Startseite Objections Proffering Choices: Negation in the Co-Construction of Political Identity by Rival Partisans in the Russian State Duma
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Objections Proffering Choices: Negation in the Co-Construction of Political Identity by Rival Partisans in the Russian State Duma

  • Richard Anderson EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 9. April 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Summary

Legislatures are often seen as fostering democracy by counterbalancing executive power. Crippled by constitutional restraints on its powers and by electoral fraud that guarantees the dominance of a single party loyal to the sitting president, the Russian State Duma seems an unsatisfactory counterweight. But a legislature also fosters democracy by acting as a megaphone reminding voters that they retain choices among opposed political identities. Because syntactic negation works by formulating a positive proposition to which introduction of a negative particle expresses some unspecified objection, every negative sentence presents an audience with at least two alternatives – and because the unspecified feature of the objection renders construal indeterminate, actually many more than two. If so, when Duma deputies address each other with negation, they co-construct alternatives before the public, preserving awareness of democratic choice even when fraud vitiates it in practice.

4 References

Athanasiadou, Angeliki. 1991. The discourse functions of questions. Pragmatics (= Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association: IPrA) 1(1). 107–122.10.1075/prag.1.1.02athSuche in Google Scholar

Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words, edited with preface by J.O. Urmson. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard.Suche in Google Scholar

Carston, Robyn. 1996. Metalinguistic negation and echoic use. Journal of pragmatics 25 (3). 309–330.10.1016/0378-2166(94)00109-XSuche in Google Scholar

Fish, M. Steven. 2005. Democracy derailed in Russia: The failure of open politics. New York: Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511791062Suche in Google Scholar

Gentiviso, Chris. 2013. Obama’s ‘Muslim socialist’ joke draws big laughs. The Huffington Post 27/04/2013. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/27/obama-muslim-socialist_n_3171902.html (accessed 28 September 2013).Suche in Google Scholar

Givon, Talmy. 1978. Negation in language: Pragmatics, function, ontology. In Peter Cole (ed.), Pragmatics, 69–112. New York: Academic.10.1163/9789004368873_005Suche in Google Scholar

Grani. 2012. Думская комиссия по этике предложила Гудковым и Пономареву сдать мандаты, 21.06.2012. http://grani.ru/Politics/Russia/Parliament/Duma/m.198551.html (accessed 7 February 2014).Suche in Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. 1985. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61(1). 121–174.10.2307/413423Suche in Google Scholar

Ilie, Cornelia. 1994. What else can I tell you? A pragmatic study of English rhetorical questions as discursive and argumentative acts. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Suche in Google Scholar

Ilie, Cornelia. 2010. Identity co-construction in parliamentary discourse practices. In Cornelia Ilie (ed.), European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices, 57–78. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/gcrp/workspace/links/cornelia_ilie_identity_co-construction.pdf (accessed 30 December 2013).10.1075/dapsac.38.04iliSuche in Google Scholar

Jacoby, Sally & Elinor Ochs. 1995. Co-construction: An introduction. Research on language and social interaction 28(3). 171–183.10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1Suche in Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. 1963 [1852]. The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Third edition. New York: International Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Myagkov, Mikhail, Peter C. Ordeshook & Dimitri Shakin. 2009. The forensics of election fraud: Russia and Ukraine. New York: Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511626807Suche in Google Scholar

Rhode, Hannah. 2006. Rhetorical questions as redundant interrogatives. San Diego Linguistics Papers 2. 134–168.Suche in Google Scholar

Stewart, Miranda. 2011. Contested talk and the (co-)construction of identity: Spanish parliamentary debate. In Nuria Lorenzo-Dus (ed.), Spanish at work: Analysing institutional discourse across the Spanish-speaking world, 111–129. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230299214_9Suche in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. New York: Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Suche in Google Scholar

Treisman, Daniel. 2011. The return: Russia’s journey from Gorbachev to Medvedev. New York: Free Press.Suche in Google Scholar

White, Stephen, Richard Rose & Ian McAllister. 1997. How Russia Votes. Chatham, New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Wilson, Andrew. 2005. Virtual politics: Faking democracy in the post-Soviet world. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale.Suche in Google Scholar

Zubov, Valerij. 2013. Валерий Зубов выступил на пленарном заседании Государственной Думы. http://zubow.ru/cgi-bin/sanitarium/view.cgi?id=657&cat_id=1&print=1 (accessed 12 December 2013).Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-4-9
Published in Print: 2016-4-1

© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 27.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/slaw-2016-0003/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen