Home Pea thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Pea thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose

  • Abu Hassan Nordin ORCID logo , Rushdan Ahmad Ilyas ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Norzita Ngadi and Nurul Huda Baharuddin
Published/Copyright: April 4, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Interest in nanocellulose has lately increased as a result of its benefits, such as renewable, biodegradable, high mechanical strength and valuable economically. In this regard, nanocellulose has been frequently employed as reinforcement for the enhancement of mechanical, thermal and biodegradation qualities of nanocomposite materials, such as thermoplastic starch. An overview of the use of pea starch that has been reinforced with nanocellulose for packaging and storage applications is given in this chapter. In comparison to standard sources of starch like maize, wheat and potatoes, it is consequently seen as a comparatively affordable source of starch. These composite polysaccharides (pea thermoplastic starch/nanocellulose) have the potential to replace traditional packaging composed of polymers derived from petroleum.


Corresponding author: Rushdan Ahmad Ilyas, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Skudai 81310, Malaysia; Centre for Advanced Composite Materials (CACM), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Skudai 81310, Malaysia; Centre of Excellence for Biomass Utilization, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 02600, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia; and Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia, E-mail:

Acknowledgement

The research has been carried out under the programme, Research Excellence Consortium (JPT (BPKI) 1000/016/018/25 (57)), provided by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE).

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: The authors would like express gratitude for the financial support received from the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia for the project ‘The impact of Malaysian bamboos’ chemical and fibre characteristics on their pulp and paper properties’, grant number PY/2022/02318—Q.J130000.3851.21H99.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Scheurer, M, Bigalke, M. Microplastics in swiss floodplain soils. Environ Sci Technol 2018;52:3591–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Teixeira, EdM, Lotti, C, Corrêa, AC, Teodoro, KB, Marconcini, JM, Mattoso, LH. Thermoplastic corn starch reinforced with cotton cellulose nanofibers. J Appl Polym Sci 2011;120:2428–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.33447.Search in Google Scholar

3. Mali, S, Grossmann, MVE, Garcia, MA, Martino, MN, Zaritzky, NE. Microstructural characterization of yam starch films. Carbohydr Polym 2002;50:379–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0144-8617(02)00058-9.Search in Google Scholar

4. Ratnayake, WS, Hoover, R, Warkentin, T. Pea starch: composition, structure and properties—a review. Starch Staerke 2002;54:217–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-379x(200206)54:6<217::aid-star217>3.0.co;2-r.10.1002/1521-379X(200206)54:6<217::AID-STAR217>3.0.CO;2-RSearch in Google Scholar

5. Montero, B, Rico, M, Rodríguez-Llamazares, S, Barral, L, Bouza, R. Effect of nanocellulose as a filler on biodegradable thermoplastic starch films from tuber, cereal and legume. Carbohydr Polym 2017;157:1094–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.073.Search in Google Scholar

6. Prachayawarakorn, J, Sangnitidej, P, Boonpasith, P. Properties of thermoplastic rice starch composites reinforced by cotton fiber or low-density polyethylene. Carbohydr Polym 2010;81:425–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.02.041.Search in Google Scholar

7. Tomé, LC, Fernandes, SC, Perez, DS, Sadocco, P, Silvestre, AJ, Neto, CP, et al.. The role of nanocellulose fibers, starch and chitosan on multipolysaccharide based films. Cellulose 2013;20:1807–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9959-6.Search in Google Scholar

8. Zainuddin, SYZ, Ahmad, I, Kargarzadeh, H, Abdullah, I, Dufresne, A. Potential of using multiscale kenaf fibers as reinforcing filler in cassava starch-kenaf biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 2013;92:2299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.106.Search in Google Scholar

9. Fazeli, M, Keley, M, Biazar, E. Preparation and characterization of starch-based composite films reinforced by cellulose nanofibers. Int J Biol Macromol 2018;116:272–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.04.186.Search in Google Scholar

10. Abral, H, Dalimunthe, MH, Hartono, J, Efendi, RP, Asrofi, M, Sugiarti, E, et al.. Characterization of tapioca starch biopolymer composites reinforced with micro scale water hyacinth fibers. Starch Staerke 2018;70:1700287. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201700287.Search in Google Scholar

11. Ma, X, Chang, PR, Yu, J. Properties of biodegradable thermoplastic pea starch/carboxymethyl cellulose and pea starch/microcrystalline cellulose composites. Carbohydr Polym 2008;72:369–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.09.002.Search in Google Scholar

12. Kaewtatip, K, Thongmee, J. Studies on the structure and properties of thermoplastic starch/luffa fiber composites. Mater Des 2012;40:314–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.053.Search in Google Scholar

13. Marsh, K, Bugusu, B. Food packaging—roles, materials, and environmental issues. J Food Sci 2007;72:R39–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00301.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Babu, RP, O’connor, K, Seeram, R. Current progress on bio-based polymers and their future trends. Prog Biomater 2013;2:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/2194-0517-2-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Aravamudhan, A, Ramos, DM, Nada, AA, Kumbar, SG. Natural polymers: polysaccharides and their derivatives for biomedical applications. In: Natural and synthetic biomedical polymers. Elsevier; 2014:67–89 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-396983-5.00004-1Search in Google Scholar

16. Zabot, GL, Silva, EK, Emerick, LB, Felisberto, MHF, Clerici, MTPS, Meireles, MAA. Physicochemical, morphological, thermal and pasting properties of a novel native starch obtained from annatto seeds. Food Hydrocolloids 2019;89:321–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.10.041.Search in Google Scholar

17. Tagliapietra, BL, Felisberto, MHF, Sanches, EA, Campelo, PH, Clerici, MTPS. Non-conventional starch sources. Curr Opin Food Sci 2021;39:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2020.11.011.Search in Google Scholar

18. Molavi, H, Behfar, S, Shariati, MA, Kaviani, M, Atarod, S. A review on biodegradable starch based film. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci 2021;2021:456–61. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2015.4.5.456-461.Search in Google Scholar

19. Dularia, C, Sinhmar, A, Thory, R, Pathera, AK, Nain, V. Development of starch nanoparticles based composite films from non-conventional source-water chestnut (Trapa bispinosa). Int J Biol Macromol 2019;136:1161–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.169.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. do Val Siqueira, L, Arias, CILF, Maniglia, BC, Tadini, CC. Starch-based biodegradable plastics: methods of production, challenges and future perspectives. Curr Opin Food Sci 2021;38:122–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2020.10.020.Search in Google Scholar

21. Nawab, A, Alam, F, Haq, MA, Lutfi, Z, Hasnain, A. Mango kernel starch-gum composite films: physical, mechanical and barrier properties. Int J Biol Macromol 2017;98:869–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.02.054.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Hoover, R, Hughes, T, Chung, H, Liu, Q. Composition, molecular structure, properties, and modification of pulse starches: a review. Food Res Int 2010;43:399–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.001.Search in Google Scholar

23. Reichert, R, Youngs, C. Starch fractions from air-classified field peas. Cereal Chem 1978;55:469–80.Search in Google Scholar

24. Ratnayake, W, Hoover, R, Shahidi, F, Perera, C, Jane, J. Composition, molecular structure, and physicochemical properties of starches from four field pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars. Food Chem 2001;74:189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(01)00124-8.Search in Google Scholar

25. Comer, F, Fry, M. Purification, modification, and properties of air-classified pea starch. Cereal Chem 1978;55:818–29.Search in Google Scholar

26. Tyler, R, Youngs, C, Sosulski, F. Air classification of legumes [beans, lentils, peas]. I. Separation efficiency, yield, and composition of the starch and protein fractions. Cereal Chem 1981;58:144–8.Search in Google Scholar

27. Meuser, F, Pahne, N, Möller, M. Extraction of high amylose starch from wrinkled peas. Starch Staerke 1995;47:56–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19950470205.Search in Google Scholar

28. Colonna, P, Mercier, C. Macromolecular structure of wrinkled-and smooth-pea starch components. Carbohydr Res 1984;126:233–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(84)85381-1.Search in Google Scholar

29. Gujska, E, Reinhard, WD, Khan, K. Physicochemical properties of field pea, pinto and navy bean starches. J Food Sci 1994;59:634–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1994.tb05580.x.Search in Google Scholar

30. Davydova, N, Leont’Ev, S, Genin, YV, Sasov, AY, Bogracheva, TY. Some physico-chemical properties of smooth pea starches. Carbohydr Polym 1995;27:109–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8617(95)00052-9.Search in Google Scholar

31. García, NL, Ribba, L, Dufresne, A, Aranguren, M, Goyanes, S. Effect of glycerol on the morphology of nanocomposites made from thermoplastic starch and starch nanocrystals. Carbohydr Polym 2011;84:203–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.024.Search in Google Scholar

32. Da Róz, A, Carvalho, A, Gandini, A, Curvelo, A. The effect of plasticizers on thermoplastic starch compositions obtained by melt processing. Carbohydr Polym 2006;63:417–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.09.017.Search in Google Scholar

33. Qiao, X, Tang, Z, Sun, K. Plasticization of corn starch by polyol mixtures. Carbohydr Polym 2011;83:659–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.035.Search in Google Scholar

34. Li, H, Huneault, MA. Comparison of sorbitol and glycerol as plasticizers for thermoplastic starch in TPS/PLA blends. J Appl Polym Sci 2011;119:2439–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.32956.Search in Google Scholar

35. Teixeira, EdM, Da Roz, A, Carvalho, A, Curvelo, A. The effect of glycerol/sugar/water and sugar/water mixtures on the plasticization of thermoplastic cassava starch. Carbohydr Polym 2007;69:619–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.01.022.Search in Google Scholar

36. Ma, XF, Yu, J, Wan, J. Urea and ethanolamine as a mixed plasticizer for thermoplastic starch. Carbohydr Polym 2006;64:267–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.11.042.Search in Google Scholar

37. Ma, X, Yu, J. Formamide as the plasticizer for thermoplastic starch. J Appl Polym Sci 2004;93:1769–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.20628.Search in Google Scholar

38. Yang, JH., Yu, JG., Ma, XF. Preparation of a novel thermoplastic starch (TPS) material using ethylenebisformamide as the plasticizer. Starch Staerke 2006;58:330–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.200500479.Search in Google Scholar

39. Dai, H, Chang, PR, Yu, J, Ma, X, Zhou, P. Preparation and properties of thermoplastic pea starch using N, N-bis (2-hydroxyethyl) formamide as the plasticizer. Polym Eng Sci 2010;50:970–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.21615.Search in Google Scholar

40. Reddy, RL, Reddy, VS, Gupta, GA. Study of bio-plastics as green and sustainable alternative to plastics. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 2013;3:76–81.Search in Google Scholar

41. Tserki, V, Matzinos, P, Zafeiropoulos, N, Panayiotou, C. Development of biodegradable composites with treated and compatibilized lignocellulosic fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 2006;100:4703–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.23240.Search in Google Scholar

42. Orts, WJ, Shey, J, Imam, SH, Glenn, GM, Guttman, ME, Revol, J-F. Application of cellulose microfibrils in polymer nanocomposites. J Polym Environ 2005;13:301–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-005-5514-3.Search in Google Scholar

43. Ferrer, A, Pal, L, Hubbe, M. Nanocellulose in packaging: advances in barrier layer technologies. Ind Crop Prod 2017;95:574–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.11.012.Search in Google Scholar

44. Ma, X, Yu, J, Kennedy, JF. Studies on the properties of natural fibers-reinforced thermoplastic starch composites. Carbohydr Polym 2005;62:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.07.015.Search in Google Scholar

45. Teixeira, EdM, Pasquini, D, Curvelo, AA, Corradini, E, Belgacem, MN, Dufresne, A. Cassava bagasse cellulose nanofibrils reinforced thermoplastic cassava starch. Carbohydr Polym 2009;78:422–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.04.034.Search in Google Scholar

46. Thuwall, M, Boldizar, A, Rigdahl, M. Extrusion processing of high amylose potato starch materials. Carbohydr Polym 2006;65:441–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.01.033.Search in Google Scholar

47. Averous, L, Boquillon, N. Biocomposites based on plasticized starch: thermal and mechanical behaviours. Carbohydr Polym 2004;56:111–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2003.11.015.Search in Google Scholar

48. Wattanakornsiri, A, Pachana, K, Kaewpirom, S, Sawangwong, P, Migliaresi, C. Green composites of thermoplastic corn starch and recycled paper cellulose fibers. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 2011;33.Search in Google Scholar

49. Curvelo, A, De Carvalho, A, Agnelli, J. Thermoplastic starch–cellulosic fibers composites: preliminary results. Carbohydr Polym 2001;45:183–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0144-8617(00)00314-3.Search in Google Scholar

50. Majeed, K, Jawaid, M, Hassan, A, Bakar, AA, Khalil, HA, Salema, A, et al.. Potential materials for food packaging from nanoclay/natural fibres filled hybrid composites. Mater Des 2013;46:391–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.10.044.Search in Google Scholar

51. Tee, T-T, Sin, LT, Gobinath, R, Bee, S-T, Hui, D, Rahmat, A, et al.. Investigation of nano-size montmorillonite on enhancing polyvinyl alcohol–starch blends prepared via solution cast approach. Compos B Eng 2013;47:238–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.033.Search in Google Scholar

52. Hajaligol, M, Waymack, B, Kellogg, D. Low temperature formation of aromatic hydrocarbon from pyrolysis of cellulosic materials. Fuel 2001;80:1799–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-2361(01)00063-1.Search in Google Scholar

53. Minelli, M, Baschetti, MG, Doghieri, F, Ankerfors, M, Lindström, T, Siró, I, et al.. Investigation of mass transport properties of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) films. J Membr Sci 2010;358:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.04.030.Search in Google Scholar

54. Khalil, HA, Davoudpour, Y, Islam, MN, Mustapha, A, Sudesh, K, Dungani, R, et al.. Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: a review. Carbohydr Polym 2014;99:649–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.069.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

55. Ma, X, Chang, PR, Yu, J, Stumborg, M. Properties of biodegradable citric acid-modified granular starch/thermoplastic pea starch composites. Carbohydr Polym 2009;75:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.05.020.Search in Google Scholar

56. Zhou, X, Cheng, R, Wang, B, Zeng, J, Xu, J, Li, J, et al.. Biodegradable sandwich-architectured films derived from pea starch and polylactic acid with enhanced shelf-life for fruit preservation. Carbohydr Polym 2021;251:117117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117117.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2022-11-02
Accepted: 2023-02-27
Published Online: 2023-04-04

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2022-0026/html
Scroll to top button