Abstract
Criminal justice investigators of atrocity crimes work in the same space as Non-Governmental Organisations. Even if having different objectives and mandates in crisis zones, numerous NGOs are also investigating or collecting evidence in the process of pursuing their other mandates, as was observed recently in Ukraine or Rohingya refugee camps. This can cause problems for the investigators of international crimes, and their work of collecting evidence on atrocity crimes in these contexts. This study is based on semi-structured interviews with sixteen experienced investigators from international and national justice institutions. Investigators raised this issue and discussed both benefits and problems of NGOs collecting evidence on atrocity crimes in conflict zones. A thematic analysis was conducted. In the results, investigators acknowledged positive effects of NGOs, such as their ability to quickly begin their operations, gather evidence and identify witnesses. Three problems and challenges of NGO involvement in the field were identified. First, NGO interviews do not always focus on establishing the facts and seeking accountability. Second, NGO involvement often meant that witnesses were interviewed multiple times, leading to inconsistencies in testimony and confusion. Third, NGO methods to interview witnesses can reduce the quality of evidence, for example by allocating insufficient time for thorough questioning, interviewing groups of witnesses simultaneously, or employing suggestive questioning techniques. Investigators described strategies for how they dealt with these problems, and recommended changes to the activities of NGOs. The findings underscore the need for improved collaboration between NGOs and justice institutions to safeguard the well-being of witnesses and the integrity of witness evidence on atrocity crimes.
References
Aksenova, M. & Bergsmo, M. (2015). Defining the purposes, mandates and outcomes of fact-finding commissions beyond international criminal justice. FICHL Policy Brief Series, 38.Search in Google Scholar
Blitt, R. C. (2004). Who will watch the watchdogs? Human rights nongovernmental organizations and the case for regulation. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review, 10, 261–398. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bhrlr/vol10/iss1/5Search in Google Scholar
Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (2009). Interviewing experts. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276.10.1057/9780230244276Search in Google Scholar
Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (2018). Generating qualitative data with experts and elites. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070.n4110.4135/9781526416070.n41Search in Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa10.1191/1478088706qp063oaSearch in Google Scholar
Chlevickaite, G. (2025). Documenting conflict-related crimes in Ukraine. Journal of International Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqaf02010.1093/jicj/mqaf020Search in Google Scholar
Clooney Foundation for Justice. (2022). Clooney Foundation for Justice launches investigation into war crimes in Ukraine. Clooney Foundation for Justice. https://cfj.org/news/clooney-foundation-for-justice-launches-investigation-into-war-crimes-in-ukraine/Search in Google Scholar
Combs, N. A. (2010). Fact-finding without facts: The uncertain evidentiary foundations of international criminal convictions. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511760259Search in Google Scholar
Combs, N. A. (2017). Grave crimes and weak evidence: A fact-finding evolution in international criminal law. Harvard International Law Journal, 58(1), 47–126. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hilj58&i=53Search in Google Scholar
Combs, N. A. (2018). Deconstructing the epistemic challenges to mass atrocity prosecutions. Washington and Lee Law Review, 75(1), 223–300. https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol75/iss1/3Search in Google Scholar
Eurojust, Genocide Network, Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. (2022). Documenting International Crimes and Human Rights Violations for Criminal Accountability Purposes: Guidelines for Civil Society Organisations.Search in Google Scholar
Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Wright, D. B. (2006). Memory conformity: Disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 480–485. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf0319387310.3758/BF03193873Search in Google Scholar
Grace, R., & Van Voorhout, J. C. (2014). From Isolation to Interoperability: The Interaction of Monitoring, Reporting, and Fact-finding Missions and International Criminal Courts and Tribunals. The Hague Institute for Global Justice.Search in Google Scholar
Hagan, J. (2003). Justice in the Balkans: Prosecuting war crimes in the Hague Tribunal. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226312309.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Heaton-Armstrong, A. (1987). Police officers’ notebooks: Recent developments. Criminal Law Review, 470–472.Search in Google Scholar
Herman, J. L. (1997). Trauma and recovery (Rev. ed.). BasicBooks.Search in Google Scholar
Herman, J. L. (1998). Recovery from psychological trauma. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 52(S1), S98-S103. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1819.1998.0520s5S145.x10.1046/j.1440-1819.1998.0520s5S145.xSearch in Google Scholar
Jarvis, M., & Nabti, N. (2016). Policies and institutional strategies for successful sexual violence prosecutions. In B. S. Brammertz & M. Jarvis (Eds.), Prosecuting conflict-related sexual violence at the ICTY (pp. 73–110). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198768562.003.000410.1093/law/9780198768562.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Jones, N. (2009). The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. In N. Jones (Ed.), The courts of genocide: Politics and the rule of law in Rwanda and Arusha (pp. 104–131). Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Karstedt, S. (2013). Contextualizing mass atrocity crimes: The dynamics of ›extremely violent societies. European Journal of Criminology, 9(5), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/147737081245464610.1177/1477370812454646Search in Google Scholar
King, K. L., & Meernik, J. D. (2017). The witness experience: Testimony at the ICTY and its impact. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/978110823606510.1017/9781108236065Search in Google Scholar
La Rooy, D., Lamb, M. E., & Pipe, M.-E. (2008). Repeated interviewing: A critical evaluation of the risks and potential benefits. In K. Kuehnle & M. Connell (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Research, evaluation, and testimony for the courts (pp. 327–361). Wiley.Search in Google Scholar
Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12(4), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.9470510.1101/lm.94705Search in Google Scholar
Melnyk, L., & Bruck, M. (2004). Timing moderates the effects of repeated suggestive interviewing on children’s eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(5), 613–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.101310.1002/acp.1013Search in Google Scholar
Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557070140130510.1080/13645570701401305Search in Google Scholar
Odinot, G., Memon, A., La Rooy, D., & Millen, A. (2013). Are two interviews better than one? Eyewitness memory across repeated cognitive interviews. PLOS ONE, 8(10), e76305. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.007630510.1371/journal.pone.0076305Search in Google Scholar
People in Need (2022, February 27). First three trucks to Ukraine. People in Need. https://www.peopleinneed.net/first-three-trucks-to-ukraine-8571gpSearch in Google Scholar
Poole, D. A., & White, L. T. (1995). Tell me again and again: Stability and change in the repeated testimonies of children and adults. In M. S. Zaragoza, J. R. Graham, G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman, & Y. S. Ben-Porath (Eds.), Memory and testimony in the child witness (pp. 24–43). Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Robben, A., C. (2017). Witness testimony and the incommensurability of truth in Argentina. In C. Brants & S. Karstedt (Eds.), Transitional justice and the public sphere: Engagement, legitimacy and contestation (pp. 221–240). Hart Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509900190.ch-01010.5040/9781509900190.ch-010Search in Google Scholar
Sable, M. R., Danis, F., Mauzy, D. L., & Gallagher, S. K. (2006). Barriers to reporting sexual assault for women and men: Perspectives of college students. Journal of American College Health, 55(3), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.3200/jach.55.3.157-16210.3200/JACH.55.3.157-162Search in Google Scholar
Sharman, S. J., & Powell, M. B. (2012). A comparison of adult witnesses’ suggestibility across various types of leading questions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.179310.1002/acp.1793Search in Google Scholar
Staniland, J., Karstedt, S., Powell, M., & Knust, N. (2025). ›How do we investigate two million murders?‹ A systematic review of practices and problems in international criminal justice. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2025.257231510.1080/1068316X.2025.2572315Search in Google Scholar
Trinczek, R. (2009). How to Interview Managers? Methodical and Methodological Aspects of Expert Interviews as a Qualitative Method in Empirical Social Research. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Interviewing Experts (pp. 203–216). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276_1010.1057/9780230244276_10Search in Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (1998). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-librarySearch in Google Scholar
Wald, P. M. (2011). Apprehending war criminals: Does international cooperation work? American University International Law Review, 27(2), 229–262. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/amuilr27&i=249Search in Google Scholar
Warner, L. (2024). The Cranes Call [Documentary]. Hidden Productions & Clooney Foundation for Justice. https://www.sbs.com.au/ondemand/watch/2437289539924Search in Google Scholar
Warren, A. R., & Lane, P. (1995). Effects of timing and type of questioning on eyewitness accuracy and suggestibility. In M. S. Zaragoza, J. R. Graham, G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman, & Y. S. Ben-Porath (Eds.), Memory and testimony in the child witness (pp. 44–60). Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Welsh, E. (2002). Dealing with data: Using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2.Search in Google Scholar
© 2026 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Atrocity Crimes and international criminal justice: Linking the past and the future
- Artikel
- Glanz und Elend des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofs –Errungenschaften, Probleme, offene Fragen
- Völkermord vor Gericht – Wie internationale Urteile den Genozid entschlüsseln
- Investigating Atrocity Crimes: Between Advocacy and Justice
- Imprisoning War Criminals on a Trial-and-Error Basis: Spandau, Landsberg, and Sugamo as Improvised Institutions of Sentence Enforcement
- Reconceptualising Offender Rehabilitation in International Criminal Justice: The IRMCT Early Release Practice (2019–2025)
- Survivor-Led Reparations in Kosovo: From Harm to Healing
- Essay
- Narratives of Victimhood and Perpetration in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Atrocity Crimes and international criminal justice: Linking the past and the future
- Artikel
- Glanz und Elend des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofs –Errungenschaften, Probleme, offene Fragen
- Völkermord vor Gericht – Wie internationale Urteile den Genozid entschlüsseln
- Investigating Atrocity Crimes: Between Advocacy and Justice
- Imprisoning War Criminals on a Trial-and-Error Basis: Spandau, Landsberg, and Sugamo as Improvised Institutions of Sentence Enforcement
- Reconceptualising Offender Rehabilitation in International Criminal Justice: The IRMCT Early Release Practice (2019–2025)
- Survivor-Led Reparations in Kosovo: From Harm to Healing
- Essay
- Narratives of Victimhood and Perpetration in Bosnia and Herzegovina