Startseite Corrigendum to “Plant Use and Cereal Cultivation Inferred from Integrated Archaeobotanical Analysis of an Ottoman Age Moat Sequence (Szigetvár, Hungary)”
Artikel Open Access

Corrigendum to “Plant Use and Cereal Cultivation Inferred from Integrated Archaeobotanical Analysis of an Ottoman Age Moat Sequence (Szigetvár, Hungary)”

Dieses Erratum berichtigt die Onlineversion des folgenden Artikels: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2022-0359
  • Andrea Torma , Katalin Náfrádi EMAIL logo , Sándor Gulyás , Norbert Pap , Pál Fodor , Máté Kitanics , Péter Gyenizse und Pál Sümegi
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 27. Juni 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

In the published article “Torma, A., Náfrádi, K., Gulyás, S. & Sümegi, P. (2024). Plant Use and Cereal Cultivation Inferred from Integrated Archaeobotanical Analysis of an Ottoman Age Moat Sequence (Szigetvár, Hungary). Open Archaeology, 10(1), 20220359. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2022-0359”, due to miscommunication between the authors, four authors were erroneously omitted from the published article.

The correct authorship is as follows:

Andrea Torma, Katalin Náfrádi*, Sándor Gulyás, Norbert Pap, Pál Fodor, Máté Kitanics, Péter Gyenizse, and Pál Sümegi

The correct captions for Figures 1 and 2 and Table 1 are as follows:

The caption to Figure 1, saying: “Location of the Szigetvár – Turbék Vineyard Hill site, Hungary (Gulyás et al., 2022)” is replaced by: “Location of the Szigetvár – Turbék Vineyard Hill site, Hungary (Gulyás et al., 2022, GIS analysis and mapping by Péter Gyenizse)”.

The caption to Figure 2, saying: “Pál Eszterházy’s drawing about the memorial place from 1664. 1 = The tomb of Suleiman I. (türbe), 2 = interior of the Ottoman mosque, 3 = exterior of the Ottoman mosque, 4 = building of the halveti dervish (Ottoman monastery: závija) 5 = moat of the ottoman memorial place, 6 = the building of the Ottoman soldiers protecting the memorial place; red circle denotes sampling location” is replaced by: “Pál Eszterházy’s drawing about the memorial place from 1664 (interpretation of the map by Máté Kitanics). 1 = The place of burial of Suleiman I, 2 = interior of the Ottoman mosque, 3 = exterior of the Ottoman mosque, 4 = building of the halveti dervish (Ottoman monastery: závija), 5 = moat of the ottoman memorial place, and 6 = the building of the Ottoman soldiers protecting the memorial place; red circle denotes sampling location”.

The caption to Table 1, saying: “Historical sources of Szigetvár – Turbék Vineyard Hill site (Pap et al., 2015)” is replaced by: “Historical sources of Szigetvár – Turbék Vineyard Hill site (modified after Pap et al., 2015 by Pál Fodor, Norbert Pap and Máté Kitanics)”.

The correct authors statements are as follows:

  1. Funding information: Open access funding was provided by the University of Szeged. The archeological excavation was funded by grant OTKA K 116270 and the Government Decree 1427/2017 (VI.29) about the excavation in Szigetvár – Turbék Vineyard Hill site. Environment historical research was funded by grants 20391-3/2018/FEKUSTRAT and GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00009 “ICER” (and NKFIH 129265) by the European Union and the State of Hungary, Ministry of Human Capacities, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and consented to its submission to the journal, reviewed all the results, and approved the final version of the manuscript. A.T. – data analysis. K.N. – data analysis; writing, review, and editing; visualization. S.G. – review and editing. N.P. – funding; project administration and managing; historical data analysis. P.F. – historical data analysis. M.K. historical data analysis. P.GY. – GIS analysis and imaging. P.S. – supervisor.

