Ausbau der Datenerhebungsbefugnisse von Sicherheitsbehörden – Lässt die wissenschaftliche Empirie Chilling-Effekte in der Bevölkerung erwarten?

Literaturverzeichnis

Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L. & Loewenstein, G. (2020). Secrets and likes: The drive for privacy and the difficulty of achieving it in the digital age. Journal of Consumer Psychology 30/4, 736–758. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.119110.1002/jcpy.1191Suche in Google Scholar

Alexandrie, G. (2017). Surveillance cameras and crime: A review of randomized and natural experiments. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention 18/2, 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14043858.2017.138741010.1080/14043858.2017.1387410Suche in Google Scholar

Allen, V.L. (1965). Situational Factors in Conformity, in: L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2). New York, 133–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60105-710.1016/S0065-2601(08)60105-7Suche in Google Scholar

Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., Megicks, S. & Henderson, R. (2016). Wearing body cameras increases assaults against officers and does not reduce police use of force: Results from a global multi-site experiment. European Journal of Criminology 13/6, 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/147737081664373410.1177/1477370816643734Suche in Google Scholar

Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J. & Sosinski, G. (2018). The Deterrence Spectrum: Explaining Why Police Body-Worn Cameras ›Work‹ or ›Backfire‹ in Aggressive Police-Public Encounters. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 12/1, 6–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paw05110.1093/police/paw051Suche in Google Scholar

Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 70/9, 1–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h009371810.1037/h0093718Suche in Google Scholar

Baillon, A., Selim, A. & van Dolder, D. (2013). On the social nature of eyes: The effect of social cues in interaction and individual choice tasks. Evolution and Human Behavior 34/2, 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.12.00110.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.12.001Suche in Google Scholar

Bourrat, P., Baumard, N. & McKay, R. (2011). Surveillance cues enhance moral condemnation. Evolutionary Psychology 9/2, 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/14747049110090020610.1177/147470491100900206Suche in Google Scholar

Braun, F. & Albrecht, F. (2017). Der Freiheit eine Gasse? Anmerkungen zur »Überwachungsgesamtrechnung« des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Verwaltungsrundschau, 151–155.Suche in Google Scholar

Bundesbeauftragter für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit (2019). 28. Tätigkeitsbericht zum Datenschutz. https://www.bfdi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Publikationen/Taetigkeitsberichte/TB_BfDI/28TB_19.html;jsessionid=0DC309E74AD6E940BFF067E5763557B6.1_cid319?nn=5217212Suche in Google Scholar

BMI (2019). Dienstvereinbarung über die Nutzung von körpernah getragenen Aufzeichnungsgeräten (Bodycams), der zum unmittelbaren Betrieb der Bodycams notwendigen technischen Geräte und Systeme zur Datenverarbeitung sowie der erzeugten Bild- und Tonaufnahmen. https://fragdenstaat.de/blog/2019/03/04/umstrittenes-dokument-wir-veroffentlichen-dienstvereinbarung-zu-bodycams/Suche in Google Scholar

BMI (21. Oktober 2020a). Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Anpassung des Verfassungsschutzrechts. https://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/pressemitteilungen/DE/2020/10/novelle-verfasschungsschutzrecht.htmlSuche in Google Scholar

BMI (13. Dezember 2020b). Bundesregierung und Deutsche Bahn beschließen weitere Maßnahmen für mehr Sicherheit an Bahnhöfen: »Sicherheit in Zügen und Bahnhöfen hat höchste Priorität« [Press release]. https://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/pressemitteilungen/DE/2020/12/sicherheit-bahnhoefe.htmlSuche in Google Scholar

Bundestagsdrucksache 17/2750. Antwort der Bundesregierung – Ausmaß von staatlicher und privater Videoüberwachung. http://dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/17/027/1702750.pdfSuche in Google Scholar

Bundestagsdrucksache 19/23695. Antrag – Freiheit und Sicherheit schützen – Für eine Überwachungsgesamtrechnung statt weiterer Einschränkungen der Bürgerrechte. https://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/19/236/1923695.pdfSuche in Google Scholar

Cayford, M. & Pieters, W. (2018). The effectiveness of surveillance technology: What intelligence officials are saying. The Information Society 34/2, 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1414721Suche in Google Scholar

