Abstract
Pollution is one of the most pressing issues of modern times. Effluent in the world is escalating due to the exponential growth in the industrial and agricultural sectors. The effluents contain heavy metals, pesticides, and inorganic substances ultimately leading to the deterioration of the ecosystem. Even though there are numerous wastewater treatment methods like adsorption, membrane separation, ion exchange, and physical, mechanical, and chemical treatments. They are expensive and have the risk of second-hand pollution. Biopolymers are alternate and superior to synthetic polymers due to their environmentally friendly approach and high efficiency in treating wastewater. The most prominent plant-based biopolymers for the treatment of pollutants are cellulose, starch, carrageenan, alginate, xylan, inulin, pectin, and tragacanth. These have their advantages and disadvantages in bioremediation. The mechanism of pollution removal has adsorption, flocculation, bridge formation, and electrostatic patches. They are biodegradable as they are natural in origin. They have proved to remove toxic pollutants like chitosan, pullulan, polyhydroxy alkonates and butyrates, dextran, starch and cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol and polycaprolactone, gelatin, collagen and wheat gluten, alginate, heparin, and pectin to name a few. Biopolymers are also sourced from diverse sources like agricultural wastes and well-known sources like plants, animals, and microbes. Biopolymer and its composites are utilized as coagulants and flocculants. They are cellulose graft polyacrylamide, anionic sodium carboxymethylcellulose, guar gum graft polyacrylamide, pectin polyacrylamide, starch, and tannin. Nanotechnology has led to the development of elite nanohybrid bio-adsorbents to actively remove pollutants. These nano adsorbents have been targeting pollutants like azo dyes, bovine serum albumin, cationic dyes, parabens, and methylene blue among others. Biopolymer composites are also widely used for diverse applications primarily due to their enhanced mechanical and thermal properties. Biopolymers from natural and synthetic sources can be modified and used as per the requirement.
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Jiang, JQ. The role of coagulation in water treatment. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2015;8:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2015.01.008.Search in Google Scholar
2. dos Santos, AJ, Kronka, MS, Fortunato, GV, Lanza, MR. Recent advances in electrochemical water technologies for the treatment of antibiotics: a short review. Curr Opin Electrochem 2021;26:100674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2020.100674.Search in Google Scholar
3. Hitam, CN, Jalil, AA. A review on exploration of Fe2O3 photocatalyst towards degradation of dyes and organic contaminants. J Environ Manag 2020;258:110050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110050.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Sudhaik, A, Raizada, P, Ahamad, T, Alshehri, SM, Nguyen, VH, Van Le, Q, et al.. Recent advances in cellulose supported photocatalysis for pollutant mitigation: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 2022;226:1284–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.11.241.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Hoviatdoost, A, Naderi, M, Ghazitabar, A, Gholami, F. Fabrication of high-performance ultralight and reusable graphene aerogel/cellulose fibers nanocomposite to remove organic pollutants. Mater Today Commun 2023;34:105077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.105077.Search in Google Scholar
6. Andrade Siqueira, TC, Zanette da Silva, I, Rubio, AJ, Bergamasco, R, Gasparotto, F, Aparecida de Souza Paccola, E, et al.. Sugarcane bagasse as an efficient biosorbent for methylene blue removal: kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamics. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2020;17:526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020526.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
7. Aggarwal, J, Sharma, S, Kamyab, H, Kumar, A. The realm of biopolymers and their usage: an overview. J Environ Treat Tech 2020;8:1005–16.Search in Google Scholar
8. Li, J, Yang, ZL, Ding, T, Song, YJ, Li, HC, Li, DQ, et al.. The role of surface functional groups of pectin and pectin-based materials on the adsorption of heavy metal ions and dyes. Carbohydr Polym 2022;276:118789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118789.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Duman, O, Polat, TG, Diker, CÖ, Tunç, S. Agar/κ-carrageenan composite hydrogel adsorbent for the removal of Methylene Blue from water. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;160:823–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.05.191.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Pethsangave, DA, Wadekar, PH, Khose, RV, Some, S. Super-hydrophobic carrageenan cross-linked graphene sponge for recovery of oil and organic solvent from their water mixtures. Polym Test 2020;90:106743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106743.Search in Google Scholar
11. Li, W, Qamar, SA, Qamar, M, Basharat, A, Bilal, M, Iqbal, HM. Carrageenan-based nano-hybrid materials for the mitigation of hazardous environmental pollutants. Int J Biol Macromol 2021;190:700–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.039.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Fu, C, Dong, X, Wang, S, Kong, F. Synthesis of nanocomposites using xylan and graphite oxide for remediation of cationic dyes in aqueous solutions. Int J Biol Macromol 2019;137:886–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.037.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Kartik, A, Akhil, D, Lakshmi, D, Gopinath, KP, Arun, J, Sivaramakrishnan, R, et al.. A critical review on production of biopolymers from algae biomass and their applications. Bioresour Technol 2021;329:124868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124868.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Łabowska, MB, Michalak, I, Detyna, J. Methods of extraction, physicochemical properties of alginates and their applications in biomedical field–a review. Open Chem 2019;17:738–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2019-0077.Search in Google Scholar
15. Lee, CS, Robinson, J, Chong, MF. A review on application of flocculants in wastewater treatment. Process Saf Environ Protect 2014;92:489–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2014.04.010.Search in Google Scholar
16. Yu, Z, Hu, C, Dichiara, AB, Jiang, W, Gu, J. Cellulose nanofibril/carbon nanomaterial hybrid aerogels for adsorption removal of cationic and anionic organic dyes. Nanomaterials 2020;10:169. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010169.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
17. Aichour, A, Zaghouane-Boudiaf, H. Single and competitive adsorption studies of two cationic dyes from aqueous mediums onto cellulose-based modified citrus peels/calcium alginate composite. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;154:1227–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.277.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Guan, Y, Yu, HY, Abdalkarim, SY, Wang, C, Tang, F, Marek, J, et al.. Green one-step synthesis of ZnO/cellulose nanocrystal hybrids with modulated morphologies and superfast absorption of cationic dyes. Int J Biol Macromol 2019;132:51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.104.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Dai, H, Huang, Y, Zhang, Y, Zhang, H, Huang, H. Green and facile fabrication of pineapple peel cellulose/magnetic diatomite hydrogels in ionic liquid for methylene blue adsorption. Cellulose 2019;26:3825–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02283-6.Search in Google Scholar
20. Pan, Y, Xie, H, Liu, H, Cai, P, Xiao, H. Novel cellulose/montmorillonite mesoporous composite beads for dye removal in single and binary systems. Bioresour Technol 2019;286:121366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121366.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Arachchige, MP, Mu, T, Ma, M. Effect of high hydrostatic pressure-assisted pectinase modification on the Pb2+ adsorption capacity of pectin isolated from sweet potato residue. Chemosphere 2021;262:128102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128102.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Zhu, W, Yang, J, Hu, D, Wang, Z. Removing Pb 2+ with a pectin-rich fiber from sisal waste. Food Funct 2021;12:2418–27. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0FO02829K.Search in Google Scholar
23. Ma, X, Li, D, Wu, Z, Zhang, H, Chen, X, Liu, Z. Mercury removal by adsorption on pectin extracted from sugar beet pulp: optimization by response surface methodology. Chem Eng Technol 2016;39:371–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201400059.Search in Google Scholar
