Home Self-reported communicative distance between Polish and English in formal and informal situational contexts
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Self-reported communicative distance between Polish and English in formal and informal situational contexts

  • Małgorzata Gawlik-Kobylińska EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 1, 2021

Abstract

This study explores the issue of communicative distance between Polish and English; its perception and conceptualization, as a function of self-reflection, are related to individual, socio-cultural and environmental, as well as linguistic factors. The aim of the article is to prove that the communicative distance is different while speaking Polish (L1) and English (L2). It was assumed that on the basis of an interlocutor’s self-reported observation and evaluation of verbal and nonverbal cues, it is possible to prove the existence of communicative distance. The research results revealed that in formal English conversations, distance was perceived as shorter than in formal Polish conversations, but in informal conversations, there were no significant differences. Due to gradual language development and absorption of English words into Polish, the study relies on a retrospective data analysis to find out the possible changes in communicative distance perception. The data was retrieved from a series of two surveys conducted in 2008 (n = 150) and 2016 (n = 150) among Poles who use English as a second language.

References

Adler, R.B. and R.F. Proctor. 2017. Looking out, looking in. Boston: Cengage Learning.Search in Google Scholar

Ahn, H.S., E.L. Usher, A. Butz and M. Bong. 2016. “Cultural differences in the understanding of modelling and feedback as sources of self‐ efficacy information”. British Journal of Educational Psychology 86. 112–136. doi:10.1111/bjep.1209310.1111/bjep.12093Search in Google Scholar

Alzoubi, Y.I., A.Q. Gill and A. Al-Ani. 2016. “Empirical studies of geographically distributed agile development communication challenges: A systematic review”. Information & Management, 53. 22–37. doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.08.00310.1016/j.im.2015.08.003Search in Google Scholar

Alzoubi, Y.I. and A.Q. Gill. 2016. “An agile enterprise architecture-driven model for geographically distributed agile development”. In: Vogel, D., X. Guo, H. Linger, C. Barry, M. Lang and C. Schneider (eds.), Transforming healthcare through information systems. Cham: Springer. 63–77.10.1007/978-3-319-30133-4_5Search in Google Scholar

Armbrüster, C., M. Wolter, T. Kuhlen, W. Spijkers and B. Fimm. 2008. “Depth perception in virtual reality: distance estimations in peri-and extrapersonal space”. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 11. 9–15. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.993510.1089/cpb.2007.9935Search in Google Scholar

Asante, M.K. 2002. Language and agency in the transformation of American identity: Lectures from the Smithsonian. Thousand Oaks: Sage.10.4135/9781452229195.n5Search in Google Scholar

Beattie, G., and A. Ellis. 2017. The psychology of language and communication. Routledge: Psychology Press Classic Edition.10.4324/9781315187198Search in Google Scholar

Berson, Y., N. Halevy, B. Shamir and M. Erez. 2015. “Leading from different psychological distances: A construal-level perspective on vision communication, goal setting, and follower motivation”. The Leadership Quarterly 26. 143–155. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.07.01110.1016/j.leaqua.2014.07.011Search in Google Scholar

Biały, P. 2015. Polish and English diminutives in literary translation: pragmatic and cross-cultural perspectives. Doctoral dissertation. University of Silesia in Katowice: Katowice. Retrieved from: https://rebus.us.edu.pl/bit-stream/20.500.12128/5608/1/Bialy_Polish_and_English_diminutives_in_literary_translation.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Biel, Ł. 2004. Distance in English and Polish. University of Gdańsk: Gdańsk. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/1263217/Emotional_and_Social_Distance_in_English_and_PolishSearch in Google Scholar

Biswas, D., D. Grewal and A.L. Roggeveen. 2010. “How the order of sampled experiential goods affects choice”. Journal of Marketing Research 47. 508–519. doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.3.50810.1509/jmkr.47.3.508Search in Google Scholar

Borowski, A. 2014. “Social interactions in the public space in the context of public confidence”. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 25. 33–41. 10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.25.33Search in Google Scholar

Boutonnet, B., B. Dering, N. Viñas-Guasch and G. Thierry. 2013. “Seeing objects through the language glass”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 25. 1702–1710. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00415.10.1162/jocn_a_00415Search in Google Scholar

Bull, P.E. 2016. Posture & Gesture: Volume 16 of International Series in Experimental Social Psychology, Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Chan, D. 2009. So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In: Lance, C.E. and R.J. Vandenberg (eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences. New York, NY: Routledge. 309-335.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Y.H. and P.J. Chen. 2015. “MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains”. Computers & Education 86. 55–70. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.00810.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.008Search in Google Scholar

Chun, D., R. Kern and B. Smith. 2016. “Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning”. The Modern Language Journal 100. 64–80. doi: 10.1111/modl.1230210.1111/modl.12302Search in Google Scholar

Cutting, J.E. 1997. “How the eye measures reality and virtual reality”. Behavior Research Methods 29. 27–36. doi:10.3758/bf0320056310.3758/bf03200563Search in Google Scholar

Daniels, M.A. and G.J. Greguras. 2014. “Exploring the nature of power distance implications for micro-and macro-level theories, processes, and outcomes”. Journal of Management 40. 1202–1229. doi:10.1177/014920631452713110.1177/0149206314527131Search in Google Scholar

Dewaele, J.M. 2016. “Why do so many bi-and multilinguals feel different when switching languages?”. International Journal of Multilingualism 13. 92–105. doi:10.1080/14790718.2015.104040610.1080/14790718.2015.1040406Search in Google Scholar

Domalewska, D. 2017. “Approaches to studying across culturally contrasting groups: Implications for Security Education”, Security and Defence Quarterly 16. 3–19. doi: 10.35467/sdq/10318110.35467/sdq/103181Search in Google Scholar

Dinnie, K. 2016. Nation branding: Concepts, issues, practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781315773612Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, C., M. Stacey and C. Earl. 2013. “Formality in design communication”. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 27. 91–103. doi:10.1017/S089006041300007310.1017/S0890060413000073Search in Google Scholar

Epifanova, S. and A. Hild. 2015. “Contemporary issues in cross-cultural business interaction amongst office and managerial staff in Thailand”. UTCC International Journal of Business and Economics, 7(1). 131–145. doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016–2202–1210.17576/3L-2016–2202–12Search in Google Scholar

Fast L.A. and D.C. Funder. 2008. “Personality as manifest in word use: correlations with self- report, acquaintance report, and behaviour”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94. 334–346. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.94.2.33410.1037/0022–3514.94.2.334Search in Google Scholar

Fluegge E. 2011. “The Consideration of Personal Sound Space: Toward a Practical Perspective on Individualized Auditory Experience”. Journal of Sonic Studies, 1. Retrieved from http://journal.sonicstudies.org/vol01/nr01/a09Search in Google Scholar

Frederick S. 2002. “Automated choice heuristics“. In: Gilovich, T., D. Griffin and D. Kahneman (eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 548–558. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.03210.1017/cbo9780511808098.032Search in Google Scholar

Fontes, R., J. Ribeiro, D.S. Gupta, D. Machado, F. Lopes-Júnior, F. Magalhães, ... and B. Velasques. 2016. “Time perception mechanisms at central nervous system“. Neurology International 8, 14–22. doi:10.4081/ni.2016.593910.4081/ni.2016.5939Search in Google Scholar

Gambier, Y. 2016. “Rapid and radical changes in translation and translation studies“. International Journal of Communication 10, 887–906. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4113.2011.00855.x10.1111/j.1741-4113.2011.00855.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gaming for Peace (GAP) Project. 2017, July. Retrieved from http://gap-project.eu/about/Search in Google Scholar

Garza R., R.R.Heredia and A.B. Cieslicka. 2016. “Male and female perception of physical attractiveness“. Evolutionary Psychology 14(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1177/147470491663161410.1177/1474704916631614Search in Google Scholar

Gesteland, R.R. 2012. “Cross-cultural business behavior: a guide for global management“. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press DK.Search in Google Scholar

Gill, A., and J. Oberlander. 2002. “Taking care of the linguistic features of extraversion“. In: Gray, W. and C. Schunn (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Fairfax, VA. 363–368. Retrieved from https://pdfs.seman-ticscholar.org/3af6/a855b58a56c4ddb87caa24dce52c620d12ef.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Greifeneder, R. and H. Bless. 2017. “The interplay of cognition and feelings: Mood states“. In: Greifeneder, R., H. Bless and K. Fiedler (eds.), Social Cognition. How Individuals Construct Social Reality. Psychology Press. 126–144.10.4324/9781315648156-7Search in Google Scholar

Gunta, R. 2015. “Indirect communication and face-saving factor: from theory to practice“. Russian Linguistic Bulletin 1(1). 29–35. doi: 10.18454/RULB00310.18454/RULB003Search in Google Scholar

Hall, E.T. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Search in Google Scholar

Han C, J.G. Janmaat, B. Hoskins and A. Green. 2012. Perceptions of Inequalities: implications for social cohesion. Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies. Retrieved from http://www.llakes.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/07/35.-Han-Janmaat-Hoskins-Green.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Harzing, A.W. and M. Pudelko. 2014. “Hablas vielleicht un peu la mia language? A comprehensive overview of the role of language differences in headquarters–subsidiary communication“. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 25. 696 - 717. doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.80901310.1080/09585192.2013.809013Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, C., I. Lau and D.R. Johnson. 1986. “The linguistic relativity of person cognition: An English-Chinese comparision“. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51. 1097–1105. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.51.6.109710.1037/0022–3514.51.6.1097Search in Google Scholar

Hofstede G. 1997. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. 2011. “Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context“. Online readings in psychology and culture 2(1). doi:10.9707/2307–0919.101410.9707/2307–0919.1014Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, J. 2001. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Harlow: Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar

Holmqvist, J., D. Guest and C. Grönroos. 2015. “The role of psychological distance in value creation“. Management Decision 53(7). 1430–1451. doi: 10.1108/MD-06–2014–0335.10.1108/MD-06– 2014–0335Search in Google Scholar

House, R.J., P.J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P.W. Dorfman and V. Gupta. 2004. Leadership, culture, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Hsu, L. 2013. “English as a foreign language learners’ perception of mobile assisted language learning: a cross-national study“. Computer Assisted Language Learning 26. 197–213. doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.64948510.1080/09588221.2011.649485Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.P. 2010. Exploring factors affecting the use of oral communication strategies. Lunghwa University of Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.lhu.edu.tw/m/oaa/synthetic/publish/publish/30/8.%E9%BB%83%E7%A7%8B%E8%90%8DExploring%20Factors%20Affecting%20the%20Use%20of%20Oral%20Communication%20Strategies.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Interrante, V., B. Ries and L. Anderson. 2006. “Distance perception in immersive virtual environments, Revisited“. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Virtual Reality. Washington DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/VR.2006.5210.1109/VR.2006.52Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, M. and L.M. Emanuelsson. 2016. “Integrated communication systems and kinesic code-switching in interpersonal interaction“. Journal of Studies in Social Sciences 14. 127–165. Retrieved from http://infinitypress.info/index.php/jsss/article/view/1299/590Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, G. and S. Connelly. 2014. “Negative emotions in informal feedback: The benefits of disappointment and drawbacks of anger“. Human Relations 67. 1265–1290. doi:10.1177/001872671453285610.1177/0018726714532856Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, A.H. 2004. “Contrastive analysis in language identifying linguistic units of comparison“. In: Willems, D., B. Defranoq, T. Colleman and D. Noël, Contrastive analysis in language. identifying linguistic units of comparison. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 197–212. doi:10.1057/978023052463710.1057/9780230524637Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, D. 2017. “The translation of texts from the tourist sector: textual conventions, cultural distance and other constraints“. TRANS. Revista de Traductología 2. 33–42. doi:10.24310/trans.1998.v0i2.235410.24310/trans.1998.v0i2.2354Search in Google Scholar

Kim, M-S., K. Tasaki, I-D Kim and H.R. Lee. 2007. “The influence of social status on communication predispositions: Focusing on independent and interdependent self- construals“. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 17(2). 303–329. doi:10.1075/japc.17.2.09kim10.1075/japc.17.2.09kimSearch in Google Scholar

Klaudy, K. 2017. “Linguistic and cultural asymmetry in translation from and into minor languages“. Cadernos de Literatura em Tradução, 17, 22–37. Retrieved from http://www.revistas.usp.br/clt/article/view/13184210.11606/issn.2359-5388.v0i17p22-37Search in Google Scholar

Kulaksız, E. 2015. “To what extent does culture create language learning in terms of proxemics?“. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199. 695–703. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.60010.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.600Search in Google Scholar

Janicka, A. and P. Kaczmarczyk. 2016. “Mobilities in the crisis and post-crisis times: migration strategies of Poles on the EU labour market“. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42(10). 1693–1710. doi:10.1080/1369183x.2016.116235010.1080/1369183x.2016.1162350Search in Google Scholar

Lemnaru, A.C. 2013. “Communication distortions and linguistic features in the journalistic style“. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 70. 963–968. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.14610.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.146Search in Google Scholar

Lopes, P.N., P. Salovey and R. Straus. 2003. “Emotional intelligence, personality, and the perceived quality of social relationships“. Personality and individual Differences 35(3). 641–658. doi:10.1016/s0191–8869(02)00242–810.1016/s0191–8869(02)00242–8Search in Google Scholar

Lund, N. 2014. Language and thought. (Routledge Modular Psychology). Routledge.10.4324/9780203695012Search in Google Scholar

Magee, J.C., and P.K. Smith. 2013. “The social distance theory of power“. Personality and Social Psychology Review 17(2). 158–186. doi:10.1177/108886831247273210.1177/1088868312472732Search in Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. 1946. “The problem of meaning in primitive languages, supplement I“. In: Eggins, S. (ed.) 2004. Introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.) New York, London: Continuum Publishing Group.Search in Google Scholar

Moran, R.T., N.R. Abramson and S.V. Moran. 2014. Managing cultural differences. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781315871417Search in Google Scholar

Myers, S.A., A.K. Goodboy and Members of COMM 600. 2014. “College student learning, motivation, and satisfaction as a function of effective instructor communication behaviors“. Southern Communication Journal 79(1). 14–26.Search in Google Scholar

Nakatani, Y. 2006. “Developing an oral communication strategy inventory“. The Modern Language Journal 90. 151–168. doi:10.1111/j.1540–4781.2006.00390.x10.1111/j.1540–4781.2006.00390.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ogiermann, E. 2009. On apologising in negative and positive politeness cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/pbns.191Search in Google Scholar

Ożańska-Ponikwia, K. 2017. “Expression and perception of emotions by Polish–English bilinguals I love you vs. Kocham Cię“. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 1–12. 493–504. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2016.127089310.1080/13670050.2016.1270893Search in Google Scholar

Pavlick, E. and J. Tetreault. 2016. “An empirical analysis of formality in online communication“. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 4. 6174.10.1162/tacl_a_00083Search in Google Scholar

Pawlak M. 2015. “Advanced learners’ use of communication strategies in spontaneous language performance“. In Pawlak, M. and E. Waniek-Klimczak (eds.), Issues in teaching, learning and testing speaking in a second language. Second language learning and teaching. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 121–141. doi: 10.1007/978–3-642–38339-7_8.10.1007/978– 3-642–38339-7_8Search in Google Scholar

Peng, B., F. 1974. “Communicative distances“. Language sciences 31. In: Gudykunst, W.B. (ed.), Bridging Differences Effective Intergroup Communication (4th ed.) London: Sage Publications. 32–38.Search in Google Scholar

Pudelko, M., H. Tenzer and A.W. Harzing. 2015. “Cross-cultural management and language studies within international business research: past and present orthodoxies and suggestions for future research“. In: Holden, N., S. Michailova and S. Tietze (eds.), The Routledge companion to cross-cultural management. New York, NY: Routledge. 85–94.10.4324/9780203798706-12Search in Google Scholar

Rogoff, B. 1995. “Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship“. In Wertsch, J.V., P. del Rio and A. Alvarez (eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 139–164. Reprinted (2008) in Hall, K. and P. Murphy (eds.), Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities. London: Sage.10.1017/CBO9781139174299.008Search in Google Scholar

Rygg, K. 2012. “ (In)directness – distance or proximity“. Synaps: Journal of Professional Communication, 27, 54–66.Search in Google Scholar

Saggar, M., P. Vrticka and A.L. Reiss. 2016. “Understanding the influence of personality on dynamic social gesture processing: An fMRI study“. Neuropsychologia 80, 71–78. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.03910.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.039Search in Google Scholar

Sakai, N. 2017. “The modern regime of translation and the emergence of the nation“. The Eighteenth Century 58. 105–108. doi:10.1353/ecy.2017.000710.1353/ecy.2017.0007Search in Google Scholar

Sallinen-Kuparinen A. 1986. “Finnish communication reticence: Perceptions and self-reported behavior“. Studia philologica Jyvaskylaensia 19, 122.Search in Google Scholar

Schröder, U. 2015. “The interplay of verbal, vocal, and visual cues in the co-construction of the experience of alterity in exchange students’ talk“. Journal of Pragmatics 81. 21–35. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.01010.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.010Search in Google Scholar

Schepens, J.J., F. van der Slik and R. van Hout. 2016. “L1 and L2 distance effects in learning L3 Dutch“. Language Learning 66. 224–256. doi:10.1111/lang.12150.10.1111/lang.12150Search in Google Scholar

Scudellari, M. 2016. “How your language shapes your brain and your personality“. New Scientist, 229(3059). 29–31. doi:10.1016/s0262–4079(16)30276–710.1016/s0262–4079(16)30276–7Search in Google Scholar

Siebdrat, F., M. Hoegl and H. Ernst. 2014. “Subjective distance and team collaboration in distributed teams“. Journal of Product Innovation Management 31. 765–779. doi:10.1111/jpim.1212210.1111/jpim.12122Search in Google Scholar

Sommer, R. 1959. “Studies in personal space“. Sociometry 22. 337–48. doi:10.2307/278566810.2307/2785668Search in Google Scholar

Sousa C.P. and F. Bradley. 2015. “Cultural distance and psychic distance: a theoretical model and empirical assessment“. In: Spotts H.E. (eds.) Assessing the different roles of marketing theory and practice in the jaws of economic uncertainty. Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978–3-319–11845–1_3610.1007/978–3-319–11845–1_36Search in Google Scholar

Stadler, K., E. Jamieson, K. Smith and S. Kirby. 2016. “Metalinguistic awareness of trends as a driving force in linguistic evolution: An empirical study“. In Roberts, S.G., C.F. Cuskley, L. McCrohon, L. Barceló-Coblijn, O. Fehér and T. Verhoef (eds.), The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference (EVOLANG11). New Orleans. 552–553.Search in Google Scholar

Stephan, E.L., N. Liberman, and Y. Trope. 2010. “Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective“. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98. 268–280. doi:10.1037/a001696010.1037/a0016960Search in Google Scholar

Sztencel M. 2009, “Boundaries crossed: The influence of English on modern Polish“. E-Pisteme 2(1). 3–17. Retrieved from http://research.ncl.ac.uk/e-pisteme/issues/issue02/contents/e-pisteme%20Vol.2(1)%20-%20Magdalena%20Sztencel.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Szewczyk, A. 2015. “European Generation of Migration: Change and agency in the post-2004 Polish graduates’ migratory experience“. Geoforum 60. 153–162. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.02.00110.1016/j.geoforum.2015.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Urick, M. 2017. “Adapting training to meet the preferred learning styles of different generations“. International Journal of Training and Development 21. 53–59. doi:10.1111/ijtd.1209310.1111/ijtd.12093Search in Google Scholar

Trope, Y. and L. Niberman. 2012. “Construal level theory“. In: Van Lange, P.A. M., A.W. Kruglanski and E.T. Higgins (eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology. Washington DC: Sage Publications. 118–134. Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781446249215.n7doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n7Search in Google Scholar

Vlăduțescu, Ș. 2014. “Communication environment: context/situation/framework“. Journal of Sustainable Development Studies 6(1). 193–204. Retrieved from http://infinitypress.info/index.php/jsds/article/view/748Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Y. 2016. “Do we know more about Whorf?“. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(1), 215–223.Search in Google Scholar

Wells, N.M., G.W. Evans, and K.A. Cheek. 2016. “Environmental psychology“. In H. Frumkin (ed.), Environmental health: From global to local (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 203–230.Search in Google Scholar

Witalisz, A. 2011. “Linguistic globalization as a reflection of cultural changes“. In: Proceedings of 19th annual conference of global awareness society international. Krakow, Poland: Jagiellonian University. Retrieved from http://orgs.bloomu.edu/gasi/2010%20Proc%20papers/Witalisz.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Yule, G. 2003. The Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, C., M. Laroche and M.O. Richard. 2017. “The differential roles of verbs, nouns, and adjectives in English and Chinese messages among bilingual consumers“. Journal of Business Research 72. 127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.007.10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.007Search in Google Scholar

Zinken, J. 2016. Requesting responsibility: The morality of grammar in Polish and English family interaction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210724.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-03-01
Published in Print: 2020-12-16

© 2020 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland

Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psicl-2020-0020/html
Scroll to top button