Home Signification, common knowledge, and womanhood: The significs of Lady Victoria Welby and beyond
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Signification, common knowledge, and womanhood: The significs of Lady Victoria Welby and beyond

  • Sophia Melanson

    Sophia Melanson (b. 1980) is a lecturer at McKenzie College of Art and Design 〈smelanson@mckenzie.edu〉. Her research interests include behavioral semiotic, pragmatism, self-objectification, and social media. Her publications include “Mediated desire & the objectification of Eastern European women: A study of the symbolic implications of demand for trafficked bodies within Western Culture” (2012).

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 23, 2013

Abstract

Lady Victoria Welby was born to an era when women were challenging their station as summarily subject to the discretion of the dominant male proprietors. The furtive soil of women's liberation had been enriched by the quill and fountain of epic female figures such as Abigail Adams (1744–1818, First Lady of the United States of America between, 1797–1801, promoted property rights for women), Mary Wollstonecraft (1759–1797 – Vindication on the Rights of Women, Thoughts on the Education of Daughters), and Charlotte Perkins Gilman (1860–1935 – The Home: Its Work and Influence). The Victorian period witnessed the burgeoning of a female authority in public consciousness with vigorous support from public figures such as John Stewart Mill (1806–1873 – The Subjection of Women), who openly rejected inequality between sexes, and John Ruskin (1819–1900), who urged women to “abandon trivial feminine pursuits in order to act as a moral force in countering the ills of society” (Ruskin, Of Queen's Gardens, Sesame and Lillie, 1865). It is, therefore, not astonishing that Lady Victoria Welby's authority among semioticians emerged from her endeavours interpreting scriptures. Moral gatekeeping was fast becoming a female authority widely respected, though most prominently within the confines of the private sphere. Women were socially groomed to manage the family's moral code, shape children's character, and nurture the husband's honorable conduct (Meyrowitz 1985: 200). However, respect for women's particular authority and power within the private sphere was limited and remained ancillary to the dominance of the masculine paradigm. Though common sensibility has changed toward women's mobility within the public sphere, the socio-operative dynamics of power between genders remains asymmetrical, the scale tipped decidedly in favour of the masculine domain. Given that the social world operates to a significant degree within the ambit of symbolic elocutions, there has never been a better moment in history to apply Lady Victoria Welby's theory of significs to examine the contemporary subordination of women, and Susan Petrilli's publication of Welby's correspondence is nothing short of timely.

About the author

Sophia Melanson

Sophia Melanson (b. 1980) is a lecturer at McKenzie College of Art and Design 〈〉. Her research interests include behavioral semiotic, pragmatism, self-objectification, and social media. Her publications include “Mediated desire & the objectification of Eastern European women: A study of the symbolic implications of demand for trafficked bodies within Western Culture” (2012).

Published Online: 2013-08-23
Published in Print: 2013-08-15

©[2013] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Introduction
  3. Lady Welby and Lady Petrilli
  4. Victoria Lady Welby – A pioneer of semiotic thought rediscovered by Susan Petrilli
  5. The life of significance: Cultivating ingenuity no less than signs
  6. Mother sense and the image schema of the gift
  7. Signification, common knowledge, and womanhood: The significs of Lady Victoria Welby and beyond
  8. Science: The question of its limits
  9. Susan Petrilli's archival research on Victoria Welby and its implications for future scholarly inquiry
  10. The “dialogue” between Victoria Lady Welby and Mikhail Bakhtin – Reading Susan Petrilli's Signifying and Understanding
  11. Christine Ladd-Franklin's and Victoria Welby's correspondence with Charles Peirce
  12. Tracing signs of a developing science: On the correspondence between Victoria Lady Welby and Charles S. Peirce
  13. Signs, senses and cognition: Lady Welby and contemporary semiotics
  14. Space and time: Continuity in the correspondence between Charles Peirce and Victoria Welby
  15. Significs and semiotics: Chronicle of an encounter foretold
  16. Hic et nunc: Evidence from canine zoosemiotics
  17. Lady Welby: Significs and the interpretive mind
  18. The translating and signifying subject as homo interpres and homo significans: Victoria Welby's concept of translation – a polyfunctional tool
  19. Semiosis and intersemiotic translation
  20. Signs, translation, and life in the Bakhtin circle and in Welby's significs
  21. Significs and mathematics: Creative and other subjects
  22. The sense, meaning, and significance of the Twin International Covenants on Political and Economic Rights
  23. Significal Designs: Translating for meanings that truly matter
  24. Mysticism and mind in Welby's significs
  25. On the translatability of liturgical texts: A significal perspective
  26. Money and metaphor in Welby Prize winner F. Tönnies' “Philosophical terminology”: Some critical considerations
  27. Lady Welby and logic
  28. Willing science – observing nature: Welby and Latour lift the veil
  29. In search of the other: Reading Victoria Welby's significs
  30. The aphasic utterance: A significal perspective
  31. The articulate music of language in The King's Speech
  32. Applying significs
  33. Presentation: Two texts at the beginning of a research itinerary. From significs to semioethics
  34. Theory of meaning and theory of knowledge: Vailati and Welby
  35. Sign and meaning in Victoria Welby and Mikhail Bakhtin: A confrontation
  36. Early recognitions of Welby's significs and the movement it inspired in the Netherlands
Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2013-0048/html
Scroll to top button