Startseite Erbium emitters in commercially fabricated nanophotonic silicon waveguides
Artikel Open Access

Erbium emitters in commercially fabricated nanophotonic silicon waveguides

  • Stephan Rinner , Florian Burger , Andreas Gritsch , Jonas Schmitt und Andreas Reiserer ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 27. Juli 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Quantum memories integrated into nanophotonic silicon devices are a promising platform for large quantum networks and scalable photonic quantum computers. In this context, erbium dopants are particularly attractive, as they combine optical transitions in the telecommunications frequency band with the potential for second-long coherence time. Here, we show that these emitters can be reliably integrated into commercially fabricated low-loss waveguides. We investigate several integration procedures and obtain ensembles of many emitters with an inhomogeneous broadening of <2 GHz and a homogeneous linewidth of <30 kHz. We further observe the splitting of the electronic spin states in a magnetic field up to 9 T that freezes paramagnetic impurities. Our findings are an important step toward long-lived quantum memories that can be fabricated on a wafer-scale using CMOS technology.

1 Introduction

A long-lived quantum memory for light is an essential ingredient for the development of large-scale quantum networks [1] and all-optical quantum computers [2, 3]. In this context, ensembles of rare-earth dopants are particularly promising, as they allow for the creation of efficient memories [4, 5] that can have exceptional coherence when storing excitations in the spin of such dopants [6, 7]. Most landmark experiments on this platform, such as the storage of entanglement in separate crystals [810], used bulk crystals. For scaling up, however, it is desirable to use nanophotonic devices that have a small footprint and can be fabricated in large numbers, which is required for the parallel operation of multiple devices. Pioneering steps in this direction used rare-earth emitters in photonic waveguides [1114] and nanophotonic cavities [1518] made from the same host crystals as used in the bulk experiments, such as yttrium orthovanadate [15], yttrium orthosilicate [14, 16, 17], or calcium tungstate [18]. Unfortunately, these and related materials are not compatible with wafer-scale manufacturing using established processes of the semiconductor industry. A promising alternative is, therefore, to integrate rare-earth dopants directly into silicon, where narrow inhomogeneous [19] and homogeneous [20] linewidths have been observed, and single dopants have been resolved in a nanophotonic resonator [21]. These experiments used the element erbium, which has a coherent optical transition at a telecommunication wavelength [22, 23] around 1536 nm, where absorption in silicon is negligible and optical fibers exhibit minimal loss. The nanophotonic devices in previous publications [1921] were fabricated using electron-beam lithography and reactive-ion etching after the entire device layer of small silicon-on-insulator chips had been implanted with erbium. In this work, we demonstrate that similar results can be obtained with silicon waveguides that were fabricated commercially on a multi-project wafer (MPW) and implanted afterward. We investigate which is the best erbium integration procedure and characterize the optical and spin properties of the emitters. This constitutes an important step toward silicon-based quantum memories that are compatible with mass fabrication.

2 Samples and setup

The silicon photonic chips were fabricated in an MPW run at Advanced Micro Foundry (AMF) and subsequently implanted with 170Er under an angle of 7° and at different temperatures by Ion Beam Services (IBS). Each sample was implanted sequentially with three parameter sets to achieve an approximately homogeneous profile of the erbium distribution in the waveguide: with a dose of 5 × 1011 ions cm−2 at 70 keV, 9 × 1011 ions cm−2 at 160 keV, and 22 × 1011 ions cm−2 at 350 keV. On one end, the waveguides are tapered, which allows for broadband coupling with a tapered single-mode optical fiber [19] that may be further improved in the future by dielectric coatings [24]. The other end is a loop reflector, which is formed by connecting the output arms of a balanced beam splitter with a waveguide bend, as shown in Figure 1A. In between, the waveguide is formed as a spiral to achieve a long length at a compact footprint. The samples are mounted in a closed-cycle cryostat with a variable temperature down to <2K. We then perform resonant spectroscopy using the setup in Figure 1B. The waveguide cross section is 500 × 220 nm, as shown in panel C together with the simulated implantation profile.

Figure 1: 
Sample and experimental setup. (A) Optical microscope image of one of the investigated structures. The waveguide is coiled up to maintain a small footprint. One end is terminated by a loop-shaped retroreflector of 10 micrometer radius (top), and the other end (not shown) is used for in- and outcoupling of light. (B) Measurement setup. A laser is used to excite the dopants. It is pulsed and frequency shifted using acousto-optical modulators (AOM). Furthermore, sidebands can be generated with three concatenated electro-optical modulators (EOM). The light is coupled into the waveguides on the chip using a tapered fiber on a nanopositioning stage in a cryostat. Before, it passes a fiber-optical 95:5 beam splitter, which attenuates the input and guides the backward-propagating light predominantly to a superconducting nanowire single photon detector (SNSPD) mounted in another cryostat. (C) Waveguide cross section. The waveguide consists of crystalline silicon (black) on top of a silicon dioxide layer (blue). It supports a single guided TE-like mode (the color gradient shows the flux density). Erbium was implanted into the waveguides at three different combinations of implantation dose and energy, resulting in an approximately homogeneous vertical erbium distribution (right side, light red).
Figure 1:

Sample and experimental setup. (A) Optical microscope image of one of the investigated structures. The waveguide is coiled up to maintain a small footprint. One end is terminated by a loop-shaped retroreflector of 10 micrometer radius (top), and the other end (not shown) is used for in- and outcoupling of light. (B) Measurement setup. A laser is used to excite the dopants. It is pulsed and frequency shifted using acousto-optical modulators (AOM). Furthermore, sidebands can be generated with three concatenated electro-optical modulators (EOM). The light is coupled into the waveguides on the chip using a tapered fiber on a nanopositioning stage in a cryostat. Before, it passes a fiber-optical 95:5 beam splitter, which attenuates the input and guides the backward-propagating light predominantly to a superconducting nanowire single photon detector (SNSPD) mounted in another cryostat. (C) Waveguide cross section. The waveguide consists of crystalline silicon (black) on top of a silicon dioxide layer (blue). It supports a single guided TE-like mode (the color gradient shows the flux density). Erbium was implanted into the waveguides at three different combinations of implantation dose and energy, resulting in an approximately homogeneous vertical erbium distribution (right side, light red).

3 Erbium integration

The experiments investigate large ensembles of erbium dopants in sites A and B, which emit at 1537.76 nm and 1536.06 nm, respectively, and have previously shown promising optical properties: narrow inhomogeneous and homogeneous broadening and short lifetimes that are predominantly radiative [20]. If erbium dopants are integrated into these or one of the many other possible sites [25] that typically have less favorable properties depends on the purity of the silicon that forms the waveguide and on the implantation and annealing conditions [20]. Here, one expects a trade-off: at higher temperatures, the crystal damage caused by the implantation will be reduced, leading to a lower waveguide loss. In addition, a narrower inhomogeneous broadening of the optical transition frequency of the preferred erbium sites may be observed in case the strain inhomogeneity is reduced by the annealing. However, the mobility of both erbium and other impurities in the crystal also increases with temperature. They may thus form clusters, yielding many possible other site configurations.

To investigate the integration into sites A and B in the commercially fabricated chips studied in this work, we use the same techniques as in our earlier work [20]. Specifically, we measure pulsed fluorescence, i.e., the signal emitted after exciting the dopant ensemble with resonant laser pulses of 0.1 ms–0.25 ms duration. The pulses have a rectangular temporal profile, generated with acousto-optical modulators with a rise time on the order of 10 ns. This is more than four orders of magnitude shorter than the emitter lifetime, which allows separating the emission from the excitation. We first perform a broad scan of the excitation laser frequency, which is slightly modulated to avoid effects of persistent hole burning. The result of this measurement for several implantation and annealing conditions is shown in Figure 2A. For comparison, we also include a spectrum obtained in our earlier measurements [20] on high-purity float-zone (FZ) silicon waveguides, implanted at room temperature and then annealed at 500 °C for approximately 1 min, on which waveguides were fabricated by our group. These chips will be referred to as “home-made” in this work.

Figure 2: 
Fluorescence of the erbium-implanted samples. (A) Broad fluorescence scan. The frequency of the excitation laser is swept, and the fluorescence is recorded in a 0.5 ms time interval after the excitation pulse. The lowest curve shows the spectrum obtained on home-made float-zone silicon waveguides for comparison. Several different implantation conditions are studied on commercially fabricated samples (bottom to top): implanted at 400 °C, 500 °C, at room temperature with a 500 °C postimplantation anneal, and implanted at 600 °C. Efficient integration into the desired erbium sites A and B (red and blue area) is achieved below 600 °C. (B) and (C) Inhomogeneous broadening of the emission from the two preferred erbium sites. The linewidth is measured by scanning the excitation laser frequency with a high resolution. (D) Obtained signal as a function of waveguide length, measured on the same sample. The clear increase up to 10 mm length suggests small loss in the implanted structures.
Figure 2:

Fluorescence of the erbium-implanted samples. (A) Broad fluorescence scan. The frequency of the excitation laser is swept, and the fluorescence is recorded in a 0.5 ms time interval after the excitation pulse. The lowest curve shows the spectrum obtained on home-made float-zone silicon waveguides for comparison. Several different implantation conditions are studied on commercially fabricated samples (bottom to top): implanted at 400 °C, 500 °C, at room temperature with a 500 °C postimplantation anneal, and implanted at 600 °C. Efficient integration into the desired erbium sites A and B (red and blue area) is achieved below 600 °C. (B) and (C) Inhomogeneous broadening of the emission from the two preferred erbium sites. The linewidth is measured by scanning the excitation laser frequency with a high resolution. (D) Obtained signal as a function of waveguide length, measured on the same sample. The clear increase up to 10 mm length suggests small loss in the implanted structures.

We find that at 400 °C erbium is efficiently integrated into the preferred sites A and B (marked blue and red, respectively) but also into pair- or precipitate sites (green) observed previously. In addition, we observe several other peaks and a broadband background. A very similar spectrum is obtained in the samples that were implanted at 500 °C. In contrast, below 400 °C, the optical loss is significantly higher. This prevents coupling into waveguides implanted at room temperature. Still, if these chips are subjected to a rapid thermal annealing at 500 °C for 1 min, we again obtain low losses and a high integration yield. Finally, at an annealing temperature of 600 °C, the fluorescence signal of sites A and B disappears completely, and the only remaining line originates from erbium precipitate sites (green) [20], which suggests that at this implantation temperature, the mobility of erbium and other impurities is too high such that clusters of several dopants and/or impurities are formed.

After characterizing the spectrum of the erbium emission over a broad range, we determine the inhomogeneous broadening of the emission from dopants in the two preferred sites. A corresponding high-resolution scan of the excitation frequency is shown in Figure 2B and C. Some difference of the linewidths is observed; however, there is no strong dependence on the implantation conditions. We find that a Lorentzian distribution fits our data the best. On the sample annealed at 500 °C, we extract full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) linewidths of 3.49(18) GHz for site A and 1.87(9) GHz for site B. This is significantly larger than the values of ∼0.5 GHz obtained in our previous experiments that were performed on samples grown by the Czochralski technique (obtained from Silicon Valley Microelectronics) and implanted at comparable parameters [20]. This suggests that the silicon device layer in the commercially fabricated chips has a larger strain inhomogeneity. This may originate directly from the used wafer (of proprietary origin) or be caused by impurities and defects added in the fabrication, implantation, and/or annealing processes. To clarify, further investigations will be required. While the increased inhomogeneous broadening may enhance the bandwidth of an ensemble-based memory [4], it also reduces the optical depth, so there will be a trade-off between efficiency and bandwidth in future memory experiments.

In addition to the resonant emission, we also observe an offset, i.e., a broad fluorescence background, that stems from dopants that can be excited off-resonantly, similar to our earlier work [20]. This background is more pronounced in the commercial samples studied here. It can be reduced by inserting a narrow-band filter that is set to transmit light only at a wavelength that corresponds to an optical transition to a higher-lying crystal field level of erbium in the preferred sites, whereas it blocks most of the background fluorescence.

Not only the erbium integration but also the waveguide losses will depend on the implantation and annealing conditions. In general, lower losses are expected for longer annealing and higher temperature. In the following, we thus study the sample implanted at 500 °C. Based on the manufacturer’s loss specification of ∼1.5 dB cm−1 (without doping), one would expect a 50 % reduction of the reflection signal from the longest studied waveguides that have a length of 1 cm. Instead, we observe that the reflection is approximately independent of the waveguide length when taking the considerable fluctuations of the coupling efficiency of the used surface couplers into account. Figure 2D shows the fluorescence signal as a function of the waveguide length. We find an approximately linear increase. Taken together, this suggests that the loss in the delivered chips is lower than specified, and that the sample fabrication procedure used in this work leads to a lower additional loss as compared to our earlier work that found ∼6 dB cm−1 at a comparable overall dose [20]. Thus, the added loss obtained in our earlier experiments may not originate from the implantation but from differences in the fabrication process on implanted rather than undoped samples. However, a definite conclusion and a precise determination of the loss would require analysis of a much larger number of structures than were available for this study.

4 Magnetic field dependence

After investigating the basic optical properties of the implanted erbium dopants, we now turn to their spin states. While earlier measurements have studied different sites of Er:Si [2628], this work restricts itself to the recently discovered sites A and B, which have favorable optical properties [20].

In sites of low symmetry, the crystal field lifts the degeneracy of the 4f orbitals of rare-earth dopants. Since erbium is a Kramers ion with an odd number of 4f electrons, its properties in a magnetic field can be modeled as an effective two-level system with an anisotropic g-tensor [29], which differs between the ground (gg) and optically excited (ge) states. Thus, the Zeeman effect leads to a splitting of the lines in a magnetic field.

We apply such a field perpendicular to the chip surface, approximately along the [100] crystalline direction. For each dopant, one expects a splitting of the spin-flip transitions, connecting the lower I15/2 to the upper I13/2 spin level and vice versa, by △νsf ∝ |gg + ge| ⋅ B. The spin-preserving lines, in contrast, would be split by △νsp ∝ |ggge| ⋅ B. Figure 3A shows an example spectrum taken at 0.5 T. The peak of erbium in site B (red) is split into six spin-preserving and four resolved weaker spin-flip lines, indicating an asymmetric g-tensor and several magnetic classes that originate from different emitter orientations. Determining the splitting of the lines for several different magnetic field values allows for a clear assignment of the peaks, see panel (B) for site B and panel (C) for site A. From linear fits we extract |gg + ge| and |ggge| for all observed magnetic classes, as given in Table 1. At the applied fields of up to 1 T, no deviation from a linear splitting is observed. This changes at higher fields that can induce a mixing of the crystal field levels when their energy would cross [30].

Figure 3: 
Magnetic field dependence. (A) Splitting of the fluorescence line of erbium in site B when a magnetic field of 0.5 T is applied. (B) and (C) Linear splitting (black fit lines) of the observed spin-preserving and spin-flip transitions as a function of the applied magnetic field. Only peaks that split symmetrically around the zero field peak position originate from erbium in the sites A (blue dots) and B (red dots) and are considered in the analysis, while peaks that originate from other sites (gray dots) are ignored. The transparency of the colors indicates the peak amplitude.
Figure 3:

Magnetic field dependence. (A) Splitting of the fluorescence line of erbium in site B when a magnetic field of 0.5 T is applied. (B) and (C) Linear splitting (black fit lines) of the observed spin-preserving and spin-flip transitions as a function of the applied magnetic field. Only peaks that split symmetrically around the zero field peak position originate from erbium in the sites A (blue dots) and B (red dots) and are considered in the analysis, while peaks that originate from other sites (gray dots) are ignored. The transparency of the colors indicates the peak amplitude.

Table 1:

Sum and difference of the effective g-factors of the erbium emitters in sites A and B.

Site |gg + ge| |ggge|
A 21.48(6) 0.60(11)
A 20.26(20) 2.04(5)
B 18.37(12) 1.22(1)
B 20.94(13) 2.23(7)
B 3.72(16)

5 Optical coherence

After studying the magnetic field dependence of erbium dopants in the preferred sites, we investigate their optical coherence. We use the same technique as in [19, 20], where three concatenated electro-optical modulators create a comb of 27 equidistant laser lines in the spectrum of the excitation pulse. Then, the fluorescence is measured as a function of the spectral line separation. Because of saturation caused by transient spectral hole burning, the fluorescence decreases when the modulation is smaller than the homogeneous linewidth. In addition, the signal is reduced when then maximum line separation approaches the inhomogenous linewidth. The linewidths can thus be obtained by fitting the signal decrease with two Lorentzian curves. In home-made samples at zero magnetic field, homogeneous linewidths below 10 kHz have been observed using this approach.

When performed on commercially fabricated silicon waveguides, the same measurement shows a different result, see Figure 4A (dark red) measured on site B: in addition to a narrow feature with a Lorentzian linewidth of 0.11(1) MHz FWHM, a second increase of the fluorescence with an FWHM of 9(1) MHz is found. The fact that two timescales are observed indicates that an additional decoherence mechanism is present for some of the dopants in the commercial chips. It can be seen in all investigated samples, independently of the exact implantation and annealing conditions. It also originates from the same site as the narrow feature, which was tested by inserting a narrow-band filter in the detection path that only transmits light on a transition to a higher-lying crystal field level.

Figure 4: 
Optical coherence measurements. (A) Measurement of the fluorescence of site B after the laser excitation pulse, modulated to have 27 equidistant lines, as a function of the frequency separation between the lines. The homogeneous linewidth of the dopants can be extracted by Lorentzian fits. In the measurement at zero magnetic field (dark red diamonds), a second decoherence mechanism is present, resulting in a double Lorentzian curve (dark red line). When a magnetic field of 9 T is applied (light red hexagons), the width of the second line is reduced (solid fit curve), approaching a single, narrow homogeneous line (dashed fit curve). (B) Homogeneous linewidth, extracted from the fit curves, as a function of the excitation laser power. The measurements of panel A are marked by circles. Light red hexagon show the measurement at 9 T. The measurement at 0 T (dark red) shows a narrow (diamonds) and a broader linewidth (squares). In both cases, a reduction of the narrow line is observed down to the lowest powers that give a sufficient signal. But even there, the power broadening is too large to observe a lifetime-limited linewidth (horizontal dashed line).
Figure 4:

Optical coherence measurements. (A) Measurement of the fluorescence of site B after the laser excitation pulse, modulated to have 27 equidistant lines, as a function of the frequency separation between the lines. The homogeneous linewidth of the dopants can be extracted by Lorentzian fits. In the measurement at zero magnetic field (dark red diamonds), a second decoherence mechanism is present, resulting in a double Lorentzian curve (dark red line). When a magnetic field of 9 T is applied (light red hexagons), the width of the second line is reduced (solid fit curve), approaching a single, narrow homogeneous line (dashed fit curve). (B) Homogeneous linewidth, extracted from the fit curves, as a function of the excitation laser power. The measurements of panel A are marked by circles. Light red hexagon show the measurement at 9 T. The measurement at 0 T (dark red) shows a narrow (diamonds) and a broader linewidth (squares). In both cases, a reduction of the narrow line is observed down to the lowest powers that give a sufficient signal. But even there, the power broadening is too large to observe a lifetime-limited linewidth (horizontal dashed line).

We attribute the additional decoherence that is not observed in home-made chips to paramagnetic impurities, which may already be present in the starting wafer or be added during the commercial fabrication process. To further investigate this, we apply a large magnetic field of up to 9 T. At the chip temperature of <2K, the spin of both the erbium dopants and all paramagnetic impurities will then be frozen to the ground state, such that magnetic field fluctuations and the resulting decoherence can be strongly reduced [31]. In our samples, the second line is slightly reduced at 1 T, and almost fully disappears at ≳4 T, where the paramagnetic spins are frozen, as shown in Figure 4A for a field of 9 T (light red). This supports our hypothesis that paramagnetic impurities are the origin of the added decoherence.

We further investigate the scaling of the homogeneous linewidths of erbium in both sites with the applied laser power in Figure 4B. As expected, we observe a drop of the homogeneous linewidth down to the lowest power that gives a sufficient signal, both without magnetic field (dark red) and at 9 T (light red). With the field applied, we extract a value of 0.028(10) MHz as an upper bound to the homogeneous linewidth. Thus, we can almost recover the narrow homogeneous linewidths observed in home-made samples [20] by applying a magnetic field of sufficient strength. The obtained linewidth, still limited by power broadening, is within an order of magnitude from the lifetime limit that stems from the exponential decay of the emitters, with a measured timescale of 197(2) μs and 227(3) μs for site A and B, respectively, in the used waveguide geometry. With no field applied, we observe a similar behavior of the narrow feature (diamonds) but a constant linewidth of 9(1) MHz for the additional line (squares). This is expected, as the dipolar interaction with paramagnetic impurities does not depend on the applied laser power.

6 Summary and outlook

In summary, we have shown that photon emitters at a telecommunication wavelength can be reliably integrated into silicon nanostructures that are commercially fabricated on a wafer-scale. In spite of added impurities, the excellent optical coherence of erbium dopants [20] can be re-established in these devices by applying a large magnetic field. Thus, emission of coherent single photons is expected in nanophotonic resonators that can reduce the lifetime sufficiently [21]. In comparison to other emitters in silicon that feature shorter lifetimes [3236], erbium does not suffer from nonradiative decay and exhibits much narrower homogeneous, inhomogenous, and spectral diffusion linewidths [20, 21]. This is a prerequisite for using the techniques of spectral hole burning and photon echoes to realize efficient quantum memories [4]. To this end, the achieved coherence should enable storage on a microsecond timescale using the electronic spin transitions investigated in this work, similar to earlier work with YSO [14, 17, 37]. Much longer coherence times, likely exceeding seconds, can then be achieved by storage in the hyperfine states of the 167Er isotope under high magnetic fields [7]. The limitation of the storage time by the coupling to the bath of nuclear spins can be avoided in isotopically purified silicon [38] or silicon-on-insulator [39] chips. This may pave the way to hour-long coherence, as demonstrated for donors without an optical interface [40]. To implement such memories, improving the purity of the starting wafer and optimizing the fabrication process based on the fluorescence signal may be advantageous to increase the optical depth and to reduce both the background and the decoherence at zero field. With this, implementing an efficient quantum memory in the demonstrated industrially fabricated samples may aid the implementation of scalable optical quantum computers by photon synchronization [2, 3] and allow for the connection of superconducting quantum computers via microwave-to-telecom conversion [41]. In addition, our system may allow for the implementation of global quantum networks via dedicated quantum repeater protocols [42].


Corresponding author: Andreas Reiserer, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Physics Department and Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology (MCQST), James-Franck-Straße 1, 85748 Garching, Germany; and Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics, Quantum Networks Group, Hans-Kopfermann-Straße 1, 85748 Garching, Germany, E-mail:

Stephan Rinner, Florian Burger and Andreas Gritsch have contributed equally to this manuscript.


Award Identifier / Grant number: 757772

Award Identifier / Grant number: 390814868

Award Identifier / Grant number: RE 3967/1

Award Identifier / Grant number: 13N15907

Award Identifier / Grant number: 16KISQ046

  1. Research funding: This project received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No 757772), from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under the German Universities Excellence Initiative – EXC-2111 – 390814868 and via the project RE 3967/1, and from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) via the grant agreements No 13N15907 and 16KISQ046.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: Authors state no conflicts of interest.

  4. Data availability: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, “Quantum internet: a vision for the road ahead,” Science, vol. 362, p. eaam9288, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9288.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] J. Nunn, N. K. Langford, W. S. Kolthammer, et al.., “Enhancing multiphoton rates with quantum memories,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 110, p. 133601, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.110.133601.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] K. Makino, Y. Hashimoto, J. i. Yoshikawa, et al.., “Synchronization of optical photons for quantum information processing,” Sci. Adv., vol. 2, p. e1501772, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501772.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] W. Tittel, M. Afzelius, T. Chaneliére, et al.., “Photon-echo quantum memory in solid state systems,” Laser Photonics Rev., vol. 4, pp. 244–267, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.200810056.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] M. P. Hedges, J. J. Longdell, Y. Li, and M. J. Sellars, “Efficient quantum memory for light,” Nature, vol. 465, pp. 1052–1056, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09081.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] M. Zhong, M. P. Hedges, R. L. Ahlefeldt, et al.., “Optically addressable nuclear spins in a solid with a six-hour coherence time,” Nature, vol. 517, pp. 177–180, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14025.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] M. Rančić, M. P. Hedges, R. L. Ahlefeldt, and M. J. Sellars, “Coherence time of over a second in a telecom-compatible quantum memory storage material,” Nat. Phys., vol. 14, pp. 50–54, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4254.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] C. Clausen, I. Usmani, F. Bussières, et al.., “Quantum storage of photonic entanglement in a crystal,” Nature, vol. 469, pp. 508–511, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09662.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] E. Saglamyurek, N. Sinclair, J. Jin, et al.., “Broadband waveguide quantum memory for entangled photons,” Nature, vol. 469, pp. 512–515, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09719.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] D. Lago-Rivera, S. Grandi, J. V. Rakonjac, A. Seri, and H. de Riedmatten, “Telecom-heralded entanglement between multimode solid-state quantum memories,” Nature, vol. 594, pp. 37–40, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03481-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] S. Marzban, J. G. Bartholomew, S. Madden, K. Vu, and M. J. Sellars, “Observation of photon echoes from evanescently coupled rare-earth ions in a planar waveguide,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 115, p. 013601, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.115.013601.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] M. Falamarzi, T. Lutz, M. Puigibert, N. Sinclair, D. Oblak, and W. Tittel, “Persistent atomic frequency comb based on Zeeman sub-levels of an erbium-doped crystal waveguide,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, vol. 37, pp. 352–358, 2020.10.1364/JOSAB.373100Suche in Google Scholar

[13] J. V. Rakonjac, G. Corrielli, D. Lago-Rivera, et al.., “Storage and analysis of light-matter entanglement in a fiber-integrated system,” Sci. Adv., vol. 8, p. eabn3919, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn3919.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[14] D.-C. Liu, P. Y. Li, T. X. Zhu, et al.., “On-demand storage of photonic qubits at telecom wavelengths,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 129, p. 210501, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.129.210501.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] T. Zhong, J. M. Kindem, J. G. Bartholomew, et al.., “Nanophotonic rare-earth quantum memory with optically controlled retrieval,” Science, vol. 357, pp. 1392–1395, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan5959.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] A. M. Dibos, M. Raha, C. M. Phenicie, and J. D. Thompson, “Atomic source of single photons in the telecom band,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 120, p. 243601, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.120.243601.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] I. Craiciu, M. Lei, J. Rochman, J. G. Bartholomew, and A. Faraon, “Multifunctional on-chip storage at telecommunication wavelength for quantum networks,” Optica, vol. 8, pp. 114–121, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.412211.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] S. Ourari, L. Dusanowski, S. Horvath, et al.., “Indistinguishable telecom band photons from a single erbium ion in the solid state,” ArXiv:2301.03564, 2023.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] L. Weiss, A. Gritsch, B. Merkel, and A. Reiserer, “Erbium dopants in nanophotonic silicon waveguides,” Optica, vol. 8, pp. 40–41, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.413330.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] A. Gritsch, L. Weiss, J. Früh, S. Rinner, and A. Reiserer, “Narrow optical transitions in erbium-implanted silicon waveguides,” Phys. Rev. X, vol. 12, p. 041009, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.12.041009.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] A. Gritsch, A. Ulanowski, and A. Reiserer, “Purcell enhancement of single-photon emitters in silicon,” Optica, vol. 10, pp. 783–789, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.486167.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] T. Böttger, C. W. Thiel, Y. Sun, and R. L. Cone, “Optical decoherence and spectral diffusion at 1.5um in Er:YSO versus magnetic field, temperature, and Er concentration,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 73, p. 075101, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.73.075101.Suche in Google Scholar

[23] B. Merkel, A. Ulanowski, and A. Reiserer, “Coherent and purcell-enhanced emission from erbium dopants in a cryogenic high-Q resonator,” Phys. Rev. X, vol. 10, p. 041025, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.10.041025.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] S. Khan, S. M. Buckley, J. Chiles, R. P. Mirin, S. W. Nam, and J. M. Shainline, “Low-loss, high-bandwidth fiber-to-chip coupling using capped adiabatic tapered fibers,” APL Photonics, vol. 5, p. 056101, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5145105.Suche in Google Scholar

[25] I. R. Berkman, A. Lyasota, G. G. de Boo, et al.., “Observing Er3+ sites in Si with an in situ single-photon detector,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 19, p. 014037, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.19.014037.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] N. Q. Vinh, H. Przybylińska, Z. F. Krasil’nik, and T. Gregorkiewicz, “Microscopic structure of Er-related optically active centers in crystalline silicon,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 90, p. 066401, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.90.066401.Suche in Google Scholar

[27] C. Yin, M. Rancic, G. G. de Boo, et al.., “Optical addressing of an individual erbium ion in silicon,” Nature, vol. 497, pp. 91–94, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12081.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] J. Yang, W. Fan, Y. Zhang, et al.., “Zeeman and hyperfine interactions of a single 167Er3+ ion in Si,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 105, p. 235306, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.105.235306.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] A. G. Maryasov and M. K. Bowman, “Spin dynamics of paramagnetic centers with anisotropic g tensor and spin of 1/2,” J. Magn. Reson., vol. 221, pp. 69–75, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2012.05.011.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] G. G. de Boo, C. Yin, M. Rančić, et al.., “High-resolution spectroscopy of individual erbium ions in strong magnetic fields,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 102, p. 155309, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.102.155309.Suche in Google Scholar

[31] T. Böttger, C. W. Thiel, R. L. Cone, and Y. Sun, “Effects of magnetic field orientation on optical decoherence in Er:YSO,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 79, p. 115104, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.79.115104.Suche in Google Scholar

[32] W. Redjem, A. Durand, T. Herzig, et al.., “Single artificial atoms in silicon emitting at telecom wavelengths,” Nat. Electron., vol. 3, pp. 738–743, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-00499-0.Suche in Google Scholar

[33] A. Durand, Y. Baron, W. Redjem, et al.., “Broad diversity of near-infrared single-photon emitters in silicon,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 126, p. 083602, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.126.083602.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] D. B. Higginbottom, A. T. K. Kurkjian, C. Chartrand, et al.., “Optical observation of single spins in silicon,” Nature, vol. 607, pp. 266–270, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04821-y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] M. Prabhu, C. Errando-Herranz, L. De Santis, et al.., “Individually addressable and spectrally programmable artificial atoms in silicon photonics,” Nat. Commun., vol. 14, p. 2380, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37655-x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[36] W. Redjem, Y. Zhiyenbayev, W. Qarony, et al.., “All-silicon quantum light source by embedding an atomic emissive center in a nanophotonic cavity,” Nat. Commun., vol. 14, p. 3321, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38559-6.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[37] B. Lauritzen, J. Minář, H. de Riedmatten, et al.., “Telecommunication-wavelength solid-state memory at the single photon level,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 104, p. 080502, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.104.080502.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] V. Mazzocchi, P. Sennikov, A. Bulanov, et al.., “99.992% Si-28 CVD-grown epilayer on 300 mm substrates for large scale integration of silicon spin qubits,” J. Cryst. Growth, vol. 509, pp. 1–7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2018.12.010.Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Y. Liu, S. Rinner, T. Remmele, O. Ernst, A. Reiserer, and T. Boeck, “28Silicon-on-insulator for optically interfaced quantum emitters,” J. Cryst. Growth, vol. 593, p. 126733, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2022.126733.Suche in Google Scholar

[40] K. Saeedi, S. Simmons, J. Z. Salvail, et al.., “Room-temperature quantum bit storage exceeding 39 minutes using ionized donors in silicon-28,” Science, vol. 342, pp. 830–833, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239584.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[41] C. O’Brien, N. Lauk, S. Blum, G. Morigi, and M. Fleischhauer, “Interfacing superconducting qubits and telecom photons via a rare-earth-doped crystal,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 113, p. 063603, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.113.063603.Suche in Google Scholar

[42] N. Sinclair, E. Saglamyurek, H. Mallahzadeh, et al.., “Spectral multiplexing for scalable quantum photonics using an atomic frequency comb quantum memory and feed-forward control,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 113, p. 053603, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.113.053603.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-05-12
Accepted: 2023-07-10
Published Online: 2023-07-27

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Broadband synchronization of ultrafast pulse generation with double-walled carbon nanotubes
  4. Noncontractible loop states from a partially flat band in a photonic borophene lattice
  5. Experimental investigation of a near-field focusing performance of the IP-Dip polymer based 2D and 3D Fresnel zone plate geometries fabricated using 3D laser lithography coated with hyperbolic dispersion surface layered metamaterial
  6. 100-Gbps per-channel all-optical wavelength conversion without pre-amplifiers based on an integrated nanophotonic platform
  7. Multi-height metasurface for wavefront manipulation fabricated by direct laser writing lithography
  8. Enabling infinite Q factors in absorbing optical systems
  9. Erbium emitters in commercially fabricated nanophotonic silicon waveguides
  10. Four-dimensional experimental characterization of partially coherent light using incoherent modal decomposition
  11. Fine-tuning biexcitons-plasmon coherent states in a single nanocavity
  12. Möbius edge band and Weyl-like semimetal flat-band in topological photonic waveguide array by synthetic gauge flux
  13. Dual-band optical collimator based on deep-learning designed, fabrication-friendly metasurfaces
  14. Thickness insensitive nanocavities for 2D heterostructures using photonic molecules
  15. Beam-steering metasurfaces assisted coherent optical wireless multichannel communication system
  16. Asymmetric metasurface photodetectors for single-shot quantitative phase imaging
  17. Room-temperature unidirectional routing of valley excitons of monolayer WSe2 via plasmonic near-field interference in symmetric nano-slits
Heruntergeladen am 5.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/nanoph-2023-0287/html?lang=de&srsltid=AfmBOoq1zEveBNBwmyKgMfiB1nWGjVum3UdUDooKaw-v8Nmo9KgEHuld
Button zum nach oben scrollen