Story versus discourse in film studies: a return to the theory of enunciation

Jesús González-Requena; Basilio Casanova

doi:10.1515/sem-2021-0045

Article

Story versus discourse in film studies: a return to the theory of enunciation

Jesús González-Requena and Basilio Casanova

Published/Copyright: April 21, 2022

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Semiotica Volume 2022 Issue 246

Abstract

In this paper, we address the problematic of film narration and its narrator from a re-reading of Émile Benveniste’s theory of enunciation in open discussion with both the theories of film enunciation that have derived from it, and the cognitive theories that, by discarding it, have tried to take its place. This has led us to a differentiation between two dimensions of the problem of enunciation that are usually ignored: that which separates the act of enunciation and the subject who performs it from that of the textual subjects (the enunciator, the narrator …) who inscribe that act in the text. An erroneous understanding of the modes of enunciation of story and discourse has derived from their ignorance, which has led to reducing the former to a kind of form that derives from the latter, constituting no more than a form of discourse that would hide its basis. A precise enunciative definition of the lie is derived from their conscience. Certainly, there is always a subject of the act of enunciation whose traces can be recognized in the materiality of the statement. But there is a properly ontological distance that separates them – as material traces – from the enunciator, as a purely formal textual figure that, by being that, may or may not be present in the text. In this way, the Benveniste’s affirmation can be sustained according to which the story, the pure mode of the narrative, so to speak, is characterized by the absence – not the erasure, nor the invisibility – of any enunciator.

Keywords: Benveniste: enunciation; character; cognitive paradigm; story: discourse

Corresponding author: Basilio Casanova, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, E-mail: josebcas@ucm.es

Funding source: Universidad Complutense de Madrid

References

Aumont, Jacques & Michel Marie. 1988. Análisis del film. Barcelona: Paidós.Search in Google Scholar

Bal, Mieke. 2009. Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. 1959a. Les relations de temps dans le verbe français. In Problèmes de linguistique générale, vol. 1, p. 206. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. 1959b. Las relaciones de tiempo en el verbo francés, Laura Baccelli & Nora Bouvet (trans.). Available at: https://es.scribd.com/document/138262016/Benveniste-E-Las-relaciones-de-tiempo-en-el-verbo-frances.Search in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. 1971. Problems in general linguistics, Mary Elizabeth Meek (trans.), vol. 2. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami.Search in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. 1977. Semiología de la lengua: Problemas de lingüística general, vol. II. México: Siglo XXI.Search in Google Scholar

Booth, Wayne C. 1983. The rhetoric of fiction. London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226065595.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bordwell, David. 1985. Narration in the fiction film. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Search in Google Scholar

Branigan, Edward. 1984. Point of view in the cinema: A theory of narration and subjectivity in classical film. Berlin: Mouton.10.1515/9783110817591Search in Google Scholar

Browne, Nick. 1975–1976. The spectator-in-the-text: The rhetoric of “Stagecoach”. Film Quarterly 29(2). 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.1975.29.2.04a00050.Search in Google Scholar

Casetti, Francesco & Federico di Chio. 1990. Cómo analizar un film. Barcelona: Paidós.Search in Google Scholar

Cassetti, Francesco. 1989. El film y su espectador. Madrid: Cátedra.Search in Google Scholar

Chatman, Seymour. 1978. Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 1899–1900. La interpretación de los sueños (Obras Completas 4), José L. Etcheverry (trans.). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu editores s. a.Search in Google Scholar

Gaudreault, Andre & Francois Jost. 1990. El relato cinematográfico. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós.Search in Google Scholar

Genette, Gerard. 1979. Narrative discourse: An essay in method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

González Requena, Jesús. 1987. Enunciación, punto de vista, sujeto. Contracampo 42. 97–135.Search in Google Scholar

González Requena, Jesús. 2006. Teoría del relato. In Clásico, manierista, postclásico: Los modos del relato en el cine de Hollywood, 584, 475–584. Valladolid: Ediciones Castilla.Search in Google Scholar

González Requena, Jesús. 2013. El ser de las imágenes: De la teoría al análisis de la imagen. https://gonzalezrequena.com/textos-en-linea-0–2/libros-en-linea/el-ser-de-las-imagenes/ (accessed 29 March 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Metz, Christian. 1982. Story/discourse (a note on two types of voyeurism). In Psychoanalysis and cinema: The imaginary signifier, 89–98. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-05103-8_6Search in Google Scholar

Mitry, Jean. 1967. Aesthetics and psychology of the cinema, Christopher King (trans.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Paolucci, Claudio. 2020. Persona: Soggetività nel lingaggio e semiotica dell’enunciazione. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-03-10

Accepted: 2021-11-02

Published Online: 2022-04-21

Published in Print: 2022-05-25

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2021-0045

Keywords for this article

Benveniste: enunciation; character; cognitive paradigm; story: discourse