Startseite Using computational chemistry to explore experimental solvent parameters – solvent basicity, acidity and polarity/polarizability
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Using computational chemistry to explore experimental solvent parameters – solvent basicity, acidity and polarity/polarizability

  • W. Earle Waghorne EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. Mai 2020

Abstract

Solvent basicity and polarity/polarizability parameters are analysed using molecular properties of solvents derived from computational chemistry. The results show that Kamlet and Taft’s measure of hydrogen bond basicity, β, is essentially identical to Gutmann’s donor number, a measure of Lewis basicity, both being determined by the charge on the most negative atom of the solvent molecule and the energy of the electron donor orbital. It is also found that, for both parameters, the calculated values for alcohols and N–H containing bases deviate systematically from those for aprotic solvents. This mirrors Kamlet and Taft’s earlier observation that different solvatochromic probes yield different β values in amphiprotic solvents. Reichardt’s E T (30) and Kamlet, Abboud and Taft’s π * both show direct dependences on the dipole moments and quadrupolar amplitudes of the solvent molecules and, surprisingly, an inverse dependence on the molecular polarizability. Additionally, E T (30) has a strong dependence on the charge on the most positive hydrogen atom of the solvent molecule, reflecting its sensitivity to hydrogen bonding. Unexpectedly, π * shows a dependence on the energy of the electron donor orbital. Kammet and Taaft’s hydrogen bond acidity parameter, α, is discussed in light of the results for π * and E T (30).


Article note

A collection of invited papers based on presentations at the 36th International Conference of Solution Chemistry (ICSC-36), held in Xining, China, 4–8 August 2019.


References

[1] W. E. Waghorne, C. O’Farrell. J. Solution Chem. 47, 1609 (2018).10.1007/s10953-018-0791-3Suche in Google Scholar

[2] W. E. Waghorne. J. Solution Chem. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-020-00979-z.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-020-00979-zSuche in Google Scholar

[3] W. E. Waghorne. J. Solution Chem. (2020). Accepted for publication.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] M. J. Kamlet, R. W. Taft. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98, 377 (1076).10.1021/ja00418a009Suche in Google Scholar

[5] V. Gutmann. Electrochim. Acta 21, 661 (1976).10.1016/0013-4686(76)85034-7Suche in Google Scholar

[6] M. J. Kamlet, J. L. Abboud, R. W. Taft. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99, 6027 (1977).10.1021/ja00460a031Suche in Google Scholar

[7] K. Dimroth, C. Reichardt, T. Siepmann, F. Bohlmann. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 661, 1 (1963).10.1002/jlac.19636610102Suche in Google Scholar

[8] C. Reichardt. Chem. Rev. 94, 2319 (1994).10.1021/cr00032a005Suche in Google Scholar

[9] R. W. Taft, M. J. Kamlet. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98, 2886 (1976).10.1021/ja00426a036Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Y. Marcus. Chem. Soc. Rev. 22, 409 (1993).10.1039/cs9932200409Suche in Google Scholar

[11] R. W. Taft, J. L. Abboud, M. J. Kamlet. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103, 1080 (1981).10.1021/ja00395a015Suche in Google Scholar

[12] N. Singh, A. Ahmad. J. Mol. Struct. 1127, 257 (2017).10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.07.098Suche in Google Scholar

[13] A. Karmaker, B. Singh. J. Mol. Liq. 247, 425 (2017).10.1016/j.molliq.2017.09.124Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Y. M. Issa, A. L. El Ansary, O. E. Sherif, H. R. Hassib. Spectrochim. Acta Part A. 79, 513 (2011).10.1016/j.saa.2011.03.022Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] N. B. Jurinski, P. A. D. Maine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86, 3217 (1964).10.1021/ja01070a003Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-05-05
Published in Print: 2020-10-25

©2020 IUPAC & De Gruyter. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For more information, please visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this issue
  3. Preface
  4. Selected papers from the 36th International Conference on Solution Chemistry (ICSC-36)
  5. Conference papers
  6. Using computational chemistry to explore experimental solvent parameters – solvent basicity, acidity and polarity/polarizability
  7. Solution chemistry in the surface region of aqueous solutions
  8. Water confined in solutions of biological relevance
  9. Real-time in-situ 1H NMR of reactions in peptide solution: preaggregation of amyloid-β fragments prior to fibril formation
  10. Free energy profile of permeation of Entecavir through Hepatitis B virus capsid studied by molecular dynamics calculation
  11. Dielectric relaxation spectroscopy: an old-but-new technique for the investigation of electrolyte solutions
  12. Excess spectroscopy and its applications in the study of solution chemistry
  13. Structure of aqueous sodium acetate solutions by X-Ray scattering and density functional theory
  14. Desymmetrization in geometry optimization: application to an ab initio study of copper(I) hydration
  15. Interactions between adsorbents and adsorbates in aqueous solutions
  16. Modeling vapor-liquid-liquid-solid equilibrium for acetone-water-salt system
  17. Apparent molar volumes of sodium arsenate aqueous solution from 283.15 K to 363.15 K at ambient pressure: an experimental and thermodynamic modeling study
  18. Extraction of various metal ions by open-chain crown ether bridged diphosphates in supercritical carbon dioxide
  19. Solvation heterogeneity in ionic liquids as demonstrated by photo-chemical reactions
  20. The structure and composition of solid complexes comprising of Nd(III), Ca(II) and D-gluconate isolated from solutions relevant to radioactive waste disposal
  21. Separation of phenols from oils using deep eutectic solvents and ionic liquids
Heruntergeladen am 3.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2020-0108/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen