Abstract
Once the tide of the war began to turn in their favor and the enormity of the crimes of the Axis powers became apparent, the Allied powers of World War II agreed that after their victory, those responsible should be prosecuted. They even agreed on which crimes should be prosecuted in such proceedings. Almost no attention, however, was given to the issue of sentence enforcement. Thus, even as the wheels of the Allies’ war-crimes tribunals in Europe and the Pacific were put in motion, there was no general plan regarding how to run the institutions where the war criminals would serve their sentences. In this article we present some preliminary conclusions of a research project that took a detailed look at the three most important prisons for WWII war criminals: Spandau, Landsberg, and Sugamo. Though the victorious powers faced similar legal and practical problems in the administration of all three institutions, the solutions they found differed considerably. The most significant common feature of the respective systems they established is their improvised nature.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank the two reviewers for their helpful comments and Nick Sywak for his assistance with the linguistic revision.
Reference List
Bienert. M. (2007). Die ungeliebte Kooperation. In M. Bienert, U. Schaper & A. Theissen (ed.), Die Vier Mächte in Berlin (175–196). Berlin: Landesarchiv.Suche in Google Scholar
Bienert, M. (2006). Viermächte-Verwaltung im Kalten Krieg – Das Alliierte Kriegsverbrechergefängnis in Berlin-Spandau (1946–1955/56) [Master Thesis]. Potsdam (not published).Suche in Google Scholar
Brandes, A. (forthcoming). Der völkerstrafrechtliche Strafvollzug in der Strafanstalt Landsberg nach den Nürnberger Nachfolgeprozessen.Suche in Google Scholar
Dilek, E. (forthcoming). Der völkerstrafrechtliche Strafvollzug im Sugamo Prison nach dem Tokioter Kriegsverbrecherprozess.Suche in Google Scholar
Frei, N. (1996): Vergangenheitspolitik: die Anfänge der Bundesrepublik und die NS-Vergangenheit. München: Beck.Suche in Google Scholar
Fülberth, J. (2014). Das Gefängnis Spandau 1918–1947. Berlin: bebra wissenschaft.Suche in Google Scholar
Ginn, J. L. (1992). Sugamo Prison, Tokyo. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co Inc.Suche in Google Scholar
Goda, N. J. W. (2007). Tales from Spandau. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Hanayama, S. (1950). The Way of Deliverance. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Suche in Google Scholar
Holá, B. & van Wijk, J. (2014). Life after Conviction at International Criminal Tribunals. Journal of International Criminal Justice 12, 109–132.10.1093/jicj/mqu003Suche in Google Scholar
Holá, B. & van Wijk, J. (2016). Rehabilitating International Prisoners. In Mulgrew, R. & Abels, D. (ed.), Research Handbook on the International Penal System (274–299). Cheltenham & Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781783472161.00023Suche in Google Scholar
Kaiser, G. & H. Schöch (2002). Strafvollzug (5. Aufl.). Heidelberg: C.F. Müller.Suche in Google Scholar
Karstedt, S. (2008). Leben nach der Strafe: »schließlich stellte ihn die Landeskirche ein« – Verurteilte nationalsozialistische Kriegsverbrecher im Nachkriegsdeutschland. In Groenemeyer, A. & Wieseler, S. (ed.), Soziologie sozialer Probleme und sozialer Kontrolle (256–276). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.10.1007/978-3-531-90879-3_13Suche in Google Scholar
Karstedt, S. (2011). Life after punishment for Nazi war criminals: reputation, careers and normative climate in post-war Germany. In Farall, S., Hough, M., Maruna, S. & Sparks, R. (ed.), Escape Routes. Contemporary Perspectives on Life After Punishment (240–277). Oxon & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Knauer, F. (2021). Völkerstrafvollzug in Deutschland. Baden-Baden: Nomos.10.5771/9783748925583Suche in Google Scholar
Knauer, F. (forthcoming). »Den Weg suchen in die aufregenden Grenzbereiche zwischen den Disziplinen« – Strafrechtswissenschaftliches Arbeiten an der Schnittstelle von Historischer Kriminologie und Strafjuristischer Zeitgeschichte am Beispiel eines Forschungsprojekts zu den Anfängen des Völkerstrafvollzugs.Suche in Google Scholar
Mulgrew, R. (2013). Towards the Development of the International Penal System. Cambridge: University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139226332Suche in Google Scholar
Penrose, M. (2016). Creating an international prison. In R. Mulgrew & D. Abels (ed.), Research Handbook on the International Penal System (423–444). Cheltenham & Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar
Raithel, T. (2009). Die Strafanstalt Landsberg am Lech und der Spöttinger Friedhof (1944–1958). Oldenburg: De Gruyter.10.1524/9783486708585Suche in Google Scholar
Rochner, J. (2014). Strafvollstreckung und Strafvollzug im internationalen Strafrecht. Hamburg: Dr. Kovac.Suche in Google Scholar
Schwartz, T. A. (1990). Die Begnadigung deutscher Kriegsverbrecher. John McCloy und die Häftlinge von Landsberg. Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 38, 375–414.Suche in Google Scholar
Sebestyen, C. (2022). The Allied War Crimes Programs and the Struggle to enact Justice in Germany 1945–58: Prisons, Prisoners, and the Fight for Legitimacy [PhD Thesis]. Toronto (not published yet).Suche in Google Scholar
Seraphim, F. (2016). A »Penologic Program« for Japanese and German War Criminals, 1945 – 1958. In J.M. Cho, L.M. Roberts & C.W. Spang (ed.), Transnational Encounters between Germany and Japan (185–205). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137573971_11Suche in Google Scholar
Seraphim, F. (2017). Carceral geographies of Japan’s vanishing empire: war criminals’ prisons in Asia. In B. Kushner & S. Muminov (ed.). The Dismantling of Japan’s Empire in East Asia (125–145). London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Stolze, N. (forthcoming). Der völkerstrafrechtliche Strafvollzug im Spandauer Alliiertengefängnis nach dem Nürnberger Hauptkriegsverbrecherprozess.Suche in Google Scholar
Vojta, F. (2020). Imprisonment for International Crimes. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Suche in Google Scholar
Wilson, S., Cribb, R., Trefalt, B. & Aszkielowicz, D. (2017). Japanese War Criminals. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2026 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Atrocity Crimes and international criminal justice: Linking the past and the future
- Artikel
- Glanz und Elend des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofs –Errungenschaften, Probleme, offene Fragen
- Völkermord vor Gericht – Wie internationale Urteile den Genozid entschlüsseln
- Investigating Atrocity Crimes: Between Advocacy and Justice
- Imprisoning War Criminals on a Trial-and-Error Basis: Spandau, Landsberg, and Sugamo as Improvised Institutions of Sentence Enforcement
- Reconceptualising Offender Rehabilitation in International Criminal Justice: The IRMCT Early Release Practice (2019–2025)
- Survivor-Led Reparations in Kosovo: From Harm to Healing
- Essay
- Narratives of Victimhood and Perpetration in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Atrocity Crimes and international criminal justice: Linking the past and the future
- Artikel
- Glanz und Elend des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofs –Errungenschaften, Probleme, offene Fragen
- Völkermord vor Gericht – Wie internationale Urteile den Genozid entschlüsseln
- Investigating Atrocity Crimes: Between Advocacy and Justice
- Imprisoning War Criminals on a Trial-and-Error Basis: Spandau, Landsberg, and Sugamo as Improvised Institutions of Sentence Enforcement
- Reconceptualising Offender Rehabilitation in International Criminal Justice: The IRMCT Early Release Practice (2019–2025)
- Survivor-Led Reparations in Kosovo: From Harm to Healing
- Essay
- Narratives of Victimhood and Perpetration in Bosnia and Herzegovina