Startseite Cognitive Status and Subject Reference in Spanish Written Discourse
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Cognitive Status and Subject Reference in Spanish Written Discourse

  • Ingrid Abisambra Miccheli EMAIL logo und Margaret Lubbers Quesada
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 28. April 2023

Abstract

Speakers make assumptions regarding the informativeness and saliency of referents in discourse and about their addressee’s cognitive status (memory and attention) regarding those referents. These assumptions, in turn, determine the forms (e.g., pronouns, NPs) speakers use when referring to entities. Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2). 274–307 proposed a set of implicationally related cognitive statuses in the Givenness Hierarchy that predict the forms speakers use to refer to entities in discourse. Greater levels of attention and memory predict the use of phonetically minimal referential forms and lesser levels predict more phonetically elaborate forms. Blackwell, Sarah E. & Margaret Lubbers Quesada. 2012. Third-person subjects in native speakers’ and L2 learners’ narratives: Testing (and revising) the Givenness Hierarchy for Spanish. In Kimberly Geeslin & Manuel Díaz-Campos (eds.), 14th Hispanic linguistics symposium, 142–164. Somerville: Cascadilla tested the predictive power of the Hierarchy for referring expressions in Spanish oral film-retell narratives. Results showed that speakers use the most minimal forms possible (e.g., null pronouns) even when the hierarchy predicts more elaborate forms. Assuming writers make fewer assumptions regarding readers’ level of attention and memory, the present study examines whether the revised Hierarchy proposed by Blackwell, Sarah E. & Margaret Lubbers Quesada. 2012. Third-person subjects in native speakers’ and L2 learners’ narratives: Testing (and revising) the Givenness Hierarchy for Spanish. In Kimberly Geeslin & Manuel Díaz-Campos (eds.), 14th Hispanic linguistics symposium, 142–164. Somerville: Cascadilla is valid for predicting referring forms in Spanish written film retell narrative discourse. The data corroborate that participants select subject forms as predicted, but also reveal an increased use of definite NPs, suggesting that the Hierarchy has a stronger predictive power for oral narratives where attention and memory play a greater role in referent identification.


Corresponding author: Ingrid Abisambra Miccheli, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA, E-mail:

Appendix 1: Output for Table 5

Null:
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) 2.2644 0.1661 13.631 <2e-16***
stylewritten −0.8000 0.2416 −3.311 0.00093***
Null deviance: 481.73 on 637 degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 470.93 on 636 degrees of freedom
Overt:
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) −2.8610 0.2144 −13.345 <2e-16***
stylewritten −0.2599 0.4024 −0.646 0.518
Null deviance: 253.89 on 637 degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 253.46 on 636 degrees of freedom
DefNP:
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) −3.9536 0.3569 −11.08 <2e-16***
stylewritten 1.8421 0.4197 4.39 1.14e-05***
Null deviance: 247.98 on 637 degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 225.22 on 636 degrees of freedom
PrpN:
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) −4.6563 0.5024 −9.269 <2e-16***
stylewritten 1.2744 0.6325 2.015 0.0439*
Null deviance: 111.14 on 637 degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 106.87 on 636 degrees of freedom

Appendix 2: Output for Table 7

Null:
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) 1.5362 0.2674 5.746 9.14e-09***
stylewritten −1.3539 0.4039 −3.352 0.000802***
Null deviance: 161.70 on 139 degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 150.29 on 138 degrees of freedom
Overt:
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) −2.3979 0.3693 −6.494 8.38e-11***
stylewritten −0.6466 0.8124 −0.796 0.426
Null deviance: 72.049 on 139 degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 71.344 on 138 degrees of freedom
DefNP:
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) −3.8501 0.7146 −5.388 7.12e-08***
stylewritten 2.4920 0.8064 3.090 0.002**
Null deviance: 77.075 on 139 degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 64.027 on 138 degrees of freedom
PrpN:
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) −4.554 1.005 −4.530 5.89e-06***
stylewritten 2.889 1.086 2.659 0.00784**
Null deviance: 61.329 on 139 degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 49.676 on 138 degrees of freedom

Appendix 3: Output for Table 9

Null:
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) −2.0314 0.3760 −5.402 6.58e-08***
stylewritten −0.7820 0.7034 −1.112 0.266
Null deviance: 73.912 on 121 degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 72.566 on 120 degrees of freedom
Overt:
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) −0.3814 0.2452 −1.556 0.1198
stylewritten −0.8473 0.4097 −2.068 0.0386*
Null deviance: 154.37 on 121 degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 149.89 on 120 degrees of freedom
Dem:
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) −3.0910 0.5902 −5.237 1.63e-07***
stylewritten 0.5855 0.7866 0.744 0.457
Null deviance: 53.604 on 121 degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 53.043 on 120 degrees of freedom
DefNP:
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) −1.0415 0.2742 −3.799 0.000145***
stylewritten 1.1548 0.3884 2.973 0.002950**
Null deviance: 161.67 on 121 degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 152.51 on 120 degrees of freedom
PrpN:
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) −1.8971 0.3575 −5.307 1.11e-07***
stylewritten −0.3646 0.5904 −0.618 0.537
Null deviance: 86.947 on 121 degrees of freedom
Residual deviance: 86.557 on 120 degrees of freedom

References

Abisambra Miccheli, Ingrid. 2022. Cognición y selección de sujetos: análisis comparativo entre narrativas escritas y orales en el discurso de español como L2. Athens, GA: University of Georgia dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 1988. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24(1). 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011567.Suche in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. New York, NY: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Blackwell, Sarah E. & Margaret Lubbers Quesada. 2012. Third-person subjects in native speakers’ and L2 learners’ narratives: Testing (and revising) the Givenness Hierarchy for Spanish. In Kimberly Geeslin & Manuel Díaz-Campos (eds.), 14th Hispanic linguistics symposium, 142–164. Somerville: Cascadilla.Suche in Google Scholar

Carminati, Maria N. 2002. The processing of Italian subject pronouns. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–55. New York, NY: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Figueras, Carolina. 2002. La jerarquía de la accesibilidad de las expresiones referenciales en español. Revista Española de Lingüística 32(1). 53–96.Suche in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1983. Introduction. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, 5–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Franklin.10.1075/tsl.3Suche in Google Scholar

Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2). 274–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/416535.Suche in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Lubbers Quesada, Margaret. 2015. The L2 acquisition of Spanish subjects. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9781614514367Suche in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor. 1979. Planned and unplanned discourse. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 12, 51–80. New York, NY: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368897_004Suche in Google Scholar

Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–233. New York, NY: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Toribio, Almeida J. 2000. Setting parameter limits on dialectal variation in Spanish. Lingua 10. 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(99)00044-3.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-04-28
Published in Print: 2023-05-25

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 18.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/shll-2023-2003/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen