The rhetorical dimension of images: identity building and management on social networks

Enzo D’Armenio

doi:10.1515/sem-2020-0113

Article

The rhetorical dimension of images: identity building and management on social networks

Enzo D’Armenio

Published/Copyright: May 3, 2022

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Semiotica Volume 2022 Issue 246

Abstract

This article proposes a semio-rhetorical epistemology for visual documents, one capable of accounting for both their internal configuration, which we shall call the compositional dimension, and their persuasive force within public space, or their rhetorical dimension. The field of reference will be that of identity-related images on social networks, because compared to other kinds of images, such as artistic or professional ones, they adopt new compositional solutions and new dynamics of circulation. To test this theoretical framework, we will conduct an analysis which has never been carried out in semiotics and which, as far as we know, remains very rare even in the overall field of visual studies, that is, the analysis of the profile of an Instagram influencer’s visual production, that of Canadian artist Rupi Kaur. Taking into account the flow of images shared over time, we will focus primarily on the compositional dimension that articulates the specificity of the language of images. The most appropriate model for investigating social network photos seems to be that of the portrait, thanks to which we will identify a first series of regularities and deviations. Secondly, we will turn towards the rhetorical dimension – the persuasive strategies found within, through, and towards images – focusing on the analysis of a single photo: on the one hand, it is a shot which presents greater compositional richness than others; on the other hand, it has greatly impacted the notoriety of the influencer, due to the censorship incurred on Instagram, its abundant coverage by traditional media, and the heated debate it triggered on social media. We will thus propose a reinterpretation of Paul Ricœur’s theory of identity in order to balance the rhetorical and the compositional dimensions through a unitary theoretical hypothesis. Visual identity on social networks is always the result of a negotiation between two opposite tendencies: on the one hand, the experiential pressure expressed through images related to the body and everyday practices; on the other, the algorithmic pressure due to the delegation of the management of identity to software. The case of Rupi Kaur is a rare example of a critical mediation between these two pressures and helps us build a methodology for the examination of images belonging to other social domains.

Keywords: identity; Kaur (Rupi); rhetoric; social network; visual studies

Corresponding author: Enzo D’Armenio, Département de Langue et littérature française et romanes, Université de Liège, Liege, Belgium, E-mail: enzodarmenio@gmail.com

Research funding: This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 896835.

References

Badir, Sémir & Maria Giulia Dondero (eds.). 2016. L’image peut-elle nier? Liège: Presses universitaires de Liège.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1961. Le message photographique. Communications 1. 127–138. https://doi.org/10.3406/comm.1961.921.Search in Google Scholar

Beyaert-Geslin, Anne. 2017. Sémiotique du portrait: De Dibutade au selfie. Louvain-La-Neuve: De Boeck.10.3917/dbu.beyae.2017.01Search in Google Scholar

Belting, Hans. 2011. An anthropology of images: Picture, medium, body. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400839780Search in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale 1. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Bordron, Jean-François. 2010. Rhétorique et économie des images. Protée 38(1). 27–40. https://doi.org/10.7202/039700ar.Search in Google Scholar

Casilli, Antonio. 2011. Les liaisons numériques : Vers une nouvelle sociabilité? Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Chalfen, Richard. 1987. Snapshot versions of life. Bowling Green, KY: Popular Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dondero, Maria Giulia. 2020. The language of images: The forms and the forces. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-52620-7Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1999. Kant and the platypus: Essays on language and cognition. San Diego: Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar

Finn, Ed. 2017. What algorithms want: Imagination in the age of computing. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262035927.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Floch, Jean-Marie. 2000. Visual identities. London & New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Fontanille, Jacques. 1989. Les espaces subjectifs : Introduction à la sémiotique de l’observateur. Paris: Hachette.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien & Joseph Courtés. 1982. Semiotics and language: An analytical dictionary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1989. Figurative semiotics and the semiotics of the plastic arts. New Literary History 20(3). 627–649. https://doi.org/10.2307/469358.Search in Google Scholar

Groupe, μ. 1992. Traité du signe visuel. Paris: Les éditions du Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Hand, Martin. 2020. Photography meets social media image making and sharing in a continually networked present. In Pasternak Gil (ed.), The handbook of photography studies, 310–326. New York & London: Bloomsbury.10.4324/9781003103974-23Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, Virginia. 2012. Images on the move. Analytics for a mixed methods approach. In Jentery Sayers (ed.), The Routledge companion to media studies and digital humanities, 300–309. New York & London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315730479-31Search in Google Scholar

Lanham, Richard. 2006. The economics of attention: Style and substance in the age of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Manovich, Lev. 2017. Instagram and contemporary image. http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/instagram-and-contemporary-image (accessed 28 March 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, William John Thomas. 2005. What do pictures want? The lives and loves of images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226245904.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Moretti, Franco. 2013. Distant reading. New York: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Nixon, Mark & Alberto Aguado. 2012. Feature extraction & image processing for computer vision. London: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Pontévia, Jean-Marie. 2000. Tout peintre se peint soi-même «Ogni dipintore dipinge se» (Écrits sur l’art et pensées détachées 3). Bordeaux: William Blake.Search in Google Scholar

Rettberg, Jill Walker. 2017. Self-representation in social media. In Jean Burgess, Alice Marwick & Thomas Poell (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media, 429–443. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.10.4135/9781473984066.n24Search in Google Scholar

Ricœur, Paul. 2012. Oneself as another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schapiro, Meyer. 1983. Words and pictures: On the literal and the symbolic in the illustration of text. Berlin & New York: Gruyter-Mouton.10.1515/9783110849813Search in Google Scholar

Stoichita, Victor. 1997. The self-aware image: An insight into early modern meta-painting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-11-03

Accepted: 2021-11-04

Published Online: 2022-05-03

Published in Print: 2022-05-25

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0113

Keywords for this article

identity; Kaur (Rupi); rhetoric; social network; visual studies