Abstract
The rich apparatus of scholia and marginalia transmitted in Lucian’s manuscripts can prove of vital help for the constitutio textus of his writings. On the one hand, their ancient and stratified origin makes it possible that they preserve traces of an earlier stage of Lucian’s text, both directly, through explicit quotations of lost variants, and indirectly, through hints given in the explanations of lemmas. On the other hand, they may allow us to recognise as problematic passages that otherwise would go unnoticed, especially in the case of intruded glosses which convey a coherent and not suspect text. The Lexiphanes, with its deliberately absurd and confused vocabulary, represents a perfect case study for the peculiar situation where it is hard to state whether a text is corrupt or not. In the present article, three textual passages from this Lucianic dialogue (Lex. 1; 3; 6) will be analysed. In all three cases, hitherto unnoticed errors will be detected and new corrections will be proposed thanks to the direct or indirect help given by the scholia and marginalia found in manuscripts.
Acknowledgements
I wish to express my sincere gratitude to Prof. Olga Tribulato and Prof. Heinz-Günther Nesselrath for their kind remarks and fruitful discussions during the writing of this article. Special thanks to Prof. Paola Degni for her palaeographical advice, to Paola Carmela La Barbera for her friendly help and to the anonymous referees for their useful comments.
Bibliography
Luciani Opera, tom. I–IV, ed. M. D. Macleod, Oxford 1972 (I), 1974 (II), 1980 (III), 1987 (IV).Suche in Google Scholar
Lucianus, tom. II, rec. C. Jacobitz, Leipzig 1838.Suche in Google Scholar
Lucien, Œuvres, tom. I, texte établi et traduit par J. Bompaire, Paris 1993.Suche in Google Scholar
Photii Patriarchae Lexicon, tom. I–II, ed. C. Theodoridis, Berlin/New York 1982 (I), 1998 (II).10.1515/9783110864069Suche in Google Scholar
Die Ekloge des Phrynichos, herausgegeben v. E. Fischer, Berlin/New York 1974.Suche in Google Scholar
Physici et medici Graeci minores, tom. II, ed. I. L. Ideler, Berlin 1842.Suche in Google Scholar
Platonis Rempublicam, ed. S. R. Slings, Oxford 2003.Suche in Google Scholar
Scholia in Lucianum, ed. H. Rabe, Leipzig 1906.Suche in Google Scholar
Suidae Lexicon, tom. IV, ed. A. Adler, Leipzig 1935 (repr. München/Leipzig 2001).Suche in Google Scholar
B. Baldwin, Studies in Lucian, Toronto 1973.Suche in Google Scholar
E. Battaglia, ‘ARTOS’. Il lessico della panificazione nei papiri greci, Milano 1989.Suche in Google Scholar
H. Blümner, Technologie und Terminologie der Gewerbe und Künste bei Griechen und Römern, I, Leipzig 21912.Suche in Google Scholar
J. Bompaire, Lucien écrivain. Imitation et création, Paris 1958.Suche in Google Scholar
M. Casevitz, “La création verbale chez Lucien. Le Lexiphanes, Lexiphane et Lucien”, in: A. Billault (ed.), Lucien de Samosate. Actes du colloque international de Lyon organisé au Centre d’études romaines et gallo-romaines les 30 septembre–1ᵉʳ octobre 1993, Lyon/Paris 1994, 77–86.Suche in Google Scholar
J. Coenen, Lukian. Zeus tragodos. Überlieferungsgeschichte, Text und Kommentar, Meisenheim am Glan 1977.Suche in Google Scholar
E. Dickey, Ancient Greek Scholarship. A Guide to Finding, Reading, and Understanding Scholia, Commentaries, Lexica, and Grammatical Treatises, from Their Beginnings to the Byzantine Period, Oxford 2007.10.1093/oso/9780195312928.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
P. Doehring, De Luciano Atticistarum irrisore, Diss. Rostock, Berlin 1916.Suche in Google Scholar
J. A. Hall, Lucian’s Satire, New York 1981.Suche in Google Scholar
R. Helm, De Luciani scholiorum fontibus, Marburg 1908.Suche in Google Scholar
C. P. Jones, “Two enemies of Lucian”, GRBS 13, 1972, 475–487.Suche in Google Scholar
N. Kavrus-Hoffmann, “From pre-bouletée to bouletée: scribe Epiphanios and the codices Mosq. Synod. Gr. 103 and Vat. Gr. 90”, in: A. Bravo García/I. Pérez Martín (eds.), The Legacy of Bernard de Montfaucon. Three Hundred Years of Studies on Greek Handwriting. Proceedings of the Seventh International Colloquium of Greek Palaeography (Madrid-Salamanca, 15–20 September 2008), Turnhout 2010, 55–66.10.1484/M.BIB-EB.3.4515Suche in Google Scholar
É. Marquis, “Les textes de Lucien à tradition simple”, RHT 8, 2013, 1–36.10.1484/J.RHT.5.101108Suche in Google Scholar
P. Martin, “Cleansing the Palate: Vomit and Satire in Lucian’s Lexiphanes”, ICS 43/2, 2018, 507–520.10.5406/illiclasstud.43.2.0507Suche in Google Scholar
K. Mras, Die Überlieferung Lucians, Wien 1911.Suche in Google Scholar
N. Nilén, Lucianus. Prolegomena, Leipzig 1907.Suche in Google Scholar
N. Nilén, “Excerpta Lucianea”, SO 3, 1925, 26–36.10.1080/00397672508590158Suche in Google Scholar
P. Orsini, “Quale coscienza ebbero i Bizantini della loro cultura grafica?”, MEG 5, 2005, 215–248.Suche in Google Scholar
H. Rabe, “Die Überlieferung der Lukianscholia”, NAWG, 1902, 718–736.Suche in Google Scholar
H. Rabe, “Die Lukianstudien des Arethas”, NAWG, 1903, 643–656.Suche in Google Scholar
M. Rothstein, Quaestiones Lucianeae, Berlin 1888.Suche in Google Scholar
G. Russo, “Gli scolii di Areta a Luciano: questioni critiche”, AFLB 45, 2002, 137–161.Suche in Google Scholar
G. Russo, Contestazione e conservazione. Luciano nell’esegesi di Areta, Berlin/Boston 2011.10.1515/9783110270693Suche in Google Scholar
J. Schneider, “Les scholies de Lucien et la tradition paroemiographique”, in: A. Billault (ed.), Lucien de Samosate. Actes du colloque international de Lyon organisé au Centre d’études romaines et gallo-romaines les 30 septembre–1ᵉʳ octobre 1993, Lyon/Paris 1994, 77–86.Suche in Google Scholar
F. Stama, Fragmenta comica. Kommentierung der Fragmente der griechischen Komödie, VII, Frinico. Introduzione,traduzioneecommento, Heidelberg 2014.Suche in Google Scholar
M. Weissenberger, Literaturtheorie bei Lukian. Untersuchungen zum Dialog Lexiphanes, Stuttgart/Leipzig 1996.10.1515/9783110957228Suche in Google Scholar
R. Winter, De Luciani scholiis quaestiones selectae, Diss. Leipzig 1908.Suche in Google Scholar
M. Wittek, “Liste des manuscrits de Lucien”, Scriptorium 6/2, 1952, 309–323.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Un frammento inedito di Zenone dagli scholia vetera alle Opere di Esiodo (= Plut. fragmentum novum?)
- Scholia and marginalia as testimonia of earlier stages of the text of Lucian: three notes on the Lexiphanes
- Ovidio, Cicerone e il finale delle Metamorfosi
- Capaneus philosophus? Una nota su Zenone, Filodemo, Stazio (e Lucrezio)
- Certa non certis... Sul testo della poetica tempestas nella redazione A dell’Historia Apollonii regis Tyri
- La luce della luna: lucifluus in Zenone di Verona (Tract. 1.2.19) e Isidoro di Siviglia (Nat. 18.1; Etym. 3.53.1)
- The Riddles in Martius Valerius
- „In tyrannos“ !? – Sicco Polentons Ovidvita zwischen mittelalterlichem ‚Aberglauben‘, ‚republikanischem Diskurs‘ und pragmatischem Bildungsideal
- Miszelle
- Note filologiche al Praeceptum deliberativae di Emporio
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Un frammento inedito di Zenone dagli scholia vetera alle Opere di Esiodo (= Plut. fragmentum novum?)
- Scholia and marginalia as testimonia of earlier stages of the text of Lucian: three notes on the Lexiphanes
- Ovidio, Cicerone e il finale delle Metamorfosi
- Capaneus philosophus? Una nota su Zenone, Filodemo, Stazio (e Lucrezio)
- Certa non certis... Sul testo della poetica tempestas nella redazione A dell’Historia Apollonii regis Tyri
- La luce della luna: lucifluus in Zenone di Verona (Tract. 1.2.19) e Isidoro di Siviglia (Nat. 18.1; Etym. 3.53.1)
- The Riddles in Martius Valerius
- „In tyrannos“ !? – Sicco Polentons Ovidvita zwischen mittelalterlichem ‚Aberglauben‘, ‚republikanischem Diskurs‘ und pragmatischem Bildungsideal
- Miszelle
- Note filologiche al Praeceptum deliberativae di Emporio