Startseite Die Lücken in der kriminologischen Wissensgrundlage schließen: Eine Forschungsagenda für die kommenden zehn Jahre
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Die Lücken in der kriminologischen Wissensgrundlage schließen: Eine Forschungsagenda für die kommenden zehn Jahre

  • Jean-Louis van Gelder EMAIL logo und Isabel Thielmann
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 7. Februar 2023

Zusammenfassung

In der Wissensgrundlage der kriminologischen Forschung bestehen gegenwärtig beachtliche Lücken: Es mangelt an wirklich interdisziplinärer Forschung; das Verständnis, wie Persönlichkeitseigenschaften mit kriminellem Verhalten zusammenhängen, ist begrenzt; dem Potenzial neuer Technologien, die helfen können, ein besseres Verständnis für die Prozesse zu bekommen, die während der Begehung von Straftaten ablaufen, wird zu wenig Beachtung geschenkt; und neue Erkenntnisse aus anderen Disziplinen, die das Verständnis von Straftaten sowie Kriminalität verbessern könnten, werden unzureichend angewendet. Die Abteilung Kriminologie am Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung von Kriminalität, Sicherheit und Recht hat es sich zum Ziel gesetzt, diese Lücken zu schließen. Durch theoretische Innovationen, die Nutzung neuer Technologien wie Virtual Reality und die Anwendung von kriminologischen Erkenntnissen in der Praxis soll der aktuell größtenteils soziologische und rechtliche Fokus des Faches erweitert und eine stärker verhaltensorientierte Perspektive eingebracht werden.

Literaturangaben

Bombari, D., Schmid Mast, M., Canadas, E., & Bachmann, M. (2015). Studying social interactions through immersive virtual environment technology: virtues, pitfalls, and future challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 869.10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00869Suche in Google Scholar

Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Burgess, J., Corbetta, M., Crawford, K., Duflo, E., Fogarty, L., Gopnik, A., Hanafi, S., Herrero, M., Hong, Y.-y., Kameyama, Y., Lee, M. C. T., Leung, G. M., Nagin, D. S., Nobre, A. C., Nordentoft, M., Okbay, A., Perfors, A., Rival, L. M., … Wagner, C. (2022). The future of human behaviour research. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 15–24.10.1038/s41562-021-01275-6Suche in Google Scholar

Burt, C. H. (2020). Self-control and crime: Beyond Gottfredson and Hirschi’s theory. Annual Review of Criminology, 3(1), 43–73.10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041344Suche in Google Scholar

Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Silva, P. A., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Krueger, R. F., & Schmutte, P. S. (1994). Are some people crime-prone? Replications of the personality-crime relationship across countries, genders, races, and methods. Criminology, 32(2), 163–196.10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01151.xSuche in Google Scholar

Cullen, F. T. (2011). Beyond adolescence‐limited criminology: Choosing our future – the American Society of Criminology 2010 Sutherland address. Criminology, 49(2), 287–330.10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00224.xSuche in Google Scholar

Defoe, I. N., Van Gelder, J. L., Ribeaud, D., & Eisner, M. (2021). The co-development of friends’ delinquency with adolescents’ delinquency and short-term mindsets: the moderating role of co-offending. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(8), 1601–1615.10.1007/s10964-021-01417-zSuche in Google Scholar

De Vries, R. E., & Van Gelder, J.-L. (2013). Tales of two self-control scales: Relations with Five-Factor and HEXACO traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(6), 756–760.10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.023Suche in Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1996). Personality and crime: Where do we stand. Psychology, Crime & Law, 2(3), 143–152.10.1080/10683169608409773Suche in Google Scholar

Exum, M. (2002). The application and robustness of the rational choice perspective in the study of intoxicated and angry intentions to aggress. Criminology, 40(4), 933–966.10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00978.xSuche in Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Franco, M., & Lanier, J. (2017). Model of illusions and virtual reality. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1125.10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01125Suche in Google Scholar

Gottfredson, M. R. and Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503621794Suche in Google Scholar

Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik Jr, R. J., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29.10.1177/0022427893030001002Suche in Google Scholar

Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (2017). The distinction between crime and criminality. In The Craft of Criminology (S. 187–202). Routledge.10.4324/9781315131511-14Suche in Google Scholar

Jacques, S., Lasky, N., & Fisher, B. S. (2015). Seeing the offenders’ perspective through the eye-tracking device: methodological insights from a study of shoplifters. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(4), 449–467.10.1177/1043986215607258Suche in Google Scholar

Janssen, H.J., Oberwittler, D., & Gerstner, D. (2022). Dissecting Disorder Perceptions: Neighborhood Structure and the Moderating Role of Interethnic Contact and Xenophobic Attitudes. International Criminal Justice Review, 32, 429–456.10.1177/1057567719896020Suche in Google Scholar

Janssen, H.J., Oberwittler, D., & Koeber, G. (2021). Victimization and Its Consequences for Well-Being: A Between- and Within-Person Analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 37, 101–140.10.1007/s10940-019-09445-6Suche in Google Scholar

Jones, S. E., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2011). Personality, antisocial behavior, and aggression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 329–337.10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.03.004Suche in Google Scholar

Köber, G., Oberwittler, D., & Wickes, R. (2022). Old age and fear of crime: cross-national evidence for a decreased impact of neighbourhood disadvantage in older age. Ageing & Society, 42, 1629–1658.10.1017/S0144686X20001683Suche in Google Scholar

Ling, Y., Nefs, H. T., Brinkman, W. P., Qu, C., & Heynderickx, I. (2013). The relationship between individual characteristics and experienced presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1519–1530.10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.010Suche in Google Scholar

Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272–292.10.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.31Suche in Google Scholar

Loomis, J. M., Blascovich, J. J., & Beall, A. C. (1999). Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1999, 31: 557–564).10.3758/BF03200735Suche in Google Scholar

Marcus, B. (2004). Self-control in the General Theory of Crime: Theoretical implications of a measurement problem. Theoretical Criminology, 8(1), 33–55.10.1177/1362480604039740Suche in Google Scholar

Matthews, R. (2010). In: E. McLaughlin & T. Newburn (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Criminological Theory (S. 40–55). London: SAGE.Suche in Google Scholar

Mazerolle, P., Piquero, A. R., & Capowich, G. E. (2003). Examining the links between strain, situational and dispositional anger, and crime further specifying and testing general strain theory. Youth & Society, 35(2), 131–157.10.1177/0044118X03255029Suche in Google Scholar

Mischel, W. (2014). The marshmallow test: Understanding self-control and how to master it. Random House.Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, G. (2012). The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 221–237.10.1177/1745691612441215Suche in Google Scholar

Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–70110.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674Suche in Google Scholar

Nagin, D. S., & Pogarsky, G. (2004). Time and punishment: Delayed consequences and criminal behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20, 295–317.10.1007/s10940-004-5866-1Suche in Google Scholar

Nee, C., White, M., Woolford, K., Pascu, T., Barker, L., & Wainwright, L. (2015). New methods for examining expertise in burglars in natural and simulated environments: preliminary findings. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(5), 507–513.10.1080/1068316X.2014.989849Suche in Google Scholar

Nee, C., Van Gelder, J.-L., Otte, M., Vernham, Z., & Meenaghan, A. (2019). Learning on the job: studying expertise in residential burlgars using virtual environments. Criminology, 39, 481–511.10.1111/1745-9125.12210Suche in Google Scholar

Nettle, D., Nott, K., & Bateson, M. (2012). ›Cycle thieves, we are watching you‹: Impact of a simple signage intervention against bicycle theft. PloS One, 7(12), e51738.10.1371/journal.pone.0051738Suche in Google Scholar

Oberwittler, D., Janssen, H.J., & Gerstner, D. (2017). Unordnung und Unsicherheit in großstädtischen Wohngebieten – Die überschätzte Rolle von »Broken Windows« und die Herausforderungen ethnischer Diversität. Soziale Probleme, 28, 181–205.10.1007/s41059-017-0040-9Suche in Google Scholar

Pletzer, J. L., Bentvelzen, M., Oostrom, J. K., & De Vries, R. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 369–383.10.1016/j.jvb.2019.04.004Suche in Google Scholar

Pogarsky, G. (2007). Deterrence and individual differences among convicted offenders. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23(1), 59–74.10.1007/s10940-006-9019-6Suche in Google Scholar

Rizzo, A., & Koenig, S. T. (2017). Is clinical virtual reality ready for primetime? Neuropsychology, 31(8), 877.10.1037/neu0000405Suche in Google Scholar

Sells, S. B., & Fixott, R. S. (1957). Evaluation of research on effects of visual training on visual functions. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 44(2), 230–236.10.1016/0002-9394(57)90012-0Suche in Google Scholar

Slater, M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1535), 3549–3557.10.1098/rstb.2009.0138Suche in Google Scholar

Slater, M., Antley, A., Davison, A., Swapp, D., Guger, C., Barker, C., … & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2006). A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PloS one, 1(1), e39.10.1371/journal.pone.0000039Suche in Google Scholar

Stieger, M., Flückiger, C., Rüegger, D., Kowatsch, T., Roberts, B. W., & Allemand, M. (2021). Changing personality traits with the help of a digital personality change intervention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(8), e2017548118.10.1073/pnas.2017548118Suche in Google Scholar

Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of Criminology (4th ed.). J. B. Lippincott.Suche in Google Scholar

Tangney, J. P., Boone, A. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324.10.4324/9781315175775-5Suche in Google Scholar

Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.10.1037/bul0000217Suche in Google Scholar

Thielmann, I., & De Vries, R. E. (2021). Who wants to change and how? On the trait-specificity of personality change goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(5), 1112–1139.10.1037/pspp0000304Suche in Google Scholar

Van Gelder, J.-L. (2020). Criminologie in de jaren twintig van de 21e eeuw: Technologie van en het zoeken naar oorzaken van crimineel gedrag. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 61(4), 349–358.10.5553/TvC/0165182X2019061004004Suche in Google Scholar

Van Gelder, J. L., Averdijk, M., Ribeaud, D., & Eisner, M. (2020). Sanctions, short‐term mindsets, and delinquency: Reverse causality in a sample of high school youth. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 25(2), 199–218.10.1111/lcrp.12170Suche in Google Scholar

Van Gelder, J. L., Averdijk, M., Ribeaud, D., & Eisner, M. (2018). Punitive parenting and delinquency: The mediating role of short-term mindsets. The British Journal of Criminology, 58(3), 644–666.10.1093/bjc/azx042Suche in Google Scholar

Van Gelder, J. L., & Van Daele, S. (2014). Innovative data collection methods in criminological research: editorial introduction. Crime Science, 3(1), 1–4.10.1186/s40163-014-0006-1Suche in Google Scholar

Van Gelder, J.-L., & De Vries, R. E. (2012). Traits and states: Integrating personality and affect into a model of criminal decision making. Criminology, 50(3), 637–671.10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00276.xSuche in Google Scholar

Van Gelder, J. L., De Vries, R. E., Demetriou, A., Van Sintemaartensdijk, I., & Donker, T. (2019) The virtual reality scenario method: Moving from imagination to immersion in criminal decision-making research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(3), 451–480.10.1177/0022427818819696Suche in Google Scholar

Van Gelder, J. L., De Vries, R. E., van Sintermaartensdijk, I., & Donker, T. (2022). Personality pathways to aggression: Testing a trait-state model using immersive technology. Criminology, 60(3), 406–428.10.21428/cb6ab371.8c8e3fc5Suche in Google Scholar

Van Gelder, J. L., Cornet, L. J., Zwalua, N. P., Mertens, E. C., & van der Schalk, J. (2022). Interaction with the future self in virtual reality reduces self-defeating behavior in a sample of convicted offenders. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1–9.10.1038/s41598-022-06305-5Suche in Google Scholar

Van Gelder, J.-L., Hershfield, H. E., & Nordgren, L. F. (2013). Vividness of the future self predicts delinquency. Psychological Science, 24(6), 974–980.10.1177/0956797612465197Suche in Google Scholar

Van Gelder, J., Otte, M., & Luciano, E.C. (2014). Using virtual reality in criminological research. Crime Science, 3, 10.10.1186/s40163-014-0010-5Suche in Google Scholar

Van Gelder, J., & Van Daele, S. (2014). Innovative data collection methods in criminological research: Editorial introduction. Crime Science 3, 6.10.1186/s40163-014-0006-1Suche in Google Scholar

Van Sintemaartensdijk, I., Van Gelder, J. L., Van Prooijen, J. W., Nee, C., Otte, M., & van Lange, P. (2021). Mere presence of informal guardians deters burglars: A virtual reality study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17(4), 657–676.10.1007/s11292-020-09430-1Suche in Google Scholar

Van Sintemaartensdijk, I., Van Gelder, J. L., Van Prooijen, J. W., Nee, C., Otte, M., & van Lange, P. (2022). Assessing the deterrent effect of symbolic guardianship through neighbourhood watch signs and police signs: a virtual reality study. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–21.10.21428/cb6ab371.b0835322Suche in Google Scholar

Vize, C. E., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2018). FFM facets and their relations with different forms of antisocial behavior: An expanded meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 57, 67–75.10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.04.004Suche in Google Scholar

Wikström, P. O. H., Oberwittler, D., Treiber, K., & Hardie, B. (2012). Breaking Rules: The Social and Situational Dynamics of Young People’s Urban Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, B. R. E., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Paternoster, R. (2004). Does the perceived risk of punishment deter criminally prone individuals? Rational choice, self-control, and crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41(2), 180–213.10.1177/0022427803260263Suche in Google Scholar

Zettler, I., Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2020). The nomological net of the HEXACO Model of Personality: A large-scale meta-analytic investigation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 723–760.10.1177/1745691619895036Suche in Google Scholar

Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-02-07
Published in Print: 2023-02-28

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 30.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mks-2022-0030/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen