Progress in LPP: towards an assessment of challenges from critical perspectives

References

Agger, Ben. 1991. Critical theory, poststructuralism, postmodernism: Their sociological relevance. Annual Review of Sociology 17. 105–131.10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.000541Search in Google Scholar

Banon, Tristane. 2021. La paix des sexes. Paris: Éditions de l’Observatoire.Search in Google Scholar

Barakos, Elisabeth. 2020. Linguistic and social justice: Towards a debate of intersections and disjuncture. Journal of Sociolinguistics 24. 265–277.10.1111/josl.12379Search in Google Scholar

Bastié, Eugénie. 2021. La guerre des idées. Enquête au cœur de l’intelligentsia française. Paris: Robert Laffont.Search in Google Scholar

Best, Steven & Douglas Kellner. 1991. Postmodern theory. Critical interrogations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-21718-2_7Search in Google Scholar

Boucher, Manuel. 2018. La gauche et la race. Réflexions sur les marches de la dignité et les antimouvements décoloniaux. Paris: L’Harmattan.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1982. Ce que parler veut dire. L’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard.Search in Google Scholar

Bouveresse, Jacques. 1999. Prodiges et vertiges de l’analogie. Paris: Raisons d’agir.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Bradley & Jason Manning. 2018. The rise of victimhood culture. Microaggressions, safe spaces, and the new culture wars. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-70329-9Search in Google Scholar

Church, Jonathan. 2020. Reinventing racism. Why “white fragility” is the wrong way to think about racial inequality. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Bernard. 1989. Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620812Search in Google Scholar

Dell’Aquila, Vittorio & Gabriele Iannàccaro. 2004. La pianificazione linguistica. Roma: Carocci.Search in Google Scholar

Gazzola, Michele, François Grin, Linda Cardinal & Kathleen Heugh (eds.). Forthcoming. The Routledge handbook of language policy and planning. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Gazzola, Michele & Bengt-Arne Wickström (eds.). 2016. The economics of language policy. Boston: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262034708.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gazzola, Michele, Torsten Templin & Bengt-Arne Wickström (eds.). 2018. Language policy and linguistic justice. Economic, philosophical and sociolinguistic approaches. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-75263-1Search in Google Scholar

González-Núñez, Gabriel & Reine Meylaerts (eds.). 2017. Translation and public policy. Interdisciplinary perspectives and case studies. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315521770-1Search in Google Scholar

Grin, François. 2003. Economics and language planning. Current Issues in Language Planning 4(1). 1–66.10.1080/14664200308668048Search in Google Scholar

Grin, François. 2021. Misconceptions of economics and political economy in sociolinguistic research. In John Petrovic & Bedrettin Yazan (eds.), The commodification of language: Conceptual concerns and empirical manifestations, 56–70. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003028581-51aSearch in Google Scholar

Grin, François, Marácz, László & Nike Pokorn (eds.). 2022. Advances in interdisciplinary language policy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/wlp.9Search in Google Scholar

Halévi, Ran. 2017. Le nouveau régime de la vérité. Le Débat 197. 28–41.10.3917/deba.197.0028Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Joseph, 2018. The problem with ‘critical’ studies. In Due Course, http://induecourse.ca/the-problem-with-critical-studies, posted on January 26, 2018 (accessed 2 March 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Heugh, Kathleen. Forthcoming. Linguistic and epistemic erasure in Africa. Coloniality, linguistic human rights and decoloniality. In Michele Gazzola, François Grin, Linda Cardinal & Kathleen Heugh (eds.), The Routledge handbook of language policy and planning. London & New York: RoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar

Hicks, Stephen. 2011. Explaining postmodernism. Skepticism and socialism from Rousseau to Foucault. Roscoe: Ockham’s Razor Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Hult, Francis M. & David Cassels Johnson (eds.). 2015: Research methods in language policy and planning. A practical guide. Malden: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118340349Search in Google Scholar

Ives, Peter. 2018. Language and the state in Western political theory. Implications for language policy and planning. In James W. Tollefson & Miguel Pérez-Milans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning, 183–201. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190458898.013.16Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, Robert B. & Richard B. Baldauf. 1997. Language planning from practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781800418059Search in Google Scholar

Kraus, Peter A. & François Grin (eds.). 2018. The politics of multilingualism. Europeanisation, globalization and linguistic governance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/wlp.6Search in Google Scholar

Lane-Mercier, Gillian, Denise Merkle & Jane Koustas (eds.). 2018. Minority languages, national languages, and official language policies. Kingston & Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.10.2307/j.ctv941x3tSearch in Google Scholar

Lindsay, James A., Peter Boghossian & Helen Pluckrose. 2018. Academic grievance studies and the corruption of scholarship. Areo (October 2), https://areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studies-and-the-corruption-of-scholarship/ (accessed 2 March 2022).Search in Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine. 2000. Points against postmodernism. Chicago-Kent Law Review 75 (3). 687–712.Search in Google Scholar

Mamou, Yves. 2019. L’université kidnappée (avec son consentement) par les indigénistes. Revue des Deux Mondes (mai 2019). 48–54.Search in Google Scholar

Maurais, Jacques (ed.). 1987. Politique et aménagement linguistiques. Québec & Paris: Conseil de la langue française & Le Robert.Search in Google Scholar

Minowitz, Peter. 2016. Rescuing ‘diversity’ from affirmative action and campus activists. Perspectives on Political Science 45 (3). 147–162.10.1080/10457097.2016.1181894Search in Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. 1997. The last word. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195149831.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Milans, Miguel & James W. Tollefson. 2018. Language policy and planning: Directions for future research. In James W. Tollefson & Miguel Pérez-Milans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning, 727–741. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190458898.013.36Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 2018. Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism and progress. London: Allen Lane.Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 2021. Rationality: What it is, why it seems, scarce, why it matters. New York: Viking.Search in Google Scholar

Pluckrose, Helen & James Lindsay. 2017. A manifesto against the enemies of modernity. Areo (August 22), https://areomagazine.com/2017/08/22/a-manifesto-against-the-enemies-of-modernity (accessed 2 March 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Pluckrose, Helen & James Lindsay. 2020. Cynical theories: How activist scholarship made everything about race, gender and identity – and why this harms everybody. Durham: Pitchstone Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Ricento, Thomas (ed.). 2006. An introduction to language policy. Theory and method. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Ricento, Thomas (ed.). 2015. Language policy and political economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199363391.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ricento, Thomas, Yael Peled & Peter Ives (eds.). 2015. Language policy and political theory: Building bridges, assessing breaches. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-15084-0Search in Google Scholar

Roudinesco, Élisabeth. 2021. Soi-même comme un roi. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Roza, Stéphanie. 2020. La gauche contre les lumières ? Paris: Fayard.10.3917/huma.328.0082Search in Google Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz. 1997. Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder: Westview Press.10.4324/9780429500275Search in Google Scholar

Shermer, Michael. 2020. Giving the devil his due. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108779395Search in Google Scholar

Shorten, Andrew. 2017. Four conceptions of linguistic disadvantage. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 38(7). 607–621.10.1080/01434632.2016.1192174Search in Google Scholar

Sokal, Alan & Jean Bricmont. 1997. Impostures intellectuelles. Paris: Odile Jacob.Search in Google Scholar

Spolsky, Bernard (ed.). 2012. The Cambridge handbook of language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511979026Search in Google Scholar

Tollefson, James W. 1991. Planning language, planning inequality. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Tollefson, James W. & Miguel Pérez-Milans (eds.). 2018a. The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190458898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Tollefson, James W. & Miguel Pérez-Milans. 2018b. Research and practice in language policy and planning. In James W. Tollefson & Miguel Pérez-Milans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning, 1–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190458898.013.1Search in Google Scholar

Valentin, Pierre. 2022. L’idéologie woke. Anatomie du wokism (1). Paris: Fondation pour l’innovation politique, https://www.fondapol.org/etude/lideologie-woke-1-anatomie-du-wokisme/ (accessed 2 March 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Agnes. 2014. Imprisoned in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199321490.001.0001Search in Google Scholar