Home Effect of gas on the polymer temperature in external gas-assisted injection molding
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effect of gas on the polymer temperature in external gas-assisted injection molding

  • Taidong Li , Jiquan Li EMAIL logo , Frederik Desplentere , Xinxin Xia , Xiang Peng and Shaofei Jiang
Published/Copyright: May 27, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The introduction of gas is the principal difference between external gas-assisted injection molding (EGAIM) and conventional injection molding. In this study, the effects of gas thickness and gas delay time on polymer temperature were discussed. A modified one-dimensional transient heat conduction model of polymer was established to reveal the relationships between polymer temperature and gas thickness and gas delay time in EGAIM. The temperature histories of polymer were obtained by the simulation methods, including Moldflow and ANSYS, and were verified by comparing the experimental data to numerical simulation results. The effects of gas thickness and gas delay time on the temperature histories of polymer will be discussed in detail. The results showed that the polymer temperature is strongly affected by the heat preservation of gas, which in turn, increases with the increase of gas thickness and delay time. This paper provides quantitative methods and theoretical guidance for the study of the effects of gas on the polymer temperature in EGAIM.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 51575491, 51505421 and U1610112)

Award Identifier / Grant number: LY19E050004 and LY18E050020

Funding statement: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 51575491, 51505421 and U1610112) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Grant Nos. LY19E050004 and LY18E050020).

References

[1] Nian SC, Li MH, Huang MS. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 2015, 86, 358–368.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.03.027Search in Google Scholar

[2] Su HY, Nian SC, Huang MS. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 2015, 66, 1–10.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2015.05.003Search in Google Scholar

[3] Chen SC, Lin YC, Huang SW. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2010, 50, 2085–2092.10.1002/pen.21747Search in Google Scholar

[4] Jiang SF, Zheng W, Zhang JB. Appl Math Inform Sci. 2012, 6, 665–671.10.1090/S0033-569X-2012-01257-3Search in Google Scholar

[5] Jiang SF, Tao JL, Li JQ. Adv Mech Eng. 2014, 14, 1–11.10.1186/s12888-014-0367-8Search in Google Scholar

[6] Aditya L, Mahlia TMI. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2017, 73, 1352–1365.10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.034Search in Google Scholar

[7] Rehman HU. Appl. Energy. 2017, 185, 1585–1594.10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.026Search in Google Scholar

[8] Spinnler M, Winter ERF. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 2004, 47, 1305–1312.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2003.08.012Search in Google Scholar

[9] Hao JH, Chen Q, Hu K. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 2016, 92, 1–7.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.08.076Search in Google Scholar

[10] Lee SC, Cunnington GR. J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer. 2000, 14, 121–136.10.2514/2.6508Search in Google Scholar

[11] Zhu H, Sankar BV, Haftka RT. Struct. Multidiscip. O. 2004, 28, 349–355.10.1007/s00158-004-0463-3Search in Google Scholar

[12] Daryabeigi K. J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer. 2003, 17, 10–20.10.2514/2.6746Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kuang T, Yu C, Xu B. J. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2016, 36, 139–148.10.1515/polyeng-2014-0369Search in Google Scholar

[14] Hsu C, Huang C T, Chang R Y. J. Polym. Eng. 2018, 38, 93–105.10.1515/polyeng-2016-0395Search in Google Scholar

[15] Wang L, Yang W, Huang L. Plast Rubber Compos. 2010, 39, 385–391.10.1179/174328910X12777566997450Search in Google Scholar

[16] Wang L, Yang B, Yang W. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2011, 289, 1661–1671.10.1007/s00396-011-2483-zSearch in Google Scholar

[17] Zhang CQ, Zhao P, Gu F. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 9226–9233.10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01724Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Zhang CQ, Zhao P, Wen W. Polym. Test. 2018, 70, 520–525.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.08.010Search in Google Scholar

[19] Zhang CQ, Zhao P, Xie J. Polym. Test. 2018, 67, 177–182.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.03.008Search in Google Scholar

[20] Sun HM, Kawara Z, Ueki Y. Heat Transfer Eng. 2011, 32, 968–973.10.1080/01457632.2011.556382Search in Google Scholar

[21] Zhao P, Yang W, Wang X. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B. 2017, 233, 204-214.10.1177/0954405417718593Search in Google Scholar

[22] Li JQ, Li TD, Jia YD. Polym. Test. 2018, 71, 182–191.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.09.004Search in Google Scholar

[23] Yang B, Fu XR, Yang W. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2008, 48, 1707–1717.10.1002/pen.21076Search in Google Scholar

[24] Zhao P, Yang D, Zhou HM. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 2011, 50, 581–587.10.1080/03602559.2010.543741Search in Google Scholar

[25] Chau SW, Lin YW. J. Polym. Eng. 2006, 26, 433–450.10.1515/POLYENG.2006.26.5.431Search in Google Scholar

[26] Lu HB, Du SY. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 1155–1162.10.1039/C3PY01256ESearch in Google Scholar

[27] Lin HY, Young WB. Appl. Math. Modell. 2009, 33, 3746–3755.10.1016/j.apm.2008.12.012Search in Google Scholar

[28] Sun L, Venart JES. Int. J. Thermophys. 2006, 27, 996–996.10.1007/s10765-006-0071-0Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-01-29
Accepted: 2019-04-20
Published Online: 2019-05-27
Published in Print: 2019-07-26

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2019-0028/html
Scroll to top button