Cultured Meat as a Transitional Step Towards Interspecies Justice?
-
Steve Cooke
Abstract
For some, cultured animal products ought to be celebrated for the potential they offer to replace factory farming. Others argue that, for the same reason, there is a duty to support their production and consumption. This paper argues that the ethical status of cultured animal products ought to be assessed not just in comparison with factory farming, but also in terms of its potential to bring about interspecies justice. The claim is made that the attitudes embodied within cultured animal products show a lack of proper respect for nonhuman animals and are at odds with those required by justice. Although cultured animal products have the potential to greatly reduce harms done to nonhuman animals, this paper argues that their adoption ought to nevertheless be regarded with some regret. Using a Rawlsian framework for assessing transitional steps towards justice, the paper shows that, whilst the adoption of cultured animal products may be permissible, the case for regarding it as a duty is much weaker. For cultured meats to be permissible, it must first be shown that alternatives that respect the value of nonhuman animals as ends-in-themselves do not exist.
Acknowledgments
My thanks to several anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions, and to the participants of the Politics, Animals and Technology panel at the MANCEPT Workshops in Political Theory 2021, where an early version of this paper was presented.
References
Abby, Ruth. 2016. “Putting Cruelty First Exploring Judith Shklar’s Liberalism of Fear for Animal Ethics.” Politics and Animals 2 (1): 25–36.Search in Google Scholar
Arora, Rashmit S., Daniel A. Brent, and Edward C. Jaenicke. 2020. “Is India Ready for Alt-Meat? Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Meat Alternatives.” Sustainability 12 (11): 4377. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114377.Search in Google Scholar
Bryant, Christopher, and Julie Barnett. 2020. “Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat: An Updated Review (2018–2020).” Applied Sciences 10 (15): 5201. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155201.Search in Google Scholar
Chauvet, David J. 2018. “Should Cultured Meat Be Refused in the Name of Animal Dignity?” Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 21 (2): 387–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-018-9888-4.Search in Google Scholar
Circus, Victoria Emma, and Rosie Robison. 2018. “Exploring Perceptions of Sustainable Proteins and Meat Attachment.” British Food Journal 121 (2): 533–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0025.Search in Google Scholar
Donaldson, Sue, and Will Kymlicka. 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Elliot, Robert. 1984. “Rawlsian Justice and Non-Human Animals.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (1): 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.1984.tb00189.x.Search in Google Scholar
Felipe, Sonia T. 2005. “Rawls’ Legacy: A Limited Possibility of a Non-speciesist Environmental Justice.” Ethic@ 4 (1): 23–37.Search in Google Scholar
Fidder, Linn, and João Graça. 2023. “Aligning Cultivated Meat with Conventional Meat Consumption Practices Increases Expected Tastefulness, Naturalness, and Familiarity.” Food Quality and Preference 109: 104911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104911.Search in Google Scholar
Fischer, Bob, and Burkay Ozturk. 2017. “Facsimiles of Flesh.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (4): 489–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12223.Search in Google Scholar
Garner, Robert. 2003. “Animals, Politics and Justice: Rawlsian Liberalism and the Plight of Non-humans.” Environmental Politics 12: 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010412331308164.Search in Google Scholar
Garner, Robert. 2013. A Theory of Justice for Animals: Animal Rights in a Nonideal World. USA: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936311.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gruen, Lori. 2011. Ethics and Animals: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511976162Search in Google Scholar
Illing, Sean. 2021. Best of: Ending the Age of Animal Cruelty, with Bruce Friedrich. The Gray Area. https://podcasts.apple.com/gh/podcast/best-ending-age-animal-cruelty-bruce-friedrich/id1081584611?i=1000504254835.Search in Google Scholar
Knight, Damon. 1950. “To Serve Man.” In Galaxy Science Fiction, 1, 91–7. Boston: Galaxy Publishing Corporation.Search in Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will, and Sue Donaldson. 2024. “Social Solidarity with Animals: The Case of Domesticated Animals.” In Solidarity with Animals: Promises, Pitfalls, and Potential, edited by Alasdair Cochrane, and Mara-Daria Cojocaru, 17–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198897941.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Lamey, Andy. 2019. Duty and the Beast: Should We Eat Meat in the Name of Animal Rights? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316672693Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, Lewis. 2002. Convention: A Philosophical Study, 1st ed. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470693711Search in Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–48. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007113830879.10.1023/A:1007113830879Search in Google Scholar
Milburn, Josh. 2016. “Chewing over in Vitro Meat: Animal Ethics, Cannibalism and Social Progress.” Res Publica 22 (3): 249–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-016-9331-4.Search in Google Scholar
Painter, James, J. Scott Brennen, and Silje Kristiansen. 2020. “The Coverage of Cultured Meat in the US and UK Traditional Media, 2013-2019: Drivers, Sources, and Competing Narratives.” Climatic Change 162 (4): 2379–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02813-3.Search in Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, 1st ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400841080Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999a. A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999b. The Law of Peoples: with the Idea of Public Reason Revisited. Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Schaefer, G. Owen, and Julian Savulescu. 2014. “The Ethics of Producing In Vitro Meat.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (2): 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12056.Search in Google Scholar
Scholz, Sally J. 2013. “Political Solidarity and the More-Than-Human World.” Ethics and the Environment 18 (2): 81–99. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.18.2.81.Search in Google Scholar
Sebo, Jeff. 2018. “The Ethics and Politics of Plant-Based and Cultured Meat.” Les Ateliers de l”éthique/The Ethics Forum 13 (1): 159–83. https://doi.org/10.7202/1055123ar.Search in Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 2010. “Ideal and Nonideal Theory.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 38 (1): 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01172.x.Search in Google Scholar
Stephens, Neil, Alexandra E. Sexton, and Clemens Driessen. 2019. “Making Sense of Making Meat: Key Moments in the First 20 Years of Tissue Engineering Muscle to Make Food.” Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00045.Search in Google Scholar
The Guardian. 2013. “Google Burger: Sergey Brin Explains Why He Funded World’s First Lab-Grown Beef Hamburger – Video,” 5 August 2013, sec. Science. http://www.theguardian.com/science/video/2013/aug/05/google-burger-sergey-brin-lab-grown-hamburger.Search in Google Scholar
Turner, Susan. 2005. “Beyond Viande: The Ethics of Faux Flesh, Fake Fur and Thriftshop Leather.” Species 13 (5). https://doi.org/10.15368/bts.2005v13n5.6.Search in Google Scholar
Verbeke, Wim, Afrodita Marcu, Pieter Rutsaert, Rui Gaspar, Beate Seibt, Dave Fletcher, and Julie Barnett. 2015. “Would You Eat Cultured Meat?’ Consumers” Reactions and Attitude Formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom.” Meat Science 102: 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.013.Search in Google Scholar
Wilks, Matti, Charlie R. Crimston, and Matthew J. Hornsey. 2024. “Meat and Morality: The Moral Foundation of Purity, but Not Harm, Predicts Attitudes toward Cultured Meat.” Appetite: 107297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107297.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
