Abstract
This study examines the entanglements of natural disasters and cultural changes from an ecosemiotic point of view. Taking the case of Mt. Merapi’s periodic eruptions and the locals’ interpretations of such constant natural hazards, it is based on empirical data gathered through longitudinal qualitative fieldworks on the local communities surrounding this volcano. In order to adapt to the constant natural hazards in their environment, disaster prone societies develop unique sign systems binding cultural and natural processes. This study shows that traditionally, unique sensorial-environmental sign systems have formed the basis of communication between human and environment, allowing the locals to perceive the eruption as a communication involving them and local environmental agencies. Recently, the eruptions have triggered the adoption of new livelihoods of local people, as well as the acceptance of new scientific signs for the interpretation of the activities of the volcano. The latter has been accompanied by significant cultural changes, including the adoption of the idea of progress and the transformation of the previous entanglements of local culture and its natural environment. The study concludes that natural disasters, entangled with ongoing social transformations, may play a fundamental role as triggers of semiotic change in a community. Such semiotic change can in turn modify the interpretation of the natural disaster itself, and in that way shift the way humans perceive and interact with their environment.
Funding source: Eesti Teadusagentuur
Award Identifier / Grant number: PRG314
Funding source: European Regional Development Fund
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2014-2020.4.01.16-0027
-
Research funding: This work was supported by the European Social Fund’s Doctoral Studies and Internationalisation Programme DoRa (Archimedes Foundation), the University of Tartu ASTRA Project PER ASPERA, which is financed by the (European Union) European Regional Development Fund; and an Estonian Research Council Grant “Semiotic Fitting as a Mechanism of Biocultural Diversity: Instability and Sustainability in Novel Environments” (PRG314). The 2019 fieldwork was funded by the Archimedes Foundation through the Dora Plus sub-activity 1.2 Doctoral Student Mobility (University of Tartu). The 2013 fieldwork was funded by the Department of Communication Universitas Islam Indonesia.
-
Conflict of interest: No potential conflict of interest is reported by the author.
References
Alexander, David. 2012. Models of social vulnerability to disasters. RCCS Annual Review 4. 22–40. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccsar.412.Search in Google Scholar
Aswani, Shankar, Anne Lemahieu & Warwick H. H. Sauer. 2018. Global trends of local ecological knowledge and future implications. PLoS ONE 13(4). e0195440. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195440.Search in Google Scholar
Bankoff, Greg. 2002. Cultures of disaster: Society and natural hazard in the Philippines. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Bankoff, Greg. 2004. In the eye of the storm: The social construction of the forces of nature and the climatic and seismic construction of God in the Philippines. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 35(1). 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022463404000050.Search in Google Scholar
Carrigan, Anthony. 2015. Towards a postcolonial disaster studies. In Elizabeth DeLoughrey, Jill Didur & Anthony Carrigan (eds.), Global ecologies and the environmental humanities: Postcolonial approaches, 117–139. New York & London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Chang, Han-liang. 2006. Disaster semiotics: An alternative “global semiotics”. Sign Systems Studies 34(1). 215–230. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2006.34.1.08.Search in Google Scholar
Donovan, Katherine. 2010. Doing social volcanology: Exploring volcanic culture in Indonesia. Area 42(1). 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00899.x.Search in Google Scholar
Dove, Michael R. 2007. Volcanic eruptions as metaphor of social integration: A political ecological study of Mount Merapi, Central Java. In John Connell & Eric Waddell (eds.), Environment, development and change in rural Asia-Pacific: Between local and global, 16–37. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Dove, Michael R. 2008. Perception of volcanic eruption as agent of change: On Mt. Merapi volcano, Central Java. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 172. 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.037.Search in Google Scholar
Dove, Michael R. 2010. The panoptic gaze in a non-western setting: Self-surveillance on Mt. Merapi volcano, Central Java. Religion 40(2). 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2009.12.007.Search in Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1960. The religion of Java. Chicago: University Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gunewardena, Nandini & Mark Schuller (eds.). 2008. Capitalizing on catastrophe: Neoliberal strategies in disaster reconstruction. Lanham: Altamira Press.Search in Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 2003. The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hermanto, Budhi. 2011. Jalin Merapi: Sistem informasi untuk penanganan bencana Merapi [Jalin Merapi: Information system for responding Merapi disaster]. In Muzayin Nazaruddin & Zaki Habibi (eds.), Jurnalisme warga, radio publik, dan pemberitaan bencana [Citizen journalism, public radio, and disaster news], 21–26. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Komunikasi UII.Search in Google Scholar
Hornborg, Alf. 2001. Vital signs: An ecosemiotic perspective on the human ecology of Amazonia. Sign Systems Studies 29(1). 121–150. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2001.29.1.09.Search in Google Scholar
Hudayana, Bambang. 1987. Tanaman dalam usaha tani subsisten di sebuah desa lahan kering lereng Merapi Yogyakarta [Plants in the subsistence farming in a dry land village on the slope of Mt. Merapi Yogyakarta]. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University undergraduate thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Hudayana, Bambang. 1993. Adaptasi manusia terhadap bencana alam: Studi kasus bencana alam Gunung Merapi [Human adaptation to natural disaster: A case study of Mt. Merapi natural disaster]. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University research report.Search in Google Scholar
Hudayana, Bambang. 2012. Komunitas lereng Merapi serta respon terhadap erupsi Merapi 2010 [Merapi communities and their responses to the 2010 Merapi eruption]. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University research report.Search in Google Scholar
Humaidi, Zuhri, Widiyanto Nur, Y. F. Wismayati & Karina A. R. Gumilang. 2012. Kehidupan ekologis masyarakat di lereng Merapi: Pelajaran di tiga lokasi [Ecological life of the communities on the slopes of Mt. Merapi: Lessons in three locations]. In Agus Indiyanto & Arqom Kuswanjono (eds.), Respons masyarakat lokal atas bencana: Kajian integratif ilmu, agama, dan budaya [Local community responses to disasters: Integrative studies of science, religion, and culture], 159–185. Yogyakarta: Mizan & CRCS UGM.Search in Google Scholar
Inandiak, Elizabeth E. 2010. Merapi omahku [Merapi my home]. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Loka-Loka.Search in Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2000. The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Kim, Sungdo. 2006. Semiotics of natural disaster discourse in post-tsunami world: A theoretical framework. Sign Systems Studies 34(1). 231–244. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2006.34.1.09.Search in Google Scholar
Kohn, Eduardo. 2007. How dogs dream: Amazonian natures and the politics of transspecies engagement. American Ethnologist 34(1). 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2007.34.1.3.Search in Google Scholar
Kull, Kalevi. 1998. Semiotic ecology: Different natures in the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 26(1). 344–371. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.1998.26.15.Search in Google Scholar
Laksono, Paschalis Maria. 1988. Perception of volcanic hazards: Villagers versus government officials in Central Java. In Michael R. Dove (ed.), The real and imagined role of culture in development: Case studies from Indonesia, 183–200. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.10.1515/9780824890759-010Search in Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674039964Search in Google Scholar
Lavigne, Franck, Benjamin De Coster, Nancy Juvin, François Flohic, Jean-Christophe Gaillard, Pauline Texier, Julie Morin & Junun Sartohadi. 2008. People’s behaviour in the face of volcanic hazards: Perspective from Javanese communities, Indonesia. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 172. 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.013.Search in Google Scholar
Lindström, Kati. 2010. Autocommunication and perceptual markers in landscape: Japanese examples. Biosemiotics 3(3). 359–373.10.1007/s12304-010-9082-0Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri M. 1990. Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. London & New York: I.B. Tauris.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri M. 2005. On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 33(1). 205–229. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2005.33.1.09.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri M. 2019. Culture, memory and history: Essays in cultural semiotics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-14710-5_10Search in Google Scholar
Maran, Timo. 2012. Are ecological codes archetypal structures? In Timo Maran, Kati Lindström, Riin Magnus & Morten Tønnessen (eds.), Semiotics in the wild: Essays in honour of Kalevi Kull on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 147–156. Tartu: Tartu University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Maran, Timo. 2017. On the diversity of environmental signs: A typological approach. Biosemiotics 10(3). 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-017-9308-5.Search in Google Scholar
Maran, Timo. 2020. Ecosemiotics: The study of signs in changing ecologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108942850Search in Google Scholar
Maran, Timo. 2021. The ecosemiosphere is a grounded semiosphere. A Lotmanian conceptualization of cultural-ecological systems. Biosemiotics 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09428-w.Search in Google Scholar
Maran, Timo & Kalevi Kull. 2014. Ecosemiotics: Main principles and current developments. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 96(1). 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12035.Search in Google Scholar
Mauch, Christof & Christian Pfister (eds.). 2009. Natural disasters, cultural responses: Case studies toward a global environmental history. Lanham: Lexington.Search in Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. 2007. Semiotic anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 36. 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094417.Search in Google Scholar
Morimoto, Ryo. 2012. Shaking grounds, unearthing palimpsests: Semiotic anthropology of disaster. Semiotica 192(1/4). 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-0088.Search in Google Scholar
Morimoto, Ryo. 2015. Waves of semiosis. Is it about time? On the semiotic anthropology of change. In Peter Pericles Trifonas (ed.), International handbook of semiotics, vol. 1, 547–564. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_24Search in Google Scholar
Nazaruddin, Muzayin. 2017. Media and visual representation of disaster: Analysis of Merapi eruption in 2010. In Riyanti Djalante, Matthias Garschagen, Frank Thomalla & Rajib Shaw (eds.), Disaster risk reduction in Indonesia: Progress, challenges, and issues, 307–333. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-54466-3_12Search in Google Scholar
Nazaruddin, Muzayin. 2020. Social media and alternative discourse on natural hazard: A case study of Facebook group Info Merapi. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication 36(1). 480–494. https://doi.org/10.17576/jkmjc-2020-3601-28.Search in Google Scholar
Oliver-Smith, Anthony. 1996. Anthropological research on hazards and disasters. Annual Review of Anthropology 25. 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.303.Search in Google Scholar
Oliver-Smith, Anthony & Susanna M. Hoffman. 2002. Why anthropologists should study disasters. In Susanna M. Hoffman & Anthony Oliver-Smith (eds.), Catastrophe & culture: The anthropology of disaster, 3–22. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pelling, Mark (ed.). 2003. Natural disasters and development in a globalizing world. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203402375Search in Google Scholar
Pilgrim, Sarah & Jules N. Pretty. 2013. Nature and culture: An introduction. In Sarah Pilgrim & Jules N. Pretty (eds.), Nature and culture: Rebuilding lost connections, 1–20. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Portis-Winner, Irene. 1999. The dynamics of semiotics of culture; its pertinence to anthropology. Sign Systems Studies 27. 24–45. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.1999.27.02.Search in Google Scholar
Pranowo, Handojo Adi. 1985. Manusia dan hutan: Proses perubahan ekologi di lereng Gunung Merapi [Human and forest: Ecological changes on the slopes of Mt. Merapi]. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pranowo, Handojo Adi. 1987. Eksploitasi alang-alang di hutan lindung di lereng Gunung Merapi [Exploitation of imperata in the protected forests on the slopes of Mt. Merapi]. In Michael R. Dove & Sugeng Martopo (eds.), Manusia dan alang-alang di Indonesia [Human and imperata in Indonesia], 133–166. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Schama, Simon. 1995. Landscape and memory. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Search in Google Scholar
