Home What power? Social representations of ICTs’ appropriation for community empowerment in Latin American social movements
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

What power? Social representations of ICTs’ appropriation for community empowerment in Latin American social movements

  • Lázaro M. Bacallao-Pino EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 9, 2018

Abstract

The article analyzes the social representations of ICTs’ appropriation for community empowerment by social movements. The study includes two recent Latin American student social movements: the Mexican #YoSoy132 and the Chilean student movement. Discourse analysis was used to examine interviews with participants in these social movements as well as other texts associated with their episodes of collective action. The discourse analysis was focused on four main dimensions of the social representations of ICTs’ appropriation: (1) the interrelationships between the technological and the socio-political and cultural dimensions; (2) the tension between a visibility-centered and an articulating-focused use of ICTs; (3) the tension between the individual and the collective dimensions; and (4) the articulation between ICTs-based collective action and offline one. The findings indicate that the online/offline and the visibility/articulation tensions are relevant dimensions, in an articulated way, of the social representation of ICTs’ appropriation for collective empowerment. The results also indicate that the sociopolitical goals of the social movements are a central mediation for the process of configuration of the social representation, as it is proved by the importance of the individual/collective tension for the process.

Acknowledgements

The author thanks [Anonymized] for funding this research.

References

Abric, Jean-Claude. 1994. Pratiques sociales et représentations. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Alvarez, Sonia E., Evelyn Dagnino & Arturo Escobar (eds.). 1998. Cultures of politics/politics of cultures: Re-visioning Latin American social movements. Boulder: Westview Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ayres, Jeffrey M. 1999. From the streets to the Internet: The cyber-diffusion of contention. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 566 (1). 132–143.10.1177/000271629956600111Search in Google Scholar

Bardici, Minavere Vera. 2012. A discourse analysis of the media representation of social media for social change: The case of Egyptian revolution and political change. Master’s thesis, Mälmo University. http://muep.mah.se/handle/2043/14121 (accessed 10 January 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Bauman, Zygmunt. 2011. El 15-M es emocional, le falta pensamiento. Interview by Vicente Verdú. El País, 17 October 2011. http://politica.elpais.com/politica/2011/10/17/actualidad/1318808156_278372.html (accessed 20 March 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, W. Lance & Alexandra Segerberg. 2012. The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society 15 (5). 739–768.10.1017/CBO9781139198752Search in Google Scholar

Bonder, Gloria. 2002. From access to appropriation: Women and ICT policies in Latin American and the Caribbean. Paper presented at the United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW) Expert Group Meeting on Information and communication technologies and their impact on and use as an instrument for the advancement and empowerment of women, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 11–14 November. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/ict2002/reports/Paper-GBonder.PDF (accessed 7 June 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Cabalín-Quijada, Cristian. 2014. Estudiantes conectados y movilizados: El uso de Facebook en las protestas estudiantiles en Chile. Comunicar 22 (43). 25–33.10.3916/C43-2014-02Search in Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 1997. The power of identity I (The information age: Economy, society, and culture 2). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 2004. The network society: A cross-cultural perspective. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781845421663Search in Google Scholar

Contarello, Alberta & Mauro Sarrica. 2007. ICTs, social thinking and subjective well-being: The Internet and its representations in everyday life. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2). 1016–1032.10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.013Search in Google Scholar

Della Porta, Donatela & Mario Diani. 2006. Social movements: An introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Drury, John & Steve Reicher. 2009. Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues 65 (4). 707–725.10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01622.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dussel, Enrique. 1985. La producción teórica de Marx. Mexico: Siglo XXI editores.Search in Google Scholar

Duveen, Gerard & Barbara Lloyd. 1990. Introduction. In Gerard Duveen & Barbara Lloyd (eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge, 1–11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511659874Search in Google Scholar

Franzosi, Roberto. 1998. Narrative analysis: Or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative. Annual Review of Sociology 24. 517–554.10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.517Search in Google Scholar

Fuchs, Christian. 2012. Social media, riots, and revolutions. Capital & Class 36. 383–391.10.1177/0309816812453613Search in Google Scholar

García, Rodrigo G. & Emiliano Treré. 2014. The #YoSoy132 movement and the struggle for media democratization in Mexico. Convergence 1354856514541744 (July). 20.10.1177/1354856514541744Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Jeff & James M. Jasper (eds.). 2003. Rethinking social movements: Structure, meaning, and emotion. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Gramsci, Antonio. 1997. Gramsci y la filosofía de la praxis. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Sociales.Search in Google Scholar

Gurstein, Michael. 2007. What is community informatics (and why does it matter)?. Milan: Polimetrica.10.15353/joci.v3i1.2381Search in Google Scholar

Harlow, Summer & Dustin Harp. 2012. Collective action on the web: A cross-cultural study of social networking sites and online and offline activism in the United States and Latin America. Information, Communication & Society 15 (2). 196–216.10.1080/1369118X.2011.591411Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, Hank. 2002. Verification and proof in frame and discourse analysis. In Bert Klandermans & Suzanne Staggenborg (eds.), Methods of social movement research, 61–91. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jordan, Tim. 2005. Social movements and social change. CRESC Working Paper Series. Milton Keynes: Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change.Search in Google Scholar

Juris, Jeffrey S. 2012. Reflections on #occupy everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist 39. 259–279.10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01362.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kavada, Anastasia. 2005. Exploring the role of the internet in the movement for alternative globalization: The case of the Paris 2003 European Social Forum. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 2 (1). 72–95.10.16997/wpcc.9Search in Google Scholar

León, Osvaldo, Sally Burch & Eduardo Tamayo. 2005. Movimientos sociales y comunicación. Quito: ALAI.Search in Google Scholar

Melucci, Albert. 1996. Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511520891Search in Google Scholar

Melucci, Albert. 2004. The process of collective identity. In Hank Johnston & Bert Klandermans (eds.), Social movements and culture, 41–63. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moscovici, Serge. 1973. Foreword. In C. Herzlich (ed.), Health and illness. London: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moscovici, Serge. 1981. On social representations. In Joseph Paul Forgas (ed.), Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding, 22–45. London: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moscovici, Serge. 1984. The phenomenon of social representations. In Robert Farr & Serge Moscovici (eds.), Social representations, 3–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moscovici, Serge. 1988. Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology 18 (3). 211–250.10.1002/ejsp.2420180303Search in Google Scholar

Olson, Mancur. 1971. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Overdijk, Maarten & Wouter Van Diggelen. 2006. Technology appropriation in face-to-face collaborative learning. In Eleftheria Tomadaki & Peter Scott (eds.), Innovative approaches for learning and knowledge sharing, 89–96. Crete: EC-TEL.Search in Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. 2015. Internet seen as positive influence on education but negative influence on morality in emerging and developing nations. http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2015/03/Pew-Research-Center-Technology-Report-FINAL-March-19-20151.pdf (accessed 31 August 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Potter, Jonathan & Michael Billig. 1992. Re-representing representations: Discussion of Räty and Snellman. Papers on Social Representations 1 (1). 15–20.Search in Google Scholar

Potter, Jonathan & Ian Litton. 1985. Some problems underlying the theory of social representations. British Journal of Social Psychology 24 (2). 81–90.10.1111/j.2044-8309.1985.tb00664.xSearch in Google Scholar

Potter, Jonathan & Margaret Wetherell. 1998. Social representations, discourse analysis, and racism. In Uwe Flick (ed.), The psychology of the social, 138–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Revilla Blanco, Marisa. 1994. El concepto de movimiento social: Acción, identidad y sentido. Zona Abierta 9. 181–213.Search in Google Scholar

Ronfeldt, David, John Arquilla, Graham Fuller & Melissa Fuller. 1998. The Zapatista social netwar in Mexico. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Search in Google Scholar

Rucht, Dieter. 1992. Estrategias y formas de acción de los nuevos movimientos sociales. In Russell J. Dalton & Manfred Kuechler (eds.), Los nuevos movimientos sociales: Un reto al orden político, 219–243. Valencia: Edicions Alfons el Magnànim.Search in Google Scholar

Rucht, Dieter. 2004. The quadruple “A.” Media strategies of protest movements since the. In Wim Van De Donk & Dieter Rucht (eds.), Cyber protest: New media, citizens, and social movements, 1960s, 25–48. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203644225Search in Google Scholar

Sarrica, Mauro. 2011. ICTs meanings and practices: Contributions from the social representation approach. Journal of Community Informatics 6(3). http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/731/612 (accessed 23 March 2015).).10.15353/joci.v6i3.2540Search in Google Scholar

Stillman, Larry & Henry Linger. 2009. Community informatics and information systems: Can they be better connected?. The Information Society 25. 255–264.10.1080/01972240903028706Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Verta & Nancy Whittier. 2004. Analytical approaches to social movements culture: The culture of the women’s movement. In Hank Johnston & Bert Klandermans (eds.), Social movements and culture, 163–187. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Valenzuela, Sebastian, Arturo Arriagada & Andrés Scherman. 2012. The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. Journal of Communication 62 (2). 299–314.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01635.xSearch in Google Scholar

Van De Donk, Wim, Brian D. Loader, Paul G. Nixon & Dieter Rucht. 2004. Introduction: Social movements and ICTs. In Wim Van De Donk & Dieter Rucht (eds.), Cyber protest: New media, citizens, and social movements, 1–21. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203644225Search in Google Scholar

Van Laer, Jeroen & Peter Van Aelst. 2009. Cyber-protest and civil society: The Internet and action repertoires in social movements. In Yvonne Jewkes & Majid Yar (eds.), Handbook on Internet crime, 230–254. Portland, OR: Willan.Search in Google Scholar

#YoSoy132. 2012a. Manifiesto del #YoSoy132. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igxPudJF6nU (accessed 12 March 2015).Search in Google Scholar

#YoSoy132. 2012b. Contrainforme presidencial. http://www.sinembargo.mx/01-09-2012/352855 (accessed 12 March 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Zibechi, Raúl. 2004. El otro mundo es el “adentro” de los movimientos sociales. América Latina en movimiento 386. 49–52.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-06-09
Published in Print: 2018-07-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2017-0013/html
Scroll to top button