24. Khozhaenko, E, Kovalev, V, Podkorytova, E, Khotimchenko, M. Removal of the metal ions from aqueous solutions by nanoscaled low molecular pectin isolated from seagrass Phyllospadix iwatensis. Sci Total Environ 2016;565:913–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.108.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Li, DQ, Wang, J, Guo, ZG, Li, J, Shuai, J. Pectin gels cross-linked by Ca2+: an efficient material for methylene blue removal. J Mol Liq 2017;238:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.04.116.Search in Google Scholar
26. Karimi, MH, Mahdavinia, GR, Massoumi, B, Baghban, A, Saraei, M. Ionically crosslinked magnetic chitosan/κ-carrageenan bioadsorbents for removal of anionic eriochrome black-T. Int J Biol Macromol 2018;113:361–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.02.102.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
27. Mola Ali Abasiyan, S, Dashbolaghi, F, Mahdavinia, GR. Chitosan cross-linked with κ-carrageenan to remove cadmium from water and soil systems. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2019;26:26254–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05488-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Al-Sakkari, EG, Abdeldayem, OM, Genina, EE, Amin, L, Bahgat, NT, Rene, ER, et al.. New alginate-based interpenetrating polymer networks for water treatment: a response surface methodology based optimization study. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;155:772–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.220.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
29. Fosso-Kankeu, E, Koen, CM, Pandey, S. Efficient removal of cationic dye on k-carrageenan–based hydrogel. In: Int’l Conference on Science, Engineering: Technology & Waste Management (SETWM-19); 2019:161–6 pp.Search in Google Scholar
30. Udayakumar, GP, Muthusamy, S, Selvaganesh, B, Sivarajasekar, N, Rambabu, K, Sivamani, S, et al.. Ecofriendly biopolymers and composites: preparation and their applications in water-treatment. Biotechnol Adv 2021;52:107815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107815.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
31. Enitan, IT, Durowoju, OS, Edokpayi, JN, Odiyo, JO. A review of air pollution mitigation approach using air pollution tolerance index (APTI) and anticipated performance index (API). Atmosphere 2022;13:374. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13030374.Search in Google Scholar
32. Montecinos Espinoza, SD, Ascazuri, M, Achaga, J, Viduzzi, G, Tognana, SA. Biopolymers to mitigate the environmental impact; 2019. Available from: https://notablesdelaciencia.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/119861.Search in Google Scholar
33. Nisar, T, Wang, ZC, Yang, X, Tian, Y, Iqbal, M, Guo, Y. Characterization of citrus pectin films integrated with clove bud essential oil: physical, thermal, barrier, antioxidant and antibacterial properties. Int J Biol Macromol 2018;106:670–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.068.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
34. Ruso, JM, Messina, PV. Application of natural, semi-synthetic, and synthetic biopolymers used in drug delivery systems design. In: Biopolymers for medical applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2017:46–73 pp.Search in Google Scholar
35. Mogoşanu, GD, Grumezescu, AM. Natural and synthetic polymers for wounds and burns dressing. Int J Pharm 2014;463:127–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.12.015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
36. Younes, I, Rinaudo, M. Chitin and chitosan preparation from marine sources. Structure, properties and applications. Mar Drugs 2015;13:1133–74. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13031133.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
37. Díez-Pascual, AM, Díez-Vicente, AL. Wound healing bionanocomposites based on castor oil polymeric films reinforced with chitosan-modified ZnO nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules 2015;16:2631–44. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.BIOMAC.5B00447.Search in Google Scholar
38. Yang, JM, Fan, CS, Wang, NC, Chang, YH. Evaluation of membrane preparation method on the performance of alkaline polymer electrolyte: comparison between poly (vinyl alcohol)/chitosan blended membrane and poly (vinyl alcohol)/chitosan electrospun nanofiber composite membranes. Electrochim Acta 2018;266:332–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.043.Search in Google Scholar
39. Sundarraj, AA, Ranganathan, TV. A review on cellulose and its utilization from agro-industrial waste. Drug Invent Today 2018;10:89–94.Search in Google Scholar
40. Crini, G. Non-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal: a review. Bioresour Technol 2006;97:1061–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.05.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
41. Faria, M, Cunha, C, Gomes, M, Mendonça, I, Kaufmann, M, Ferreira, A, et al.. Bacterial cellulose biopolymers: the sustainable solution to water-polluting microplastics. Water Res 2022;222:118952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118952.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
42. Kurniawan, A, Yamamoto, T. Biofilm polymer for biosorption of pollutant ions. Procedia Environ Sci 2013;17:179–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENV.2013.02.027.Search in Google Scholar
43. Mohite, BV, Patil, SV. Bacterial cellulose of Gluconoacetobacter hansenii as a potential bioadsorption agent for its green environment applications. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2014;25:2053–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2014.970063.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
44. Wanichapichart, P, Kaewnopparat, S, Buaking, K, Puthai, W. Characterization of cellulose membranes produced by Acetobacter xyllinum. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 2002;24:855–62.Search in Google Scholar
45. Hassan, E, Hassan, M, Abou-Zeid, R, Berglund, L, Oksman, K. Use of bacterial cellulose and crosslinked cellulose nanofibers membranes for removal of oil from oil-in-water emulsions. Polymers 2017;9:388. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM9090388.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
46. Isik, Z, Unyayar, A, Dizge, N. Filtration and antibacterial properties of bacterial cellulose membranes for textile wastewater treatment. Avicenna J Environ Health Eng 2018;5:106–14. https://doi.org/10.15171/AJEHE.2018.14.Search in Google Scholar
47. Guleria, A, Kumari, G, Lima, EC. Cellulose-g-poly- (acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) polymeric bioadsorbent for the removal of toxic inorganic pollutants from wastewaters. Carbohydr Polym 2020;228:115396. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2019.115396.Search in Google Scholar
48. Robledo-Olivo, A, Cabrera-De la Fuente, M, Benavides-Mendoza, A. Application of nanosilicon and nanochitosan to diminish the use of pesticides and synthetic fertilizers in crop production. In: In Handbook of Nanomaterials and Nanocomposites for Energy and Environmental Applications; 2021:2093–119 pp.10.1007/978-3-030-36268-3_47Search in Google Scholar
49. Soares, SF, Simoes, TR, Trindade, T, Daniel-da-Silva, AL. Highly efficient removal of dye from water using magnetic carrageenan/silica hybrid nano-adsorbents. Wate Air Soil Pollut 2017;228:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11270-017-3281-0.Search in Google Scholar
50. Maharani, CA, Budiasih, E, Wonorahardjo, S. Preparation and characterization of silica-carrageenan adsorbent for Pb2+ and Cd2+ as interfering ion. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2019;546:4. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/546/4/042021.Search in Google Scholar
51. de Sousa Rodrigues, LA, Figueiras, A, Veiga, F, de Freitas, RM, Nunes, LC, da Silva Filho, EC, et al.. The systems containing clays and clay minerals from modified drug release: a review. Colloids Surf B 2013;103:642–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.10.068.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
52. Prasannan, A, Udomsin, J, Tsai, HC, Wang, CF, Lai, JY. Robust underwater superoleophobic membranes with bio-inspired carrageenan/laponite multilayers for the effective removal of emulsions, metal ions, and organic dyes from wastewater. Chem Eng J 2020;391:123585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123585.Search in Google Scholar
53. Gamage, A, Thiviya, P, Mani, S, Ponnusamy, PG, Manamperi, A, Evon, P, et al.. Environmental properties and applications of biodegradable starch-based nanocomposites. Polymers 2022;14:4578. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214578.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
54. Hosseini, M, Pourabadeh, A, Fakhri, A, Hallajzadeh, J, Tahami, S. Synthesis and characterization of Sb2S3-CeO2/chitosan-starch as a heterojunction catalyst for photo-degradation of toxic herbicide compound: optical, photo-reusable, antibacterial and antifungal performances. Int J Biol Macromol 2018;118:2108–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.065.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
55. Ilyas, RA, Sapuan, SM, Norrrahim, MN, Yasim-Anuar, TA, Kadier, A, Kalil, MS, et al.. value="starch"Nanocellulose/starch biopolymer nanocomposites: processing, manufacturing, and applications. In: Advanced processing, properties, and applications of starch and other bio-based polymers. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020:65–88 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-819661-8.00006-8Search in Google Scholar
56. Dmour, I, Taha, MO. Natural and semisynthetic polymers in pharmaceutical nanotechnology. In: Organic materials as smart nanocarriers for drug delivery; 2018:35–100 pp. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128136638000026.10.1016/B978-0-12-813663-8.00002-6Search in Google Scholar
57. Marichelvam, MK, Jawaid, M, Asim, M. Corn and rice starch-based bio-plastics as alternative packaging materials. Fibers 2019;7:32. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib7040032.Search in Google Scholar
58. Sganzerla, WG, Rosa, GB, Ferreira, AL, da Rosa, CG, Beling, PC, Xavier, LO, et al.. Bioactive food packaging based on starch, citric pectin and functionalized with Acca sellowiana waste by-product: characterization and application in the postharvest conservation of apple. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;147:295–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.074.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
59. Cheng, H, Chen, L, McClements, DJ, Yang, T, Zhang, Z, Ren, F, et al.. Starch-based biodegradable packaging materials: a review of their preparation, characterization and diverse applications in the food industry. Trends Food Sci Technol 2021;114:70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.05.017.Search in Google Scholar
60. Wang, B, Wan, Y, Zheng, Y, Lee, X, Liu, T, Yu, Z, et al.. Alginate-based composites for environmental applications: a critical review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2019;49:318–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2018.1547621.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
61. Elgueta, E, Becerra, Y, Martínez, A, Pereira, M, Carrillo-Varela, I, Sanhueza, F, et al.. Adsorbents derived from xylan hemicellulose with removal properties of pollutant metals. Chin J Polym Sci 2023;41:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10118-023-2897-3.Search in Google Scholar
62. Kalaivani, GJ, Suja, SK. TiO2 (rutile) embedded inulin—a versatile bio-nanocomposite for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. Carbohydr Polym 2016;143:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.054.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
63. Valizadeh, K, Bateni, A, Sojoodi, N, Ataabadi, MR, Behroozi, AH, Maleki, A, et al.. Magnetized inulin by Fe3O4 as a bio-nano adsorbent for treating water contaminated with methyl orange and crystal violet dyes. Sci Rep 2022;12:22034. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26652-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
64. Sharma, G, Kumar, A, Chauhan, C, Okram, A, Sharma, S, Pathania, D, et al.. Pectin-crosslinked-guar gum/SPION nanocomposite hydrogel for adsorption of m-cresol and o-chlorophenol. Sustainable Chem Pharm 2017;6:96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2017.10.003.Search in Google Scholar
65. Gouveia, TI, Biernacki, K, Castro, MC, Gonçalves, MP, Souza, HK. A new approach to develop biodegradable films based on thermoplastic pectin. Food Hydrocolloids 2019;97:105175. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODHYD.2019.105175.Search in Google Scholar
66. Thakur, S, Chaudhary, J, Kumar, V, Thakur, VK. Progress in pectin based hydrogels for water purification: trends and challenges. J Environ Manag 2019;238:210–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
67. Ranjbar-Mohammadi, M, Rahimdokht, M, Pajootan, E. Low cost hydrogels based on gum Tragacanth and TiO2 nanoparticles: characterization and RBFNN modelling of methylene blue dye removal. Int J Biol Macromol 2019;134:967–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.026.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
68. Sharma, B, Thakur, S, Mamba, G, Gupta, RK, Gupta, VK, Thakur, VK. Titania modified gum tragacanth based hydrogel nanocomposite for water remediation. J Environ Chem Eng 2021;9:104608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104608.Search in Google Scholar
69. Hadi, A, Nawab, A, Alam, F, Zehra, K. Alginate/aloe vera films reinforced with tragacanth gum. Food Chem Mol Sci 2022;4:100105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100105.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
70. Bharagava, RN. Emerging eco-friendly green technologies for wastewater treatment. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2020. Available from: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-981-15-1390-9.pdf.10.1007/978-981-15-1390-9Search in Google Scholar
71. Muthukumaran, P, Babu, PS, Shyamalagowri, S, Aravind, J, Kamaraj, M, Govarthanan, M. Polymeric biomolecules based nanomaterials: production strategies and pollutant mitigation as an emerging tool for environmental application. Chemosphere 2022;307:136008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
72. Safarik, I, Horska, K, Safarikova, M. Magnetically responsive biocomposites for inorganic and organic xenobiotics removal. In: Microbial biosorption of metals; 2011:301–20 pp.10.1007/978-94-007-0443-5_13Search in Google Scholar
73. Roy, S, Priyadarshi, R, Ezati, P, Rhim, JW. Curcumin and its uses in active and smart food packaging applications-A comprehensive review. Food Chem 2022;375:131885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131885.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
74. Abdul Khalil, HPS, Tye, YY, Leh, CP, Saurabh, CK, Ariffin, F, Mohammad Fizree, H, et al.. value="cellulose"value="biodegradable"value="polymer"value="packaging"Cellulose-reinforced biodegradable polymer composite film for packaging applications. In: Bionanocomposites for packaging applications. Midtown Manhattan: Springer, Cham; 2017:49–69 pp.10.1007/978-3-319-67319-6_3Search in Google Scholar
75. Walzl, A, Kopacic, S, Bauer, W, Leitner, E. Characterization of natural polymers as functional barriers for cellulose-based packaging materials. Food Addit Contam 2019;36:976–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2019.1600747.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
76. Cazón, P, Vázquez, M. Mechanical and barrier properties of chitosan combined with other components as food packaging film. Environ Chem Lett 2020;18:257–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-019-00936-3.Search in Google Scholar
77. Gonzalez, K, Iturriaga, L, Gonzalez, A, Eceiza, A, Gabilondo, N. Improving mechanical and barrier properties of thermoplastic starch and polysaccharide nanocrystals nanocomposites. Eur Polym J 2020;123:109415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.109415.Search in Google Scholar
78. Taherimehr, M, Bagheri, R, Taherimehr, M. In-vitro evaluation of thermoplastic starch/beta-tricalcium phosphate nano-biocomposite in bone tissue engineering. Ceram Int 2021;47:15458–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.02.111.Search in Google Scholar
79. Ebrahimi, Y, Peighambardoust, SJ, Peighambardoust, SH, Karkaj, SZ. Development of antibacterial carboxymethyl cellulose-based nanobiocomposite films containing various metallic nanoparticles for food packaging applications. J Food Sci 2019;84:2537–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14744.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Reviews
- Circular plastics technologies: pyrolysis of plastics to fuels and chemicals
- Morphological, water barrier and biodegradable properties of sugar palm nanocellulose/starch biopolymer composites incorporated with cinnamon essential oils
- Plant-based biopolymers for wastewater pollutants mitigation
- Oat thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
- Miniaturization and microfluidic devices: an overview of basic concepts, fabrication techniques, and applications
- Pea thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
- Biopolymer based membrane technology for environmental applications
- Characterization of crude saponins from stem bark extract of Parinari curatellifolia and evaluation of its antioxidant and antibacterial activities
- Random and block architectures of N-arylitaconimide monomers with methyl methacrylate
- Physicochemical and free radical scavenging activity of Adansonia digitata seed oil
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Reviews
- Circular plastics technologies: pyrolysis of plastics to fuels and chemicals
- Morphological, water barrier and biodegradable properties of sugar palm nanocellulose/starch biopolymer composites incorporated with cinnamon essential oils
- Plant-based biopolymers for wastewater pollutants mitigation
- Oat thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
- Miniaturization and microfluidic devices: an overview of basic concepts, fabrication techniques, and applications
- Pea thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
- Biopolymer based membrane technology for environmental applications
- Characterization of crude saponins from stem bark extract of Parinari curatellifolia and evaluation of its antioxidant and antibacterial activities
- Random and block architectures of N-arylitaconimide monomers with methyl methacrylate
- Physicochemical and free radical scavenging activity of Adansonia digitata seed oil