Abstract
This research paper provides a syntactic account of the observation that plurals of non-count nouns (i.e., collective and mass nouns) in Jordanian Arabic (JA) may express different readings, namely a counting reading and paucity in quantity. We propose that availability of such readings or lack thereof depend crucially on whether or not Division Phrase (DivP) (Borer, 2005) projects in narrow syntax. When DivP projects over nP, a counting reading is available for the plural of singulatives. On the other hand, when DivP does not project, no counting reading is available, and alternatively a small-quantity reading is held. This implies that pluralization in JA is subject to the availability of functional projections that form the relevant DP, hence supplying evidence against the lexical hypothesis of plural formation. As for paucity in quantity, we argue that it is a product of (or a subtype of) the well-known paucal plural (cf. Ojeda 1992; Mathieu 2013).
References
Acquaviva, P. 2008. Lexical plurals: A morphosemantic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199534210.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. 2010. “Plural mass nouns and the morpho-syntax of Number”. The West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 28. University of Southern California.Search in Google Scholar
Bale, A. and D. Barner. 2011. Mass–count distinction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Borer, H. 2005. In name only Structuring sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0028Search in Google Scholar
Butler, L. 2012. “Crosslinguistic and experimental evidence for non-number plural”. Linguistic Variation 12. 27–56.10.1075/lv.12.1.02butSearch in Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. 1998. “Reference to Kinds across languages”. Natural Language Semantics 6. 339–405.10.1023/A:1008324218506Search in Google Scholar
Dali, M., and É. Mathieu. 2016. “Les pluriels internes féminins de l’arabe tunisien”. Lingvisticæ Investigationes 39. 253–271.10.1075/li.39.2.03dalSearch in Google Scholar
Deal, A. R. 2017. “Countability distinctions and semantic variation”. Natural Language Semantics 25(2). 125–171.10.1007/s11050-017-9132-0Search in Google Scholar
Embick, D. and Noyer. 2007. “Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology Interface”. In Ramchand, G. and C. Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 289–32410.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0010Search in Google Scholar
Erwin, M. 1963. A short reference grammar of Iraqi Arabic. (Arabic series.) Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, A. 2003. “Nominal classes and parameters across interfaces and levels, with a particular reference to Arabic”. Linguistic Research 8. 9–101.Search in Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, A. 2012. Key features and parameters in Arabic grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.182Search in Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, A. 2018. Constructing feminine to mean gender, number, numeral and quantifier extensions in Arabic. USA: Lexington Books.Search in Google Scholar
Gillon, C. 2015. “Innu-aimun plurality”. Lingua 162. 128–148.10.1016/j.lingua.2015.05.006Search in Google Scholar
Harrell, R. 1962. A short reference grammar of Moroccan Arabic. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harbour, D. 2011. “Valence and atomic number”. Linguistic Inquiry 42. 561–594.10.1162/LING_a_00061Search in Google Scholar
Harbour, D. 2014. “Paucity, abundance, and the theory of number”. Language 90. 185–229.10.1353/lan.2014.0003Search in Google Scholar
Jarrah, M., Al-Jarrah, and Abu-Dalu. 2018. “Assignment of plural modes in northern rural Jordanian Arabic”. Dirasat, Human and Social Sciences 45. 210–223.10.35516/0103-045-003-014Search in Google Scholar
Jarrah, M. and A. Zibin. 2016. “Syntactic investigation of nunation in Haili Arabic”. SKY Journal of Linguistics 29. 39–62.Search in Google Scholar
Kramer, R. 2012. A split analysis of plurality: Evidence from Amharic. In WCCFL Santa Cruz.Search in Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, J. 2008. “On n, nP and √”. In Hartmann, J., V. Hegedus and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The sounds of silence: Empty elements in syntax and phonology. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 105–144.Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. and Prince. 1990. “Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology”. In Eid, M. and J. McCarthy (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics: Papers from the Second Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 1–54.10.1075/cilt.72Search in Google Scholar
Mathieu, E. 2012a. “Flavors of division.” Linguistic Inquiry 43. 650–679.10.1162/ling_a_00110Search in Google Scholar
Mathieu, E. 2012b. “The mass/count distinction in Ojibwe”. In Massam, D. (ed.), Count and mass across languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 172–198.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0010Search in Google Scholar
Mathieu, E. 2013. “On the plural of the singulative”. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 23.Search in Google Scholar
Mathieu, E. 2014. “Many a plural”. In Aguilar-Guevara, B., L. Bruyn and J. Zwarts (eds.), Weak referentiality. 157–181.10.1075/la.219.07matSearch in Google Scholar
Mathieu, E. and Zareikar. 2015. “Measure words, plurality, and cross-linguistic variation”. Linguistic Variation 2. 169–200.10.1075/lv.15.2.02matSearch in Google Scholar
Ojeda, A. E. 1992. “The semantics of number in Arabic”. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 2. 303–326.10.3765/salt.v2i0.3040Search in Google Scholar
Ritter, E. 1991. “Two functional categories in modern Hebrew noun phrases”. In Rothstein, S. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 25. Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing. New York: Academic Press. 37–60.10.1163/9789004373198_004Search in Google Scholar
Ritter, E. 1995. “On the syntactic category of pronouns and agreement”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13. 405–443.10.1007/BF00992737Search in Google Scholar
Smith, P. W. 2014. “Plural mass nouns in Telugu”. (Manuscript, University of Connecticut.)Search in Google Scholar
Talmoudi, F. 1980. The Arabic dialect of Sûsa (Tunisia). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Search in Google Scholar
Tsoulas, G. 2007. “On the grammar of number and mass terms in Greek”. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49. 239–266.Search in Google Scholar
Wiese, H. 2012. Collectives in the intersection of mass and count nouns. Dans Count and Mass across languages, sous la dir. de Diane Massam. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 220-23710.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Wiltshko, M. 2008. “The syntax of non-inflectional plural marking”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26. 639–694.10.1007/s11049-008-9046-0Search in Google Scholar
Zabbal, Y. 2002. The semantics of number in the Arabic noun phrase. (MA thesis, University of Calgary.)Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Articles in the same Issue
- Table of contents
- A dependent case approach to complex event nominals in standard Arabic
- Word-formation and reduplication in standard Arabic: A new distributed morphology approach
- Predicting foreign language skills based on first languages: The role of lexical distance and relative morphological complexity
- Formulaic language in oral academic discourse socialization of graduate students in a Northern Cyprus university
- ‘Leftover women’: A sociolinguistic study of gender bias in Chinese
- The syntax of plurals of collective and mass nouns: Views from Jordanian Arabic
- Attitudes of Nigerian expatriates towards accents of English
- Synthetic -BLE compounds VS. -BLE adjectives: Issues in the external and internal syntax
- English loan translations in Polish in the area of computers: Syntactic aspects
- Engagement in Chinese criminal judgments
Articles in the same Issue
- Table of contents
- A dependent case approach to complex event nominals in standard Arabic
- Word-formation and reduplication in standard Arabic: A new distributed morphology approach
- Predicting foreign language skills based on first languages: The role of lexical distance and relative morphological complexity
- Formulaic language in oral academic discourse socialization of graduate students in a Northern Cyprus university
- ‘Leftover women’: A sociolinguistic study of gender bias in Chinese
- The syntax of plurals of collective and mass nouns: Views from Jordanian Arabic
- Attitudes of Nigerian expatriates towards accents of English
- Synthetic -BLE compounds VS. -BLE adjectives: Issues in the external and internal syntax
- English loan translations in Polish in the area of computers: Syntactic aspects
- Engagement in Chinese criminal judgments