Received: 2024-05-04
Accepted: 2024-05-17
Published Online: 2024-06-27

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Social Organization, Intersections, and Interactions in Bronze Age Sardinia. Reading Settlement Patterns in the Area of Sarrala with the Contribution of Applied Sciences
  3. Creating World Views: Work-Expenditure Calculations for Funnel Beaker Megalithic Graves and Flint Axe Head Depositions in Northern Germany
  4. Plant Use and Cereal Cultivation Inferred from Integrated Archaeobotanical Analysis of an Ottoman Age Moat Sequence (Szigetvár, Hungary)
  5. Salt Production in Central Italy and Social Network Analysis Centrality Measures: An Exploratory Approach
  6. Archaeometric Study of Iron Age Pottery Production in Central Sicily: A Case of Technological Conservatism
  7. Dehesilla Cave Rock Paintings (Cádiz, Spain): Analysis and Contextualisation within the Prehistoric Art of the Southern Iberian Peninsula
  8. Reconciling Contradictory Archaeological Survey Data: A Case Study from Central Crete, Greece
  9. Pottery from Motion – A Refined Approach to the Large-Scale Documentation of Pottery Using Structure from Motion
  10. On the Value of Informal Communication in Archaeological Data Work
  11. The Early Upper Palaeolithic in Cueva del Arco (Murcia, Spain) and Its Contextualisation in the Iberian Mediterranean
  12. The Capability Approach and Archaeological Interpretation of Transformations: On the Role of Philosophy for Archaeology
  13. Advanced Ancient Steelmaking Across the Arctic European Landscape
  14. Military and Ethnic Identity Through Pottery: A Study of Batavian Units in Dacia and Pannonia
  15. Stations of the Publicum Portorium Illyrici are a Strong Predictor of the Mithraic Presence in the Danubian Provinces: Geographical Analysis of the Distribution of the Roman Cult of Mithras
  16. Rapid Communications
  17. Recording, Sharing and Linking Micromorphological Data: A Two-Pillar Database System
  18. The BIAD Standards: Recommendations for Archaeological Data Publication and Insights From the Big Interdisciplinary Archaeological Database
  19. Corrigendum
  20. Corrigendum to “Plant Use and Cereal Cultivation Inferred from Integrated Archaeobotanical Analysis of an Ottoman Age Moat Sequence (Szigetvár, Hungary)”
  21. Special Issue on Microhistory and Archaeology, edited by Juan Antonio Quirós Castillo
  22. Editorial: Microhistory and Archaeology
  23. Contribution of the Microhistorical Approach to Landscape and Settlement Archaeology: Some French Examples
  24. Female Microhistorical Archaeology
  25. Microhistory, Conjectural Reasoning, and Prehistory: The Treasure of Aliseda (Spain)
  26. On Traces, Clues, and Fiction: Carlo Ginzburg and the Practice of Archaeology
  27. Urbanity, Decline, and Regeneration in Later Medieval England: Towards a Posthuman Household Microhistory
  28. Unveiling Local Power Through Microhistory: A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Early Modern Husbandry Practices in Casaio and Lardeira (Ourense, Spain)
  29. Microhistory, Archaeological Record, and the Subaltern Debris
  30. Two Sides of the Same Coin: Microhistory, Micropolitics, and Infrapolitics in Medieval Archaeology
  31. Special Issue on Can You See Me? Putting the 'Human' Back Into 'Human-Plant' Interaction
  32. Assessing the Role of Wooden Vessels, Basketry, and Pottery at the Early Neolithic Site of La Draga (Banyoles, Spain)
  33. Microwear and Plant Residue Analysis in a Multiproxy Approach from Stone Tools of the Middle Holocene of Patagonia (Argentina)
  34. Crafted Landscapes: The Uggurwala Tree (Ochroma pyramidale) as a Potential Cultural Keystone Species for Gunadule Communities
  35. Special Issue on Digital Religioscapes: Current Methodologies and Novelties in the Analysis of Sacr(aliz)ed Spaces, edited by Anaïs Lamesa, Asuman Lätzer-Lasar - Part I
  36. Rock-Cut Monuments at Macedonian Philippi – Taking Image Analysis to the Religioscape
  37. Seeing Sacred for Centuries: Digitally Modeling Greek Worshipers’ Visualscapes at the Argive Heraion Sanctuary
Heruntergeladen am 5.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/opar-2024-1705/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen