Home Herod Strategy and a Social Insurance Scheme Against a Short Life: Three Challenges
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Herod Strategy and a Social Insurance Scheme Against a Short Life: Three Challenges

  • Gregory Ponthiere EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 11, 2024

Abstract

A social insurance scheme against a short life seems impossible: ex ante (before lengths of life are known), it is hard to identify the persons who will be short-lived, and ex post (once lengths of life are known), it is often too late to compensate the short-lived. However, it is possible to insure persons against a short life by means of age-based statistical discrimination that favours the young in line with the Herod strategy: allocating the good things of life to all young adults improves the situation of the unidentified persons who will die prematurely and reduces the deprivation due to an early death. This article examines three challenges questioning the capacity of the Herod strategy to reduce wellbeing deprivation due to a premature death. First, the limited substitutability between the quantity and the quality of life years makes an efficient insurance scheme against a short life incomplete. Second, the state cannot know ex ante the conception of the good life of the short-lived and must offer baskets of universal means that would improve all kinds of short lives. Such baskets will, under endowment effects, affect the adopted views about the good life, against the ideal of a neutral state. Third, the bias towards the future makes persons spontaneously reallocate the good things of life to later ages, which would defeat insurance against a short life.


Corresponding author: Gregory Ponthiere, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Rennes, CREM (UMR 6211), ENS-Rennes, Campus de Ker Lann, 11 Avenue Robert Schumann, 35170 Bruz, France, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the editor, Michael Schefczyk, two anonymous reviewers, as well as Paul Bou-Habib, Daniel Halliday, Kasim Khorasanee and Jonathan Quong, and participants of the 2023 Annual Conference of the Society for Applied Philosophy (Antwerp), for their helpful comments.

  1. Competing interests: The author declares none.

  2. Research funding: This paper did not benefit from any funding.

References

Ackerman, B., and A. Alstott. 1999. The Stakeholder Society. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Arrhenius, G., and E. Andersson. 2022. “The Repugnant Conclusion: An Overview.” In The Oxford Handbook of Intergenerational Justice, edited by S. Gardiner. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190881931.013.7Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, A. 2015. Inequality: What Can Be Done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674287013Search in Google Scholar

Barr, N., and P. Diamond. 2003. “The Economics of Pensions.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22: 15–39.10.1093/oxrep/grj002Search in Google Scholar

Barr, N., and P. Diamond. 2008. Reforming Pensions. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311303.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bentham, J. 1789. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Clarendon Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00077240Search in Google Scholar

Bradley, B. 2009. Well-Being and Death. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557967.001.1Search in Google Scholar

Broome, J. 2004. Weighing Lives. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019924376X.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cowen, T. 1989. “Normative Population Theory.” Social Choice and Welfare 6: 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00433361.Search in Google Scholar

De Lazari-Radek, K., and P. Singer. 2017. Utilitarianism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198728795.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Epictetus. “Manual.” In A Selection from the Discourses of Epictetus with the Encheiridion, translated by George Long. The Guttenberg Project.Search in Google Scholar

Epicurus. 1926. Letter to Menoeceus, translated by Cyril Bailey.Search in Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M. 2010. “Assessing Risky Social Situations.” Journal of Political Economy 18: 649–80. https://doi.org/10.1086/656513.Search in Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M. 2016. “Equivalent Incomes.” In Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy, edited by M. Adler, and M. Fleurbaey. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.15Search in Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M., M. L. Leroux, P. Pestieau, G. Ponthiere, and S. Zuber. 2022. “Premature Deaths, Accidental Bequests and Fairness.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 124: 709–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12478.Search in Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M., M. L. Leroux, and G. Ponthiere. 2014. “Compensating the Dead.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 51: 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2014.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

Fleurbaey, M., and G. Ponthiere. 2023. “Well-Being Measurement and Lives Worth Living.” Economic Theory 75: 1247–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-022-01446-0.Search in Google Scholar

Harsanyi, J. 1982. “Morality and Theory of Rational Behavior.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by A. Sen, and B. Williams. Cambridge: B. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hersch, G., and D. Weltman. 2023. “A New Well-Being Atomism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 107: 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12900.Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., J. Knetsch, and R. Thaler. 1991. “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem.” Journal of Political Economy 98: 1325–48. https://doi.org/10.1086/261737.Search in Google Scholar

Kamm, F. 1998. Morality, Mortality, Volume I, Death and Whom to Save from It. New-York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195119118.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Knetsch, J. 1989. “The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Non-Reversible Indifference Curves.” American Economic Review 79: 1277–84.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, R. 2003. “The Demographic Transition: Three Centuries of Fundamental Change.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 17: 167–90. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003772034943.Search in Google Scholar

Lippert-Rasmussen, K. 2018. “Discrimination.” In Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice, edited by S. Olsaretti, 479–97. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199645121.013.20Search in Google Scholar

Lucretius. 1921. On the Nature of Things, translated by W. E. Leonard. J. M. Dent & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Nagel, T. 1979. Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pestieau, P., and G. Ponthiere. 2023. “An Age-Differentiated Taxation on Bequests.” In Ageing without Agism, edited by G. Bognar, and A. Gosseries, 254–66. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780192894090.003.0019Search in Google Scholar

Piketty, T. 2016. Capital and Ideology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ponthiere, G. 2020. “A Theory of Reverse Retirement.” Journal of Public Economic Theory 22: 1618–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12458.Search in Google Scholar

Ponthiere, G. 2023. Allocating Pensions to Younger People: Towards a Social Insurance against a Short Life. Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1007/978-3-031-24748-4Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674042605Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. 1982. “Social Unity and Primary Goods.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by A. Sen, and B. Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611964.010Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. 1988. “The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 17: 251–76.Search in Google Scholar

Scheffler, S. 2021. “Temporal Neutrality and the Bias towards the Future.” In Principles and Persons: The Legacy of Derek Parfit, edited by J. McMahan, T. Campbell, J. Goodrich, and K. Ramakrishan. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780192893994.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1980. “Equality of What?” In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 1, edited by S. McMurrin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1998. “Mortality as an Indicator of Economic Success and Failure.” Economic Journal 108: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00270.Search in Google Scholar

Van Parijs, P. 1991. “The Liberal Case for an Unconditional Basic Income.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 20: 101–31.Search in Google Scholar

Veenhoven, R. 1996. “Happy Life Expectancy.” Social Indicators Research 39: 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00300831.Search in Google Scholar

Velleman, D. 1993. “Well-Being and Time.” In The Metaphysics of Death, edited by J. Fisher, 73–92. Stanford: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503622036-019Search in Google Scholar

Warren, J. 2004. Facing Death. Epicurus and his Critics. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199252890.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Zweifel, P., and R. Eisen. 2012. Insurance Economics. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-20548-4Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-02-08
Accepted: 2024-09-27
Published Online: 2024-12-11

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mopp-2024-0009/html
Scroll to top button