Home Border Control, Migration Pathways, and Social Inequality
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Border Control, Migration Pathways, and Social Inequality

  • Michael Ball-Blakely EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 14, 2025

Abstract

Relational egalitarians have increasingly argued that immigration control facilitates social inequality. This ranges from Amy Reed-Sandoval’s account of the socially undocumented, to Désirée Lim’s criticisms of skill selection’s expressive disrespect, to Daniel Sharp’s claim that immigration control exercises power over would-be immigrants. I develop a novel extension of relational egalitarianism principles. Unlike other accounts, I argue that immigration control contributes to inegalitarian relationships that are not: (1) within the receiving state, (2) the result of discrimination, (3) simply the exercise of power-over, and (4) between the receiving state and would-be immigrants. I argue that immigration restrictions can, in the context of cultures of migration, create inegalitarian relationships in sending countries, harming both would-be immigrants and nonimmigrant populations. Cultures of migration respond to and help create changes in values. They lead to a dissatisfaction with local opportunities – including employment, consumption, and cultural practices. When borders are relaxed, these changes promote immigration. But when they are hardened, the changes persist while the dissatisfied are increasingly trapped in a society that they no longer find desirable. And nonimmigrants – who might still endorse local values and desire local opportunities – are left living amidst (often) more privileged compatriots who increasingly denigrate the lifestyles they endorse.


Corresponding author: Michael Ball-Blakely, Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Texas at El Paso, Worrell Hall, 2281 Dormitory Rd, El Paso, TX 79902, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for MOPP, including the guest editor, for incredibly helpful and in-depth comments. This project has also benefitted greatly from the lovely community at the Stanford McCoy Center for Ethics, the Stanford Political Theory Workshop, and attendees at the North American Society for Social Philosophy, the Society for Philosophy in the Contemporary World, the Eastern APA, and Cal State University Sacramento.

References

Akhtar, Sahar. 2022. “Race beyond Our Borders: Is Racial and Ethnic Immigration Selection Always Morally Wrong?” Ethics 132 (2): 322–51. https://doi.org/10.1086/716870.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. “What Is the Point of Equality?” Ethics 109: 287–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/233897.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Elizabeth. 2017. “The Problem of Equality from a Political Economy Perspective: The Long View of History.” In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy Volume 3, edited by David Sobel, 37–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198801221.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Ball-Blakely, Michael. 2022. “Skill-selection and Socioeconomic Status: An Analysis of Migration and Domestic Justice.” Journal of Social Philosophy 53: 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12485.Search in Google Scholar

Blake, Michael. 2001. “Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (3): 257–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00257.x.Search in Google Scholar

Blake, Michael. 2020. Justice, Migration, and Mercy. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190879556.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Castles, Stephen, and Mark J. Miller, eds. 2013. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World, 5th ed. New York: The Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chacón, Justin Akers. 2021. The Border Crossed Us: The Case for Opening the US-Mexico Border. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Search in Google Scholar

Fine, Sarah, and Lea Ypi, eds. 2016. Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676606.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Fourie, Carina. 2012. “What Is Social Equality? An Analysis of Status Equality as a Strongly Egalitarian Ideal.” Res Publica 18: 107–26, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-011-9162-2.Search in Google Scholar

Fussell, Elizabeth, and Douglas S. Massey. 2004. “The Limits to Cumulative Causation: International Migration from Mexican Urban Areas.” Demography 41 (1): 151–71. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2004.0003.Search in Google Scholar

Gonzalez, Gilbert. 2006. Guest Workers or Colonized Labor? Mexican Labor Migration to the United States. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

de Haas, H. 2010. “Migration and Development: A Theoretical Perspective.” International Migration Review 44 (1): 227–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00804.x.Search in Google Scholar

de Haas, H. 2021. “A Theory of Migration: The Aspirations-Capabilities Framework.” Comparative Migration Studies 9 (8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00210-4.Search in Google Scholar

Hoye, Matthew J. 2021. “Migration, Membership, and Republican Liberty.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 24 (2): 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2018.1532228.Search in Google Scholar

Kukathas, Chandran. 2021. Immigration and Freedom. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will. 1990. Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levitt, and Lamba-Nieves. 2011. “Social Remittances Revisited.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2011.521361.Search in Google Scholar

Lim, Désirée. 2017. “Selecting Immigrants by Skill: A Case of Wrongful Discrimination?” Social Theory and Practice 43 (2): 369–96. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract20172157.Search in Google Scholar

Lim, Désirée. 2019. “The Indirect Gender Discrimination of Skill-Selective Immigration Policies.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (7): 906–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2018.1479812.Search in Google Scholar

Lim, Désirée. 2023. Immigration and Social Equality: The Ethics of Skill-Selective Immigration Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780197658093.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Massey, Douglas S., Joaquin Arango, Graeme Hugo, Ali Kouaouci, Adela Pellegrino, and J. Edward Taylor. 1993. “Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal.” Population and Development Review 19 (3): 431–66, https://doi.org/10.2307/2938462.Search in Google Scholar

Massey, Douglas, Luin Goldring, and Jorge Durand. 1994. “Continuities in Transnational Migration: An Analysis of Nineteen Mexican Communities.” American Journal of Sociology 99 (6): 1492–533, https://doi.org/10.1086/230452.Search in Google Scholar

Mendoza, Jose Jorge. 2018. “Discrimination and Immigration.” In The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Discrimination, edited by Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, 254–63. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.10.4324/9781315681634-25Search in Google Scholar

Milkman, Ruth. 2020. Immigrant Labor and the New Precariat. Medford: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Todd. 2019. Empire of Borders: The Expansion of the U.S. Border Around the World. Brooklyn, New York: Verso Books.Search in Google Scholar

Nath, Rekha. 2015. “On the Scope and Grounds of Social Equality.” In Social Equality: What it Means to Be Equals, edited by Carina Fourie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199331109.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Nath, Rekha. 2020. “Relational Egalitarianism.” Philosophy Compass 15 (7). https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12686.Search in Google Scholar

O’Hearn, Denis, and Paul S. Ciccantell. 2022. Migration, Racism and Labor Exploitation in the World System. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003179047Search in Google Scholar

Paredes-Orozco, Guillermo. 2019. “The Limits to Cumulative Causation Revisited: Urban-Origin Mexico-US Migration in an Era of Increased Immigration Restrictions.” Demographic Research 41: 815–46. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2019.41.28.Search in Google Scholar

Piore, Michael J. 1979. Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511572210Search in Google Scholar

Reed-Sandoval, Amy. 2020. Socially Undocumented: Identity and Immigration Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190619800.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sassen, S. 2001. “U.S. Immigration Policy toward Mexico in a Global Economy.” Journal of International Affairs 43: 369–83.Search in Google Scholar

Schemmel, Christian. 2011. “Why Relational Egalitarians Should Care about Distributions.” Social Theory and Practice 37 (3): 365–90. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract201137323.Search in Google Scholar

Sharp, Daniel. 2022. “Relational Equality and Immigration.” Ethics 132 (3): 644–79. https://doi.org/10.1086/718076.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, David, Gilbert Gonzalez, Linda Trinh Võ, Raul A. Fernandez, and Vivian Price, eds. 2004. Labor Versus Empire: Race, Gender, and Migration. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Sotomayor, J. 2018. “Dissenting Opinion.” In Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Hawaii, et al.Search in Google Scholar

Walia, Harsha. 2021. Border and Rule: Global Migration, Capitalism, and the Rise of Racist Nationalism. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Search in Google Scholar

Wellman, Christopher Heath. 2008. “Immigration and Freedom of Association.” Ethics 119 (1): 109–41. https://doi.org/10.1086/592311.Search in Google Scholar

Wellman, Christopher Heath, and Phillip Cole. 2011. Debating the Ethics of Immigration: Is There a Right to Exclude? Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199731732.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Shelley. 2014. “Do Duties to Outsiders Entail Open Borders? A Reply to Wellman.” Philosophical Studies 169 (1): 123–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9902-y.Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, Allison. 2020. Just Immigration in the Americas: A Feminist Account. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.10.5771/9781786613349Search in Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion. 2006. “Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model.” Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1): 102–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052506060043.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-04-16
Accepted: 2025-01-07
Published Online: 2025-02-14

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mopp-2024-0038/html
Scroll to top button