Home Physical Sciences Ultrasound-promoted solvent-free synthesis of some new α-aminophosphonates as potential antioxidants
Article Open Access

Ultrasound-promoted solvent-free synthesis of some new α-aminophosphonates as potential antioxidants

  • Meson Haji Basha , Chennamasetty Subramanyam EMAIL logo and Kammela Prasada Rao EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 28, 2020

Abstract

Ultrasonic irradiation has been adopted in order to achieve an efficient synthesis of some novel α-aminophosphonates by Pudovik reaction. Major benefits of this method are as follows: eco-friendly, free of catalyst, high yielding, uncomplicated work-up procedure, short reaction time, and solvent free condition. Spectral characterisation and elemental analysis of the synthesized samples was carried out. In vitro antioxidant activity of the title compounds was screened by DPPH˙, O2-˙ and NO˙ scavenging methods. Good activity was shown by most of the compounds as compared with the standards.

1 Introduction

α-Aminophosphonates (AAPs) are most important group of organophosphorus compounds that are structural analogues of amino acids where a carboxylic substituent is substituted by phosphonic acid or related groups (Merino et al., 2008). Due to their outstanding biological and physical characteristics together with their usefulness as intermediates in synthesis; AAPs have found a wide variety of applications in industry, agriculture and medicine (Moonen et al., 2004; Palacios et al., 2004; Schug and Lindner, 2005). They are discovered to be antibacterial (Subramanyam et al., 2017), antifungal (Yang et al., 2006), antiviral (Xu et al., 2006), anti-inflammatory agents (Sujatha et al., 2017), anti-HIV (Bhattacharya et al., 2012), anticancer (Bahrami et al., 2016), anti-proliferative and apoptosis inducing (Huang et al., 2016a, 2016b; Li et al., 2015), antitumor (Liu et al., 2017), herbicidal activity (Che et al., 2016) and insecticidal activity (Jiang et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2012). Addition of trialkyl or dialkylphosphite to imines is a successful technique to obtain them (Azizi et al., 2004; Heydari et al., 2009; Kassaee et al., 2009; Manjula et al., 2013; Yadav et al., 2001). Many reviews were published using various Bronsted acids, Lewis acids, hetero poly acids, heterogeneous and nano catalysts to accomplish this transformation (Ambica et al., 2008; Anastas and Eghbali, 2010; Bhattacharya et al., 2007, 2008; Chandrasekhar et al., 2001; Heydari et al., 2007; Mitragotri et al., 2008; Sobhani et al., 2008; Yadav et al., 2003; Vahdat et al., 2008). Nevertheless, most of them are highly-expensive, corrosive and occupy tedious separation processes and long reaction times. So that, establishment of an environmental friendly protocol would expand the scope of the synthesis of AAPs. In this regard, solvent free synthesis is one of the best option especially when the solvents are toxic and flammable (Hung et al., 2016a).

Alternatively, synthesis of organic compounds by means of ultrasound irradiation is a successful protocol which is an alternate energy source for organic reactions typically accomplished by normal heating (Juarez et al., 2009, 2010). One advantage of using cavitation as an energy source to promote organic reactions includes shorter reaction times (Srivastava et al., 2009). In the cavitation process, the molecules of the liquid are split, produces bubbles which further collapse in the compression cycle during the rarefaction cycle. These quick and aggressive implosions produce tiny-lived regions by means of temperatures of approximately 5000°C, pressures of about 1000 atm and heating and cooling rates above 107°C per second. Such localized hot spots can be considered as micro reactors where the sound energy is distorted into a helpful chemical form (Duarte et al., 2010; Stefani et al., 2005). This method is found to be a hygienic, convenient and helpful etiquette in organic synthesis compared with traditional methods (Srivastava et al., 2009). In an effort to achieve higher yields with selectivity, this method is determined to be excellent alternative in organic synthesis (Gallardo and Nakayama, 2010; Heydari et al., 2007). Currently, some researchers have reported the solvent-free synthesis of AAPs using ultrasound from amines, aldehydes and and diethylphosphite by diverse catalysts (Agawane et al., 2010; Shinde et al., 2011).

On the basis of previous reports and present need of merits on the synthesis of AAPs and in extension of our research to increase new protocols (Ravikumar et al., 2018), we focussed at the synthesis of AAPs via Pudovik reaction under solvent-free condition using ultrasonication. DPPH, O2- and NO methods had been chosen to test their antioxidant activity.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Chemistry

A series of AAPs, 7a-e and 8a-e were synthesized in two steps by Pudovik reaction. At first, a series of imines (4a-e and 5a-e) were prepared by reacting equimolar quantities of amines (1a-e) and aldehydes (2 and 3) in ethanol at 40°C for approximately 1h. Then, the corresponding imine was treated with diethylphosphite (6) to give AAPs, 7a-e and 8a-e using both conventional approach as well as ultrasonication methods. Table 1 and Scheme 1 represent the results and the synthetic protocol of this process.

Table 1

Comparison of ultrasonication effect on the synthesis of AAPs (7a-e and 8a-e).

EntryWithout ultrasonication[a]With ultrasonication[b]
Time (h)Yield[c] (%)Time (min)Yield[c] (%)
7a3681090
8a5711889
7b3733293
8b4702590
7c4.5782189
8c5692785
7d3.5714088
8d3702586
7e4763495
8e3682891
Scheme 1 Synthesis of AAPs (7a-e and 8a-e).
Scheme 1

Synthesis of AAPs (7a-e and 8a-e).

The chemical structures of all the title compounds 7a-e and 8a-e were characterized by IR, 1H, 13C, 31P NMR, mass spectral data and elemental analyses and their data were presented in the experimental section. IR absorptions in the regions 3345-3308, 1236-1210 and 1018-1012 cm-1 were assigned to NH, P=O and P–O–C stretching vibrations respectively for the title compounds (Subramanyam et al., 2013). The 1H NMR spectra gave signals due to Ar-H in the range of δ 8.13-6.82 ppm. The proton signal at δ 4.55 was assigned to -NH stretching vibrations of all the title compounds. The proton signal in the range δ 3.90-3.84 as doublet was assigned to P–CH stretching vibrations of all the title compounds. The methylene and methyl protons of P–O–CH2CH3 resonated as multiplet and triplet respectively at δ 4.05 and 1.18 cm-1. 13C NMR chemical shift for methylene and methyl carbons were observed at 61.9 ppm and 16.2 ppm respectively for the title compounds 7a-e and 8a-e. The chemical shift for P–CH carbons was observed at δ 57.5 ppm respectively for the title compounds. 31P NMR signals were observed in the region 20.3-15.2 ppm for 5a-j (Subramanyam et al., 2017). In their mass spectra, M+. ions were observed in the expected m/z values. The representative spectra of compound 7a were provided in Supplementary material as Figures S1-S6.

2.2 Antioxidant activity

Antioxidant activity of newly prepared compounds become screened at concentrations 50 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL by DPPH, Superoxide and Nitric oxide (NO) radical scavenging activities. The investigational results be obtainable in Table 2.

Table 2

DPPH, superoxide and NO radical scavenging activities of compounds 7a-e and 8a-e.

CompoundDPPH radical scavenging activitySuperoxide radical scavenging activityNO radical scavenging activity
% inhibition% inhibition% inhibition
50 μg/mL100

μg/mL
50 μg/mL100

μg/mL
50 μg/mL100

μg/mL
7a56.475.562.272.143.263.8
8a55.667.658.579.550.378.6
7b63.680.354.373.164.290.2
8b52.174.242.462.631.362.5
7c64.281.557.678.467.393.9
8c60.777.256.377.155.583.4
7d40.463.640.960.756.385.5
8d54.271.551.272.152.279.9
7e34.550.826.243.239.865.7
8e58.677.331.451.658.587.7
*Standard68.484.264.678.468.5696.07
Blank------

Out of all, the compounds; 7b and 7c showed the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity with % inhibition 64.2, 81.5 μg/mL, and 63.6, 80.3 μg/mL, respectively at 50 and 100 μg/mL. The remaining compounds showed moderate activity while compared with the antioxidant, Ascorbic acid.

In superoxide radical scavenging activity assay, the compounds 8a, 7c, and 8c showed the highest % inhibition 58.5, 79.5 μg/mL, 57.6, 78.4 μg/mL, and 56.3, 77.1 μg/mL, respectively at 50 and 100 μg/mL. The remaining exhibited considerable activity with reference to standard antioxidant, BHT.

In NO radical scavenging activity assay, the compounds 7c and 7b showed the highest % inhibition 67.3, 93.9 μg/mL and 64.2, 90.2 μg/mL, respectively at 50 and 100 μg/mL. The remaining exhibited considerable activity with reference to the usual antioxidant, BHT.

3 Conclusion

In conclusion, we demonstrated right here an efficient, cheaper, environmentally benign protocol for the formation of AAPs by Pudovik reaction through an intermediate imine using solvent and catalyst free condition. The antioxidant activity of the synthesized compounds was evaluated by DPPH, O2− and NO methods. Compound 7b, bearing with 4-fluorophenyl)(thiazol-2-ylamino moiety; 7c incorporated with 4-fluorophenyl) (1-methyl-2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidin-4-ylamino moiety and 8c bearing 4-chlorophenyl)(1-methyl-2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidin-4-ylvamino motif exhibited potent antioxidant activity when in comparison with the standard antioxidants.

Experimental

Materials and methods

The chemicals were purchased from Sd. Fine Chem. Ltd., India and some of them were purified using standard procedures. The purity of the compounds was checked by TLC on silica gel coated Al sheet. In conventional technique, the reaction was carried out on magnetic stirrer cum hot plate. Ultrasonicator, BANDELIN SONOREXR (Germany) (35 kHz, 200 W) with inbuilt heating 30°C-80°C was used for ultrasonic irradiation technique. J (coupling constants) and δ (chemical shift) values were reported in Hz and ppm, respectively. Bruker AMX spectrometer was used to record 31P (161.9 MHz), 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR spectra. The symbols ‘s’ for singlet, ‘d’ for doublet, ‘t’ for triplet and ‘m’ for multiplet were used to represent peaks in NMR spectra. L.C. MS were recorded on SHIMADZU 2010A. Thermo Finnigan Flash 1112 apparatus was used for CHN analysis. Bruker IFS 55 (Equinox) FTIR spectrometer in KBr was used to record IR spectra.

Procedure

Synthesis of imines (4a-e and 5a-e)

The reaction of equimolar amounts of numerous amines (1a-e) (0.02 mole) with aldehydes (2 and 3) (0.02 mole) in ethanol at 40°C for about 1 h produced the respective imines (4a-e and 5a-e).

Synthesis of AAPs, 7a-e and 8a-e by conventional heating method

The imine (0.01 mole) become reacted with diethylphosphite (6) (0.015 mole) in EtOH using tetramethylguanidine (TMG) at 50°C-60°C for 3-5 h to yield the corresponding AAPs (7a-e and 8a-e). TLC (ethylacetate: n-hexane, 6:4) was used for verifying the development of the process. As soon as the reaction was finished, as confirmed via TLC, the aggregate became chilled to room temperature. The pure compounds (7a-e and 8a-e) were obtained by column chromatography by means of n-hexane:ethyl acetate (2:3) as eluent. The yield become located in the range of 68-78%.

Ultrasonication procedure for the synthesis of AAPs, 7a-e and 8a-e

The imines (4a-e and 5a-e) (0.01 mole) which received formerly and diethylphosphite (6) (0.015 mole) were positioned in a RB Flask and the reactants become irradiated in ultrasonicator at room temperature for about 15-40 min to obtain respective AAPs (7a-e and 8a-e). TLC (ethyl acetate: n-hexane, 6:4) was used for verifying the progress of the reaction. Once the reaction was completed, as tested by TLC, the combination turned into chilled to room temperature. The pure compounds (7a-e and 8a-e) were acquired through column chromatography using ethyl acetate: n-hexane (3:2) as eluent. The yield of the synthesized compounds was observed within the range of 85-95%.

Characterization of title compounds (7a-e and 8a-e)

Diethyl (4-fluorophenyl)(pyridin-3-ylamino)methylphos-phonate (7a). Yield: 90%; semi solid. δH (DMSO-d6): 8.13-7.28 (m, 7H, Ar-H), 4.55 (s, 1H, -NH), 4.05 (p, 4H, O-CH_2_CH3),3.86 (d, 1H, P-CH), 1.18 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 6H, O-CH2CH_3_);δC (DMSO-d6): 162.3 (C-13), 147.8 (C-16), 139.5 (C-19), 136.4 (C-21), 132.9 (C-10), 127.3 (C-11, C-15), 125.9 (C-18), 119.1 (C-17), 116.6 (C-12, C-14), 61.9 (C-5, C-8), 57.5 (C-1), 16.2 (C-6, C-9); δP (DMSO-d6): 16.7 ppm; IR (KBr) (νmax cm-1): 3326 (NH), 1233 (P=O), 1017 (P-O-Calip); LCMS (m/z, %): 339 (M+H+, 100); For C16H20FN2O3P; calcd: C, 56.80; H, 5.96; N, 8.28%; found: C, 56.86; H, 5.91; N, 8.32%.

Figure 1 General structure of title compounds (7a-e and 8a-e).
Figure 1

General structure of title compounds (7a-e and 8a-e).

Diethyl (4-chlorophenyl)(pyridin-3-ylamino)methyl-phosphonate (8a). Yield: 89%; semi solid. δH (DMSO-d6): 8.13-7.24 (m, 7H, Ar-H), 5.20 (s, 1H, -NH), 4.05 (p, 4H, O-CH_2CH3),3.86 (d, 1H, P-CH), 1.18 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 6H, OCH2CH_3_);δC (DMSO-d6): 147.8 (C-16), 139.5 (C-19), 136.4 (C-21), 132.8 (C-10), 132.3 (C-13), 128.9 (C-12, C-14), 128.3 (C-11, C-15), 125.9 (C-18), 119.1 (C-17), 61.9 (C-5, C-8), 57.5 (C-1), 16.2 (C-6, C-9); δP (DMSO-d6): 15.2 ppm; IR (KBr) (νmax cm-1): 3321 (NH), 1227 (P=O), 1013 (P-O-Calip); LCMS (m/z, %): 355 (M+H+, 100), 357 (M+2+, 32.7); For C16H20ClN2O3P; calcd: C, 54.17; H, 5.68; N, 7.90%; found: C, 54.23; H, 5.62; N, 7.96%.

Diethyl (4-fluorophenyl)(thiazol-2-ylamino)methyl-phosphonate (7b). Yield: 93%; semi solid. δH (DMSO-d6): 7.35-6.82 (m, 6H, Ar-H), 4.05 (p, 4H, O-CH_2_CH3),5.20 (s, 1H, -NH), 3.90 (d, 1H, P-CH), 1.18 (t, J=7.6Hz, 6H, O-CH2CH_3_);δC (DMSO-d6): 164.8 (C-16), 162.3 (C-13), 138.3 (C-18), 132.9 (C-10), 127.3 (C-11, C-15), 116.6 (C-12, C-14), 114.2 (C-19), 61.9 (C-5, C-8), 57.5 (C-1), 16.2 (C-6, C-9); δP (DMSO-d6): 18.8 ppm; IR (KBr) (νmax cm-1): 3336 (NH), 1230 (P=O), 1014 (P-O-Calip); LCMS (m/z, %): 345 (M+H+, 100); For C14H18FN2O3PS; calcd: C, 48.83; H, 5.27; N, 8.14%; found: C, 48.89; H, 5.22; N, 8.19%.

Diethyl (4-chlorophenyl)(thiazol-2-ylamino)methyl-phosphonate (8b). Yield: 90%; semi solid. δH (DMSO-d6): 7.47-6.82 (m, 6H, Ar-H), 4.05 5.20 (s, 1H, -NH), 3.90 (d, 1H, P-CH), 1.18 (t, J=7.6Hz, 6H, O-CH2CH_3_);δC (DMSO-d6): 164.8 (C-16), 132.3 (C-13), 132.8 (C-10), 138.3 (C-18), 128.9 (C-12, C-14), 128.3 (C-11, C-15), 114.2 (C-19), 61.9 (C-5, C-8), 57.5 (C-1), 16.2 (C-6, C-9); δP (DMSO-d6): 16.9 ppm; IR (KBr) (νmax cm-1): 3328 (NH), 1222 (P=O), 1012 (P-O-Calip); LCMS (m/z, %): 360 (M+H+, 100), 362 (M+2+, 32.7); For C14H18ClN2O3PS; calcd: C, 46.61; H, 5.03; N, 7.76%; found: C, 46.67; H, 5.09; N, 7.70%. (p, 4H, O-CH_2_CH3),

Diethyl (4-fluorophenyl)(1-methyl-2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidin-4-ylamino)methylphosphonate (7c). Yield: 89%; semi solid. δH (DMSO-d6): 10.89 (s, 1H, CO-NH_,7.28 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 7.19 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 4.42 (s, 1H, ethylene-H), 4.05 (p, 4H, O-CH_2_CH3),3.84 (d, 1H, P-CH), 3.32 (s, 3H, N-CH), 2.17 (s, 1H, -NH), 1.18 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 6H, 3O-CH2CH_3_);δC (DMSO-d6): 165.4 (C-16), 163.4 (C-20), 162.3 (C-13), 161.4 (C-18), 132.9 (C-10), 127.3 (C-11, C-15), 116.6 (C-12, C-14), 76.8 (C-17), 61.9 (C-5, C-8), 57.5 (C-1), 29.2 (C-22), 16.2 (C-6, C-9); δP (DMSO-d6): 20.3 ppm; IR (KBr) (νmax cm-1): 3345 (NH), 1235 (P=O), 1018 (P-O-Calip); LCMS (m/z, %): 386 (M+H+, 100); For C16H21FN3O5P; calcd: C, 49.87; H, 5.49; N, 10.91%; found: C, 49.93; H, 5.42; N, 10.98%.

Diethyl (4-chlorophenyl)(1-methyl-2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidin-4-ylamino)methylphosphonate (8c). Yield: 85%; semi solid. δH (DMSO-d6): 10.89 (s, 1H, CO-NH_,7.45 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 7.25 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 4.42 (s, 1H, ethylene-H), 4.05 (p, 4H, O-CH_2_CH3),3.84 (d, 1H, P-CH), 3.32 (s, 3H, N-CH), 2.17 (s, 1H, -NH), 1.18 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 36H,O-CH2CH_3_);δC (DMSO-d6): 165.4 (C-16), 163.4 (C-20), 161.4 (C-18), 132.8 (C-10), 132.3 (C-13), 128.9 (C-12, C-14), 128.3 (C-11, C-15), 76.8 (C-17), 61.9 (C-5, C-8), 57.5 (C-1), 29.2 (C-22), 16.2 (C-6, C-9); δP (DMSO-d6): 18.6 ppm; IR (KBr) (νmax cm-1): 3334 (NH), 1234 (P=O), 1015 (P-O-Calip); LCMS (m/z, %): 402 (M+H+, 100) 404 (M+2+, 33.2); For C16H21ClN3O5P; calcd: C, 47.83; H, 5.27; N, 10.46%; found: C, 47.89; H, 5.22; N, 10.52%.

Diethyl (4-fluorophenyl)(thiomorpholinoamino)methyl-phosphonate (7d). Yield: 88%; semi solid. δH (DMSO-d6): 7.29 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 7.15 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 4.05 (p, 4H, O-CH_2CH3),3.90 (d, 1H, P-CH), 2.76 (t, 4H, -CH2), 2.45 (t, 4H, -CH2), 2.12 (s, 1H, -NH), 1.18 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 6H, O-CH2CH_3_);δC (DMSO-d6): 162.3 (C-13), 132.9 (C-10), 127.3 (C-11, C-15), 116.6 (C-12, C-14), 61.9 (C-5, C-8), 58.9 (C-17, C-21), 57.5 (C-1), 24.8 (C-18, C-20), 16.2 (C-6, C-9); δP (DMSO-d6): 18.7 ppm; IR (KBr) (νmax cm-1): 3320 (NH), 1219 (P=O), 1014 (P-O-Calip); LCMS (m/z, %): 363 (M+H+, 100); For C15H24FN2O3PS; calcd: C, 49.71; H, 6.68; N, 7.73%; found: C, 49.77; H, 6.62; N, 7.78%.

Diethyl (4-chlorophenyl)(thiomorpholinoamino) methylphosphonate (8d). Yield: 86%; semi solid. δH (DMSO-d6): 7.54 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 7.23 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 4.05 (p, 4H, OCH_2_CH3),3.90 (d, 1H, P-CH), 2.76 (t, 4H, -CH2), 2.45 (t, 4H, -CH), 2.12 (s, 1H, -NH), 1.18 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 6H, 2O-CH2CH_3_);δC (DMSO-d6): 132.3 (C-13), 132.8 (C-10), 128.9 (C-12, C-14), 128.3 (C-11, C-15), 61.9 (C-5, C-8), 58.9 (C-17, C-21), 57.5 (C-1), 24.8 (C-18, C-20), 16.2 (C-6, C-9); δP (DMSO-d6): 18.3 ppm; IR (KBr) (νmax cm-1): 3315 (NH), 1212 (P=O), 1012 (P-O-Calip); LCMS (m/z, %): 379 (M+H+, 100) 381 (M+2+, 36.6); For C15H24ClN2O3PS; calcd: C, 47.55; H, 6.39; N, 7.39%; found: C, 47.61; H, 6.32; N, 7.45%.

Diethyl (4-fluorophenyl)(4-methylpiperazin-1-ylamino) methylphosphonate (7e). Yield: 95%; semi solid. δH (DMSO-d6): 7.29 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 7.15 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 4.05 (p, 4H, O-CH2CH3), 3.90 (d, 1H, P-CH), 2.72 (m, 4H, -CH2), 2.32 (s, 3H, -CH3), 2.28 (m, 4H, -CH2), 2.12 (s, 1H, -NH), 1.18 (t,J=7.6Hz, 6H,O-CH2CH_3_);δC (DMSO-d6): 162.3 (C-13), 132.9 (C-10), 127.3 (C-11, C-15), 116.6 (C-12, C-14), 61.9 (C-5, C-8), 57.5 (C-1), 56.1 (C-17, C-21), 51.2 (C-18, C-20), 46.6 (C-22), 16.2 (C-6, C-9); δP (DMSO-d6): 17.7 ppm; IR (KBr) (νmax cm-1): 3313 (NH), 1212 (P=O), 1015 (P-O-Calip); LCMS (m/z, %): 360 (M+H+, 100); For C16H27FN3O3P; calcd: C, 53.47; H, 7.57; N, 11.69%; found: C, 53.53; H, 7.52; N, 11.75%.

Diethyl (4-chlorophenyl)(4-methylpiperazin-1-ylamino)methylphosphonate (8e). Yield: 91%; semi solid. δH 6(DMSO-d): 7.37 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 7.17 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 4.05 (p, 4H, O-CH_2CH3),3.90 (d, 1H, P-CH), 2.72 (m, 4H, -CH2), 2.32 (s, 3H, -CH3), 2.28 (m, 4H, -CH2), 2.12 (s, 1H, -NH), 1.18 (t,J=7.6Hz, 6H, O-CH2CH_3_);δC (DMSO-d6): 132.8 (C-10), 132.3 (C-13), 128.9 (C-12, C-14), 128.3 (C-11, C-15), 61.9 (C-5, C-8), 57.5 (C-1), 56.1 (C-17, C-21), 51.2 (C-18, C-20), 46.6 (C-22), 16.2 (C-6, C-9); δP (DMSO-d6): 16.2 ppm; IR (KBr) (νmax cm-1): 3308 (NH), 1210 (P=O), 1012 (P-O-Calip); LCMS (m/z, %): 376 (M+H+, 100) 378 (M+2+, 36.6); For C16H27ClN3O3P; calcd: C, 51.13; H, 7.24; N, 11.18%; found: C, 51.20; H, 7.18; N, 11.24%.

Antioxidant activity

DPPH˙ Scavenging activity

We followed the usual approach of Cotelle et al. (1996) with some adjustments for screening DPPH. scavenging activity of synthesized compounds at concentrations 50 and 100 μg/mL. The screening was carried out in triplicate and the common values were taken as final result. The % inhibition of DPPH. was tested by taking the results of the test with those of the control.

O2scavenging activity

We have used the same old method of Robak and Gryglewski (1988) with minor variations in incubation period and concentration of PMS for screening O2 scavenging activity of synthesized compounds at concentrations 50 and 100 μg/mL. Butylated hydroxyl toluene (BHT) was used as standard.

NO˙ Scavenging activity

NO˙ Scavenging activity of the title compounds was carried out using standard method of modified protocol of Green et al. (1982) and Marcocci et al. (1994) with minor modifications at concentrations 50 and 100 μg/mL. BHT was used as standard drug for the study. The experiment was carried out in triplicate and the results are presented in Table 2.

Acknowledgements

Authors thanks to Dr. C. Naga Raju, Department of Chemistry, S. V. University, Tirupati for his constant support; Lila Impex pharmaceuticals, Vijayawada and HCU, Hyderabad for providing spectral data.

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest about the eBook of this newsletter.

References

Agawane S.M., Nagarkar J.M., Nano ceria catalyzed synthesis of α-aminophosphonates under ultrasonication. Tetrahedron Lett., 2011, 52(27), 3499-3504.10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.04.112Search in Google Scholar

Ambica K.S., Taneja S.C., Hundal M.S., Kapoor K.K., One-pot synthesis of α-aminophosphonates catalyzed by antimony trichloride adsorbed on alumina. Tetrahedron Lett., 2008, 49, 2208.10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.02.047Search in Google Scholar

Anastas P., Eghbali N., Green Chemistry: Principles and Practice. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 301-312.10.1039/B918763BSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Azizi N., Rajabi F., Saidi M.R., A mild and highly efficient protocol for the one-pot synthesis of primary α-amino phosphonates under solvent-free conditions. Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45, 9233-9236.10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.10.092Search in Google Scholar

Bahrami F., Panahi F., Daneshgar F., Yousefi R., Shahsavani M.B., Khalafi-Nezhad A., Synthesis of new α-aminophosphonate derivatives incorporating benzimidazole, theophylline and adenine nucleobases using l-cysteine functionalized magnetic nanoparticles (LCMNP) as magnetic reusable catalyst: evaluation of their anticancer properties. RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 5915-5924.10.1039/C5RA21419JSearch in Google Scholar

Bhattacharya A.K., Rana K.C., Pannecouque C., De Clercq E., An efficient synthesis of a hydroxyethylamine isostere and its α-aminophosphonate and phosphoramidate derivatives as potential anti HIV agents. Chem. Med. Chem., 2012, 7, 1601-1611.10.1002/cmdc.201200271Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Bhattacharya A., Kaur T., An Efficient One-Pot Synthesis of α-Amino Phosphonates Catalyzed by Bismuth Nitrate Pentahydrate. Synlett, 2007, 745-748.10.1055/s-2007-970762Search in Google Scholar

Bhattacharya A.K., Rana K.C., Amberlite-IR 120 catalyzed three-component synthesis of α-amino phosphonates in one-pot. Tetrahedron Lett., 2008, 49, 2598-2601.10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.02.102Search in Google Scholar

Chandrasekhar S., Prakash S.J., Jagadeshwar V., Narsihmulu C., Three component coupling catalyzed by TaCl5-SiO2 synthesis of α-amino phosphonates. Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 5561-5563.10.1016/S0040-4039(01)01053-XSearch in Google Scholar

Che J.Y., Xu X.Y., Tang Z.L., Gu Y.C., Shi D.Q., Synthesis and herbicidal activity evaluation of novel α-aminophosphonate derivatives containing a uracil moiety. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2016, 26, 1310-1313.10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.01.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Cotelle N., Bemier J.L., Catteau J.P., Pommery J., Wallet J.C., Gaydou E.M., Antioxidant properties of hydroxy-flavones. Free Radical. Bio. Med., 1996, 20, 35-43.10.1016/0891-5849(95)02014-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Duarte A., Cunico W., Pereira C.M.P., Flores A.F.C., Freitag R.A., Siqueira G.M., Ultrasound promoted synthesis of thioesters from 2-mercaptobenzoxa(thia)zoles. Ultrason. Sonochem., 2010, 17, 281-283.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.08.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Gallardo R., Nakayama K., Tin(II) compounds as catalysts for the Kabachnik-Fields reaction under solvent-free conditions: Facile synthesis of α-aminophosphonates. Synthesis, 2010, 1, 57-62.10.1055/s-0029-1217091Search in Google Scholar

Green L.C., Wagner D.A., Glogowski J., Skipper P.L., Wishnok J.S., Tannenbaum S.R., Analysis of nitrate, nitrite and [15N] nitrate in biological fluids. Anal. Biochem., 1982, 126(1), 131-138.10.1016/0003-2697(82)90118-XSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Heydari A., Hamadi H., Pourayoubi M., A new one-pot synthesis of α-amino phosphonates catalyzed by H3PW12O40 Catal. Commun., 2007, 8, 1224-1226.10.1016/j.catcom.2006.11.008Search in Google Scholar

Heydari A., Karimian A., Ipaktschi J., Lithium perchlorate/diethylether catalyzed aminophosphonation of aldehydes. Tetrahedron Lett., 2009, 39(1998), 6729-6732.10.1016/S0040-4039(98)01411-7Search in Google Scholar

Huang R.Z., Wang C.Y., Li J.F., Yao D.Y., Pan Y.M., Ye M.Y., et al., Synthesis, antiproliferative and apoptosis-inducing effects of novel asiatic acid derivatives containing α-aminophosphonates. RSC Adv., 2016a, 6, 62890-62906.10.1039/C6RA11397DSearch in Google Scholar

Huang Y.B., Shen M., Wang X., Huang P., Chen R., Lin Z.J., et al., Water-medium C-H activation over a hydrophobic perfluoro alkane-decorated metal-organic framework platform. J. Catal., 2016b, 333, 1-7.10.1016/j.jcat.2015.10.012Search in Google Scholar

Jiang Z., Zhao J., Gao B., Chen S., Qu W., Mei X., et al., Synthesis and application of N-Tosyl piperidinyl containing α-aminophosphonates. Phosphorus Sulfur, 2013, 188, 1026-1037.10.1080/10426507.2012.729236Search in Google Scholar

Juarez R., Concepcion Corma P., Garcia H., Ceria nanoparticles as heterogeneous catalyst for CO2 fixation by ω-aminoalcohols. Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 4181-4183.10.1039/c001955kSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Juarez R., Corma A., Garcia H., Gold nanoparticles promote the catalytic activity of ceria for the transalkylation of propylene carbonate to dimethyl carbonate. Green Chem., 2009, 11, 949-952.10.1039/b902850aSearch in Google Scholar

Kassaee M.Z., Movaheddi F., Masrouri H., ZnO nanoparticles as an efficient catalyst for the one-pot synthesis of α-amino phosphonates. Synlett, 2009, 1326-1330.10.1055/s-0028-1088135Search in Google Scholar

Li Y.J., Wang C.Y., Ye M.Y., Yao G.Y., Wang H.S. Novel coumarin-containing aminophosphonates as antitumor agent: Synthesis, cytotoxicity, DNA-binding and apoptosis evaluation. Molecules, 2015, 20, 14791-14809.10.3390/molecules200814791Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Liu J., Liao P., Hu J., Zhu H., Wang Y., Li Y., et al., Synthesis and antitumor activities of chiral dipeptide thioureas containing α-aminophosphonate moiety. Molecules, 2017, 22, 238, 1-10.10.3390/molecules22020238Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Liu J.Z., Song B.A., Bhadury P.S., Hu D.Y., Yang S., Synthesis and bioactivities of α-aminophosphonate derivatives containing benzothiazole and thiourea moieties. Phosphorus Sulfur, 2012, 187, 61-70.10.1080/10426507.2011.575422Search in Google Scholar

Manjula A., Rao B.V., Neelakantan P., One pot Synthesis of α-aminophosphonates: an inexpensive approach. Synth. Commun., 2013, 33(17), 2963-2969.10.1081/SCC-120022468Search in Google Scholar

Marcocci L., Packer L., Droy Lefaix, M.T., Sekaki, A., Gardès-Albert M., Antioxidant action of Ginkgo biloba extracts EGb 761. Methods Enzymol., 1994, 234, 462-475.10.1016/0076-6879(94)34117-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Merino P., Marqués López E., Herrera R.P., Catalytic Enantioselective Hydrophosphonylation of Aldehydes and Imines. Adv. Synth. Catal., 2008, 350, 1195-1208.10.1002/adsc.200800131Search in Google Scholar

Mitragotri S.D., Pore D.M., Desai U.V., Wadgaonkar P.P., Sulfamic acid: An efficient and cost-effective solid acid catalyst for the synthesis of α-aminophosphonates at ambient temperature. Catal. Commun., 2008, 9, 1822-1826.10.1016/j.catcom.2008.02.011Search in Google Scholar

Moonen K., Laureyn I., Stevens C.V., Synthetic methods for azahete-rocyclic phosphonates and their biological activity. Chem. Rev., 2004, 104(12), 6177-6215.10.1021/cr030451cSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Palacios F., Alonso C., De los Santos J.M., β-phosphono and phosphino peptides derived from β-aminophosphonic and phosphinic acids. Curr. Org. Chem., 2004, 8(15), 1481-1496.10.2174/1385272043369863Search in Google Scholar

Ravikumar D., Mohan S., Subramanyam Ch., Prasada Rao K., Solvent-free sonochemical Kabachnic-Fields reaction to synthesize some new α-aminophosphonates catalyzed by nano-BF3SiO2 Phosphorus Sulfur, 2018, 193(6), 400-407.10.1080/10426507.2018.1424163Search in Google Scholar

Robak J., Gryglewski R.J., Flavonoids are scavengers of superoxide anions. Biochem. Pharmacol., 1988, 37(5), 837-841.10.1016/0006-2952(88)90169-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Schug K.A., Lindner W., Noncovalent binding between guanidinium and anionic groups: focus on biological and synthetic-based arginine/guanidinium interactions with phosphonate and sulfonate residues. Chem. Rev., 2005, 105(1), 67-114.10.1021/cr040603jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Shinde P.V., Kategaonkar A.H., Shingate B.B., Shingare M.S., An organocatalyzed facile and rapid access to α-hydroxy and α-amino phosphonates under conventional/ultrasound technique. Tetrahedron Lett., 2011, 52, 2889-2892.10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.03.138Search in Google Scholar

Sobhani S., Safaei E., Asadi M., Jalili F., An eco-friendly procedure for the efficient synthesis of dialkyl α-aminophosphonates in aqueous media. J. Organomet. Chem., 2008, 693, 3313-3317.10.1016/j.jorganchem.2008.07.037Search in Google Scholar

Srivastava R.M., Filho R.A.W.N., Silva C.A., Bortoluzzi, A., First ultrasound-mediated one-pot synthesis of N-substituted amides. Ultrason. Sonochem., 2009, 16, 737-742.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.04.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Stefani H.A., Pereira C.M.P., Almeida R.B., Braga R.C., Guzenb K.P., Cellac R., A mild and efficient method for halogenation of 3,5-dimethyl pyrazoles by ultrasound irradiation using N-halosuccinimides. Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46, 6833-6837.10.1016/j.tetlet.2005.08.027Search in Google Scholar

Subramanyam C., Taslim Bhasha S.K., Madhava G., Adam S.K., Srinivasa Murthy S.D., Naga Raju C., Synthesis, spectral characterization and bioactivity evaluation of novel α-aminophosphonates. Phosphorus Sulfur 2017, 192(3), 267-270.10.1080/10426507.2016.1225056Search in Google Scholar

Subramanyam C., Venkata Ramana K., Rasheed S., Adam S., Naga Raju C., Synthesis and biological activity of novel diphenyl N-substituted carbamimidoylphosphoramidate derivatives. Phosphorus Sulfur 2013, 188, 1228-1235.10.1080/10426507.2012.745075Search in Google Scholar

Sujatha B., Mohan S., Subramanyam C., Prasada Rao K., Microwave-assisted synthesis and anti-inflammatory activity evaluation of some novel α-aminophosphonates. Phosphorus Sulfur 2017, 192(10), 1110-1113.10.1080/10426507.2017.1331233Search in Google Scholar

Vahdat S.M., Baharfar R., TajbakhshM., Heydari A, Baghbanian S.M., Khaksar S., Organocatalytic synthesis of α-hydroxy and α-aminophosphonates. Tetrahedron Lett., 2008, 49, 6501-6504.10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.08.094Search in Google Scholar

Xu Y., Yan K., Song B., Xu G., Yang S., Xue W., et al., Synthesis and antiviral bioactivities of α-aminophosphonates containing alkoxyethyl moieties. Molecules, 2006, 11(9), 666-676.10.3390/11090666Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Yadav J.S., Reddy B.V.S., Raj K.S., Reddy K.B., Prasad A.R., ZrCl4-catalyzed efficient synthesis of α-aminophosphonates. Synthesis, 2001, 2277-2280.10.1055/s-2001-18444Search in Google Scholar

Yadav J.S., Reddy B.V.S., Sreedhar P., Three component one pot synthesis of α-hydroxylamino phosphonates using ionic liquids. Adv. Synth. Catal., 2003, 345, 564-567.10.1002/adsc.200202209Search in Google Scholar

Yang S., Gao X.W., Diao C.L., Synthesis and antifungal activity of novel chiral α-aminophosphonates containing fluorine moiety. Chin. J. Chem., 2006, 24(11), 1581-1588.10.1002/cjoc.200690296Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-11-07
Accepted: 2020-07-06
Published Online: 2020-08-28

© 2020 Basha et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. An accelerated and effective synthesis of zinc borate from zinc sulfate using sonochemistry
  3. A new approach on lithium-induced neurotoxicity using rat neuronal cortical culture: Involvement of oxidative stress and lysosomal/mitochondrial toxic Cross-Talk
  4. Green synthesis and characterization of hexaferrite strontium-perovskite strontium photocatalyst nanocomposites
  5. Assessment of content and chemical forms of arsenic, copper, lead, and chromium in sewage sludge compost as affected by various bulking agents
  6. Preparation of skeletally diverse quinazoline-2,4(1H,3H)-diones using Na2SiO3/SnFe2O4 catalytic system through a four-component reaction
  7. Efficient photocatalytic degradation of organic dye from aqueous solutions over zinc oxide incorporated nanocellulose under visible light irradiation
  8. Synthesis of pyrimidines by Fe3O4@SiO2-L-proline nanoparticles
  9. Abnormally aggregation-induced emissions observed from hydrogen- and silyl-substituted siloles
  10. Organodiphosphines in PtP2X2 (X = As, Ge or Te) derivatives – Structural aspects
  11. Synthesis and structural characterization of dialkyltin complexes of N-salicylidene-L-valine
  12. Ultrasound-promoted solvent-free synthesis of some new α-aminophosphonates as potential antioxidants
  13. Occupational exposure in lead and zinc mines induces oxidative stress in miners lymphocytes: Role of mitochondrial/lysosomal damage
  14. Eccentric topological properties of a graph associated to a finite dimensional vector space
  15. Magnetically recoverable nanostructured Pd complex of dendrimeric type ligand on the MCM-41: Preparation, characterization and catalytic activity in the Heck reaction
  16. Short Communications
  17. The crystal structure of the first ether solvate of hexaphenyldistannane [(Ph3Sn)2 • 2 THF]
  18. New crystal structures of alkali metal tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borates
  19. s-Block metal scorpionates – A new sodium hydrido-tris(3,5-dimethyl-1-pyrazolyl)borate salt showing an unusual core stabilized by bridging and terminal O-bonded DMSO ligands
  20. Reduction of a 1,4-diazabutadiene and 2,2’-bipyridine using magnesium(I) compounds
  21. fac-Bis(phenoxatellurine) tricarbonyl manganese(I) bromide
  22. A new 2D dibutyltin coordination polymer with 3,5-dinitrosalicylate and 4,4’-bipyridine ligands
  23. Review
  24. Structures of Pt(0)P3, Pt(0)P4 and Pt(II)P4 – Distortion isomers
  25. Special Issue: Topological descriptors of chemical networks: Theoretical studies (Guest Editors: Muhammad Imran and Muhammad Javaid)
  26. Modified Zagreb connection indices of the T-sum graphs
  27. Topological properties of metal-organic frameworks
  28. Eccentricity based topological indices of siloxane and POPAM dendrimers
  29. On topological aspects of degree based entropy for two carbon nanosheets
  30. On multiplicative degree based topological indices for planar octahedron networks
  31. Computing entire Zagreb indices of some dendrimer structures
Downloaded on 21.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mgmc-2020-0018/html
Scroll to top button