Abstract
We analyze the rise and loss of isoglosses in two Indo-European languages, early Greek and early English, which, however, show considerable distance between their structures in many other domains. We follow Keidan’s approach (2013), that has drawn the attention on the fact that the study of isoglosses (i.e., linguistic features common to two or more languages) is connected with common innovations of particular languages after the split into sub-groups of Indo-European: this type of approach aims at collecting isoglosses that appear across the branches of Indo-European. We examine the rise of the isogloss of labile verbs and the loss of the isogloss of the two classes of aspectual verbs in early Greek and early English. Our study shows that the rise of labile verbs in both languages is related to the innovative use of intransitives in causative constructions. On the other hand, the innovations in voice morphology follow different directions in Greek and English and are unrelated to the rise of labile verbs. In contrast to labile verbs, which are still predominant for causative-anticausative constructions in both languages, the two classes of aspectual verbs are lost in the later stages of Greek but are predominant even in Present-day English. Again, a “prerequisite” change for the isogloss can be easily located in a structural ambiguity that is relevant for aspectual verbs in early Greek and early English. However, another independent development, the changes in verbal complementation (the development of infinitival and participial complements) in Greek and English, determined the loss of this isogloss.
References
Akmajian, A., S.M. Steele and Th. Wasow. 1979. “The category AUX in Universal Grammar”. Linguistic Inquiry 10. 1–64.Suche in Google Scholar
Callaway, M. 1913. The infinitive in Anglo-Saxon. Washington: Carnegie Institute of Washington.10.5962/bhl.title.166130Suche in Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. 1989. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. (Ms., Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, and 2004. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou and M. Everaert (eds.), The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 22–59.Suche in Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 2006. “Transitivity pairs, markedness, and diachronic stability”. Linguistics 44(2). 303–318.10.1515/LING.2006.011Suche in Google Scholar
Disterheft, D. 1980. The syntactic development of the infinitive in Indo-European. Columbus, OH: Slavica.Suche in Google Scholar
Disterheft, D. 1981. “Remarks on the history of the Indo-European infinitive”. Folia Linguistica Historica 2(1). 3–34.10.1515/flih.1981.2.1.3Suche in Google Scholar
Dixon, R. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611896Suche in Google Scholar
Eythórsson, T. 2003. “The change that never happened: The story of oblique subjects”. Journal of Linguistics 39(3). 439–472.10.1017/S002222670300207XSuche in Google Scholar
Fischer, O. 2013. “The role of contact in English syntactic change in the Old and Middle English periods”. In: Hundt, M. and D. Schreier (eds), English as a contact language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 18–40.10.1017/CBO9780511740060.002Suche in Google Scholar
Fukuda, S. 2007. “On the control/raising ambiguity with aspectual verbs: A structural account”. In: Stiebels, B. (ed.), ZAS Papers in Linguistics 47: Studies in complement control. Berlin: ZAS. 159–195.Suche in Google Scholar
Gelderen, van. E. 2000. A history of English reflexive pronouns: Person, self, and interpretability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.39Suche in Google Scholar
Gelderen, van. E. 2011. “Valency changes in the history of English”. Journal of Historical Linguistics 1(1). 106–143.10.1075/jhl.1.1.05vanSuche in Google Scholar
Givón, T. 2006. “Grammatical relations in passive clauses: A diachronic perspective”. In: Abraham, W. and L. Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and typology: Form and function. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 337–350.10.1075/tsl.68.19givSuche in Google Scholar
Givón, T. and L. Yang. 1994. “The rise of the English GET-Passive”. In: Fox, B. and P.J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 119–150.10.1075/tsl.27.07givSuche in Google Scholar
Görlach, M. 1997. The linguistic history of English. Basingstoke: MacMillan.Suche in Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1993. “More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations”. In: Comrie, B. and M. Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 87–120.10.1075/slcs.23.05hasSuche in Google Scholar
Hermodsson, L. 1952. Reflexive und intransitive Verba im älteren Westgermanischen. Uppsala: Almquist and Wiksells.Suche in Google Scholar
Joseph, B. 1982. A new convergence concerning the Balkan loss of the infinitive. Indogermanische Forschungen 85: 176-187.Suche in Google Scholar
Joseph, B. 1983. The synchrony and diachrony of the Balkan infinitive: A Study in areal, general, and historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Jucker, A.H. 2000. History of English and English historical linguistics. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett.Suche in Google Scholar
Karantzola E. and N. Lavidas. 2014. “On the relation between labilizations and neuter gender: Evidence from the Greek diachrony”. Linguistics 52(4). 1025–1059.10.1515/ling-2014-0015Suche in Google Scholar
Karla, G. and N. Lavidas. 2006. “To aparemfato ston aksona tis diaxronias tis Elinikis” [The infinitive in the diachrony of Greek]. Proceedings of ΙCGL6. <http://www.philology.uoc.gr/conferences/6thICGL/ebook>Suche in Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. 1992. “Word-formation”. In: Hogg, R.M. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Volume 1: The beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 355–400.Suche in Google Scholar
Keidan, A. 2013. “Branch-crossing Indo-European isoglosses: a call for interest”. Indoevropejskoe âzykoznanie i klassičeskaâ filologiâ 17. 406–416.Suche in Google Scholar
Keyser, S.J. and T. Roeper. 1984. “On the middle and ergative constructions in English”. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 381–416.Suche in Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. 1994. “On external arguments”. In: Benedicto, E. and J. Runner (eds), Functional projections: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 17. Amherst, MA: GLSA. 103–130.Suche in Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. 1996. “Severing the external argument from the verb”. In: Rooryck, J. and L. Zariing (eds), Phrase structure and the lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 109–137.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5Suche in Google Scholar
Kulikov, L.I. 2001. “Causatives”. In: Haspelmath, M.E. König, W. Oesterreicher and W. Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals. An international handbook. Vol. 2. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. 886–898.Suche in Google Scholar
Lass, R. 1994. Old English: A historical linguistic companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621000Suche in Google Scholar
Lavidas, N. In press. “The diachrony of labile verbs: Evidence from the history of English and Greek”. In: Kulikov, L. and S. Kittilä (eds.), Diachronic typology of voice and valency-changing categories. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Lavidas, N. 2009. Transitivity alternations in diachrony: Changes in argument structure and voice morphology. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar
Lavidas, N. and G. Drachman. 2012. “On the verbal complements of aspectual verbs”. Journal of Greek Linguistics 12(2). 305–333.10.1163/15699846-00000004Suche in Google Scholar
Lavidas, N. and C. Therapontos. 2009. “Diachronic aspects of transitivity alternations in Cypriot”. In: Janse, M., B. Joseph, P. Pavlou and A. Ralli (eds.), Studies in Modern Greek dialects and linguistic theory. Nicosia: Kykkos Cultural Research Center. 245–270.Suche in Google Scholar
Los, B. 1998. “The rise of the to-infinitive as verb complement”. English Language and Linguistics 2(1). 1–36.10.1017/S1360674300000678Suche in Google Scholar
Los, B. 2000. “Onginnan/beginnan with bare and to-infinitive in Ælfric”. In: Fischer, O. (ed.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 251–274.10.1075/slcs.53.13losSuche in Google Scholar
Matasović, R. 2017. “Proto-Indo-European and language typology”. In: Kapović, M. (ed.), The Indo-European languages. London: Routledge. 153–170.Suche in Google Scholar
McMillion, A. 2006. Labile verbs in English. (PhD dissertation. Stockholm Univ.)Suche in Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. 1985. Old English syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198119357.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Möhlig, R. and M. Klages. 2002. “Detransitivization in the history of English from a semantic perspective”. In: Fanego, T. and M.J. López-Couso (eds.), English historical syntax and morphology. Selected papers from 11 ICEHL. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 231–254.10.1075/cilt.223.14mohSuche in Google Scholar
Moser, A. 1997. “The choice of aspect in na-complements”. In: Drachman, G., A. Malikouti-Drachman, J. Fykias and S. Klidi (eds), Greek Linguistics ’95: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Greek Linguistics. Graz: Neugebauer. 567–576.Suche in Google Scholar
Mustanoja, T.F. 1960. A Middle English syntax. I. Parts of speech. Helsinki: Société Neophilologique.Suche in Google Scholar
Ottósson, K.G. 2013. “The anticausative and related categories in the Old Germanic languages”. In: Josephson, F. and I. Söhrman (eds.), Diachronic and typological perspectives on verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 329–382.10.1075/slcs.134.12ottSuche in Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D.M. 1970. “The two verbs begin”. In: Jacobs, R. and P. Rosenbaum (eds), Readings in English transformational grammar. Walthem: Blaisdell Publishing Company. 107–119.Suche in Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. 1999. “Syntax”. In: Lass, R. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, III: 1476–1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 187–331.Suche in Google Scholar
Sims L. and E. van Gelderen. 2010. Aspectual cycles: The history of English. GLAC 16, Wisconsin, 30 Apr 2010. <http://www.public.asu.edu/~gelderen/GLAC16.docx>Suche in Google Scholar
Sims, L. 2008. Ingressive aspect in the History of English. (PhD dissertation, Arizona State University.)Suche in Google Scholar
Tchekhoff, C. 1980: “The organization of a voice-neutral verb: An example in Avar”. International Review of Slavic Linguistics 5. 219–230.10.1080/08351818309370603Suche in Google Scholar
Timofeeva, O. 2010. “Anglo–Latin bilingualism before 1066: Prospects and limitations”. In: Hall, A. et al. (eds), Interfaces between language and culture in medieval England: A festschrift for Matti Kilpiö. Leiden: Brill. 1–36.10.1163/ej.9789004180116.i-340Suche in Google Scholar
Visser, F. 1963–1973. An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2020 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Isoglosses and language change: Evidence of the rise and loss of isoglosses from a comparison of early Greek and early English
- The interaction of L2 and L3 levels of proficiency in third language acquisition
- Self-reported communicative distance between Polish and English in formal and informal situational contexts
- Mining historical texts for diachronic spelling variants
- Nigerian newscasters’ English as a model of standard Nigerian English?
- A cognitive semantic exploration of English plant phrasal verbs with the particle out and their Serbian counterparts
- Wordform-specific frequency effects cause acoustic variation in zero-inflected homophones
- Erratum
- Erratum
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Isoglosses and language change: Evidence of the rise and loss of isoglosses from a comparison of early Greek and early English
- The interaction of L2 and L3 levels of proficiency in third language acquisition
- Self-reported communicative distance between Polish and English in formal and informal situational contexts
- Mining historical texts for diachronic spelling variants
- Nigerian newscasters’ English as a model of standard Nigerian English?
- A cognitive semantic exploration of English plant phrasal verbs with the particle out and their Serbian counterparts
- Wordform-specific frequency effects cause acoustic variation in zero-inflected homophones
- Erratum
- Erratum