters such as pH [15], [16] and oxygen availability [17], [18], [19] on growth and fermentation characteristics of yeast were extensively studied, and variations in either parameter has been employed as a control or modification mechanism for fermentation processes [20], [21]. However, the synergetic effects between these parameters on growth and fermentation characteristics, nor on the cellular landscape, were not investigated. Combined effect of pH and oxygen availability was only considered in evaluating the productivity of genetically engineered yeast strains [22], [23] but not from a bioprocess perspective.

Extracellular pH of yeast cells was shown to be connected to some extent, and at times be correlated with the intracellular pH [24], which is one of the major controllers of cellular growth in S. cerevisiae [25] with a tight control mechanism to maintain intracellular acidity within a tolerable range [26]. This phenomenon was observed in other eukaryotes [27], [28], too, indicative of at least a certain degree of conservation across eukaryotic systems.

Recent studies on biotechnologically relevant systems focus on understanding of the tight interconnection between intracellular pH and oxygen availability with the aim of exploiting these systems more efficiently as cell factories [29]. This would then allow the tailoring of optimised cultivation conditions that take the cellular requirements of the system of interest into consideration, and thus facilitate the design of bioprocesses with improved yield and productivity. Current bioprocess design practice relies dominantly on the investigation of factors contributing to the cultivation performance by varying only one parameter at a time [30], although approaches, which take synergistic effects between design parameters into consideration, also exist [31].

In a recent study, we showed that the synergy between extracellular pH and oxygen availability had an impact on the amino acid metabolism in the Baker’s yeast during balanced growth in response to sustained low-dose exposure to the macrolide, rapamycin [32]. On the other hand, the interactive impact of these parameters has not ever been investigated on non-treated cultures growing under non-stressing conditions. Cell culturing or fermentation processes ranging from culturing in shake flasks to bioreactors with advanced process control implementation all inherently incorporate the synergy between these two factors into experimental design. In one extreme, simple processes where neither parameter is controlled lie; on the other extreme, bioreactors that allow tight control over both parameters reside. However, the cellular response to these two most commonly employed modes of operation, which are exploited to bring populations to pseudo steady state phase of growth, have not been investigated at the transcriptional, metabolic, or at the phenotypical level even for the simplest eukaryote, S. cerevisiae.

This work explores the significance and prevalence of synergetic relationships between two major growth parameters; extracellular pH and oxygen availability, on the cultivation performance and cellular response of S. cerevisiae, the simple eukaryotic cell. The environmental pH and dissolved oxygen (dO2) level of the cultures were either controlled at their optimal settings (pH=5.5 and dO2>90%), or left to follow their own course during fermentation, allowing the exploration of synergistic as well as single-parameter effects on cellular physiology, gene expression by transcription, and metabolite levels.

Materials and methods

Data compilation and the experimental background for the datasets

The data was collected from duplicate batch cultivations of homozygous hoΔ/hoΔ strain of S. cerevisiae BY4743 (MATa/MATα his3Δ1/his3Δ1 leu2Δ0/leu2Δ0 lys2Δ0/+ met15Δ0/+ ura3Δ0/ura3Δ0) grown in synthetic medium (Table 1) [33]. The dissolved oxygen (dO2) saturation was maintained at above 90% in air+ cultures by sparging the cultures with air at a rate of 0.1 vvm, and was monitored in air− cultures. pH was controlled at 5.5 in pH+ cultures, and was only monitored in pH− cultures. The samples for transcriptome and metabolite analyses were collected at OD600 range of 0.6–0.8. Biomass density was determined gravimetrically. Microarray analysis was carried out by as described in the GeneChip®Expression Analysis Technical Manual (relevant kits, chips, and instrumentation: Affymetrix Inc., USA). The tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediate and amino acid profiles were acquired from the Agilent 6430 Triple Quadrupole LC-MS system (USA). The glucose, glycerol, ethanol and ammonium content of the supernatant was determined enzymatically. The unprocessed raw data files for transcriptome analysis were accessed from the European Bioinformatics Institute ArrayExpress Data Repository [34] under the Accession number E-MTAB-6628. The submitted data was in compliance with the MIAME [35] standards, with fully accessible experimental details. The growth characteristics, endometabolic and exometabolic amino acid and TCA cycle intermediate profiles were accessed from [32].

Table 1:

Synthetic medium composition.

Compound Concentration (g/L)
Glucose 20
NH4SO4 3.13
KH2PO4 2
MgSO4·7H2O 0.55
NaCl 0.1
CaCl2·2H2O 0.09
Uracil 0.02
Histidine 0.02
Leucine 0.1
ZnSO4·7H2O 0.00007
CuSO4·5H2O 0.00001
H3BO3 0.00001
KI 0.00001
FeCl3·6H2O 0.00005
Inositol 0.062
Thiamine/HCl 0.014
Pyridoxine 0.004
Ca-pantothenate 0.004
Biotin 0.0003

Microarray data preprocessing

The raw image files (.cel extension) were processed and normalised with their quality assessed by the dChip software [36]. The baseline array for normalization was selected as the array having the best call rate, which was 59.7% for this dataset. The expression values were obtained using the model-based expression modelling method and conducting mismatch probe background subtraction calculated from the difference between the perfect match and mismatch values. The smoothing method was running median. All single, array and probe outliers were checked and datasets were ensured to have <1% array outliers and <0.5% single outliers. The expression values were log2 transformed prior to data analysis.

Data analysis

The significance of physiological characteristics and exometabolic metabolite measurements was evaluated employing 2-way ANalysis Of VAriance (ANOVA) for data with replicates followed by Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test for multiple testing correction. For the transcriptome analysis and endometabolic measurements Student’s t-test was employed for statistical analysis whenever sample size ≥3, followed by the Benjamini-Hochberg test for multiple testing correction of the false discovery rate (FDR). Two-way ANOVA for data with replicates was employed as required for datasets where samples size <3, followed by Tukey HSD test as post-hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. Significance was evaluated at the confidence level of α=0.05. Hierarchical clustering of samples was carried out using Hierarchical Clustering Explorer (HCE) 3.5 [36], with Pearson correlation employed as the distance metric and average linkage employed as the linkage metric. Princeton GO tools Generic GO Term Finder was employed for Gene Ontology Enrichment Analysis (http://go.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/GOTermFinder) accessed on (02/2018) [37]. Bonferroni correction was applied for p-values and FDR was included in the evaluation. Gene ontology associations inferred from electronic annotation (IEA) were excluded from analysis.

Results

Extracellular pH and oxygen availability jointly control cellular growth

The physiological characteristics of the batch cultures where (i) the cells were grown in a pH− controlled and aerated environment (air+ pH+), (ii) in environments where neither of these parameters were controlled (air− pH−), or (iii) and (iv) only one parameter was controlled (air+ pH−, air− pH+), were investigated. Growth rate, mid-exponential phase and steady state biomass accumulation, uptake of main carbon (glucose) and nitrogen (ammonium) sources, and the secretion of main by-products (glycerol and ethanol), amino acids, and TCA cycle intermediates were analysed to shed light on how cellular physiology was affected by synergistic effects between oxygen availability and extracellular pH.

The pH of the controlled cultures was maintained in the range of 5.44–5.51 at all times, whereas the extracellular pH was observed to drop down to the range of 3.56–3.84 during the exponential phase of growth in pH− cultures. The pH decreased further down to the range of 2.81–2.96 as those cultures reached stationary phase. The dissolved oxygen content of the air+ cultures remained always above 90%. Conversely, the dissolved oxygen content was in the range of 45–63% during the mid-exponential phase of the cultures that were fully saturated with oxygen at the time of inoculation, and were later operated as micro-aerated systems. The dissolved oxygen content of these cultures were observed to drop down to below 5% as they reached stationary phase. The overhead oxygen content of all cultures was measured as 20.34±1.03% for the duration of the cultivation indicating that the positive pressure in the vessels did not yield to oxygen escape from dissolved to gas state; the overhead oxygen content did not vary significantly with air supplementation regime, except for marginally low overhead oxygen measured during the stationary phase of air− cultures (Table 2).

Table 2:

Fermentation parameters of the batch yeast cultures.a

Parameterb Air+ pH+ Air+ pH− Air− pH+ Air− pH−
Culture pH at M 5.44±0.00 3.75±0.12 5.45±0.01 3.57±0.01
Culture pH at S 5.48±0.04 2.82±0.01 5.45±0.00 2.93±0.04
dO2 sat. at M (%) 92.75±8.27 97.35±0.07 53.95±12.37 56.55±2.62
dO2 sat. at S (%) 93.30±5.52 100.05±1.48 35.10±9.63 3.00±1.56
Overhead O2 at M (%) 20.60±0.10 21.30±5.52 18.30±2.94 21.50±2.07
Overhead O2 at S (%) 20.53±0.06 20.13±0.85 19.91±1.41 19.80±0.19
  1. aValues for duplicate cultures provided as average±standard deviation. bM, mid-exponential phase; S, stationary phase; sat., saturation.

The specific growth rate (μs) at exponential phase of cultivation varied by 26% under different conditions, and it was the lowest (μs=0.31 h−1) in air− pH− cultures. The time for the cultures to reach mid-exponential phase significantly increased with high oxygen availability (p-value=0.032). The optical density (OD) of the cultures at mid-exponential phase was significantly affected by the interactive effect of extracellular pH and oxygen availability (p-value=0.043), whereas the OD measured at stationary phase (prior to the diauxic shift) was significantly affected by the environmental pH only (p-value=0.002). In both instances, the OD measurements were lower in pH− cultures. The biomass densities of the cultures were significantly affected by the interactive effect of culture pH and oxygenation both at the mid-exponential phase and at stationary phase (p values=6.43×10−12 and 7.96×10−5, respectively) (Table 3).

Table 3:

Growth characteristics, macro-nutrient uptake and by-product secretion of the batch yeast cultures.a

Parameterb Air+ pH+ Air+ pH− Air− pH+ Air− pH−
μs at M (h−1) 0.36±0.01 0.39±0.04 0.35±0.03 0.31±0.00
Time to reach M (h) 8.84±0.01 7.68±0.25 10.03±0.59 9.23±1.02
Time to reach S (h) 29.11±0.01 29.14±5.98 24.23±2.76 28.17±4.91
OD600 at M 0.87±0.04 0.63±0.01 0.69±0.01 0.67±0.10
OD600 at S 1.60±0.01 1.44±0.05 1.59±0.06 1.34±0.00
Bio at M (g/L)c 0.41±0.15 0.74±0.12 0.71±0.18 0.17±0.08
Bio at S (g/L)c 1.43±0.17 1.30±0.45 1.52±0.27 0.60±0.11
Glu by M (g/L) 6.22±0.28 7.41±0.48 7.82±0.42 6.32±0.31
NH4 + by M (g/L) 0.75±0.00 0.75±0.00 0.78±0.01 0.74±0.01
Eth by M (g/L) 1.58±0.03 1.43±0.06 2.00±0.04 1.15±0.03
Gly by M (g/L) 0.20±0.00 0.12±0.01 0.39±0.00 0.27±0.00
  1. aValues for duplicate cultures provided as average±standard deviation. bM, mid-exponential phase; S, stationary phase; Bio, biomass density; Glu, glucose consumed; NH4 +, ammonium consumed; Eth, ethanol secreted; Gly, glycerol secreted. cGravimetric measurements of biomass was conducted in five replicates for each culture; results represent 10 measurements for each condition.

The uptake of the macronutrients acting as the primary carbon and nitrogen sources was significantly affected by an interaction between the two environmental factors under investigation (p-values=0.008 and 0.047 for glucose and ammonium, respectively). The amount of glucose consumed by the yeast populations varied by 25%, whereas the amount of ammonium consumed by the cultures varied only by 0.5%, although the differences between the cultures under different conditions were apparent, and significant in both cases. The ethanol and glycerol secretion of yeast cultures were significantly different (p-values=2.60×10−4 and 1.60×10−2 for ethanol and glycerol, respectively), and extracellular pH and oxygen availability at mid-exponential phase exhibited an interaction effect on the amount of by-product secreted. Both by-products were detected at lower concentration in the pH− cultures than in pH+ cultures (Table 3).

The uptake of histidine or leucine, to which the strain employed in the study was auxotrophic, was not significantly different between cultures. Leucine and histidine supplementation in the medium was in excess of the cellular requirements by design, thus their uptake only created a marginal and insignificant difference. On the other hand, the extracellular concentration of seven amino acids (alanine, arginine, asparagine, aspartate, cysteine, methionine, and threonine) as well as five TCA cycle intermediates (citrate, isocitrate, malate, cis-acotinate, and pyruvate) were significantly different between cultivation conditions. Since the cultures were not supplemented with either of these small molecules, all were considered as metabolites; the cellular by-products metabolically produced and secreted in differing ratios in response to different cultivation conditions here explored. The differences in arginine, cysteine, methionine, threonine, citrate, and malate concentrations were significantly affected by the interactive effect between the two environmental factors under investigation. Extracellular alanine and isocitrate concentrations were significantly responsive to the dO2 level, whereas asparagine, aspartate, cis-acotinate, and pyruvate concentrations were significantly responsive to extracellular pH only (Table 4). The differences in the extracellular amino acid and TCA cycle intermediate metabolite concentrations revealed the directionality of material flow through metabolic fluxes of these populations grown under different environmental conditions, and highlighted the preferential production and secretion of different families of amino acids, some of which employ TCA cycle intermediates as precursors for biosynthesis (Figure 1). Aspartate synthesized from the TCA cycle intermediate oxaloacetate acted as the major precursor amino acid for the amino acids, whose exometabolic profiles displayed significant differences in response to different environmental conditions investigated in this study.

Table 4:

Significant differences in extracellular amino acid and TCA cycle intermediate concentrations for the batch yeast cultures.a

Metabolite Effectb Response observed p-Value
Alanine Air Higher in air+ cultures 8.19×10−3
Arginine Air/pH Lower in pH− cultures for air+ cases 4.97×10−4
Higher in pH− cultures for air− cases
Asparagine pH Lower in pH− cultures 4.99×10−3
Aspartate pH Lower in pH− cultures 5.42×10−5
Cysteine Air/pH Higher in pH− cultures for air+ cases 3.70×10−2
Methionine Air/pH Lower in pH− cultures for air− cases 1.73×10−3
Threonine Air/pH Lower in pH− cultures for air+ cases 2.33×10−7
Higher in pH− cultures for air− cases
Citrate Air/pH Lower in pH− cultures for air− cases 1.07×10−4
Isocitrate Air Higher in air+ cultures 7.93×10−4
pH Lower in pH− cultures 3.89×10−3
Malate Air/pH Lower in pH− cultures for air+ cases 3.22×10−3
Cis-acotinate pH Lower in pH+ cultures 8.10×10−3
Pyruvate pH Lower in pH+ cultures 1.39×10−3
  1. ap-Values were determined by 2-way ANOVA (for samples with replicates), followed by the Tukey HSD test as an ad-hoc analysis. Pairwise comparisons are reported for the air/pH interaction effect. bAir, air only; pH, pH only; Air/pH, air – pH interaction effect.

Figure 1: 
Extracellular distribution of amino acids from TCA cycle precursors.
The amino acids and their TCA cycle intermediate precursors are depicted in rounded rectangles connected either by solid lines indicating a single metabolic step or by dashed lines indicating multiple metabolic steps. The reversibility of the steps is indicated by the direction of the arrows. The red dashed box groups two metabolites produced from aspartate in the same metabolic process. The blue banners denote metabolite concentrations that are significantly high at dO2>90% due to aeration effect, at low acidity due to pH effect, or at low acidity due to an interaction effect between culture pH and aeration levels. The orange banners denote metabolite concentrations that are significantly low at low acidity due to pH effect, or due to an interaction effect between culture pH and aeration levels.
Figure 1:

Extracellular distribution of amino acids from TCA cycle precursors.

The amino acids and their TCA cycle intermediate precursors are depicted in rounded rectangles connected either by solid lines indicating a single metabolic step or by dashed lines indicating multiple metabolic steps. The reversibility of the steps is indicated by the direction of the arrows. The red dashed box groups two metabolites produced from aspartate in the same metabolic process. The blue banners denote metabolite concentrations that are significantly high at dO2>90% due to aeration effect, at low acidity due to pH effect, or at low acidity due to an interaction effect between culture pH and aeration levels. The orange banners denote metabolite concentrations that are significantly low at low acidity due to pH effect, or due to an interaction effect between culture pH and aeration levels.

Differences in growth characteristics were traceable in endometabolic and transcriptomic profiles of yeast populations

The differences observed in the growth characteristics and the physiology of the yeast populations in response to extracellular pH and dissolved oxygen availability led to an in-depth investigation of the accompanying intracellular changes of these cell populations in order to gain insight on the underlying molecular mechanisms, which are responsible for inducing these differences in the culture characteristics.

For this purpose, we first investigated how the intracellular TCA cycle intermediate and amino acid concentrations varied in these cultures. Significant differences were observed around the amino acid metabolism with the intracellular concentration of 14 of the 20 amino acids measured (alanine, arginine, glutamate, glutamine, glycine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, proline, serine, threonine, and valine) as well as of four TCA cycle intermediates (α-ketoglutarate, malate, cis-acotinate, and pyruvate) being altered between cultivation conditions. The significant differences in alanine, arginine, glutamate, histidine, leucine, methionine, proline, serine, and valine concentrations, as well as in α-ketoglutarate, malate, and pyruvate concentrations were caused by an interactive effect of both culture parameters investigated as factors; extracellular acidity and oxygen availability. Furthermore, the differences in cis-aconitate concentration was only responsive to differences in oxygen availability and the differences in glycine, lysine and threonine concentrations were only responsive to differences in extracellular acidity. Interestingly, the differences in glutamine and isoleucine concentrations were responsive to differences in either extracellular acidity or oxygen availability alone, but these two factors did not have an interactive effect on the concentration of these intracellular metabolites (Table 5). Glutamate, which employed α-ketoglutarate as its TCA cycle precursor was identified as the key amino acid in repurposing the intracellular amino acid pools available within yeast (Figure 2).

Table 5:

Significant differences in intracellular amino acid and TCA cycle intermediate concentrations for the batch yeast cultures.a

Metabolite Effectb Response observed p-Value
Alanine Air/pH Higher in pH− cultures for air− cases 1.99×10−2
Arginine Air/pH Higher in pH+ cultures for air+ cases 1.10×10−2
Glutamate Air/pH Higher in pH− cultures for air− cases 1.27×10−3
Higher in pH+ cultures for air+ cases
Glutamine Air Higher in air+ cultures 4.94×10−3
pH Higher in pH+ cultures 1.42×10−3
Glycine pH Higher in pH+ cultures 8.44×10−3
Histidine Air/pH Higher in pH+ cultures for air+ cases 8.24×10−3
Isoleucine Air Higher in air+ cultures 2.63×10−3
pH Higher in pH− cultures 6.40×10−4
Leucine Air/pH Higher in pH− cultures for air− cases 2.14×10−3
Lysine pH Higher in pH+ cultures 1.42×10−2
Methionine Air/pH Higher in pH+ cultures for air− cases 1.49×10−2
Higher in pH+ cultures for air+ cases
Proline Air/pH Higher in pH+ cultures for air+ cases 3.16×10−2
Serine Air/pH Higher in pH− cultures for air− cases 3.65×10−4
Higher in pH+ cultures for air+ cases
Threonine pH Higher in pH− cultures 9.24×10−3
Valine Air/pH Higher in pH− cultures for air− cases 6.75×10−3
Malate Air/pH Higher in pH+ cultures for air− cases 1.14×10−2
Higher in pH+ cultures for air+ cases
α-ketoglutarate Air/pH Higher in pH+ cultures for air− cases 3.31×10−3
Cis-acotinate Air Higher in air− cultures 6.72×10−3
Pyruvate Air/pH Higher in pH− cultures for air+ cases 4.94×10−3
  1. ap-Values were determined by 2-way ANOVA (for samples with replicates), followed by the Tukey HSD test as an ad-hoc analysis. Pairwise comparisons are reported for the interaction effect. bAir, air only; pH, pH only; Air/pH, air – pH interaction effect.

Figure 2: 
Intracellular distribution of amino acids from TCA cycle precursors.
The amino acids and their TCA cycle intermediate precursors are depicted in rounded rectangles connected either by solid lines indicating a single metabolic step or by dashed lines indicating multiple metabolic steps. The reversibility of the steps is indicated by the direction of the arrows. The blue banners denote metabolite concentrations that are significantly high at dO2>90% due to aeration effect, at low acidity due to pH effect, or at low acidity due to an interaction effect between culture pH and aeration levels. The orange banners denote metabolite concentrations that are significantly low at low acidity due to pH effect, or due to an interaction effect between culture pH and aeration levels. Metabolic pathways are represented in ovals. The block arrows represent the uptake of glucose and ammonium as the main carbon and nitrogen source macronutrients, respectively. The banners indicate, using the same colour codes, the significant differences in the amount of metabolite consumed in response to differences in the control of aeration and extracellular acidity.
Figure 2:

Intracellular distribution of amino acids from TCA cycle precursors.

The amino acids and their TCA cycle intermediate precursors are depicted in rounded rectangles connected either by solid lines indicating a single metabolic step or by dashed lines indicating multiple metabolic steps. The reversibility of the steps is indicated by the direction of the arrows. The blue banners denote metabolite concentrations that are significantly high at dO2>90% due to aeration effect, at low acidity due to pH effect, or at low acidity due to an interaction effect between culture pH and aeration levels. The orange banners denote metabolite concentrations that are significantly low at low acidity due to pH effect, or due to an interaction effect between culture pH and aeration levels. Metabolic pathways are represented in ovals. The block arrows represent the uptake of glucose and ammonium as the main carbon and nitrogen source macronutrients, respectively. The banners indicate, using the same colour codes, the significant differences in the amount of metabolite consumed in response to differences in the control of aeration and extracellular acidity.

The transcriptional landscape of the yeast populations growing in different pH and dO2 controlling and monitoring regimes were investigated in order to identify the changes in gene expression events accompanying or underlying the differences observed in the exometabolic and the endometabolic profiles of these cultures. The effect of controlling dissolved oxygen or the pH of the culture was investigated by pooling the cultures such that the effect of either factor was investigated irrespective of the other, or by conducting an analysis of variance to identify the unique effect of each factor on the transcriptional profiles as well as the interaction (i.e. the synergy) between the factors.

Pooling experiments by a single factor, irrespective of the other factor proved to be a very stringent criterion to identify differential expression at a threshold of p-value <0.05 post FDR correction (see Materials and methods for details) between air+ and air−, or between pH+ and pH− cultures. In fact, this was the primary indicator of the fact that the synergistic effects between the two factors had an important contribution to explaining the transcriptional landscape underlying these observations at the phenotypic and metabolic levels. The expression of only three genes were significantly affected as a response to dissolved oxygen availability, and these genes were significantly associated with establishing protein localization to membrane (p-value=0.0118). The expression levels of 433 genes were responsive to controlling extracellular pH, although these genes were not significantly associated with a specific molecular function or biological process. However, the set was enriched for genes that are located in membrane-bound organelles (p-value=4.48×10−6), and a subset of those genes were significantly associated with membrane rafts (p-value=0.0168).

Analysis of variance showed that the expression level of 156 genes was significantly affected only by the level of aeration of the culture, and of 286 genes only by the extracellular pH of the cultivation environment. The transcription of 50 more genes were differentially affected by the interaction between the extracellular pH and dissolved oxygen availability. The 156 genes whose expression levels were affected only by the level of dissolved oxygen of the culture were not significantly associated with any biological process or molecular function, nor with any specific subcellular compartment of the cell, as classified by the Gene Ontology. On the other hand, a subset of the 286 genes, whose transcription levels were affected by extracellular pH, was significantly associated with actomyosin contractile ring organization (p-value=5.48×10−3), a cytokinesis-associated phenomenon. The subset of genes whose transcription was significantly altered in response to an interaction effect created by both oxygen availability and extracellular acidity were involved in growth-associated cellular mechanisms. These genes were significantly associated with cytoplasmic translation (p-value=0.0155); more specifically, they were genes encoding proteins that constitute the cytoplasmic ribosome structure (p-value=2.20×10−4), and unsurprisingly, the gene products were significantly associated with the ribosome (p-value=4.00×10−4).

Discussion

This paper investigated the synergetic effect of extracellular pH and oxygen availability on batch cultures of the Baker’s yeast, and explored the underlying transcriptional and metabolic changes, which instigated the measured phenotypic responses of these cultures. The most striking phenotypic response was observed in the growth-associated parameters. Maintaining high oxygen levels and mildly acidic extracellular environment throughout the duration of the cultivation was observed to assist growth. This was apparent both by the high growth rates achieved, hence indicating faster growth, and in the high cell populations and biomass densities reached.

These differences that were observed in growth characteristics were complemented by differences in the ability of these cultures to consume (or uptake) macronutrients such as glucose and ammonium, and produce (and subsequently secrete) metabolic by-products such as ethanol and glycerol. Furthermore, the physiological response could also be captured by differences in the production and secretion of metabolic intermediates, particularly those of TCA cycle intermediates and amino acids. The extracellular concentrations of pyruvate, citrate, cis-acotinate, and isocitrate were responsive to differences in pH and oxygen availability of the environment, as were those of alanine, methionine, cysteine, threonine, aspartate, arginine, and asparagine. These amino acids were able to employ only pyruvate and oxaloacetate as their biosynthetic precursors, along with ammonium. This could potentially imply that the upper TCA cycle was active and was coupled with dynamic secretion activity, which could be responsible for the exometabolic profiles observed for these cultures.

Broadly speaking, the concentration of TCA cycle intermediates and amino acids in the extracellular environment varied antagonistically in pH+ and pH− cultures. The amino acids that displayed significantly different exometabolic profiles across different conditions were of neutral character, except for arginine, which is strongly basic. On the other hand, the TCA cycle intermediates mentioned above, along with pyruvate, are able to support and maintain a low pH environment, since they all are acidic molecules. Whether the naturally occurring secretion of acidic compounds into a potentially compromised environment, where the pH was not controlled, escalated the severity of the adversely acidic conditions, or whether it is the susceptibility of the environment that induced over-secretion of acidic metabolites yet remains an open question.

A similar investigation of the endometabolic profiles highlighted the differences in the biosynthesis of compounds contributing to the intracellular amino acid pools, which would be essential for translation. These amino acids would be likened to currency amino acids required in the cell for growth and proliferation in contrast to those that were secreted out, which in a way, could serve as potential savings that could later be taken up from the extracellular environment. The concentration levels of 14 different amino acids were observed to vary in response to different levels of extracellular pH and oxygen availability, possibly indicating high adaptability and a global organisation of the amino acid biosynthetic routes to meet the demands of the cell exposed to different environmental conditions. Glutamate possibly served as the biosynthetic precursor of all of these amino acids, and it was likely to be produced from the TCA cycle intermediate α-ketoglutarate, given the metabolic findings under the investigated conditions.

The differences observed around the TCA cycle and the amino acid metabolism at the metabolic level were not accompanied by differences at the transcriptional level of the genes associated with these metabolic pathways. This indicated that the transcriptional profiles of the cell populations, at the time of steady growth, were robust, and that the cell populations sustained relatively constant transcription levels of central metabolic pathway enzymes despite substantial differences in environmental conditions. On the other hand, transcriptional differences were observed in the expression levels of genes involved in cytoplasmic translation, pointing towards the relevant cellular adjustments related to translation processes handled at the transcriptional level.

The synergistic effects of pH and oxygen availability would have been very difficult to determine during stationary phase of growth as yeast population growth is impeded primarily by the limitation in nutrient resources, in carbon in the case of the particular medium employed in this study, rather than low environmental pH or a limitation in extracellular oxygen levels. The stress imposed on the system would then instigate the manifestation of a three-factorial design problem, at the minimum; one including oxygen availability, pH and limiting nutrient availability investigated at different levels.

In conclusion, the synergy between environmental parameters emerged as the key effector of optimal growth and proliferation for eukaryotic cells, even at the level of the simplest eukaryote. This study explored the synergy between environmental pH and oxygen availability affecting yeast growth. It showed that this synergy, rather than the stand-alone effect of individual factors was responsible for most of the physiological changes, which were accompanied by an extensive rewiring of the cellular events manifesting both at the transcriptional level and at the metabolic level through the modulation of cytoplasmic translation coupled with the reorganisation in amino acid and their precursor pools. Design of experiments is often a crucial step in optimisation of bioprocesses to improve production systems in biotechnological, and particularly, in metabolic engineering applications. Yeast, a popular biotechnological workhorse, and an efficient cell factory, was thus shown to be impacted significantly and substantially by the synergy between cultivation parameters. This highlights the importance of selecting experimental design tools, which consider interaction effects in their evaluation, in order to exploit these biotechnologically relevant systems more efficiently to achieve improved bioprocess design leading to superior production performance.

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank Elif Dereli Eke, Serpil Eraslan, Betul Kirdar and Stephen G Oliver. Funding from The Leverhulme Trust (Grant no: ECF-2016-681) is gratefully acknowledged. The funding agency had no role in study design, data collection or interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

  1. Conflict of interest: No competing interests are to be declared.

References

1. Mattanovich D, Sauer M, Gasser B. Yeast biotechnology: teaching the old dog new tricks. Microb Cell Fact 2014;13:34.10.1186/1475-2859-13-34Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Robak K, Balcerek M. Review of second generation bioethanol production from residual biomass. Food Technol Biotechnol 2018;56:174–87.10.17113/ftb.56.02.18.5428Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Brochado A, Matos C, Møller BL, Hansen J, Mortensen UH, Patil K. Improved vanillin production in Baker’s yeast through in silico design. Microb Cell Fact 2010;9:84.10.1186/1475-2859-9-84Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Li M, Kildegaard KR, Chen Y, Rodriguez A, Borodina I, Nielsen J. De novo production of resveratrol from glucose or ethanol by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 2015;32:1–11.10.1016/j.ymben.2015.08.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. DeJong JM, Liu Y, Bollon AP, Long RM, Jennewein S, Williams D, et al. Genetic engineering of taxol biosynthetic genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 2006;93:212–24.10.1002/bit.20694Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. DeRisi JL, Iyer VR, Brown PO. Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 1997;278:680–6.10.1126/science.278.5338.680Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat Biotechnol 2001;19:242–7.10.1038/85686Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Winzeler EA, Shoemaker DD, Astromoff A, Liang H, Anderson K, Andre B, et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 1999;285:901–6.10.1126/science.285.5429.901Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Cherry JM, Adler C, Ball C, Chervitz SA, Dwight SS, Hester ET, et al. SGD : saccharomyces genome database. Nucleic Acids Res 1998;26:73–9.10.1093/nar/26.1.73Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H, Davis RW, Dujon B, Feldmann H, et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science 1996;274:563–7.10.1126/science.274.5287.546Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Dikicioglu D, Pir P, Oliver SG. Predicting complex phenotype-genotype interactions to enable yeast engineering: Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism and a cell factory. Biotechnol J 2013;8:1017–34.10.1002/biot.201300138Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Al-Mudhaffar S. Studies on the conditions of growth of Baker’s yeast, grown in solution of molasses or debis. Food/Nahrung 1978;22:385–9.10.1002/food.19780220403Suche in Google Scholar

13. Wasungu KM, Simard RE. Growth characteristics of Bakers’ yeast in ethanol. Biotechnol Bioeng 1982;24:1125–34.10.1002/bit.260240509Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Gibson BR, Lawrence SJ, Leclaire JP, Powell CD, Smart KA. Yeast responses to stresses associated with industrial brewery handling. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2007;31:535–69.10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00076.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Arroyo-López FN, Orlić S, Querol A, Barrio E. Effects of temperature, pH and sugar concentration on the growth parameters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. kudriavzevii and their interspecific hybrid. Int J Food Microbiol 2009;131:120–7.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.01.035Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Peña A, Sánchez NS, Álvarez H, Calahorra M, Ramírez J. Effects of high medium pH on growth, metabolism and transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2015;15:2.10.1093/femsyr/fou005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. David MH, Kirsop BH. Yeast growth in relation to the dissolved oxygen and sterol content of wort. J Inst Brew 1973;79:20–5.10.1002/j.2050-0416.1973.tb03491.xSuche in Google Scholar

18. Furukawa K, Heinzle E, Dunn IJ. Influence of oxygen on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in continuous culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 1983;25:2293–317.10.1002/bit.260251003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Aceituno FF, Orellana M, Torres J, Mendoza S, Slater AW, Melo F, et al. Oxygen response of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118 grown under carbon-sufficient, nitrogen-limited enological conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78:8340–52.10.1128/AEM.02305-12Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Peres MF, Tininis CR, Souza CS, Walker GM, Laluce C. Physiological responses of pressed Baker’s yeast cells pre-treated with citric, malic and succinic acids. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2005;21:537–43.10.1007/s11274-004-3136-xSuche in Google Scholar

21. Kasperski A, Miśkiewicz T. Optimization of pulsed feeding in a Baker’s yeast process with dissolved oxygen concentration as a control parameter. Biochem Eng J 2008;40:321–7.10.1016/j.bej.2008.01.002Suche in Google Scholar

22. Shi YA, Shen LP, Tang XX, Li ZP, Yuan WK, Chen MH. Effect of pH value and dissolved oxygen concentration on expression of hepatitis B surface antigen by genetically engineered yeast in fermentation processes. Chin J Biotechnol 1989;5:203–11.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Abrahão-Neto J, Infanti P, Vitolo M. Influence of pH, temperature and dissolved oxygen concentration on the production of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and invertase by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Brazilian J Chem Eng 1997;14:89–94.10.1590/S0104-66321997000100008Suche in Google Scholar

24. Imai T, Ohno T. Measurement of yeast intracellular pH by image processing and the change it undergoes during growth phase. J Biotechnol 1995;38:165–72.10.1016/0168-1656(94)00130-5Suche in Google Scholar

25. Orij R, Urbanus ML, Vizeacoumar FJ, Giaever G, Boone C, Nislow C, et al. Genome-wide analysis of intracellular pH reveals quantitative control of cell division rate by pH(c) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol 2012;13:R80.10.1186/gb-2012-13-9-r80Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Orij R, Brul S, Smits GJ. Intracellular pH is a tightly controlled signal in yeast. Biochim Bophysica Acta 2011;1810:933–44.10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.03.011Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Karagiannis J, Young PG. Intracellular pH homeostasis during cell-cycle progression and growth state transition in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Cell Sci 2001;114:2929–41.10.1242/jcs.114.16.2929Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Ruffin VA, Salameh AI, Boron WF, Parker MD. Intracellular pH regulation by acid-base transporters in mammalian neurons. Front Physiol 2014;5:43.10.3389/fphys.2014.00043Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Zahrl RJ, Peña DA, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. Systems biotechnology for protein production in Pichia pastoris. FEMS Yeast Res 2017;17:7.10.1093/femsyr/fox068Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Kumar V, Rathorre AS. Design of experiments applications in bioprocessing: concepts and approach. Biotechnol Prog 2014;30:86–99.10.1002/btpr.1821Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Cankorur-Cetinkaya A, Dias JM, Kludas J, Slater NK, Rousu J, Oliver SG, et al. CamOptimus: a tool for exploiting complex adaptive evolution to optimize experiments and processes in biotechnology. Microbiology 2017;163:829–39.10.1099/mic.0.000477Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Dikicioglu D, Dereli Eke E, Eraslan S, Oliver SG, Kirdar B. Saccharomyces cerevisiae adapted to grow in the presence of low-dose rapamycin exhibit altered amino acid metabolism. Cell Commun Signal 2018;16:85.10.1186/s12964-018-0298-ySuche in Google Scholar

33. Baganz F, Hayes A, Marren D, Gardner DC, Oliver SG. Suitability of replacement markers for functional analysis studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1997;13:1563–73.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199712)13:16<1563::AID-YEA240>3.0.CO;2-6Suche in Google Scholar

34. Kolesnikov N, Hastings E, Keays M, Melnichuk O, Tang YA, Williams E, et al. ArrayExpress update – simplifying data submissions. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:D1113–6.10.1093/nar/gku1057Suche in Google Scholar

35. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spellman P, Stoeckert C, et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet 2001;29:365–71.10.1038/ng1201-365Suche in Google Scholar

36. Seo J, Bakay M, Chen Y-W, Hilmer S, Shneiderman B, Hoffman EP. Interactively optimizing signal-to-noise ratios in expression profiling: project-specific algorithm selection and detection p-value weighting in Affymetrix microarrays. Bioinformatics 2004;20:2534–44.10.1093/bioinformatics/bth280Suche in Google Scholar

37. Boyle EI, Weng S, Gollub J, Jin H, Botstein D, Cherry JM, et al. GO::TermFinder – open source software for accessing Gene Ontology information and finding significantly enriched Gene Ontology terms associated with a list of genes. Bioinformatics 2004;20:3710–5.10.1093/bioinformatics/bth456Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-03-27
Accepted: 2019-05-10
Published Online: 2019-06-20
Published in Print: 2020-04-28

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review Article
  3. Lipidomics and cognitive dysfunction – A Narrative review
  4. Research Articles
  5. Effects of topiramate on adipocyte differentiation and gene expression of certain carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes
  6. Heterologous expression of a plant WRKY protein confers multiple stress tolerance in E. coli Bir bitkinin heterolog ifadesi WRKY proteini çoklu stres yaratır E. coli’de tolerans
  7. Cytogenetic impact of sodium chloride stress on root cells of Vigna radiata L. seedlings
  8. Understanding the impacts of self-shuffling approach on structure and function of shuffled endoglucanase enzyme via MD simulations
  9. Evaluation ofTrichoderma atroviride and Trichoderma citrinoviride growth profiles and their potentials as biocontrol agent and biofertilizer
  10. Physio-biochemical analyses in seedlings of sorghum-sudangrass hybrids that are grown under salt stress under in vitro conditions
  11. The structural diversity of ginsenosides affects their cholinesterase inhibitory potential
  12. Extracellular acidity and oxygen availability conjointly control eukaryotic cell growth via modulation of cytoplasmic translation
  13. Genome-wide identification, phylogeny and expression analysis of G6PC gene family in common carp, Cyprinus carpio
  14. The effect of Diplotaenia turcica root extract in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats
  15. Letter to the Editor
  16. Metabolomics analysis of medicinal insect Protaetia brevitarsis after Bacillus subtilis fermentation
  17. Opinion Paper
  18. Identifying and solving scientific problems in the medicine: key to become a competent scientist
Heruntergeladen am 12.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjb-2019-0130/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen