Home Linguistics & Semiotics The syntax of plurals of collective and mass nouns: Views from Jordanian Arabic
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The syntax of plurals of collective and mass nouns: Views from Jordanian Arabic

  • Abdulazeez Jaradat and Marwan Jarrah EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 20, 2022

Abstract

This research paper provides a syntactic account of the observation that plurals of non-count nouns (i.e., collective and mass nouns) in Jordanian Arabic (JA) may express different readings, namely a counting reading and paucity in quantity. We propose that availability of such readings or lack thereof depend crucially on whether or not Division Phrase (DivP) (Borer, 2005) projects in narrow syntax. When DivP projects over nP, a counting reading is available for the plural of singulatives. On the other hand, when DivP does not project, no counting reading is available, and alternatively a small-quantity reading is held. This implies that pluralization in JA is subject to the availability of functional projections that form the relevant DP, hence supplying evidence against the lexical hypothesis of plural formation. As for paucity in quantity, we argue that it is a product of (or a subtype of) the well-known paucal plural (cf. Ojeda 1992; Mathieu 2013).


Marwan Jarrah Department of English Language and Literature School of Foreign Languages University of Jordan Amman 11942 Jordan

References

Acquaviva, P. 2008. Lexical plurals: A morphosemantic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199534210.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, A. 2010. “Plural mass nouns and the morpho-syntax of Number”. The West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 28. University of Southern California.Search in Google Scholar

Bale, A. and D. Barner. 2011. Mass–count distinction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Borer, H. 2005. In name only Structuring sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0028Search in Google Scholar

Butler, L. 2012. “Crosslinguistic and experimental evidence for non-number plural”. Linguistic Variation 12. 27–56.10.1075/lv.12.1.02butSearch in Google Scholar

Chierchia, G. 1998. “Reference to Kinds across languages”. Natural Language Semantics 6. 339–405.10.1023/A:1008324218506Search in Google Scholar

Dali, M., and É. Mathieu. 2016. “Les pluriels internes féminins de l’arabe tunisien”. Lingvisticæ Investigationes 39. 253–271.10.1075/li.39.2.03dalSearch in Google Scholar

Deal, A. R. 2017. “Countability distinctions and semantic variation”. Natural Language Semantics 25(2). 125–171.10.1007/s11050-017-9132-0Search in Google Scholar

Embick, D. and Noyer. 2007. “Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology Interface”. In Ramchand, G. and C. Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 289–32410.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0010Search in Google Scholar

Erwin, M. 1963. A short reference grammar of Iraqi Arabic. (Arabic series.) Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fassi Fehri, A. 2003. “Nominal classes and parameters across interfaces and levels, with a particular reference to Arabic”. Linguistic Research 8. 9–101.Search in Google Scholar

Fassi Fehri, A. 2012. Key features and parameters in Arabic grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.182Search in Google Scholar

Fassi Fehri, A. 2018. Constructing feminine to mean gender, number, numeral and quantifier extensions in Arabic. USA: Lexington Books.Search in Google Scholar

Gillon, C. 2015. “Innu-aimun plurality”. Lingua 162. 128–148.10.1016/j.lingua.2015.05.006Search in Google Scholar

Harrell, R. 1962. A short reference grammar of Moroccan Arabic. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harbour, D. 2011. “Valence and atomic number”. Linguistic Inquiry 42. 561–594.10.1162/LING_a_00061Search in Google Scholar

Harbour, D. 2014. “Paucity, abundance, and the theory of number”. Language 90. 185–229.10.1353/lan.2014.0003Search in Google Scholar

Jarrah, M., Al-Jarrah, and Abu-Dalu. 2018. “Assignment of plural modes in northern rural Jordanian Arabic”. Dirasat, Human and Social Sciences 45. 210–223.10.35516/0103-045-003-014Search in Google Scholar

Jarrah, M. and A. Zibin. 2016. “Syntactic investigation of nunation in Haili Arabic”. SKY Journal of Linguistics 29. 39–62.Search in Google Scholar

Kramer, R. 2012. A split analysis of plurality: Evidence from Amharic. In WCCFL Santa Cruz.Search in Google Scholar

Lowenstamm, J. 2008. “On n, nP and √”. In Hartmann, J., V. Hegedus and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The sounds of silence: Empty elements in syntax and phonology. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 105–144.Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. and Prince. 1990. “Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology”. In Eid, M. and J. McCarthy (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics: Papers from the Second Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 1–54.10.1075/cilt.72Search in Google Scholar

Mathieu, E. 2012a. “Flavors of division.” Linguistic Inquiry 43. 650–679.10.1162/ling_a_00110Search in Google Scholar

Mathieu, E. 2012b. “The mass/count distinction in Ojibwe”. In Massam, D. (ed.), Count and mass across languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 172–198.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Mathieu, E. 2013. “On the plural of the singulative”. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 23.Search in Google Scholar

Mathieu, E. 2014. “Many a plural”. In Aguilar-Guevara, B., L. Bruyn and J. Zwarts (eds.), Weak referentiality. 157–181.10.1075/la.219.07matSearch in Google Scholar

Mathieu, E. and Zareikar. 2015. “Measure words, plurality, and cross-linguistic variation”. Linguistic Variation 2. 169–200.10.1075/lv.15.2.02matSearch in Google Scholar

Ojeda, A. E. 1992. “The semantics of number in Arabic”. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 2. 303–326.10.3765/salt.v2i0.3040Search in Google Scholar

Ritter, E. 1991. “Two functional categories in modern Hebrew noun phrases”. In Rothstein, S. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 25. Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing. New York: Academic Press. 37–60.10.1163/9789004373198_004Search in Google Scholar

Ritter, E. 1995. “On the syntactic category of pronouns and agreement”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13. 405–443.10.1007/BF00992737Search in Google Scholar

Smith, P. W. 2014. “Plural mass nouns in Telugu”. (Manuscript, University of Connecticut.)Search in Google Scholar

Talmoudi, F. 1980. The Arabic dialect of Sûsa (Tunisia). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Search in Google Scholar

Tsoulas, G. 2007. “On the grammar of number and mass terms in Greek”. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49. 239–266.Search in Google Scholar

Wiese, H. 2012. Collectives in the intersection of mass and count nouns. Dans Count and Mass across languages, sous la dir. de Diane Massam. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 220-23710.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Wiltshko, M. 2008. “The syntax of non-inflectional plural marking”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26. 639–694.10.1007/s11049-008-9046-0Search in Google Scholar

Zabbal, Y. 2002. The semantics of number in the Arabic noun phrase. (MA thesis, University of Calgary.)Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-10-20
Published in Print: 2022-09-27

© 2022 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland

Downloaded on 13.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psicl-2022-0023/pdf
Scroll to top button