Home Linguistics & Semiotics Word-formation and reduplication in standard Arabic: A new distributed morphology approach
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Word-formation and reduplication in standard Arabic: A new distributed morphology approach

  • Muteb Alqarni EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 20, 2022

Abstract

The current paper aims to capture the properties of reduplication within the distributed morphology model (Halle and Marantz 1993, 1994; Embick and Noyer 2007; Siddiqi 2009; Embick 2010). Taking Standard Arabic (SA) as a representative, the article shows that SA, like many other languages, has both full and partial reduplication. Full reduplication repeats entire stems while partial reduplication doubles part of it. Rather than the available two analyses, i.e. the readjustment approach (Raimy 2000; Frampton 2009) and the affixation approach (Haugen 2008, 2010, 2011; Haugen and Harley 2010), the current paper provides a novel approach to the phenomenon of reduplication in the world languages. It argues that root consonants and vowels should be decomposed into non-phonetic distinctive features that undergo late insertion at PF. These non-phonetic distinctive features are supplied with sound items at PF in the same fashion that the terminal nodes with morphosyntactic features are fed with vocabulary items. This approach serves three purposes. It accounts for speech errors, captures the non-concatenative morphology in Semitic languages, and allows the reduplicant form to copy all the distinctive features of the roots, yielding instances of full reduplication. Instances of partial reduplication can be generated by root-sensitive impoverishment rules which target and delete some of the features of the stem or the reduplicant form.


King Khalid University College of Sciences and Arts (Tanuma) B. O. Box. 250 69889, Tanuma, Asir Saudi Arabia

References

Abu-Mansour, M. 2015. “A study of internal reduplication in Makkan Arabic”. Journal of Asian and African Studies 9. 29–30.Search in Google Scholar

Acquaviva, P. 2008. Roots and lexicality in distributed morphology. Retrieved from <https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/000654> on 20 Mar 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Alqarni, M. 2015. The morphosyntax of numeral-noun constructions in Modern Standard Arabic. (PhD dissertation, University of Florida.)Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, S. R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511586262Search in Google Scholar

Arad, M. 2003. “Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21. 737–778.10.1023/A:1025533719905Search in Google Scholar

Arad, M. 2005. Roots and patterns: Hebrew morphosyntax. Berlin: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Bonet, E. 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. (PhD dissertation, MIT.)Search in Google Scholar

Borer, H. 2014. “Wherefore roots?” Theoretical Linguistics 40(3/4). 343–359.10.1515/tl-2014-0016Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2000. “Minimalist inquiries: The framework”. In: Martin, R., D. Michaels, J. Uriagereka and S. Keyser (eds.), Step by step: Essays in minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 89–155.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2001. “Derivation by phase”. In: Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 1–52.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2004. “Beyond explanatory adequacy”. In: Belletti, A. (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures (vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 104–131.Search in Google Scholar

Clements, G. and S. Keyser. 1983. CV phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

De Belder, M. 2011. Roots and affixes: Eliminating lexical categories from syntax. Brussels: HU Brussel, Utrecht University.Search in Google Scholar

Downing, L. J. and S. Inkelas. 2015. “What is reduplication? Typology and analysis part 2/2: The analysis of reduplication”. Language and Linguistics Compass 9(12). 516–528.10.1111/lnc3.12152Search in Google Scholar

Elzarka, D. 2005. “Gemination and other consonant doubling in Arabic morphology”. In: Bernhard, H. (ed.), Studies on reduplication. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 395–430.Search in Google Scholar

Embick, D. and A. Marantz. 2008. “Architecture and blocking”. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1). 1–53.10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Embick, D. and R. Noyer. 2001. “Movement operations after syntax”. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4). 555–595.10.1162/002438901753373005Search in Google Scholar

Embick, D. and R. Noyer. 2007. “Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface”. In: Ramchand, G. and C. Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 289–324.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0010Search in Google Scholar

Embick, D. and M. Halle. 2005. “On the status of stems in morphological theory”. In: Geerts, T., I. van Ginneken and H. Jacobs (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 59–88.10.1075/cilt.270.03embSearch in Google Scholar

Embick, D. 1997. Voice and the interfaces of syntax. (PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.)Search in Google Scholar

Embick, D. 1998. “Voice systems and the syntax/morphology interface”. MITWPL 32: Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect. 41–72.Search in Google Scholar

Embick, D. 2000. “Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect”. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2). 185–230.10.1162/002438900554343Search in Google Scholar

Embick, D. 2010. Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014229.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Embick, D. 2015. The morpheme: A theoretical introduction. Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501502569Search in Google Scholar

Fisch, M. 1998. Thimbukushu grammar. Windhoek: Out of Africa Publisher.Search in Google Scholar

Frampton, J. 2009. Distributed reduplication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press10.7551/mitpress/9780262013260.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gouskova, M. 2004. “Minimal reduplication as a paradigm uniformity effect”. In: Chand, V., A. Kelleher, A.J. Rodríguez and B. Schmeiser (eds.), The Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. 265–278.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, M. and A. Marantz. 1993. “Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection”. In: Keyser, S. and K. Hale (eds.), The view from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 111–176.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, M. and A. Marantz. 1994. “Some key features of distributed morphology”. In: Carnie, A., H. Harley and T. Bures (eds.), MIT Working Papers In Linguistics 21: Papers on Phonology And Morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 275–288.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, M. 1990. “An approach to morphology”. Proceedings of NELS 20. 150–185.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, M. 1997. “Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission”. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30. 425–449.10.1075/cilt.202.07halSearch in Google Scholar

Harley, H. 1994. “Hug a tree: Deriving the morphosyntactic feature hierarchy”. In: Carnie, A. and H. Harley (eds.), MITWPL 21: Papers on phonology and morphology. Cambridge: MITWPL. 275–288.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, H. 2014. “On the identity of roots”. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3). 225–276.10.1515/tl-2014-0010Search in Google Scholar

Harris, J. 1997. “Why n ’ho is pronounced [li] in Barceloni Catalan”. In: Bruening, B., Y. Kang and M. McGinnis (eds.), MITWPL 30: Papers at the Interface. Cambridge: MITWPL. 451–479.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. 2002. Understanding morphology. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. and the APiCS Consortium. 2013. “Functions of reduplication”. In: Michaelis, S.M., P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath and M. Huber (eds.), The atlas of pidgin and creole language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haugen, J.D. 2008. Morphology at the interfaces. Reduplication and noun incorporation in Uto-Aztecan. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.117Search in Google Scholar

Haugen, J.D. 2010. “Review of John Frampton’ s Distributed reduplication”. Language 86(4). 953–957.10.1353/lan.2010.0029Search in Google Scholar

Haugen, J.D. 2011. “Reduplication in Distributed Morphology”. In: Schertz, S., A. Hogue, D. Bell, D. Brenner and S. Wray (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Arizona Linguistics Circle Conference (ALC 4). (Coyote Papers 18.) Tucson: University of Arizona, Department of Linguistics. 1–27.Search in Google Scholar

Haugen, J.D. 2016. “Readjustment: Rejected?” In: Siddiqi, D. and H. Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 303–342.10.1075/la.229.11hauSearch in Google Scholar

Haugen, J.D. and H. Harley. 2010. “Head-marking inflection and the architecture of grammatical theory: Evidence from reduplication and compounding in Hiaki (Yaqui)”. Ms, Oberlin College and the University of Arizona.Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, B. 2009. Introductory phonology. Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Healey, P. M. 1960. An Agta grammar. Manila: Republic of the Philippines Bureau of Printing.Search in Google Scholar

Inkelas, S. and C. Zoll. 2005. Reduplication: Doubling in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627712Search in Google Scholar

Kastner, I. 2019. “Templatic morphology as an emergent property: Roots and functional heads in Hebrew”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 37(2). 571–619.10.1007/s11049-018-9419-ySearch in Google Scholar

Kim, E. 2008. “Multiple patterns of reduplication in Nuuchahnulth: A templatic approach”. Second Language Research 44(1). 63–94.Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. 1973. “Elsewhere in phonology”. In: Anderson, S. and P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt. 93–106.Search in Google Scholar

Kirchner, J. S. 2013. “Minimal reduplication and reduplicative exponence”. Morphology 23(1). 227–243.10.1007/s11525-013-9225-5Search in Google Scholar

Kouwenberg, S. and D. LaCharité. 2005. “Less is more: Evidence from diminutive reduplication in Caribbean Creole languages”. In: Hurch, B. (ed.), Studies on reduplication. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter. 533–546.10.1515/9783110911466.533Search in Google Scholar

Kramer, R. 2006. “Root and pattern morphology in Coptic: Evidence for the root”. In: Davis, C., A.R. Deal and Y. Zabbal (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 36. Amherst, MA: GLSA. 399–412.Search in Google Scholar

Maas, U. 2005. “Syntactic reduplication in Arabic”. In: Bernhard, B. (ed.), Studies on reduplication. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 395–430.10.1515/9783110911466.395Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, A. 1995. “Cat” as a phrasal idiom: consequences of late insertion in Distributed Morphology. (Unpublished manuscript, MIT.)Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, A. 1997. “Cat as a phrasal idiom: Stem suppletion, or the arbitrariness of the sign”. Paper presented at the Université de Paris VIII.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, A. 2007. “Phases and words”. In: Choe, S.-H. (ed.), Phases in the theory of grammar. Seoul: Dong In. 191–222.Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, J.J. and A. Prince. 1995. “Faithfulness and reduplicative identity”. In: Beck-man, J., L. Walsh Dickey and S. Urbanczyk (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory. (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18.) Amherst: University of Massachusetts. 249–384.Search in Google Scholar

Mielke, J. 2008. The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199207916.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ngunga, A. 2000. Phonology and morphology of the Ciyao verb. Standford: California, CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Noyer, R. 1997. Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Noyer, R. 1998. “Impoverishment theory and morphosyntactic markedness”. In: Lapointe, S., D.K. Brentari and P. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax. Stanford: CSLI. 264–285.Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, D. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Pfau, R. 2000. Features and categories in language production. (PhD Dissertation, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main.)Search in Google Scholar

Pfau, R. 2009. Grammar as processor: a distributed morphology account of spontaneous speech errors. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.137Search in Google Scholar

Procházka, S. 1993. “Some remarks on the semantic function of the reduplicated quadrilateral verbs (structure fa3fa3a)”. In: Devenyi, K. and T. Ivanyi (eds.), Proceedings of the Colloquium on Arabic Lexicology and Lexicography 1. Budapest: Eotvos Lorand University & Csoma de Koros Society. 97–103.Search in Google Scholar

Raimy, E. 2000. The phonology and morphology of reduplication. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110825831Search in Google Scholar

Rekanga, J.P. 1989. Essai de Grammaire Gunu. (PhD dissertation, Universite Libre de Bruxelles.)Search in Google Scholar

Rudy, S. 1988. Major works 1976–1980: Completion (vol. 1). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110862744Search in Google Scholar

Ryding, K. 2005. A reference grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486975Search in Google Scholar

Schwaiger, T. 2018. “The derivational nature of reduplication: Towards a Functional Discourse Grammar account of a non-concatenative morphological process”. Word Structure 11(1). 118–144.10.3366/word.2018.0118Search in Google Scholar

Shaw, P.A. 1980. Theoretical issues in Dakota phonology and morphology. New York: Garland Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Shaw, P.A. 2004. “Reduplicant order and identity: Never trust a Salish CVC either?” In: Kinkade, D., D. Gerdts and L. Matthewson (eds.), Studies in Salish linguistics in honor of M. Dale Kinkade. (University of Montana Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17.) Missoula, MT: University of Montana.Search in Google Scholar

Siddiqi, D. 2009. Syntax within the word: Economy, allomorphy, and argument selection in distributed morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.138Search in Google Scholar

Sproat, R. 1985. On deriving the lexicon. (PhD dissertation, MIT.)Search in Google Scholar

Tucker, M. 2011. “The morphosyntax of the Arabic verb: Toward a unified syntax-prosody”. In Morphology at Santa Cruz: Papers in honor of Jorge Hankamer. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Wallace, K. 2013. A concatenative approach to Semitic templatic morphology. Ms., NYU. lingbuzz/002299.Search in Google Scholar

Watanabe, H. 1994. A report on Sliammon (Mainland Comox) phonology and reduplication. (MA thesis, Hokkaido University.)Search in Google Scholar

Watson, J.C.E. 2002. Phonology and morphology of Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199257591.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Zukoff, S. 2012. The phonology of verbal reduplication in Ancient Greek: An Optimality Theory Approach. (MA thesis, University of Georgia.)Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-10-20
Published in Print: 2022-09-27

© 2022 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland

Downloaded on 13.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psicl-2022-0019/pdf
Scroll to top button