Summary
Ever since the Russian “Winter of discontent” in 2011/12, the role of social networks in the protest movement has been much studied. Researchers have analysed the emerging structures of online political engagement, the role of social networks in the organization of protest events, the interaction of old and new media, and new models of political leadership. Less attention has been paid to the form, style and rhetoric of online political talk and to the interaction of established models of political discourse with the affordances and constraints of new technologies. In this paper, I focus on political humour and analyse one Twitter event from 7 October 2011: tweets featuring the hashtag spasiboputinuzaeto (‘thankstoputinforthat’). I look at the origin and spread of the hashtag, the style of responses, variations and metacommentaries to it. I argue that #spasiboputinuzaeto is a particularly telling example of how established traditions of political humour are transformed and transmediated in a digital context.
References
Alexander, Lawrence. 2015. Social Network Analysis Reveals Full Scale of Kremlin’s Twitter Bot Campaign. Global Voices 2 April. https://globalvoices.org/2015/04/02/analyzing-kremlin-twitter-bots/ (accessed 21 November 2015).Suche in Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis (ed.). 2014. Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110346831Suche in Google Scholar
Axapkina, Ia (ed.). 2014. Sovremennyj russkij jazyk v internete. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Suche in Google Scholar
Camus, Rémi. 2006. ‘We’ll Hack Them, even in the Outhouse’: On a Phrase by V.V. Putin. In Kultura 10 (special issue on Language and Social Change: New Tendencies in the Russian Language). http://www.kultura-rus.uni-bremen.de/kultura_dokumente/ausgaben/englisch/kultura_10_2006_EN.pdf (accessed 21 November 2015).Suche in Google Scholar
Enikolopov, Ruben, Maria Petrova, & Konstantin Sonin. 2013. Social Media and Corruption. Center for New Media and Society, Working Papers. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2153378 (accessed 21 November 2015).Suche in Google Scholar
Gabowitsch, Mischa. 2012. Social Media, Mobilisation and Protest Slogans in Moscow and Beyond. Digital Icons 7. http://www.digitalicons.org/issue07/files/2012/06/7.6.1_Gabowitsch.pdf (accessed 21 November 2015).Suche in Google Scholar
Gorham, Michael S., Ingunn Lunde & Martin Paulsen (eds.). 2014. Digital Russia: The Language, Culture and Politics of New Media Communication. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315816470Suche in Google Scholar
Gorham, Michael S. 2013. Medvedev’s New Media Gambit: The Language of Power in 140 Characters or Less. In Per-Arne Bodin, Stefan Hedlund, and Elena Namli (eds.), Power and Legitimacy – Challenges from Russia, 199–219. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Greene, Samuel A. 2013. Beyond Bolotnaia Bridging Old and New in Russia’s Election Protest Movement. Problems of Post-Communism 60 (2). 40–52.10.2753/PPC1075-8216600204Suche in Google Scholar
Grin, Samuel’ A. [Samuel A. Greene]. 2012. Tvitter i rossijskij protest: memy, seti i mobilizacija.” Rabočie materialy CIIO 1. Moscow. http://de.scribd.com/doc/94393467/Твиттер-и-российский-протест-РМ-ЦИИО-2012-1 (accessed 21 November 2015).Suche in Google Scholar
Gusejnov, Gasan (ed.). 2014. Russkij jazyk i novye texnologii. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.Suche in Google Scholar
Jonson, Lena. 2015. Art and Protest in Putin’s Russia. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315728469Suche in Google Scholar
Kelly, John, Bruce Etling, Rob Faris, John Palfrey, Urs Gasser, John Kelly, Karina Alexanyan, Vladimir Barash 2012. Mapping Russian Twitter. Cambridge, MA: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society. http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/publications (accessed 21 November 2015).Suche in Google Scholar
Krongauz, Maksim. 2013. Samoučitel’ olbanskogo. Moscow: Ast.Suche in Google Scholar
Mroczek, Kristine & Crispin Thurlow (eds.). 2011. Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Nikiporets-Takigawa, Galina. 2013. Tweeting the Russian Protests. Digital Icons 9. http://www.digitalicons.org/issue09/files/2013/06/DI_9_1_Nikiporets.pdf (accessed 21 November 2015).Suche in Google Scholar
Oates, Sarah. 2013. Revolution Stalled: The Political Limits of the Internet in the Post-Soviet Sphere. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199735952.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Pančenko, Egor. 2012. Mitingi ‘Za čestnye vybory’: protestnaja aktivnost’ v social’nyx setjax.” Digital Icons 7. http://www.digitalicons.org/issue07/files/2012/06/7.5.5_Panchenko.pdf (accessed 21 November 2015).Suche in Google Scholar
Paulsen, Martin & Zvereva, Vera. 2014. Testing and Contesting Russian Twitter. In Michael S. Gorham, Ingunn Lunde & Martin Paulsen (eds.), Digital Russia: The Language, Culture and Politics of New Media Communication, 88–104. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Pil’gun, Marija (ed.). 2011. Kommunikacii v transformirujuščemsja mediaprostranstve. Moscow: Izdatel’skij dom NIU VŠE.Suche in Google Scholar
Radčenko, D.A. 2009. ‘Padončestvo’: social’nyj fenomen i jazykovaja igra.” In Dmitrij Gromov & Marina Martynova (eds.), Molodežnye subkul’tury Moskvy, 504–524. Moscow: Institut etnologii i antropologii RAN.Suche in Google Scholar
Rheingold, Howard. 1993. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Suche in Google Scholar
Suvorov, Gleb. 2012. Kto že vse-taki byl na Bolotnoj i na Saxarova? Analiz profilej 20,000 učastnikov mitinga. Moscow: Basilisklab. http://basilisklab.com/boloto-analis-posetitelei.html. (accessed 21 November 2015).Suche in Google Scholar
Toler, Aric. 2015. Inside the Kremlin Troll Army Machine: Templates, Guidelines, and Paid Posts. Global Voices 14 March. https://globalvoices.org/2015/03/14/russia-kremlin-troll-army-examples/ (accessed 21 November 2015).Suche in Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2011. Ambient Affiliation: A Linguistic Perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society 13. 788–806.10.1177/1461444810385097Suche in Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web (= Bloomsbury Discourse Series). London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781472541642Suche in Google Scholar
© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Titelseiten
- Aufsätze
- Preface
- Linguistic Violence in Contemporary Russian Public Discourses
- Objections Proffering Choices: Negation in the Co-Construction of Political Identity by Rival Partisans in the Russian State Duma
- Posing Questions without Asking
- Patriotyzm genetyczny, półka kulturowa and Palikotyzacja X-a – blends as catchwords in Polish political discourse
- Hashtag Poetics: Political humour on Russian Twitter
- Quotations, intertextual references, models and myths in the presidential debate of the Czech Parliament
- Interdiscursive strategies of metaphor-driven rhetoric in Romanian discourses on a political crisis
- Intertextual references in British, German and Russian political interviews and blogs
- Types and functions of intertextual references in the Russian State Duma
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Titelseiten
- Aufsätze
- Preface
- Linguistic Violence in Contemporary Russian Public Discourses
- Objections Proffering Choices: Negation in the Co-Construction of Political Identity by Rival Partisans in the Russian State Duma
- Posing Questions without Asking
- Patriotyzm genetyczny, półka kulturowa and Palikotyzacja X-a – blends as catchwords in Polish political discourse
- Hashtag Poetics: Political humour on Russian Twitter
- Quotations, intertextual references, models and myths in the presidential debate of the Czech Parliament
- Interdiscursive strategies of metaphor-driven rhetoric in Romanian discourses on a political crisis
- Intertextual references in British, German and Russian political interviews and blogs
- Types and functions of intertextual references in the Russian State Duma