Startseite Intertextual references in British, German and Russian political interviews and blogs
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Intertextual references in British, German and Russian political interviews and blogs

  • Maria A. Sivenkova EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 9. April 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Summary

The purpose of this contribution is to investigate some cross-cultural and genre-related peculiarities of intertextual references derived from British, German and Russian political interviews and politicians’ blogs.

D. Weiss’s (2012) classification of intertextual references is applied in the study, containing the following classes: (1) literary references: literary fiction, political and scientific literature, etc.; (2) political topicality: quotations from various genres of political discourse, references to mass-media texts from traditional or internet-based mass media; (3) historical figures and contemporaries: intertextual references that are not related to hot political issues; (4) folk wisdom: proverbs and sayings, tautologies and truisms, jokes, etc.; (5) music and show business; (6) cinematographic references; (7) advertising.

The cross-cultural and cross-genre analyses attempted in this study allow uncovering some interesting similarities and differences in the use of intertextual references in the six data sets related to the degree of polyphonicity, eclecticism, and the openness of boundaries of political discourse.

References

Austermühl, Frank. 2014. The Great American Scaffold: Intertextuality and identity in American presidential discourse (Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.53Suche in Google Scholar

Elspaß, Stephan. 2002. Phraseological units in parliamentary discourse. In Paul A. Chilton & Christina Schäffner (eds.), Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic approaches to political discourse, 81–110. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.4.06elsSuche in Google Scholar

Emmler, Martin, Volling, Jens & Vowe, Gerhard. 2012. Changing political communication in Germany: Findings from a longitudinal study on the influence of the Internet on political information, discussion and the participation of citizens. In Communications 37 (3). 233–252.10.1515/commun-2012-0013Suche in Google Scholar

Fetzer, Anita. 2010. Small stories in political discourse: The public self goes private. In Christian R. Hoffmann (ed.), Narrative revisited: Telling a Story in the Age of New Media, 163–184. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.199.09fetSuche in Google Scholar

Fetzer, Anita. 2012. Quotations in monologic and dialogic political discourse. In Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman & Elisabeth Reber (eds.), Follow-ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Form and Function. Proceedings of the EFC strategic workshop, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, 72–86. Universität Würzburg: OPUS. http://opus.bibliothek.uni-wuerzburg.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/6116 (accessed on 3.12.2015).Suche in Google Scholar

Gadavanij, Savitri. 2002. Intertextuality as discourse strategy: the case of no-confidence debates in Thailand. In Diane Nelson (ed.), Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 9, 35–55. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/arts/info/125154/leeds_working_papers_in_linguistics_and_phonetics/1947/volume_9_2002 (accessed on 3.12.2015).Suche in Google Scholar

Gruber, Helmut. 2012. Establishing intertextual references in Austrian parliamentary debates. A pilot study. In Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman & Elisabeth Reber (eds.), Follow-ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-cultural Exploration of their Form and Function. Proceedings of the EFC strategic workshop, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, 86–107. Universität Würzburg: OPUS. http://opus.bibliothek.uni-wuerzburg.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/6116 (accessed on 3.12.2015).Suche in Google Scholar

Hodges, Adam. 2011. The “War on Terror” Narrative: Discourse and Intertextuality in the Construction and Contestation of Sociopolitical Reality. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ilie, Cornelia. 2000. Cliché-based metadiscursive argumentation in the Houses of Parliament. In International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10 (1). 65–84.10.1111/j.1473-4192.2000.tb00140.xSuche in Google Scholar

Ilie, Cornelia. 2009. Argumentative functions of parentheticals in parliamentary debates. In Gloria Álvarez-Benito, Gabriela Fernández-Díaz & Isabel Íñigo-Mora (eds.), Discourse and Politics, Chapter four, 61–79. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuo, Sai-Hua. 2001. Reported Speech in Chinese Political Discourse. In Discourse Studies 3 (2). 181–202.10.1177/1461445601003002002Suche in Google Scholar

Meraz, Sharon. 2009. Is There an Elite Hold? Traditional Media to Social Media Agenda Setting Influence in Blog Networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14. 682–707.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01458.xSuche in Google Scholar

Momani, Kawakib, Badarneh, Muhammad A. & Migdadi, Fathi. 2010. Intertextual borrowings in ideologically competing discourses: The case of the Middle East. In Journal of Intercultural Communication 22. http://www.immi.se/intercultural (accessed on 3.12.2015).Suche in Google Scholar

Orwenjo, Daniel Ochieng. 2009. Political grandstanding and the use of proverbs in African political discourse. In Discourse & Society 20 (1). 123–146.10.1177/0957926508097097Suche in Google Scholar

Reyes-Rodriguez, Antonio. 2009. Shifts, voices and positionings in political discourse: A comparative analysis of creating allies and enemies through linguistic choices. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Shilikhina, Ksenia. 2013. Canned jokes in Russian political discourse. In The European Journal of Humour Research 2 (1). 84–100.10.7592/EJHR2013.1.2.shilikhinaSuche in Google Scholar

Stieglitz, Stefan & Dang-Xuan, Linh. 2013. Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework. In Social Network Analysis and Mining 3 (4). 1277–1291.10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3Suche in Google Scholar

Wallsten, Kevin. 2007. Agenda Setting and the Blogosphere: An Analysis of the Relationship between Mainstream Media and Political Blogs. In Review of Policy Research24 (6). 567–587.10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00300.xSuche in Google Scholar

Weilin, Dou. 2011. A Comparative Study of Governmental Discourse between the People’s Republic of China and the United States of America. Shanghai International Studies University: PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Weiss, Daniel (2012). Deputaty ljubjat citaty: ssylki na ksenoteksty v Gosdume [Deputies love quotations: references to xenotexts in the State Duta]. In Nina Rozanova (ed.), Russkij jazyk segodnja: Problemy rečevogo obščenija [The Russian language today: issues of speech communication], 64–75. Moskva: Flinta/Nauka.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-4-9
Published in Print: 2016-4-1

© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 27.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/slaw-2016-0009/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen