Home Linguistics & Semiotics Indexicals, fiction, and perspective
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Indexicals, fiction, and perspective

  • Zoltán Vecsey

    Zoltán Vecsey (b. 1965) is a research associate at MTA-DE Research Group for Theoretical Linguistics 〈vecseyz@freemail.hu〉. His research interests include formal semantics, logic, and epistemology. His publications include Names and objects: On the semantics of proper names (in Hungarian, 2007); “On the epistemic status of borderline cases” (2012); “Borderline cases and definiteness” (2012); and “Epistemic modals: A cross-theoretical approach” (2013).

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 30, 2015

Abstract

David Kaplan elaborated a so-called two-step method for the analysis of indexical expressions. In the first step of the method, the content of indexical sentences is determined with respect to a particular collection of contextual parameters. The second step of the method identifies an actual or counterfactual circumstance with respect to which it is possible to ask for the truth values of sentence contents. In some cases of language use, however, the two-step method cannot be applied in its original form. In fictional discourses, for example, indexical sentences seem to shift their content. Truth Perspectivism is a Kaplanian view that conceives the phenomenon of content-shift as an effect of perspectival operators. It is argued in this paper that Truth Perspectivism has some counterintuitive consequences. For this reason, an alternative view is proposed that is able to explain the underlying mechanism of content-shift in a less controversial way. This alternative view is introduced here under the label Meaning Perspectivism.

About the author

Zoltán Vecsey

Zoltán Vecsey (b. 1965) is a research associate at MTA-DE Research Group for Theoretical Linguistics 〈vecseyz@freemail.hu〉. His research interests include formal semantics, logic, and epistemology. His publications include Names and objects: On the semantics of proper names (in Hungarian, 2007); “On the epistemic status of borderline cases” (2012); “Borderline cases and definiteness” (2012); and “Epistemic modals: A cross-theoretical approach” (2013).

Published Online: 2015-1-30
Published in Print: 2015-2-1

©2015 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Munich/Boston

Downloaded on 2.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2014-0077/html
Scroll to top button