Schlehe, Judith. 1996. Reinterpretations of mystical traditions: Explanations of a volcanic eruption in Java. Anthropos 91(4/6). 391–409.Search in Google Scholar
Schlehe, Judith. 2009. Cultural politics of natural disasters: Discourses on volcanic eruptions in Indonesia. In Michael J. Casimir (ed.), Culture and the changing environment: Uncertainty, cognition, and risk management in crosscultural perspective, 275–299. Oxford & New York: Berghahn.10.1515/9780857450043-013Search in Google Scholar
Siewers, Alfred K. 2014. Introduction. Song, tree, and spring: Environmental meaning and environmental humanities. In Alfred K. Siewers (ed.), Re-imagining nature: Environmental humanities and ecosemiotics, 1–41. Bucknell: Bucknell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sobirin, Supardiyono. 2018. Pranata mangsa dan budaya kearifan lingkungan [Pranata mangsa and culture of environmental wisdom]. Jurnal Budaya Nusantara 2(1). 250–264. https://doi.org/10.36456/b.nusantara.vol2.no1.a1719.Search in Google Scholar
Surono, Philippe Jousset, John Pallister, M Marie Boichu, Fabrizia Buongiorno, Agus Budisantoso, Fidel Costa, Supriyati Andreastuti, Fred Prata, David Schneider, Lieven Clarisse, Hanik Humaida, Sri Sumarti, Christian Bignami, Julie Griswold, Simon Carn, Clive Oppenheimer & Franck Lavigne. 2012. The 2010 explosive eruption of Java’s Merapi volcano – a “100-year” event. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 241–242. 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2012.06.018.Search in Google Scholar
Thouret, Jean-Claude, Franck Lavigne, Karim Kelfoun & Sutikno Bronto. 2000. Toward a revised hazard assessment at Merapi volcano, Central Java. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 100. 479–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-0273(00)00152-9.Search in Google Scholar
Torop, Peeter. 2005. Semiosphere and/as the research object of semiotics of culture. Sign Systems Studies 33(1). 159–173. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2005.33.1.06.Search in Google Scholar
Torrence, Robin & John Grattan (eds.). 2002. In Natural disasters and cultural change. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203279533Search in Google Scholar
Triyoga, Lucas Sasongko. 2010. Merapi dan orang Jawa: Persepsi dan kepercayaannya [Merapi and the Javanese: Perceptions and beliefs]. Jakarta: Grasindo.Search in Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 1998. Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4(3). 469–488. https://doi.org/10.2307/3034157.Search in Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2012. Cosmological perspectivism in Amazonia and elsewhere (Masterclass Series 1). Manchester: HAU Network of Ethnographic Theory.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Les enjeux sémiotiques de la médiation : le cas de la figure du pont Khadjou d’Ispahan
- Studying values about childhood using networked photography on Instagram
- The Garden: blending in the semiotics of songs
- Story versus discourse in film studies: a return to the theory of enunciation
- The rhetorical dimension of images: identity building and management on social networks
- The semiology of colors in scripture translation: Arabic-English
- Alternative model of the communication process: a theoretical proposal
- Semiotics in South Korea: history and research trends
- The role of natural disasters in the semiotic transformations of culture: the case of the volcanic eruptions of Mt. Merapi, Indonesia
- Peirce’s evolving interpretants
- Questionnement sur la dualité: Quelques éléments pour fonder une sémiotique du bouddhisme
- Multimodality in Hong Kong government posters from the 1950s–1980s: an appraisal analysis and the discursive construction of legitimation
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Les enjeux sémiotiques de la médiation : le cas de la figure du pont Khadjou d’Ispahan
- Studying values about childhood using networked photography on Instagram
- The Garden: blending in the semiotics of songs
- Story versus discourse in film studies: a return to the theory of enunciation
- The rhetorical dimension of images: identity building and management on social networks
- The semiology of colors in scripture translation: Arabic-English
- Alternative model of the communication process: a theoretical proposal
- Semiotics in South Korea: history and research trends
- The role of natural disasters in the semiotic transformations of culture: the case of the volcanic eruptions of Mt. Merapi, Indonesia
- Peirce’s evolving interpretants
- Questionnement sur la dualité: Quelques éléments pour fonder une sémiotique du bouddhisme
- Multimodality in Hong Kong government posters from the 1950s–1980s: an appraisal analysis and the discursive construction of legitimation