Abstract
Our interest should always be aroused when scholars reject the testable approaches that have underwritten scientific development since the seventeenth century. Academic excursions in the arts and humanities need not adhere to scientific benchmarks, of course, and discussions relevant to science that are presented there need not always be subject to rigorous examination. When investigations move into social-science territory, however, more focused attention is called for. Since the scholars discussed in this paper clearly think of themselves as social scientists, it is quite legitimate to subject their investigations to scientific scrutiny and logical analysis. This article briefly describes contemporary investigations and research paradigms characterized by unnecessary neologisms, flatulent jargon, fuzzy thinking, and unconvincing arguments about the discovery of new territory in well-ploughed ground.
References
Anderson, Stephen. 2012. Languages: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780199590599.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Andreski, Stanislav. 1972. Social sciences as sorcery. London: André Deutsch.Search in Google Scholar
Asimov, Isaac. 1988. The relativity of wrong. New York: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar
Bartolomé, Lilia. 2000. Democratizing bilingualism: The role of critical teacher education. In Zeynap Beykont (ed.), Lifting every voice: Pedagogy and politics of bilingualism, 167–186. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 2017. Giving voice: A personal essay on the shape of sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(5). 587–602.10.1111/josl.12268Search in Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 2013. Learn to write badly: How to succeed in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139208833Search in Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 2019. More examples, less theory: Historical studies of writing psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108696517Search in Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511845307.003Search in Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2013. Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783090419Search in Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. Further reflections on conversations of our time. Diacritics 27(1). 13–15.10.1353/dia.1997.0004Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. Dialogues avec Mitsou Ronat. Paris: Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar
Czaika, Mathias & Hein de Haas. 2014. The globalization of migration: Has the world become more migratory? International Migration Review 48(2). 283–323.10.1111/imre.12095Search in Google Scholar
Darwish, Abdullah. 2017. Review of Language and superdiversity (Karel Arnaut et al.). Journal of Language, Identity and Education 16(6). 427–429.10.1080/15348458.2017.1404911Search in Google Scholar
De Fina, Anna, Didem Ikizoglu & Jeremy Wegner. 2017. Introduction. In Anna De Fina, Didem Ikizoglu & Jeremy Wegner (eds.), Diversity and super-diversity: Sociocultural linguistic perspectives, vii–xii. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Duarte, Joana. 2020. Translanguaging in the context of mainstream multilingual education. International Journal of Multilingualism 17(2). 232–247.10.1080/14790718.2018.1512607Search in Google Scholar
Dutton, Denis. 1996–1998. The bad writing contest: Press releases, 1996–1998. http://www.denisdutton.com/bad_writing.htm#:~:text=The%20Bad%20Writing%20Contest%20attempts,serious%20academic%20journals%20or%20book (accessed 3 March 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Edwards, John. 1995. Multilingualism. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Edwards, John. 2003. Contextualizing language rights. Journal of Human Rights 2(4). 551–571.10.1080/1475483032000137138Search in Google Scholar
Edwards, John. 2010. Language diversity in the classroom. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847692276Search in Google Scholar
Edwards, John. 2020. History, philosophy and the social psychology of language. In Ali Al-Hoorie & Peter MacIntyre (eds.), Contemporary language motivation theory, 262–282. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781788925211-017Search in Google Scholar
Freire, Paulo. 1970. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.Search in Google Scholar
Fuller, Janet. 2018. Ideologies of language, bilingualism and monolingualism. In Annick De Houwer & Lourdes Ortega (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of bilingualism, 119–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316831922.007Search in Google Scholar
García, Ofelia. 2009. Bilingual education in the 21st century. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
García, Ofelia, Nelson Flores & Massimiliano Spotti. 2017. Language and society: A critical post-structuralist perspective. In Ofelia García, Nelson Flores & Massimiliano Spotti (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and society, 1–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212896.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2010. Personal reflections on theory and psychology. Theory & Psychology 20(6). 733–743.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199390076.003.0012Search in Google Scholar
Grin, François. 2018. On some fashionable terms in multilingualism research: Critical assessment and implications for language policy. In Peter Kraus & François Grin (eds.), The politics of multilingualism, 247–274. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/wlp.6.11griSearch in Google Scholar
Jaspers, Jürgen. 2018. The transformative limits of translanguaging. Language and Communication 58. 1–10.10.1016/j.langcom.2017.12.001Search in Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Normann. 2010. Languaging. Copenhagen: Copenhagen University Faculty of Humanities.Search in Google Scholar
Joseph, George, Vasu Reddy & Mary Searle-Chatterjee. 1990. Eurocentrism in the social sciences. Race and Class 31(4). 1–26.10.1177/030639689003100401Search in Google Scholar
Juffermans, Kasper, Jan Blommaert, Sjaak Kroon & Jinling Li. 2014. Dutch-Chinese repertoires and language ausbau in superdiversity. Discourse, Context and Media 4–5. 48–61.10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.001Search in Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. (1962 [2012]). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1969. The logic of nonstandard English. Georgetown Monographs on Language and Linguistics 22. 1–31.10.1016/B978-0-12-754850-0.50014-3Search in Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1976. Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lambert, Wallace, Richard Hodgson, Robert Gardner & Stanley Fillenbaum. 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60(1). 44–51.10.1037/h0044430Search in Google Scholar
Lindsay, James & Peter Boyle. 2017. The conceptual penis as a social construct. Cogent Social Sciences 3. Article 1330439.10.1080/23311886.2017.1330439Search in Google Scholar
Makoni, Sinfree. 2012. A critique of language, languaging and supervernacular / Uma crítica à noçãde língua, linguagem e supervernáculo. Muitas Vozes (Ponta Grossa) 1(2). 189–199.10.5212/MuitasVozes.v.1i2.0003Search in Google Scholar
May, Stephen. 2001. Language and minority rights. London: Longman.10.4324/9780203832547Search in Google Scholar
Meissner, Fran & Steven Vertovec. 2015. Comparing super-diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38(4). 541–555.10.4324/9781315687483Search in Google Scholar
Minogue, Kenneth. 2001. Bang to rights. Times Literary Supplement, 9 February. 26–27.Search in Google Scholar
Mohanty, Sachidananda. 2005. Towards a global citizenship: An interview with Homi Bhabha. The Hindu, 3 July. https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-literaryreview/towards-a-global-cultural-citizenship/article28500054.ece (accessed 3 March).Search in Google Scholar
Moore, Emilee, Jessica Bradley & James Simpson (eds.). 2020. Translanguaging as transformation: The collaborative construction of new linguistic realities. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781788928052Search in Google Scholar
Orwell, George. 1945 [1970]. Notes on nationalism. In Sonia Orwell & Ian Angus (eds.), The collected essays, journalism and letters of George Orwell (Volume 3), 410–431. London: Penguin. [The essay first appeared in the May 1945 number of Polemic.]Search in Google Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo, Ofelia García & Wallis Reid. 2018. A translanguaging view of the linguistic system of bilinguals. Applied Linguistics Review 10(4). 625–651.10.1515/applirev-2018-0020Search in Google Scholar
Pavlenko, Aneta. 2019. Superdiversity and why it isn’t: Reflections on terminological innovation and academic branding. In Barbara Schmenk, Stephan Breidbach & Lutz Küster (eds.), Sloganization in language education discourse: Conceptual thinking in the age of academic marketization, 142–168. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781788921879-009Search in Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 2004. Performativity and language studies. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 1(1). 1–19.10.1207/s15427595cils0101_1Search in Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 2006. Postmodernism in language policy. In Thomas Ricento (ed.), An introduction to language policy, 60–76. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 2016. Mobile times, mobile terms: The trans-super-poly-metro movement. In Nikolas Coupland (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates, 201–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107449787.010Search in Google Scholar
Pluckrose, Helen & James Lindsay. 2020. Cynical theories. Durham, North Carolina: Pitchstone.Search in Google Scholar
Richards, Jack. 2006. Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1950. Unpopular essays. London: Allen & Unwin.Search in Google Scholar
Schmenk, Barbara, Stephan Breidbach & Lutz Küster (eds.). 2019. Sloganization in language education discourse: Conceptual thinking in the age of academic marketization. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781788921879Search in Google Scholar
Schuessler, Jennifer. 2018. Hoaxers slip breastaurants and dog-park sex into journals. New York Times, 4 October. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/04/arts/academic-journals-hoax.html (accessed 3 March 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Shermer, Michael. 2006. Wronger than wrong. Scientific American 295(5). 40.10.1038/scientificamerican1106-40Search in Google Scholar
Sokal, Alan. 2008. Beyond the hoax: Science, philosophy and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sokal, Alan & Jean Bricmont. 1999. Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern intellectuals’ abuse of science. New York: Picador.10.1063/1.882506Search in Google Scholar
Spencer-Bennett, Joe. 2020. The people’s critical linguistics: using archival data to investigate responses to linguistic informalisation. Language in Society 50(2). 283–304.10.1017/S0047404520000305Search in Google Scholar
Steiner, George. 1971. In Bluebeard’s castle. London: Faber & Faber.Search in Google Scholar
Viebrock, Britta. 2019. Just another prefix? From inter- to transcultural foreign language learning and beyond. In Barbara Schmenk, Stephan Breidbach & Lutz Küster (eds.), Sloganization in language education discourse: Conceptual thinking in the age of academic marketization, 72–93. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781788921879-006Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Cen. 1996. Secondary education: Teaching in the bilingual situation. In Cen Williams, Gwyn Lewis & Colin Baker (eds.), Pwyso a Mesur y Polisi Iaith: Dehongli ac Arfarnu Polisi Iaith mewn Addysg Gwynedd / The Language Policy: Taking Stock: Interpreting and Appraising Gwynedd’s Language Policy in Education, 39–78. Caernarfon: Gwynedd County Council.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelei
- Sociolinguistica: past, present and future
- Writing regime change: a research agenda
- Pasts, presents and futures: discourses of colonization and decolonization
- Metalinguistic activities as a focus of sociolinguistic research: Language Management Theory, its potential, and fields of application
- Deconstructivism, postmodernism and their offspring: disorders of our time
- Language biographies
- Progress in LPP: towards an assessment of challenges from critical perspectives
- Sociolinguistics in an increasingly technologized reality
- Language policy research directions embedded in the sociolinguistic enterprise
- Superdiversity and its explanatory limits
- Language and identity: past concerns, future directions
- Reconstructing multilingualism in the Habsburg state: lessons learnt and implications for historical sociolinguistics
- Language planning and language policies for sign languages: an emerging civil rights movement
- Rethinking some terminological and disciplinary boundaries in researching language maintenance and shift (in the context of migration and beyond)
- The macrosociolinguistics of language contact
- Beyond the binarism: locating past, present and future sociolinguistic research on ideologies of communication
- The pursuit of language standardization research as a mission for true sociolinguists
- Spatial representation and sociolinguistic synergies
- Reviews
- Josephson, Olle (2018): Språkpolitik [Language policy]. Stockholm: Morfem. 320 p.
- Chalier, Marc (2021): Les normes de prononciation du français : une étude perceptive panfrancophone (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 454). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. 544 p.
- Spolsky, Bernard (2021): Rethinking Language Policy. Edinburgh. Edinburgh University Press. 276 p.
- Borbély, Anna (ed. 2020): Nemzetiségi nyelvi tájkép Magyarországon (Linguistic Landscape of Nationalities in Hungary). Budapest: Nyelvtudományi Intézet, 262 p.
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelei
- Sociolinguistica: past, present and future
- Writing regime change: a research agenda
- Pasts, presents and futures: discourses of colonization and decolonization
- Metalinguistic activities as a focus of sociolinguistic research: Language Management Theory, its potential, and fields of application
- Deconstructivism, postmodernism and their offspring: disorders of our time
- Language biographies
- Progress in LPP: towards an assessment of challenges from critical perspectives
- Sociolinguistics in an increasingly technologized reality
- Language policy research directions embedded in the sociolinguistic enterprise
- Superdiversity and its explanatory limits
- Language and identity: past concerns, future directions
- Reconstructing multilingualism in the Habsburg state: lessons learnt and implications for historical sociolinguistics
- Language planning and language policies for sign languages: an emerging civil rights movement
- Rethinking some terminological and disciplinary boundaries in researching language maintenance and shift (in the context of migration and beyond)
- The macrosociolinguistics of language contact
- Beyond the binarism: locating past, present and future sociolinguistic research on ideologies of communication
- The pursuit of language standardization research as a mission for true sociolinguists
- Spatial representation and sociolinguistic synergies
- Reviews
- Josephson, Olle (2018): Språkpolitik [Language policy]. Stockholm: Morfem. 320 p.
- Chalier, Marc (2021): Les normes de prononciation du français : une étude perceptive panfrancophone (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 454). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. 544 p.
- Spolsky, Bernard (2021): Rethinking Language Policy. Edinburgh. Edinburgh University Press. 276 p.
- Borbély, Anna (ed. 2020): Nemzetiségi nyelvi tájkép Magyarországon (Linguistic Landscape of Nationalities in Hungary). Budapest: Nyelvtudományi Intézet, 262 p.