Oat thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose

References

1. Boczkowska, M, Podyma, W, Łapiński, B. 4 – oat. In: Singh, M, Upadhyaya, HD, editors. Genetic and genomic resources for grain cereals improvement. San Diego: Academic Press; 2016:159–225 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-802000-5.00004-6Search in Google Scholar

2. Jing, P, Hu, X. Nutraceutical properties and health benefits of oats. In: Cereals and pulses. Iowa: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2012:21–36 pp.10.1002/9781118229415.ch3Search in Google Scholar

3. Yue, J, Gu, Z, Zhu, Z, Yi, J, Ohm, JB, Chen, B, et al.. Impact of defatting treatment and oat varieties on structural, functional properties, and aromatic profile of oat protein. Food Hydrocoll 2021;112:106368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106368.Search in Google Scholar

4. Punia, S, Sandhu, KS, Dhull, SB, Siroha, AK, Purewal, SS, Kaur, M, et al.. Oat starch: physico-chemical, morphological, rheological characteristics and its applications - a review. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;154:493–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.083.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. United Nations Environment Program. UN environment assembly concludes with 14 resolutions to curb pollution, protect and restore nature worldwide [Press Release]. Nairobi; 2022. Available from: https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/un-environment-assembly-concludes-14-resolutions-curb-pollution#:∼:text=Nairobi%2C 02 March 2022 – The,to advance global environmental governance [Accessed 5 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

6. Ai, Y, Jane, JL. Understanding starch structure and functionality. Duxford: Elsevier Ltd; 2018. Epub ahead of print 2018.10.1016/B978-0-08-100868-3.00003-2Search in Google Scholar

7. Gallant, DJ, Bouchet, B, Baldwin, PM. Microscopy of starch: evidence of a new level of granule organization. Carbohydr Polym 1997;32:177–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0144-8617(97)00008-8.Search in Google Scholar

8. Tang, H, Mitsunaga, T, Kawamura, Y. Molecular arrangement in blocklets and starch granule architecture. Carbohydr Polym 2006;63:555–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.10.016.Search in Google Scholar

9. Joye, IJ Starch. In: Melton, L, Shahidi, F, Varelis, P, editors, Amsterdam: Encyclopedia of food chemistry. Elsevier; 2008:256–64 pp.10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.21586-2Search in Google Scholar

10. Jane, J, Chen, YY, Lee, LF, McPherson, AE, Wong, KS, Radosavljevic, M, et al.. Effects of amylopectin branch chain length and amylose content on the gelatinization and pasting properties of starch. Cereal Chem 1999;76:629–37. https://doi.org/10.1094/cchem.1999.76.5.629.Search in Google Scholar

11. Englyst, HN, Kingman, SM, Cummings, JH. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992;46:S33–50.Search in Google Scholar

12. Tamura, M, Singh, J, Kaur, L, Ogawa, Y. Impact of the degree of cooking on starch digestibility of rice – an in vitro study. Food Chem 2016;191:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.127.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Frei, M, Siddhuraju, P, Becker, K. Studies on the in vitro starch digestibility and the glycemic index of six different indigenous rice cultivars from the Philippines. Food Chem 2003;83:395–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(03)00101-8.Search in Google Scholar

14. Han, J-A, BeMiller, JN. Preparation and physical characteristics of slowly digesting modified food starches. Carbohydr Polym 2007;67:366–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.06.011.Search in Google Scholar

15. Chung, H-J, Liu, Q, Lee, L, Wei, D. Relationship between the structure, physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility of rice starches with different amylose contents. Food Hydrocoll 2011;25:968–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.09.011.Search in Google Scholar

16. Tester, RF, Karkalas, J, Qi, X. Starch—composition, fine structure and architecture. J Cereal Sci 2004;39:151–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2003.12.001.Search in Google Scholar

17. Finnie, SM, Jeannotte, R, Morris, CF, Giroux, M, Faubion, J. Variation in polar lipids located on the surface of wheat starch. J Cereal Sci 2010;51:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2009.09.007.Search in Google Scholar

18. Ao, Z, Jane, J. Characterization and modeling of the A-and B-granule starches of wheat, triticale, and barley. Carbohydr Polym 2007;67:46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.04.013.Search in Google Scholar

19. Singh, S, Singh, N, Isono, N, Noda, T. Relationship of granule size distribution and amylopectin structure with pasting, thermal, and retrogradation properties in wheat starch. J Agric Food Chem 2010;58:1180–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf902753f.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Cornejo-Ramírez, YI, Ramírez-Reyes, F, Cinco-Moroyoqui, FJ, Rosas-Burgos, EC, Martinez-Cruz, O, Carvajal-Millan, E, et al.. Starch debranching enzyme activity and its effects on some starch physicochemical characteristics in developing substituted and complete triticales (X Triticosecale Wittmack). Cereal Chem 2016;93:64–70. https://doi.org/10.1094/cchem-02-15-0034-r.Search in Google Scholar

21. Cornejo-Ramírez, YI, Martínez-Cruz, O, Del Toro-Sánchez, CL, Wong-Corral, FJ, Borboa-Flores, J, Cinco-Moroyoqui, FJ. The structural characteristics of starches and their functional properties. CyTA – J Food 2018;16:1003–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2018.1518343.Search in Google Scholar

22. Buléon, A, Colonna, P, Planchot, V, Ball, S. Starch granules: structure and biosynthesis. Int J Biol Macromol 1998;23:85–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-8130(98)00040-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Manners, DJ. Recent developments in our understanding of amylopectin structure. Carbohydr Polym 1989;11:87–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8617(89)90018-0.Search in Google Scholar

24. Copeland, L, Blazek, J, Salman, H, Tang, MC. Form and functionality of starch. Food Hydrocoll 2009;23:1527–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.09.016.Search in Google Scholar

25. Li, L, Jiang, H, Campbell, M, Blanco, M, Jane, J. Characterization of maize amylose-extender (ae) mutant starches. Part I: relationship between resistant starch contents and molecular structures. Carbohydr Polym 2008;74:396–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.03.012.Search in Google Scholar

26. Bertoft, E. Analyzing starch molecular structure. Duxford: Elsevier; 2018. Epub ahead of print 2018.10.1016/B978-0-08-100868-3.00002-0Search in Google Scholar

27. Mua, JP, Jackson, DS. Fine structure of corn amylose and amylopectin fractions with various molecular weights. J Agric Food Chem 1997;45:3840–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf960877a.Search in Google Scholar

28. Putseys, JA, Lamberts, L, Delcour, JA. Amylose-inclusion complexes: formation, identity and physico-chemical properties. J Cereal Sci 2010;51:238–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2010.01.011.Search in Google Scholar

29. Song, Y, Jane, J. Characterization of barley starches of waxy, normal, and high amylose varieties. Carbohydr Polym 2000;41:365–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0144-8617(99)00098-3.Search in Google Scholar

30. Bertoft, E, Piyachomkwan, K, Chatakanonda, P, Sriroth, K. Internal unit chain composition in amylopectins. Carbohydr Polym 2008;74:527–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.04.011.Search in Google Scholar

31. Kalinga, DN, Waduge, R, Liu, Q, Yada, RY, Bertoft, E, Seetharaman, K. On the differences in the granular architecture and starch structure between pericarp and endosperm wheat starches. Starch – Stärke 2013;65:791–800. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201200240.Search in Google Scholar

32. Vermeylen, R, Goderis, B, Reynaers, H, Delcour, JA. Amylopectin molecular structure reflected in macromolecular organization of granular starch. Biomacromolecules 2004;5:1775–86. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0499132.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Koroteeva, DA, Kiseleva, VI, Sriroth, K, Piyachomkwan, K, Bertoft, E, Yuryev, PV, et al.. Structural and thermodynamic properties of rice starches with different genetic background Part 1. Differentiation of amylopectin and amylose defects. Int J Biol Macromol 2007;41:391–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2007.05.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Srichuwong, S, Sunarti, TC, Mishima, T, Isono, N, Hisamatsu, M. Starches from different botanical sources I: contribution of amylopectin fine structure to thermal properties and enzyme digestibility. Carbohydr Polym 2005;60:529–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.03.004.Search in Google Scholar

35. Yoo, S-H, Jane, J. Structural and physical characteristics of waxy and other wheat starches. Carbohydr Polym 2002;49:297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0144-8617(01)00338-1.Search in Google Scholar

36. Nakamura, Y. Starch: metabolism and structure; (2015). Japan: Springer; 2015:1–451 pp.10.1007/978-4-431-55495-0Search in Google Scholar

37. Aberle, T, Burchard, W, Vorwerg, W, Radosta, S. Conformational contributions of amylose and amylopectin to the structural properties of starches from various sources. Starch – Starke 1994;46:329–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19940460903.Search in Google Scholar

38. Millard, MM, Dintzis, FR, Willett, JL, Klavons, JA. Light-scattering molecular weights and intrinsic viscosities of processed waxy maize starches in 90% dimethyl sulfoxide and H2O. Cereal Chem 1997;74:687–91.https://doi.org/10.1094/cchem.1997.74.5.687.Search in Google Scholar

39. Takeda, Y, Shibahara, S, Hanashiro, I. Examination of the structure of amylopectin molecules by fluorescent labeling. Carbohydr Res 2003;338:471–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6215(02)00488-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Meyer, KH, Bernfeld, P. Recherches sur l’amidon V. L’amylopectine. Helv Chim Acta 1940;23:875–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.194002301112.Search in Google Scholar

41. Gunja-Smith, Z, Marshall, JJ, Mercier, C, Smith, E, Whelan, W. A revision of the Meyer-Bernfeld model of glycogen and amylopectin. FEBS Lett 1970;12:101–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(70)80573-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Horibata, T, Nakamoto, M, Fuwa, H, Inouchi, N. Structural and physicochemical characteristics of endosperm starches of rice cultivars recently bred in Japan. J Appl Glycosci 2004;51:303–13. https://doi.org/10.5458/jag.51.303.Search in Google Scholar

43. Osborne, TB. The proteins of the wheat kernel/by Thomas B. Osborne. Washington, D.C: Carnegie Institution of Washington; 1907.10.5962/bhl.title.22763Search in Google Scholar

44. Peterson, DM, Smith, D. Changes in nitrogen and carbohydrate fractions in developing oat Groats1. Crop Sci 1976;16:67–71. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1976.0011183x001600010017x.Search in Google Scholar

45. Peterson, DM. Subunit structure and composition of oat seed globulin. Plant Physiol 1978;62:506–9. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.62.4.506.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

46. Gangopadhyay, N, Hossain, MB, Rai, DK, Brunton, N. A review of extraction and analysis of bioactives in oat and barley and scope for use of novel food processing technologies. Molecules 2015;20:10884–909. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200610884.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Kaur, R, Sharma, M, Ji, D, Xu, M, Agyei, D. Structural features, modification, and functionalities of beta-glucan. Fibers 2020;8. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib8010001.Search in Google Scholar

48. Dawkins, NL, Nnanna, IA. Oat gum and β-glucan extraction from oat bran and rolled oats: temperature and pH effects. J Food Sci 1993;58:562–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb04324.x.Search in Google Scholar

49. Kumar, L, Sehrawat, R, Kong, Y. Oat proteins: a perspective on functional properties. LWT 2021;152:112307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112307.Search in Google Scholar

50. Sibakov, J, Myllymäki, O, Holopainen, U, Kaukovirta-Norja, A, Hietaniemi, V, Pihlava, J, et al.. Lipid removal enhances separation of oat grain cell wall material from starch and protein. J Cereal Sci 2011;54:104–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2011.04.003.Search in Google Scholar

51. Ramadhan, K, Foster, T. Effects of ball milling on the structural, thermal, and rheological properties of oat bran protein flour. J Food Eng 2018;229:50–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.10.024.Search in Google Scholar

52. Prosekov, A, Babich, O, Kriger, O, Ivanova, S, Pavsky, V, Sukhikh, S, et al.. Functional properties of the enzyme-modified protein from oat bran. Food Biosci 2018;24:46–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2018.05.003.Search in Google Scholar

53. Liu, K. Fractionation of oats into products enriched with protein, beta-glucan, starch, or other carbohydrates. J Cereal Sci 2014;60:317–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2014.06.002.Search in Google Scholar

54. Schutyser, MAI, van der Goot, AJ. The potential of dry fractionation processes for sustainable plant protein production. Trends Food Sci Technol 2011;22:154–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2010.11.006.Search in Google Scholar

55. Benito-Román, O, Alonso, E, Lucas, S. Optimization of the β-glucan extraction conditions from different waxy barley cultivars. J Cereal Sci 2011;53:271–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2011.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

56. Guan, X, Yao, H. Optimization of Viscozyme L-assisted extraction of oat bran protein using response surface methodology. Food Chem 2008;106:345–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.05.041.Search in Google Scholar

57. Zhang, Z, Smith, C, Li, W. Extraction and modification technology of arabinoxylans from cereal by-products: a critical review. Food Res Int 2014;65:423–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.05.068.Search in Google Scholar

58. Galanakis, CM. Sustainable applications for the valorization of cereal processing by-products. Foods 2022;11:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11020241.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

59. Kriger, O, Kashirskikh, EV, Babich, O, Noskova, S. OAT protein concentrate production. Foods Raw Mater 2018;6:47–55. https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2018-1-47-55.Search in Google Scholar

60. Liu, G, Li, J, Shi, K, Wang, S, Chen, J, Liu, Y, et al.. Composition, secondary structure, and self-assembly of oat protein isolate. J Agric Food Chem 2009;57:4552–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf900135e.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

61. Mirmoghtadaie, L, Kadivar, M, Shahedi, M. Effects of succinylation and deamidation on functional properties of oat protein isolate. Food Chem 2009;114:127–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.025.Search in Google Scholar

62. Yung Ma, C. Preparation, composition and functional properties of oat protein Isolates11contribution no. 509. Can Inst Food Sci Technol J 1983;16:201–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0315-5463(83)72208-x.Search in Google Scholar

63. Anderson, JW, Gilinsky, NH, Deakins, DA, Smith, S, O’Neal, D, Dillon, D, et al.. Lipid responses of hypercholesterolemic men to oat-bran and wheat-bran intake. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;54:678–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/54.4.678.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

64. åman, P. Cholesterol-lowering effects of barley dietary fibre in humans: scientific support for a generic health claim. Scand J Food Nutr 2006;50:173–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482970601057990.Search in Google Scholar

65. Regand, A, Chowdhury, Z, Tosh, SM, Wolever, TM, Wood, P. The molecular weight, solubility and viscosity of oat beta-glucan affect human glycemic response by modifying starch digestibility. Food Chem 2011;129:297–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.04.053.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

66. Harasym, J, Żyła, E, Dziendzikowska, K, Gromadzka-Ostrowska, J. Proteinaceous residue removal from oat β-glucan extracts obtained by alkaline water extraction. Molecules 2019;24. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24091729.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

67. Saskatoon, B, Canada RS University of S. Extraction and enrichment (1 leads to 3), (1 leads to 4)-beta-D-glucan from barley and oat brans. Cereal Chem 1993; 70:73–7.Search in Google Scholar

68. Lehtinen, P, Kiiliäinen, K, Lehtomäki, I, Laakso, S. Effect of heat treatment on lipid stability in processed oats. J Cereal Sci 2003;37:215–21. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.2002.0496.Search in Google Scholar

69. Ziegler, V, Ferreira, CD, da Silva, J, da Rosa Zavareze, E, Dias, ARG, de Oliveira, M, et al.. Heat-moisture treatment of oat grains and its effects on lipase activity and starch properties. Starch – Stärke 2018;70:1700010. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201700010.Search in Google Scholar

70. Alrahmany, R, Avis, TJ, Tsopmo, A. Treatment of oat bran with carbohydrases increases soluble phenolic acid content and influences antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Food Res Int 2013;52:568–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.03.037.Search in Google Scholar

71. Galanakis, CM. Concluding remarks and future perspectives. In: Sustainable recovery and reutilization of cereal processing by-products. Duxford: Elsevier Inc; 2018:319–27 pp.10.1016/B978-0-08-102162-0.00011-3Search in Google Scholar

72. Wang, L, Weller, CL. Recent advances in extraction of nutraceuticals from plants. Trends Food Sci Technol 2006;17:300–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2005.12.004.Search in Google Scholar

73. Smith, EL, Abbott, AP, Ryder, KS. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) and their applications. Chem Rev 2014;114:11060–82. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300162p.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

74. Mitbumrung, W, Rungraung, N, Muangpracha, N, Akanitkul, P, Winuprasith, T. Approaches for extracting nanofibrillated cellulose from oat bran and its emulsion capacity and stability. Polymers 2022;14. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14020327.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

75. Wang, H, Xiang, L, Rao, P, Ke, L, Wu, B, Chen, S, et al.. Effects of pretreatments on structural and functional changes of oat protein isolate. Cereal Chem 2022;99:90–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10480.Search in Google Scholar

76. Immonen, M, Myllyviita, J, Sontag-Strohm, T, Myllarinen, P. Oat protein concentrates with improved solubility produced by an enzyme-aided ultrafiltration extraction method. Foods 2021;10:3050. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10123050.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

77. Li, Y, Obadi, M, Qi, Y, shi, J, Liu, S, Sun, J, et al.. Extraction of oat lipids and phospholipids using subcritical propane and dimethyl ether: experimental data and modeling. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 2021;123:2000092. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.202000092.Search in Google Scholar

78. Mel, R, Malalgoda, M. Oat protein as a novel protein ingredient: structure, functionality, and factors impacting utilization. Cereal Chem 2022;99:21–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10488.Search in Google Scholar

79. Nieto-Nieto, TV, Wang, YX, Ozimek, L, Chen, L. Inulin at low concentrations significantly improves the gelling properties of oat protein – a molecular mechanism study. Food Hydrocoll 2015;50:116–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.03.031.Search in Google Scholar

80. Zhong, L, Ma, N, Wu, Y, Zhao, L, Pei, F, Hu, Q. Characterization and functional evaluation of oat protein isolate-Pleurotus ostreatus β-glucan conjugates formed via Maillard reaction. Food Hydrocolloids 2019;87:459–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.08.034.Search in Google Scholar

81. Mohamed, A, Biresaw, G, Xu, J, Hojilla-Evangelista, MP, Rayas-Duarte, P. Oats protein isolate: thermal, rheological, surface and functional properties. Food Res Int 2009;42:107–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2008.10.011.Search in Google Scholar

82. Konak, Üİ, Ercili-Cura, D, Sibakov, J, Sontag-Strohm, T, Certel, M, Loponen, J. CO2-defatted oats: solubility, emulsification and foaming properties. J Cereal Sci 2014;60:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2014.01.013.Search in Google Scholar

83. Zhang, B, Guo, X, Zhu, K, Peng, W, Zhou, H. Improvement of emulsifying properties of oat protein isolate–dextran conjugates by glycation. Carbohydr Polym 2015;127:168–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.072.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

84. Nieto, TVN, Wang, Y, Ozimek, L, Chen, L. Improved thermal gelation of oat protein with the formation of controlled phase-separated networks using dextrin and carrageenan polysaccharides. Food Res Int 2016;82:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.01.027.Search in Google Scholar

85. Yang, C, Wang, Y, Chen, L. Fabrication, characterization and controlled release properties of oat protein gels with percolating structure induced by cold gelation. Food Hydrocoll 2017;62:21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.07.023.Search in Google Scholar

86. Mäkinen, OE, Sozer, N, Ercili-Cura, D, Poutanen, K. Chapter 6 - protein from oat: structure, processes, functionality, and nutrition. In: Nadathur, SR, Wanasundara, JPD, Scanlin, LBT-SPS, editors. San Diego: Academic Press; 2017:105–19 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-802778-3.00006-8Search in Google Scholar

87. Sunilkumar, BA, Tareke, E. Review of analytical methods for measurement of oat proteins: the need for standardized methods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2019;59:1467–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1414029.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

88. Wu, YV, Cluskey, JE, Wall, JS, GEI. Oat protein concentrates from a wet-milling process: composition and properties. Cereal Chem 1973;50:481–8.Search in Google Scholar

89. Zhao, Y, Mine, Y, Ma, C-Y. Study of thermal aggregation of oat globulin by laser light scattering. J Agric Food Chem 2004;52:3089–96. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf030735y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

90. Schmidt, M. Cereal beta-glucans: an underutilized health endorsing food ingredient. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2020:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1864619.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

91. Ryu, J-H, Lee, S, You, S, Shim, JH, Yoo, SH. Effects of barley and oat β-glucan structures on their rheological and thermal characteristics. Carbohydr Polym 2012;89:1238–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.025.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

92. Lan-Pidhainy, X, Brummer, Y, Tosh, SM, Wolever, TM, Wood, PJ. Reducing beta-glucan solubility in oat bran muffins by freeze-Thaw treatment attenuates its hypoglycemic effect. Cereal Chem 2007;84:512–7. https://doi.org/10.1094/cchem-84-5-0512.Search in Google Scholar

93. Moriartey, S, Temelli, F, Vasanthan, T. Effect of formulation and processing treatments on viscosity and solubility of extractable barley $β$-glucan in bread dough evaluated under in vitro conditions. Cereal Chem 2010;87:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1094/cchem-87-1-0065.Search in Google Scholar

94. Herrera, MP, Gao, J, Vasanthan, T, Temelli, F, Henderson, K. β-Glucan content, viscosity, and solubility of Canadian grown oat as influenced by cultivar and growing location. Can J Plant Sci 2016;96:183–96. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2014-0440.Search in Google Scholar

95. Agarwal, S. Major factors affecting the characteristics of starch based biopolymer films. Eur Polym J 2021;160:110788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110788.Search in Google Scholar

96. Lauer, MK, Smith, RC. Recent advances in starch-based films toward food packaging applications: physicochemical, mechanical, and functional properties. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2020;19:3031–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12627.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

97. Shah, U, Gani, A, Ashwar, BA, Shah, A, Ahmad, M, Gani, A, et al.. A review of the recent advances in starch as active and nanocomposite packaging films. Cogent Food Agric 2015;1:1115640. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2015.1115640.Search in Google Scholar

98. Coppola, G, Gaudio, MT, Lopresto, CG, Calabro, V, Curcio, S, Chakraborty, S. Bioplastic from renewable biomass: a facile solution for a greener environment. Earth Syst Environ 2021;5:231–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-021-00208-7.Search in Google Scholar

99. Özeren, HD, Wei, X-F, Nilsson, F, Olsson, RT, Hedenqvist, MS. Role of hydrogen bonding in wheat gluten protein systems plasticized with glycerol and water. Polymer 2021;232:124149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2021.124149.Search in Google Scholar

100. Slavutsky, AM, Bertuzzi, MA. Improvement of water barrier properties of starch films by lipid nanolamination. Food Packag Shelf Life 2016;7:41–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2016.01.004.Search in Google Scholar

101. Galdeano, MC, Mali, S, Grossmann, MVE, Yamashita, F, Garcia, MA. Effects of plasticizers on the properties of oat starch films. Mater Sci Eng C 2009;29:532–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2008.09.034.Search in Google Scholar

102. Galdeano, MC, Wilhelm, AE, Mali, S, Grossmann, MVE. Influence of thickness on properties of plasticized oat starch films. Brazilian Arch Biol Technol 2013;56:637–44. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-89132013000400014.Search in Google Scholar

103. Żołek-Tryznowska, Z, Kałuża, A. The influence of starch origin on the properties of starch films: packaging performance. Materials 2021;14:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14051146.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

104. Zamudio-Flores, PB, Ochoa-Reyes, E, Ornelas-Paz, Jde J, Tirado-Gallegos, JM, Bello-Pérez, LA, Rubio-Ríos, A, et al.. Physicochemical, mechanical, and structural features of oxidized oat and banana starch films enriched with betalains. Agrociencia 2015;49:483–98.Search in Google Scholar

105. Bangar, SP, Whiteside, WS. Nano-cellulose reinforced starch bio composite films-a review on green composites. Int J Biol Macromol 2021;185:849–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

106. Bruni, GP, de Oliveira, JP, Fonseca, LM, Silva, FT, Dias, ARG, da Rosa Zavareze, E. Biocomposite films based on phosphorylated wheat starch and cellulose nanocrystals from rice, oat, and Eucalyptus husks. Starch – Stärke 2020;72:1900051. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201900051.Search in Google Scholar

107. Qazanfarzadeh, Z, Kadivar, M. Properties of whey protein isolate nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose isolated from oat husk. Int J Biol Macromol 2016;91:1134–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.06.077.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

108. Diyana, ZN, Jumaidin, R, Selamat, MZ, Ghazali, I, Julmohammad, N, Huda, N, et al.. Physical properties of thermoplastic starch derived from natural resources and its blends: a review. Polymers 2021;13:1396. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13091396 (1,4)-linked D-glucose.10.3390/polym13091396Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central