Chan, E.Y. & Saqib, N.U. (2021). Privacy concerns can explain unwillingness to download and use contact tracing apps when COVID-19 concerns are high. Computers in Human Behavior 119, 106718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.10671810.1016/j.chb.2021.106718Suche in Google Scholar

Cialdini, R.B. (2005). Basic social influence is underestimated. Psychological Inquiry 16/4, 158–161. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1604_0310.1207/s15327965pli1604_03Suche in Google Scholar

Cialdini, R.B. & Goldstein, N.J. (2004). Social influence: Compli-ance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology 55/1, 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.14201510.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015Suche in Google Scholar

Clarke, R.V. (2005). Seven misconceptions of situational crime prevention, in: N. Tilley & A. Sidebottom, Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety. Devon, UK. Suche in Google Scholar

Comparitech (2020). Surveillance camera statistics: which cities have the most CCTV cameras? https://www.comparitech.com/vpn-privacy/the-worlds-most-surveilled-cities/Suche in Google Scholar

Conty, L., George, N. & Hietanen, J.K. (2016). Watching eyes effects: When others meet the self. Consciousness and Cognition 45, 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.01610.1016/j.concog.2016.08.016Suche in Google Scholar

Dear, K., Dutton, K. & Fox, E. (2019). Do ‘watching eyes’ influence antisocial behavior? A systematic review & meta-analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior 40/3, 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.01.00610.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.01.006Suche in Google Scholar

Dencik, L. & Cable, J. (2017). The advent of surveillance realism: Public opinion and activist responses to the Snowden leaks. International Journal of Communication 11, 763–781. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5524Suche in Google Scholar

Draper, N.A. & Turow, J. (2019). The corporate cultivation of digital resignation. New Media & Society 21/8, 1824–1839. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481983333110.1177/1461444819833331Suche in Google Scholar

Felson, M. & Cohen, L.E. (1980). Human ecology and crime: A routine activity approach. Human Ecology 8/4, 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0156100110.1007/BF01561001Suche in Google Scholar

Francey, D. & Bergmüller, R. (2012). Images of eyes enhance investments in a real-life public good. PLOS ONE 7/5, e37397. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.003739710.1371/journal.pone.0037397Suche in Google Scholar

Gawronski, B. & Creighton, L.A. (2013). Dual process theories, in: D. Carlston (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition. New York, 282–312.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730018.013.0014Suche in Google Scholar

Gilbert, D.T. & Malone, P.S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological bulletin 117/1, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.2110.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21Suche in Google Scholar

Glaubitz, C., Kudlacek, D., Neumann, M., Fleischer, S. & Bliesener, T. (2018). Ergebnisse der Evaluation der polizeilichen Videobeobachtung in Nordrhein-Westfalen gemäß § 15 a PolG NRW. Kriminologisches Institut Niedersachsen e. V. https://kfn.de/wp-content/uploads/Forschungsberichte/FB_143.pdfSuche in Google Scholar

Goold, B.J. (2002). Privacy rights and public spaces: CCTV and the problem of the »unobservable observer«. Criminal Justice Ethics 21/1, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2002.999211310.1080/0731129X.2002.9992113Suche in Google Scholar

Haley, K.J. & Fessler, D. M. (2005). Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior 26/3, 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.01.00210.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.01.002Suche in Google Scholar

Hermstrüwer, Y. & Dickert, S. (2013). Tearing the veil of privacy law: An experiment on chilling effects and the right to be forgotten. Discussion Paper Series, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods. https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpg/wpaper/2013_15.html10.2139/ssrn.2311201Suche in Google Scholar

Hornung, G. & Schindler, S. (2017). Das biometrische Auge der Polizei. Zeitschrift für Datenschutz (ZD) 203, 207–209.Suche in Google Scholar

Jansen, A.M., Giebels, E., van Rompay, T.J.L. & Junger, M. (2018). The influence of the presentation of camera surveillance on cheating and pro-social behavior. Frontiers in Psychology 9, 1937. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.0193710.3389/fpsyg.2018.01937Suche in Google Scholar

Kaminski, M.E. & Witnov, S. (2015). The conforming effect: First Amendment implications of surveillance, beyond chilling speech. University of Richmond Law Review 49, 465–518.Suche in Google Scholar

Kawamura, Y. & Kusumi, T. (2017). The norm-dependent effect of watching eyes on donation. Evolution and Human Behavior 38/5, 659–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.05.00310.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.05.003Suche in Google Scholar

Kelsey, C., Vaish, A. & Grossmann, T. (2018). Eyes, more than other facial features, enhance real-world donation behavior. Human Nature 29/4, 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-018-9327-110.1007/s12110-018-9327-1Suche in Google Scholar

Kersting, S., Naplava, T., Reutemann, M., Heil, M. & Scheer-Vesper, C. (2019). Die deeskalierende Wirkung von Bodycams im Wachdienst der Polizei Nordrhein-Westfalen: Abschlussbericht. Institut für Polizei- und Kriminalwissenschaft der Fachhochschule für öffentliche Verwaltung NRW. https://www.hspv.nrw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/190429_Bodycam_NRW_Abschlussbericht.pdfSuche in Google Scholar

Kett-Straub, G. (2011). Dient die Technoprävention der Vermeidung von Kriminalität? Insbesondere die Wirksamkeit der staatlichen Videoüberwachung im öffentlichen Raum. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 123/1, 110–133. https://doi.org/10.1515/zstw.2011.110Suche in Google Scholar

Kundu, P. & Cummins, D.D. (2013). Morality and conformity: The Asch paradigm applied to moral decisions. Social Influence 8/4, 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.72776710.1080/15534510.2012.727767Suche in Google Scholar

Leary, M.R. (1996). Self-Presentation: Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior. New York.Suche in Google Scholar

Lindner, J.F. & Unterreitmeier, J. (2017). Die »Karlsruher Republik« – wehrlos in Zeiten des Terrors?. Die Öffentliche Verwaltung, 90–98.Suche in Google Scholar

Lum, C., Koper, C. S., Wilson, D.B., Stoltz, M., Goodier, M., Eggins, E., Higginson, A. & Mazerolle, L. (2020). Body-worn cameras’ effects on police officers and citizen behavior: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews 16/3, e1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.111210.1002/cl2.1112Suche in Google Scholar

Lutz, C., Hoffmann, C. P. & Ranzini, G. (2020). Data capitalism and the user: An exploration of privacy cynicism in Germany. New Media & Society 22/7, 1168–1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912544Suche in Google Scholar

Lyon, D. (2007). Surveillance Studies – An Overview. Polity Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Marthews, A. & Tucker, C. (2017a). The impact of online surveillance on behavior, in: D. Gray & S. E. Henderson (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Surveillance Law. Cambridge, 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481127.01910.1017/9781316481127.019Suche in Google Scholar

Marthews, A. & Tucker, C. (2017b). Government surveillance and internet search Behavior. Information Systems: Behavioral & Social Methods. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2412564Suche in Google Scholar

Mills, A. (2019). Now you see me – now you don't: Journalists’ experiences with surveillance. Journalism Practice 13/6, 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1555006Suche in Google Scholar

Moll, R. (2017). Die Zukunft des Rechts auf informationelle Selbstbestimmung aus medienpsychologischer Sicht, in: M. Friedewald, J. Lamla & A. Roßnagel (Hrsg.), Informationelle Selbstbestimmung im digitalen Wandel (DuD-Fachbeiträge). Wiesbaden, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17662-4_4Suche in Google Scholar

Moll, R., Pieschl, S. & Bromme, R. (2017). Whoever will read it – The overload heuristic in collective privacy expectations. Computers in Human Behavior 75, 484–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.03510.1016/j.chb.2017.05.035Suche in Google Scholar

Mummendey, M. & Bolten, H. (1983). Die Impression-Management-Theorie, in: D. Frey & M. Irle (Hrsg.), Theorien der Sozialpsychologie: Band 1: Kognitive Theorien. Bern, 57–75. Hans Huber Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Nettle, D., Harper, Z., Kidson, A., Stone, R., Penton-Voak, I. S. & Bateson, M. (2013). The watching eyes effect in the Dictator Game: It's not how much you give, it's being seen to give something. Evolution and Human Behavior 34/1, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.08.004Suche in Google Scholar

Neubaum, G. & Krämer, N.C. (2016). What do we fear? Expected sanctions for expressing minority opinions in offline and online communication. Communication Research 45/2, 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365021562383710.1177/0093650215623837Suche in Google Scholar

Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence – A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication 24/2, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.xSuche in Google Scholar

Nolan, J.M., Schultz, P.W., Cialdini, R.B., Goldstein, N.J. & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34/7, 913–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616720831669110.1177/0146167208316691Suche in Google Scholar

Norberg, P.A., Horne, D.R. & Horne, D.A. (2007). The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs 41/1, 100–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.xSuche in Google Scholar

Northover, S.B., Pedersen, W.C., Cohen, A.B. & Andrews, P.W. (2017). Effect of artificial surveillance cues on reported moral judgment: Experimental failures to replicate and two meta-analyses. Evolution and Human Behavior 38/5, 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.12.00310.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.12.003Suche in Google Scholar

Oda, R. (2019). Is the watching-eye effect a fluke? Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science 10/1, 4–6. https://doi.org/10.5178/lebs.2019.6810.5178/lebs.2019.68Suche in Google Scholar

Oulasvirta, A., Pihlajamaa, A., Perkiö, J., Ray, D., Vähäkangas, T., Hasu, T., Vainio, N. & Myllymäki, P. (2012). Long-term effects of ubiquitous surveillance in the home. UbiComp ’12, Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.237022410.1145/2370216.2370224Suche in Google Scholar

Penney, J.W. (2016). Chilling effects: Online surveillance and wikipedia use. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 31/1, 117–182. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2769645Suche in Google Scholar

Penney, J.W. (2017). Internet surveillance, regulation, and chilling effects online: a comparative case study. Internet Policy Review 6/2. https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.2.69210.14763/2017.2.692Suche in Google Scholar

Petri, T. (2018). Biometrie in der polizeilichen Ermittlungsarbeit am Beispiel der automatisierten Gesichtserkennung. Zeitschrift für das Gesamte Sicherheitsrecht, 144–148.Suche in Google Scholar

Pew Research Center (2015). Americans’ Privacy Strategies Post-Snowden. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/03/16/americans-privacy-strategies-post-snowden/Suche in Google Scholar

Pfattheicher, S. & Keller, J. (2015). The watching eyes phenomenon: The role of a sense of being seen and public self‐awareness. European Journal of Social Psychology 45/5, 560–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.212210.1002/ejsp.2122Suche in Google Scholar

Pfattheicher, S., Strauch, C., Diefenbacher, S. & Schnuerch, R. (2018). A field study on watching eyes and hand hygiene compliance in a public restroom. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 48/4, 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.1250110.1111/jasp.12501Suche in Google Scholar

Piza, E.L., Welsh, B.C., Farrington, D.P. & Thomas, A.L. (2019). CCTV surveillance for crime prevention. Criminology & Public Policy 18/1, 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12419Suche in Google Scholar

Posner, R.A. (21. Dezember 2005). Our domestic intelligence crisis. Washington Post.Suche in Google Scholar

Poscher, R., Kilchling. M. (2020). Pilotprojekt zur Entwicklung eines periodischen Überwachungsbarometers für Deutschland. Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung von Kriminalität, Sicherheit und Recht. https://www.freiheit.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/uberwachungsbarometer_sachstandsbericht_rev_feb2021_final.pdf. Suche in Google Scholar

Roßnagel, A. (2010). Die »Überwachungs-Gesamtrechnung« – Das BVerfG und die Vorratsdatenspeicherung. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 1238–1242.Suche in Google Scholar

Rosso, M., Nasir, A.B. & Farhadloo, M. (2020). Chilling effects and the stock market response to the Snowden revelations. New Media & Society 22/11, 1976–1995. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144482092461910.1177/1461444820924619Suche in Google Scholar

Scheufle, D.A. & Moy, P. (2000). Twenty-five years of the spiral of silence: A conceptual review and empirical outlook. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 12/1, 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/12.1.3Suche in Google Scholar

Schneider, F. (2020). Aktuelle Herausforderungen für Telekommunikationsüberwachungsmaßnahmen durch die Nachrichtendienste. Kommunikation und Recht, 500–506.Suche in Google Scholar

Schneier, B. (2015). Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect your Data and Control your World. New York. Suche in Google Scholar

Solove, D.J. (2007a). I’ve Got Nothing to Hide and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy. San Diego Law Review, 745–772.Suche in Google Scholar

Solove, D.J. (2007b). The first amendment as criminal procedure. New York University Law Review 82/1. https://www.nyulawreview.org/issues/volume-82-number-1/the-first-amendment-as-criminal-procedure/Suche in Google Scholar

Sparks, A. & Barclay, P. (2015). No effect on condemnation of short or long exposure to eye images. Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science 6/2, 13–16. https://doi.org/10.5178/lebs.2015.3510.5178/lebs.2015.35Suche in Google Scholar

Staben, J. (2016). Der Abschreckungseffekt auf die Grundrechtsausübung. Strukturen eines verfassungsrechtlichen Arguments. Tübingen. 10.1628/9783161554889Suche in Google Scholar

Stoycheff, E. (2016). Under surveillance: Examining Facebook’s spiral of silence effects in the wake of NSA internet monitoring. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 93/2, 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901663025510.1177/1077699016630255Suche in Google Scholar

Stoycheff, E., Liu, J., Xu, K. & Wibowo, K. (2018). Privacy and the panopticon: Online mass surveillance’s deterrence and chilling effects. New Media & Society 21/3, 602–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481880131710.1177/1461444818801317Suche in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R.R. (1996). Social Norms and Social Roles. Columbia Law Review 96/4, 903–968.10.2307/1123430Suche in Google Scholar

Trepte, S. & Masur, P.K. (2016). Cultural differences in media use, privacy, and self-disclosure. Research report on a multicultural survey study. Germany. University of Hohenheim.Suche in Google Scholar

Trepte, S., Teutsch, D., Masur, P.K., Eicher, C., Fischer, Mona, Hennhöfer, A. & Lind, F. (2015). Do people know about privacy and data protection strategies? Towards the »Online Privacy Literacy Scale« (OPLIS), in: S. Gutwirth, R. Leenes & P. de Hert (Hrsg.), Reforming European Data Protection Law. Dordrecht, 333–365.10.1007/978-94-017-9385-8_14Suche in Google Scholar

Unterreitmeier, J. (2018). Folgewirkungen des BKAG-Urteils für die Nachrichtendienste? Eine Erwiderung auf Siems. Nordrhein-Westfälische Verwaltungsblätter, 227–231.Suche in Google Scholar

van Bommel, M., van Prooijen, J.‑W., Elffers, H. & van Lange, P.A.M. (2013). Intervene to be seen: The power of a camera in attenuating the bystander effect. Social Psychological and Personality Science 5/4, 459–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/194855061350795810.1177/1948550613507958Suche in Google Scholar

van Rompay, T.J.L., Vonk, D.J. & Fransen, M.L. (2008). The eye of the camera: Effects of security cameras on prosocial behavior. Environment and Behavior 41/1, 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391650730999610.1177/0013916507309996Suche in Google Scholar

Weinrich, M. (2018). Die Novellierung des bayerischen Polizeiaufgabengesetzes: Drohende Gefahr für die Verfassung in Bayern? Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht, 1680–1685.Suche in Google Scholar

Welsh, B.C. & Farrington, D.P. (2009). Public area CCTV and crime prevention: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis. Justice Quarterly 26/4, 716–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/0741882080250620610.1080/07418820802506206Suche in Google Scholar

White, G. & Zimbardo, P. (1980). The effects of threat of surveillance and actual surveillance on expressed opinions toward marijuana. The Journal of social psychology 111, 49–61.10.1080/00224545.1980.9924272Suche in Google Scholar

Wissenschaftliche Dienste. (2018). Einsatz sogenannter Bodycams bei den Polizeien des Bundes und der Länder (WD 3 – 3000 – 219/18). Deutscher Bundestag. https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/568224/c28954e299e3cc9293d859af1e53092e/wd-3-219-18-pdf-data.pdfSuche in Google Scholar

Wu, Y., Gupta, P., Wei, M., Acar, Y., Fahl, S. & Ur, B. (2018). Your Secrets Are Safe: How browsers’ explanations impact misconceptions about private browsing mode. WWW ›18: Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186088Suche in Google Scholar

YouGov (28. Dezember 2016). Mehrheit der Bürger spricht sich nach Anschlag von Berlin für mehr Polizei und Videoüberwachung aus. https://yougov.de/news/2016/12/28/mehrheit-der-burger-spricht-sich-nach-dem-anschlag/Suche in Google Scholar

YouGov (3. Juli 2017). »Staatstrojaner«: Drei von fünf stimmen Verwendung zu. https://yougov.de/news/2017/07/03/staatstrojaner-drei-von-funf-stimmen-verwendung-zu/Suche in Google Scholar

ZDF.de. (30. Dezember 2020). Corona-App: Datenschutz, Speicherplatz, technische Probleme. https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/panorama/corona-warn-app-nutzlos-100.htmlSuche in Google Scholar